Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitbucket Server vs GitHub comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket Server
Ranking in Version Control
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
GitHub
Ranking in Version Control
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
94
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 22.3%, down from 27.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 7.6%, up from 6.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Dileep DK - PeerSpot reviewer
Facilitates efficient branching and integration with flexible workflow management
Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration. It provides flexibility, allowing teams to customize workflows according to their specific needs. We maintain a master branch for production and separate branches for different features, which makes it easier to manage code changes. Additionally, its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility.
Kamalanadha Reddy - PeerSpot reviewer
Improved deployment pipeline visibility with generally good support
My primary use case involves working with GitHub for code management. I have extensive experience using it for various tasks, such as creating repositories, managing pull requests, and utilizing GitHub Actions for automating workflows GitHub contributes to efficient project management by…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is server management."
"It is an amazingly stable solution."
"The platform's most valuable features are the code reviews and the ability to add comments to the code."
"Our code is secure."
"Integration of Bitbucket with JIRA & Bamboo is well done by Atlassian."
"The product is easy to maintain."
"Bitbucket Server is easy to use. You can use other applications to access it, or you can use it to access the internet. You can use solutions, such as Sourcetree, which is free, and put it on your development system and use it to do the check-in, checkouts, and those type of operations. It is nice, but some other developers may agree."
"The product’s most valuable features are private repositories and the ability to work as a proxy for implementing CI/CD pipelines."
"The most important feature of GitHub is the maintainability of the versions of the code."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the version control field."
"GitHub provides the SFH key to protect our passwords and connection."
"Our code is secure."
"The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code."
"You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests."
"The most valuable aspects of GitHub are version control and parallel development. I also appreciate the forking part, which allows us to release a specific set of features to the environment."
"The tool also helps organize collaboration by allowing users to share a repository with other developers."
 

Cons

"If I want to mail someone a master branch, then sometimes it shows some conflict with other codes in the master branch."
"The response time of the product's support team may not be good enough to meet the expectations of users, making it an area where improvements are required."
"The tasks on Bitbucket must be automatically integrated into Jira."
"The product's initial setup phase is complex."
"It would have been better to use Bitbucket Server if it had something similar to the concept called GitHub Actions since it allows GitHub to provide seamless integration of CI/CD pipelines."
"Bitbucket Server has limited user support for its free version. It is expensive."
"Enhancing the real-time reflection of changes online is an area that could benefit from improvement."
"The product interface consists of multiple features that are complicated to navigate for new users."
"The sign in process is a bit difficult. Signing up was challenging at that time."
"Scalability is an area with a shortcoming, because of which it has room for improvement."
"We face issues with synchronization while working with teams."
"Could be more user friendly."
"There can be conflict issues when two developers work on the same file or line of code, and it would be great to see that improved, possibly with an AI solution."
"The solution can improve by adding video guides, official guides, or short courses that cater to beginners who are new to the system. These resources could offer step-by-step guidance on how to use GitHub, including common procedures such as pulling and committing. Currently, many of us have to resort to searching for information on how to do these tasks via Google. An official guide provided by GitHub itself would be a valuable asset to newcomers and would save them time and effort."
"GitHub could have better integration or capability with other solutions."
"GitHub could improve by being more user-friendly."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."
"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."
"As for licensing, Bitbucket is one of the more affordable options."
"The solution comes as a part of the suite."
"Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."
"We pay around $6 per user."
"One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."
"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."
"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."
"I use the free version of GitHub."
"The price of this solution is reasonable."
"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."
"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."
"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."
"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."
"It’s an open-source solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user185772 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 27, 2015
GitHub vs. GitLab vs. BitBucket Server (Formerly Stash)
Originally posted at http://technologyconversations.com/2015/10/16/github-vs-gitlabs-vs-bitbucket-server-formerly-stash/ This article will try to compare GitHub, GitLab and BitBucket Server (previously called Stash) installed on your own servers. Similar comparison of cloud offerings is outside…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
7%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?
While Bitbucket Server performs well, the improvement lies not in the tool itself yet in the discipline of the team using it. The tool does not impose restrictions, allowing for flexibility in work...
What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?
Bitbucket Server is used for private code management and source code management. It facilitates versioning, allowing us to maintain a master branch which reflects the code in production, and manage...
What do you like most about GitHub?
The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?
I am not aware about the pricing, so I will not be able to give feedback.
What needs improvement with GitHub?
Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area. We have used GitHub mainly for the code generation part. That is the only...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Stash
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.
Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbucket Server vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.