GitHub vs Liquibase comparison

GitHub and Liquibase are both solutions in the Version Control category. GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.0, while Liquibase is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0. GitHub holds a 9.3% mindshare in VC, compared to Liquibase’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Liquibase users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 97 GitHub reviews

3,549 Views
1,207 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Liquibase

Read 4 Liquibase reviews

639 Views
639 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub

Liquibase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

GitHub and Liquibase operate in different areas, with GitHub focusing on code repository hosting and Liquibase on database version control. GitHub has an advantage in pricing and support, while Liquibase excels in database management features.

Features: GitHub provides issue tracking, team collaboration, and integration capabilities for software development. It features advanced security, version control, and seamless integration with DevOps tools like Jenkins. Liquibase offers database schema management, changelog capabilities, and support for multiple databases, including rollback and automation of database scripts, making it effective for database changes.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could enhance its integration with DevOps tools to match GitLab's capabilities. Liquibase could improve ease of use and reduce complexity in deployment, particularly for those less experienced with data engineering.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub's deployment integrates smoothly with various development environments and platforms, supported by extensive resources. Liquibase's deployment is more complex due to its focus on database changes, but it provides targeted support for database management needs.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub is cost-effective for software development teams due to its range of features. Liquibase, although possibly more expensive initially, offers strong ROI for businesses needing robust database management. GitHub is generally considered more budget-friendly, whereas Liquibase is valued for specific database versioning needs.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. Liquibase Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Liquibase

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (4th), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Liquibase

Ranking in Version Control

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

4.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of GitHub is 9.3%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Liquibase is 4.4%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub	9.3%
Liquibase	4.4%
Other	86.3%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

CI/CD workflows have become streamlined and AI support has improved collaborative development

We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us. The open source and community support are very good. We are always up-to-date with the community, and integration difficulty is very low. If you integrate any CI/CD solutions on GitHub, it's very easy. We started using GitHub about three months ago with AI integration. For our deployments, some developers can be very shy about asking for descriptions on their commits. We are using AI support for comments and deployment management, which is beautiful. We are not using the GitHub API for automating workflows in our projects. I give GitHub a five-star rating for the review capabilities. I also give GitHub five stars for integration with third-party applications. There is a lot of integration available on GitHub. If you want to integrate something, even if it could be integrated before GitHub, you can make your code and integrate your own in-house applications. It's a very easy and powerful aspect of GitHub.

Read full review

reviewer2797194

Software Engineer

Database-as-code has transformed how we track schema changes and manage controlled migrations

The best features Liquibase offers include CI/CD integration, which we really appreciate because we didn't have a lot of issues integrating it into our existing CI pipelines, and the changeset and changelog, which are the source of truth that effectively tell us how the database changes are taking effect. The CI/CD integration helped my workflow by improving visibility with the changelog and changeset. For the CI part, Maven and Gradle builds are already available, so we just use the Maven plugin and it was pretty straightforward. There is something called Liquibase Validate as well, which helps with pre-deployment checks. We use the update SQL command for dry-run approvals. Liquibase has positively impacted my organization by providing a way to manage database migrations instead of maintaining raw SQL, which comes with the issue of not being able to track certain schema updates or new table creations. With Liquibase, you have that history through the changelog and changeset tables, which maintain that history of changes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is scalable."

"The best feature is the ability to track the history of all code changes, and it's easy to use. Additionally, as it's open source, anyone can use that feature resulting in distributed development. This opens the door to collaboration with different code and developer, feature, and master branches of development."

"GitHub Actions, specifically in the DevOps field, have been extremely valuable."

"We can make a private repository."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the version control field."

"This solution is just easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is help offered by the community for open-source projects."

"This solution is very easy to use which I like about it. The capacity to own artifacts and share them with others is another good feature. You don't have to write all your code from scratch, you can use available templates and alter the code according to your needs."

More GitHub pros

"Liquibase has positively impacted my organization by providing a way to manage database migrations instead of maintaining raw SQL, which comes with the issue of not being able to track certain schema updates or new table creations."

"The solution is easy to use, and it has very clear documentation."

"They have some nice features around the automation of rule checking. They have a rules engine that checks the SQL code so that you can actually do your edit checks on the validity of the SQL code. If you don't want certain tables to be able to have certain things done to them, you can have it checked for that. It's a very flexible way to kind of do an automated peer review of the SQL code to catch things before you actually try to deploy it."

"It will be useful for teams to automate and reduce manual work."

Cons

"If we have complex branch strategies, it becomes very complicated to manage all those branches."

"If you are uploading or cloning a large file, with more than 25 megs, it's pretty slow."

"I cannot recall coming across any shortcomings of the product."

"The UI is a little outdated, so that could be improved."

"Though I haven't done much research, GitHub lacks in providing more functions like GitLab."

"GitHub could have better integration or capability with other solutions."

"The stability can be improved."

"I would like to see more security where a plugin was available for us to update in relation to security."

More GitHub cons

"We were not able to delete some of the tables because of a security issue."

"Liquibase can be improved by addressing the issue that changelog files could conflict with Git if they're not modularized properly."

"One thing we faced issues with is that Liquibase does not show the exact error, which added to the complexity."

"The pricing is quite high."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"It's cheaper than Bitbucket."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"We pay a licensing fee for GitHub, which could be cheaper."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"Liquibase is an open-source solution."

"The pricing is fair."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	49

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I was paying approximately one hundred dollars annually about a year ago. I am uncertain of the current cost, but GitHub without Copilot is free as far as I know. I am not paying anything for my Gi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice. That would be much better. Additionally, LLM integration on...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Liquibase?

Liquibase is an open-source solution. If you are using Liquibase, you need to update its license. I think Liquibase is affordable for our organization.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Liquibase?

We were not able to delete some of the tables because of a security issue.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Liquibase?

I have worked on the Liquibase commands, Liquibase updates, Liquibase storeback, and some basic commands from Liquibase. We were using the Docker image installed from the AWS CI/CD, downloading thi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Git vs Liquibase

Compared 24% of the time

DBmaestro Database Source Control vs Liquibase

Compared 21% of the time

Bitbucket vs Liquibase

Compared 20% of the time

Bitbucket Server vs Liquibase

Compared 20% of the time

More Liquibase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

January 2026

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Version Control

January 2026

Download Liquibase product report

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Liquibase is a migration-based open source database version control solution that relies on a changelog to track what changesets have been deployed to a database, and what additional changesets needs to be applied to a database in order to migrate a database schema to a specific version. Liquibase supports an XML model for defining changesets so that database schema changes can easily be translated to another DBMS platforms. As an open source solution, Liquibase is ideal for smaller teams and projects or for teams that have ample time to invest in extending and adapting the open source capability to meet their needs.

Liquibase

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Nike, JP Morgan Chase, Bancolombia, UPS, Anthem

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Liquibase

December 2025

Free Report: GitHub vs. Liquibase

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. Liquibase and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. Liquibase report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.