GitHub vs Liquibase comparison

GitHub and Liquibase are both solutions in the Version Control category. GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.0, while Liquibase is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0. GitHub holds a 7.6% mindshare in VC, compared to Liquibase’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Liquibase users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 94 GitHub reviews

3,586 Views
1,434 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Liquibase

Read 3 Liquibase reviews

594 Views
594 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub

Liquibase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

GitHub and Liquibase operate in software development, with GitHub leading in source code management and Liquibase specializing in database schema management. GitHub has the upper hand due to widespread adoption and a large community, whereas Liquibase stands out for its specialized database capabilities.

Features: GitHub is known for robust version control, collaborative tools, and integrations with various services. Liquibase provides strong database schema change management, advanced rollback capabilities, and support for multiple database platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is cloud-based, allowing easy deployment with extensive documentation and active community forums for support. Liquibase offers flexible deployment suitable for diverse environments, focusing customer service on database management challenges.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub's pricing offers a low entry cost with several plans, making it accessible to developers and large teams, often resulting in a quicker ROI. Liquibase's pricing is flexible and targets organizations with rigorous database change management needs, providing substantial ROI for complex requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. Liquibase Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Liquibase

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (6th)

Liquibase

Ranking in Version Control

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of GitHub is 7.6%, up from 6.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Liquibase is 3.5%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Kamalanadha Reddy

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

Improved deployment pipeline visibility with generally good support

My primary use case involves working with GitHub for code management. I have extensive experience using it for various tasks, such as creating repositories, managing pull requests, and utilizing GitHub Actions for automating workflows GitHub contributes to efficient project management by…

Read full review

Sudheer Kumar Jamjam

Technical Lead Cloud DevOps Engineer at Deloitte

Offers integration with multiple databases, stable product and reduced our manual intervention

I would recommend using it. To learn Liquibase, one should have some database knowledge. If the person is from a DBA background, they would be able to learn quickly. But if they are from an application or infrastructure role, it's medium complex. Before getting started, you should thoroughly go through the documentation and follow the latest changes deployed by the Liquibase product team. Basically, when using the product, you should be able to understand it and stay updated on the latest releases. Overall, I would rate the product a nine out of ten. Organizations should have this kind of tool to reduce manual intervention. The one point they could improve on is documentation, which they haven't clarified, and they need to work on that a lot.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"GitHub provides the SFH key to protect our passwords and connection."

"The version control functionality for this solution has been most valuable, especially when managing projects with multiple versions."

"GitHub's source code management is top-notch. It's easy to inspect changes and visualize code and differences. Their action system is comprehensive in terms of making changes and automation."

"GitHub's version control is valuable."

"Complication free with good ability for third-party integrations."

"The most valuable feature is the source code management. It's very helpful and it's a great product."

"GitHub is good for small companies and for personal use."

"With GitHub, we can manage our development progress, CID, and continuous integration. It helps streamline our development processes effectively."

More GitHub pros

"It will be useful for teams to automate and reduce manual work."

"They have some nice features around the automation of rule checking. They have a rules engine that checks the SQL code so that you can actually do your edit checks on the validity of the SQL code. If you don't want certain tables to be able to have certain things done to them, you can have it checked for that. It's a very flexible way to kind of do an automated peer review of the SQL code to catch things before you actually try to deploy it."

"The solution is easy to use, and it has very clear documentation."

Cons

"The security for this solution could be tightened up and improved."

"There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished."

"The development team pushes the code into a repository, and the CI/CD pipeline will perform the build. We need open-source libraries to perform the builds. It would be helpful to have the ability to link to open-source libraries like npm libraries. I don't know if GitHub Actions provides this. I would like to see that in GitHub Actions if they don't."

"There is a bit of a learning curve."

"The product must document the CI/CD process more."

"I cannot recall coming across any shortcomings of the product."

"It would be good if there were training materials for junior developers."

"The only thing I see missing in GitHub is that it isn't very user friendly for key personnel who don't have in-depth, technical knowledge. In Jira, there are many functions to upload our test cases, and in GitHub we can only do it manually. There are functions which can be used to upload different files, but that still requires some technical knowledge. A layman cannot do it."

More GitHub cons

"We were not able to delete some of the tables because of a security issue."

"The pricing is quite high."

"One thing we faced issues with is that Liquibase does not show the exact error, which added to the complexity."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

"We are currently paying nothing for GitHub."

"There are no licensing fees for the features that we use."

"The price of this solution is reasonable."

"I use the free version of the tool."

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is fair."

"Liquibase is an open-source solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

30%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I am not aware about the pricing, so I will not be able to give feedback.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area. We have used GitHub mainly for the code generation part. That is the only...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Liquibase?

Liquibase is an open-source solution. If you are using Liquibase, you need to update its license. I think Liquibase is affordable for our organization.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Liquibase?

We were not able to delete some of the tables because of a security issue.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Liquibase?

I have worked on the Liquibase commands, Liquibase updates, Liquibase storeback, and some basic commands from Liquibase. We were using the Docker image installed from the AWS CI/CD, downloading thi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 15% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

DBmaestro Database Source Control vs Liquibase

Compared 27% of the time

Bitbucket vs Liquibase

Compared 21% of the time

Git vs Liquibase

Compared 20% of the time

Bitbucket Server vs Liquibase

Compared 15% of the time

More Liquibase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

August 2025

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Version Control

August 2025

Download Liquibase product report

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Liquibase is a migration-based open source database version control solution that relies on a changelog to track what changesets have been deployed to a database, and what additional changesets needs to be applied to a database in order to migrate a database schema to a specific version. Liquibase supports an XML model for defining changesets so that database schema changes can easily be translated to another DBMS platforms. As an open source solution, Liquibase is ideal for smaller teams and projects or for teams that have ample time to invest in extending and adapting the open source capability to meet their needs.

Liquibase

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Nike, JP Morgan Chase, Bancolombia, UPS, Anthem

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Liquibase

July 2025

Free Report: GitHub vs. Liquibase

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. Liquibase and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. Liquibase report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.