AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket Server comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Atlassian are both solutions in the Version Control category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while Atlassian is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 5.0% mindshare in VC, compared to Atlassian’s 22.3% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Atlassian users who would recommend it.

AWS CodeCommit

Read 12 AWS CodeCommit reviews

944 Views
944 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Bitbucket Server

Read 26 Bitbucket Server reviews

2,774 Views
2,774 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Bitbucket Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

Bitbucket Server and AWS CodeCommit compete in the source code management space. AWS CodeCommit has an edge due to its seamless integration with AWS services, though Bitbucket Server stands out for its appealing pricing and substantial customer service.

Features: Bitbucket Server provides seamless integration with Atlassian tools, advanced branching models, and effective version control. AWS CodeCommit offers deep integration with AWS services, robust scalability, and encryption features.

Room for Improvement: Bitbucket Server can enhance its cloud-native capabilities, improve scalability, and offer more streamlined collaboration features. AWS CodeCommit could improve user interface enhancements, native code review capabilities, and reduce reliance on AWS for full functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbucket Server offers on-premise deployment with extensive support documentation, while AWS CodeCommit is easily deployed within AWS infrastructure with robust AWS support.

Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket Server offers cost-effective options for smaller teams with lower upfront costs. AWS CodeCommit aligns with cloud scalability through a pay-as-you-go model, providing potential for long-term ROI through AWS integration.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Bitbucket Server

Ranking in Version Control

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 5.0%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 22.3%, down from 27.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Munisaiteja Narravula

AWS Engineer at 6thgen

Efficient integration of code changes with seamless private repository management

AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly. It doesn't require any complex authentication, which makes the process seamless. Deployments happen in a straightforward manner once the code is organized correctly in the repository. The platform allows the creation of private repositories, securing and restricting access to our team members only. This ensures that unauthorized users cannot access sensitive files. AWS CodeCommit also integrates well when we use it with Check Point allowing us to implement information in the criteria we need.

Read full review

Dileep DK

Head of Engineering - Consumer Finance at DBS Bank

Facilitates efficient branching and integration with flexible workflow management

Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration. It provides flexibility, allowing teams to customize workflows according to their specific needs. We maintain a master branch for production and separate branches for different features, which makes it easier to manage code changes. Additionally, its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The customer service is pretty good."

"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"It helps us to install our code idea projects."

"AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username."

"The customer service and support for AWS CodeCommit are excellent."

"What I find best about AWS CodeCommit is its seamless integration with the AWS ecosystem."

"The solution is quite scalable."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"The initial setup is straightforward. It takes half an hour to deploy."

"Bitbucket Server integrates well with other products."

"The most valuable feature of the Bitbucket Server is its ease of management. The solution is easy to manage once we migrate and set up the data. The solution offers a fast code push feature."

"The most valuable feature is that it has its own pipelines."

"It is an amazingly stable solution."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is server management."

"It is an easily scalable solution."

"Bitbucket Server easily integrates with Jira because they are both Atlassian products."

More Bitbucket Server pros

Cons

"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."

"The Git interfaces in AWS CodeCommit definitely need work. When we migrated our payment processing system at Huntington, we found the web UI to be basic compared to GitHub and GitLab."

"Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved."

"Not really that much stands out. I am using CodeCommit since my customer asked me to use it. It is just an appliance, and GitHub and GitLab can do a better job."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

"The tool should improve its UI."

"Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price."

"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

More AWS CodeCommit cons

"The product requires patching and version improvements. Some functions do not work properly when we move from one version to another. We need a technical improvement. Also, communicating with other Atlassian products becomes cumbersome when we move from one version to another. I want Bitbucket Server to include a dashboard similar to Jira's. Atlassian must also develop a tool to scan our complete base for vulnerabilities."

"Bitbucket Server has limited user support for its free version. It is expensive."

"The response time of the product's support team may not be good enough to meet the expectations of users, making it an area where improvements are required."

"There might be further integration ideas for continuous deployment."

"At the moment, there are not many details on how to proceed with the troubleshooting if one of the users faces an issue with the product."

"Currently, the interface could benefit from a more sophisticated code viewing option."

"The UI could be enhanced."

"Bitbucket Server can experience performance issues when pushing a large amount of code. This process may take a considerable amount of time."

More Bitbucket Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."

"As for licensing, Bitbucket is one of the more affordable options."

"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."

"We pay around $6 per user."

"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."

"One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."

"Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly. Prices can become expensive if you have a lot of users."

More Bitbucket Server pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is actually one of the cost-effective AWS services. It follows a straightforward pricing model where you pay for users and storage. With around 40 to 50 developers, it ranges from $1...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

Understanding AWS CodeCommit was a hectic job for developers at first, while it was easier for the DevOps team. Even with access, they faced questions and difficulties navigating the service, indic...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bitbucket Server?

The product is easy to maintain.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?

While Bitbucket Server performs well, the improvement lies not in the tool itself yet in the discipline of the team using it. The tool does not impose restrictions, allowing for flexibility in work...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?

Bitbucket Server is used for private code management and source code management. It facilitates versioning, allowing us to maintain a master branch which reflects the code in production, and manage...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 58% of the time

GitHub vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 24% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 9% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 86% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 7% of the time

GitHub vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 3% of the time

Liquibase vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 3% of the time

More Bitbucket Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeCommit

August 2025

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

Buyer's Guide

Bitbucket Server

August 2025

Download Bitbucket Server product report

Also Known As

CodeCommit

Stash

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Bitbucket Server offers seamless integrations with tools like Jira and Jenkins, a user-friendly interface, and robust code collaboration features. It's known for excellent development support, scalability, and high availability, making it a preferred choice for many technical teams.

Bitbucket Server stands out due to its flexibility in workflows and ability to manage branching and code integration. It supports pull requests, private repositories, and is easy to manage on servers. Integration with CI/CD pipelines and traceability features enhances its functionality. Though there are areas requiring improvement such as remote site capabilities, granular access control, and support for large files, it remains a vital tool for code management, version control, and repository management in the CI/CD ecosystem, often utilized alongside Jenkins, Bamboo, and Jira. It supports software development processes such as task tracking and issue logging.

What are the key features of Bitbucket Server?

Seamless Integration: Integrates with Jira and Jenkins for enhanced workflow.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for simplicity and ease of use.
Robust Code Collaboration: Supports branching and pull requests.
Scalability and High Availability: Reliable across all project sizes.
CI/CD Pipeline Integration: Streamlines deployment processes with CI/CD tools.

What benefits should users look for in the reviews?

Development Support: Provides extensive resources for aiding development.
Flexibility in Workflows: Adaptable to different project needs.
Permission Management: Effective control over user access.
Code Quality Maintenance: Ensures high standards in code management.
Traceability: Offers excellent tracking features for seamless integration.

In industries with strong development focus, Bitbucket Server plays a critical role in managing code versions and repositories. It supports agile planning and DevOps practices, enabling organizations to streamline code integration and task management efficiently. Companies benefit from its robust features, especially in complex software development environments.

Atlassian

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server

July 2025

Free Report: AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.