Bitbucket Server vs GitHub comparison

Read 97 GitHub reviews

3,549 Views
1,207 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bitbucket Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Bitbucket Server and GitHub are prominent competitors in the version control platform category. GitHub tends to have an upper hand due to its extensive community and wide range of integrations, while Bitbucket shines in enterprise settings with its integration capabilities with Atlassian products.

Features: Bitbucket Server specializes in robust code review processes, seamless Jira integration, and enhanced security features. GitHub stands out with its rich collaboration tools, support for open-source projects, and a vast array of extensions that cater to diverse development needs.

Room for Improvement: Bitbucket could improve its cloud-based deployment options and expand its community-driven features. Enhancing the user interface and providing more straightforward setup processes could also be beneficial. GitHub could enhance its enterprise-level security features and improve direct support services. Increased focus on enterprise-grade integrations would further solidify its position in the corporate sector.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbucket Server requires on-premises deployment, suitable for enterprises with dedicated infrastructure. Its direct integration with enterprise tools ensures smooth deployment within such environments. GitHub, predominantly cloud-based, offers flexibility and ease of access, supported by its extensive online community. While both offer customer support, GitHub's large community provides an additional layer of assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket Server involves higher upfront costs due to infrastructure requirements but offers significant ROI through enterprise-focused features. GitHub's pricing model is more transparent with lower initial costs, offering substantial returns through a wide range of features for individuals and teams. GitHub is a cost-effective solution, ideal for those seeking broad functionality, while Bitbucket caters to specific enterprise needs, despite a higher initial investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitbucket Server vs. GitHub Report (Updated: December 2025).

Bitbucket Server vs. GitHub

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

1.0

Bitbucket Server offers cost savings, improved collaboration, and reduced maintenance, surpassing Perforce or GitLab alternatives in efficiency and value.

Sentiment score

3.3

GitHub improves efficiency and cost savings with enhanced code management, secure storage, and streamlined version control for faster releases.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Bitbucket Server report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

5.5

Bitbucket Server support receives mixed reviews, with inconsistencies in response times but solutions generally provided eventually.

Sentiment score

4.7

GitHub's customer service is generally efficient, with community forums often preferred due to quick, effective solutions.

Finding the right solution becomes difficult because there are so many things that create confusion.

For more quotes and insights, download the Bitbucket Server report

Principal System Developer at DiwanDubai

If they encounter problems beyond their scope, they contact the vendor directly.

Dileep DK

Head of Engineering - Consumer Finance at DBS Bank

The technical support from GitHub is generally good, and they communicate effectively.

Kamalanadha Reddy

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

Some forums help you get answers faster since you just type in your concern and see resolutions from other engineers.

Aeron Gonzales

Quality Assurance Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

I have not used GitHub's technical support extensively because there are many resources and a robust knowledge base available due to the large user community.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

8.0

Bitbucket Server scales well for all sizes, though its interface lacks intuitiveness and may face occasional stability issues.

Sentiment score

7.3

GitHub excels in scalability, seamlessly supporting large user bases and complex projects with robust performance and adaptability.

Bitbucket Server has been working efficiently for us so far, and I would rate it an eight or nine for scalability.

Section Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Bitbucket Server is quite scalable because it is a server-side solution, and we can scale it vertically easily.

For more quotes and insights, download the Bitbucket Server report

Principal System Developer at DiwanDubai

We have never had a problem with scalability, so I would rate it at least eight to nine.

reviewer899619

Consultant at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

GitHub is more scalable than on-prem solutions, allowing for cloud-based scaling which is beneficial for processing large workloads efficiently.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

5.3

Bitbucket Server is highly rated for stability, with occasional issues, making it a reliable choice for code management.

Sentiment score

8.3

GitHub is highly reliable, praised for seamless performance and minimal issues, with users rating its reliability very high.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Bitbucket Server report

If a skilled developer uses it, it is ten out of ten for stability.

Raj Test

Lead Software Engineer at The 5 Chairs

It provides a reliable environment for code management.

Kamalanadha Reddy

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

GitHub is mostly stable, but there can be occasional hiccups.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Room For Improvement

Bitbucket Server needs UI improvements, better performance, enhanced integration, expanded features, and improved third-party compatibility for users.

Users recommend improvements in GitHub's interface, integration, documentation, and tools addressing performance, learning curve, and licensing issues.

Bitbucket Server should provide more flexible configuration for granular permissions.

Principal System Developer at DiwanDubai

While Bitbucket Server performs well, the improvement lies not in the tool itself yet in the discipline of the team using it.

Dileep DK

Head of Engineering - Consumer Finance at DBS Bank

Collaboration could be improved as the main aspect.

For more quotes and insights, download the Bitbucket Server report

Section Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

When working with the CI/CD pipeline and somebody is writing the workflow file, it would be best to include the AI feature so if they write incorrect code, it will notify me about it in the same dashboard, eliminating the need to use third-party tools to review the file.

reviewer2618670

AWS & Azure Engineer at a media company with 11-50 employees

I am providing this feedback for Copilot because it seems more widespread and more companies allow it rather than Amp, and it would be beneficial if they catch up with Amp on this capability.

reviewer2760345

Senior Software Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice.

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Setup Cost

Bitbucket Server offers tiered pricing based on user count with affordable options, including a free version for public repositories.

GitHub provides cost-effective pricing options for enterprises with free public repositories and paid private ones, despite licensing challenges.

It's probably slightly expensive, and the cost depends on what you compare it with.

Section Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Bitbucket Server license is affordable.

For more quotes and insights, download the Bitbucket Server report

Principal System Developer at DiwanDubai

Normally, GitHub is not expensive, but it would be welcome if it reduces costs for developing countries.

Raj Test

Lead Software Engineer at The 5 Chairs

The pricing of GitHub is reasonable, with the cost being around seven dollars per user per month for private repositories.

Anuj-Kataria

QA Manager at Next Solutions

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Valuable Features

Bitbucket Server offers seamless Atlassian integration, efficient code collaboration, robust version control, and competitive pricing with LDAP support.

GitHub enhances collaboration with features like version control, automation, security, cloud access, and integration with Azure and Jenkins.

Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration.

Dileep DK

Head of Engineering - Consumer Finance at DBS Bank

The pull request feature in Bitbucket Server is necessary.

Section Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Using Bitbucket Server helps me easily track my code changes and where they belong, which saves a lot of time and effort.

For more quotes and insights, download the Bitbucket Server report

Principal System Developer at DiwanDubai

The pull request facility for code review.

Anuj-Kataria

QA Manager at Next Solutions

GitHub Actions allow for creating multiple jobs that run in different stages such as build, test, and deploy, which enable better visibility and control over the deployment pipeline.

Kamalanadha Reddy

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

For branching, it works well, especially in an agile environment.

Aeron Gonzales

Quality Assurance Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket Server

Ranking in Version Control

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (4th), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 14.3%, down from 28.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 9.3%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Bitbucket Server	14.3%
GitHub	9.3%
Other	76.4%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Integrated code tracking has streamlined our development workflows and supports project visibility

Principal System Developer at DiwanDubai

The biggest benefit I see from Bitbucket Server is that it is providing all the features which Git is providing. Bitbucket Server is using Git as a source code main tool, and it has all the features that any source code repository can provide. A plus point is that we can install it on-premises and manage it easily. Using Bitbucket Server helps me easily track my code changes and where they belong, which saves a lot of time and effort. Without Bitbucket Server, it is very difficult to track the code and changes. The integration with Jira helps me personally with project tracking because Bitbucket Server is a source code repository. We have our SDLC lifecycle in Jira. Every change or every feature request is created as a ticket in Jira, and this ticket is linked with Bitbucket Server repository. Any changes to the code linked to that feature will go to the repository, and we can track that this is the code changed by this feature.

Read full review

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

CI/CD workflows have become streamlined and AI support has improved collaborative development

We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us. The open source and community support are very good. We are always up-to-date with the community, and integration difficulty is very low. If you integrate any CI/CD solutions on GitHub, it's very easy. We started using GitHub about three months ago with AI integration. For our deployments, some developers can be very shy about asking for descriptions on their commits. We are using AI support for comments and deployment management, which is beautiful. We are not using the GitHub API for automating workflows in our projects. I give GitHub a five-star rating for the review capabilities. I also give GitHub five stars for integration with third-party applications. There is a lot of integration available on GitHub. If you want to integrate something, even if it could be integrated before GitHub, you can make your code and integrate your own in-house applications. It's a very easy and powerful aspect of GitHub.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user185772

Senior Software Architect with 5,001-10,000 employees

Oct 27, 2015

GitHub vs. GitLab vs. BitBucket Server (Formerly Stash)

Originally posted at http://technologyconversations.com/2015/10/16/github-vs-gitlabs-vs-bitbucket-server-formerly-stash/ This article will try to compare GitHub, GitLab and BitBucket Server (previously called Stash) installed on your own servers. Similar comparison of cloud offerings is outside…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket Server?

The product is easy to maintain.

What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?

There are certain features in Bitbucket Server that could be better or enhanced, which would make our life easier. One limitation is that we can control granular permissions, but there are some lim...

What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?

My major use case for Bitbucket Server is that it is a source code repository. We are using it to store our application source code, and we are tracking the check-in, check-out, and all the activit...

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I was paying approximately one hundred dollars annually about a year ago. I am uncertain of the current cost, but GitHub without Copilot is free as far as I know. I am not paying anything for my Gi...

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice. That would be much better. Additionally, LLM integration on...

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server

Comparisons

Compared 64% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 9% of the time

Liquibase vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 5% of the time

Surround SCM vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 4% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 4% of the time

More Bitbucket Server Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Download Bitbucket Server product report

Bitbucket Server

January 2026

Download GitHub product report

January 2026

Also Known As

Stash

No data available

Overview

Bitbucket Server offers seamless integrations with tools like Jira and Jenkins, a user-friendly interface, and robust code collaboration features. It's known for excellent development support, scalability, and high availability, making it a preferred choice for many technical teams.

Bitbucket Server stands out due to its flexibility in workflows and ability to manage branching and code integration. It supports pull requests, private repositories, and is easy to manage on servers. Integration with CI/CD pipelines and traceability features enhances its functionality. Though there are areas requiring improvement such as remote site capabilities, granular access control, and support for large files, it remains a vital tool for code management, version control, and repository management in the CI/CD ecosystem, often utilized alongside Jenkins, Bamboo, and Jira. It supports software development processes such as task tracking and issue logging.

What are the key features of Bitbucket Server?

Seamless Integration: Integrates with Jira and Jenkins for enhanced workflow.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for simplicity and ease of use.
Robust Code Collaboration: Supports branching and pull requests.
Scalability and High Availability: Reliable across all project sizes.
CI/CD Pipeline Integration: Streamlines deployment processes with CI/CD tools.

What benefits should users look for in the reviews?

Development Support: Provides extensive resources for aiding development.
Flexibility in Workflows: Adaptable to different project needs.
Permission Management: Effective control over user access.
Code Quality Maintenance: Ensures high standards in code management.
Traceability: Offers excellent tracking features for seamless integration.

In industries with strong development focus, Bitbucket Server plays a critical role in managing code versions and repositories. It supports agile planning and DevOps practices, enabling organizations to streamline code integration and task management efficiently. Companies benefit from its robust features, especially in complex software development environments.

Atlassian

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent