AWS CodeCommit vs Liquibase comparison

Read 8 Liquibase reviews

1,029 Views
1,029 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Liquibase and AWS CodeCommit compete in database change management and version control. Liquibase seems to have the upper hand due to its detailed feature set and ease of deployment, while AWS CodeCommit is praised for robust features and integration with other AWS tools.

Features: Liquibase offers powerful change automation, tracking capabilities, and specialized database management. AWS CodeCommit integrates seamlessly with AWS tools, provides comprehensive version control, and offers versatility within the AWS ecosystem.

Room for Improvement: Liquibase needs better documentation, more intuitive setup processes, and broader user support. AWS CodeCommit would benefit from improved performance speed, support for non-AWS integrations, and better user guidance for non-AWS environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Liquibase is known for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. AWS CodeCommit simplifies deployment for existing AWS users but can be complex for others, integrating well within AWS infrastructure.

Pricing and ROI: Liquibase is cost-effective with good setup costs and long-term ROI. AWS CodeCommit is more expensive initially but offers high ROI for large-scale deployments within the AWS ecosystem. Liquibase provides value for database-focused projects, while AWS CodeCommit suits those needing comprehensive version control within AWS.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. Liquibase Report (Updated: June 2026).

AWS CodeCommit vs. Liquibase

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Liquibase

Ranking in Version Control

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

4.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 4.7%, down from 5.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Liquibase is 5.0%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS CodeCommit	4.7%
Liquibase	5.0%
Other	90.3%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Andrea-Carella

DevOps Engineer at GFT Group

Has improved repository management through policy customization but needs better integration with external tools

AWS CodeCommit is a good product to use when you also have to use CodePipeline because it is all integrated in the same system, which is beneficial. However, the integration with other code pipeline tools outside the AWS world is uncertain, as there has been no experience with that integration. The number of users for AWS CodeCommit is generally less compared to other version control systems. To improve the adoption of AWS CodeCommit with respect to others that are more used in the market, something would need to be done to increase market share, as people are often more educated to use GitLab or GitHub. AWS CodeCommit is quite easy to learn in general, but competitors have a bigger market share in this particular area for many reasons.

Read full review

Akashkhurana Hirana

Senior Software Engineer II at Porch.com, Inc.

Daily database version control has ensured consistent schemas and confident rollbacks

The best features Liquibase offers include the database rollback mechanism, open source availability at no cost, and the ability to connect to all relational databases including MySQL, SQL Server, and PostgreSQL. Liquibase provides a rollback mechanism, transaction and lock management, database version control, and change tracking. It maintains a history table in one of the schemas that records which changes have been applied and which changes remain pending. If I need to migrate from PostgreSQL to MySQL in the future, I only need to change the URL and credentials without modifying the database structure, as Liquibase handles everything automatically. Liquibase has a vast community with widespread usage, particularly with Spring Boot microservices applications. Out of all these features, I rely most on database version control in my daily work to maintain a history of when I added columns or tables. The rollback support is excellent and maintains consistency across all environments including development, staging, and production. Liquibase provides a feature to check database differences across multiple environments in QA, development, and production. I can easily compare databases or changes between development and QA environments using this feature. Liquibase integrates easily with CI/CD tools including Jenkins, GitHub Actions, and GitLab with extensive support for these integrations. Liquibase has positively impacted my organization by maintaining database consistency across all environments. Inconsistent databases increase debugging time for engineers and associated costs, and can impact users. The primary benefit Liquibase provides is database consistency, ensuring a consistent database across all environments.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of AWS CodeCommit include the least privilege access from IAM, where permissions are granted only for the specific repository the developer is working on, which allows for hundreds of repositories with controlled access per project."

"The solution is quite scalable."

"What I find best about AWS CodeCommit is its seamless integration with the AWS ecosystem."

"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"It is a really good product where you can easily create your repository and integrate it with other tools such as IAM to handle the user and management aspects of the repository."

"The customer service and support for AWS CodeCommit are excellent."

"AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"The solution is easy to use, and it has very clear documentation."

"Liquibase has positively impacted my organization by reducing the time spent syncing databases."

"Liquibase has positively impacted my organization by eliminating the risk around database changes."

"It will be useful for teams to automate and reduce manual work."

"Liquibase has positively impacted my organization by providing a way to manage database migrations instead of maintaining raw SQL, which comes with the issue of not being able to track certain schema updates or new table creations."

"Liquibase has positively impacted my organization by maintaining database consistency across all environments."

"They have some nice features around the automation of rule checking. They have a rules engine that checks the SQL code so that you can actually do your edit checks on the validity of the SQL code. If you don't want certain tables to be able to have certain things done to them, you can have it checked for that. It's a very flexible way to kind of do an automated peer review of the SQL code to catch things before you actually try to deploy it."

"Liquibase has positively impacted my organization by significantly increasing deployment frequency for database changes."

More Liquibase pros

Cons

"The Git interfaces in AWS CodeCommit definitely need work. When we migrated our payment processing system at Huntington, we found the web UI to be basic compared to GitHub and GitLab."

"There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes, like Fortran, which is designed to make these alterations in a friendly manner across AWS requirements."

"The tool should improve its UI."

"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."

"Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price."

"Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved."

"Not really that much stands out. I am using CodeCommit since my customer asked me to use it. It is just an appliance, and GitHub and GitLab can do a better job."

More AWS CodeCommit cons

"One thing we faced issues with is that Liquibase does not show the exact error, which added to the complexity."

"We were not able to delete some of the tables because of a security issue."

"Regarding Liquibase's AI capabilities, I believe its accuracy and reliability of output could be improved."

"The pricing is quite high."

"I believe the official documentation of Liquibase could be more detailed and comprehensive."

"Liquibase could be improved in several ways. Some facilities could be enhanced, and for first-time users, it could be more intuitive rather than overwhelming."

"Liquibase can be improved by addressing the issue that changelog files could conflict with Git if they're not modularized properly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"Liquibase is an open-source solution."

"The pricing is fair."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

University

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is actually one of the cost-effective AWS services. It follows a straightforward pricing model where you pay for users and storage. With around 40 to 50 developers, it ranges from $1...

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

What is your primary use case for AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is a version control system integrated directly in the cloud environment, similar to GitHub, GitLab, and other platforms. It offers every single benefit of using any other version co...

What needs improvement with Liquibase?

Liquibase could be improved in several ways. Some facilities could be enhanced, and for first-time users, it could be more intuitive rather than overwhelming.

What is your primary use case for Liquibase?

My main use case for Liquibase is syncing different databases. I have an RDS cluster with different databases, and when there is a change in one database, I sync the other databases with the same c...

What advice do you have for others considering Liquibase?

Liquibase is overall good software, but for first-time users, it could be more intuitive. Everything else works well. I would rate this review as a six.

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Comparisons

Compared 26% of the time

GitHub vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 21% of the time

Bitbucket Server vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 15% of the time

Cloudogu SCM- Manager vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Rational ClearCase vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 7% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

Git vs Liquibase

Compared 29% of the time

Bitbucket Server vs Liquibase

Compared 16% of the time

Bitbucket vs Liquibase

Compared 11% of the time

GitHub vs Liquibase

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Liquibase

Compared 9% of the time

More Liquibase Competitors

Product Reports

AWS CodeCommit

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

Download Liquibase product report

Also Known As

CodeCommit

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed source control service that facilitates seamless integration with AWS services, offering scalable and secure private Git repositories. It enhances team collaboration with features like pull requests and IAM access control.

AWS CodeCommit effectively manages multiple repositories, supports versioning, and collaborates through pull requests and branch management. Its integration with AWS services like EC2, S3, and CodePipeline enhances development workflows. The platform also provides secure encryption, IAM-based access control, and customizable policies, ensuring smooth permission setup. Despite its integration benefits, areas like online repository forks, code reviewing, and file size limitations compared to GitHub necessitate enhancements. Organizations leverage CodeCommit for continuous integration and development, particularly when transitioning from older systems like Subversion.

What are the key features of AWS CodeCommit?

Seamless AWS Integration: Efficiently integrates with AWS services like CodePipeline and CodeBuild.
IAM-based Access Control: Provides secure access management with IAM rules.
Branch Management: Features for managing branches effectively.
Notification Rules: Enhances team collaboration with efficient notification setups.
Private Repositories: Offers secure, privately managed repositories.

What are the benefits of using AWS CodeCommit?

Easy Scalability: Adapts to growing development needs without complex configurations.
Enhanced Security: Encrypts data and allows for customizable security policies.
Improved Collaboration: Supports effective team collaboration with pull requests and notifications.
Seamless Integration: Integrates with AWS services to streamline deployment workflows.
Cost-Effective: Provides a cost-efficient solution for code management in the cloud.

In industries focused on cloud-based infrastructure, AWS CodeCommit supports private code storage and leverages AWS's secure environment. Teams manage and deploy applications efficiently, benefitting from seamless integration with AWS services. It is particularly beneficial for transitioning from traditional systems, aiding in modernizing and streamlining development processes.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Liquibase is a solution for database change management that automates scripts and integrates with MySQL, MSSQL, and PostgreSQL. It simplifies database syncing, reduces risks, and supports SQL validation while effectively tracking schema updates in DevOps environments.

Liquibase offers a robust platform for automating database changes, effectively supporting integration with CI/CD pipelines. Users benefit from its capabilities to manage changesets and changelogs, ensuring controlled rollbacks and pre-deployment checks. Liquibase is highly valuable for managing database-as-code tasks like schema creation and maintaining migrations. Despite its strengths, areas like security, documentation on automation, and performance during diff operations, especially in large-scale situations, could see improvements. Integration challenges with Git, particularly with changelog file conflicts, are noted by users who also seek an enhanced newcomer experience.

What are Liquibase's Most Important Features?

Automation of database scripts: Streamlines database changes, reducing manual intervention.
CI/CD integration: Enables seamless integration into existing DevOps pipelines.
Changeset and changelog management: Facilitates organized tracking of schema changes.
Rollback capabilities: Allows reverting to previous database states without raw SQL execution.
SQL code validation support: Offers a rules engine to ensure database script integrity.

What Benefits Should Users Look for in Liquibase?

Database consistency: Minimizes the risk of inconsistent changes across platforms.
Efficiency in operations: Enhances productivity through automated processes.
Risk reduction: Supports controlled rollbacks and pre-deployment checks.
Streamlined deployment: Facilitates integration with Docker and AWS for efficient deployment.

In DevOps environments, Liquibase is crucial for automating database changes and ensuring migrations are consistent across various platforms. Financial institutions and e-commerce companies frequently implement Liquibase to synchronize multiple databases via Jenkins pipelines, promoting reliable change management and operational efficiency.

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Nike, JP Morgan Chase, Bancolombia, UPS, Anthem

AWS CodeCommit vs. Liquibase