Atlassian SourceTree vs Git comparison

Read 39 Git reviews

5,233 Views
5,233 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Atlassian SourceTree

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Git and Atlassian SourceTree compete in version control systems. Git has the upper hand with its robust support and lower pricing, while Atlassian SourceTree is noted for its comprehensive features.

Features: Git's decentralized version control, performance in handling large projects, and flexible branching model are highly valued. Atlassian SourceTree excels in graphical representations, ease of managing both Git and Mercurial repositories, and visual tools integration.

Room for Improvement: Git could enhance its graphical management tool, simplify complex workflows, and improve integration features. Atlassian SourceTree needs performance optimization, better handling of large repositories, and improved customer service responsiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Git offers smooth deployment and extensive community support, easing the learning and troubleshooting process despite some initial setup challenges. Atlassian SourceTree provides quick installation but faces occasional criticism for its customer service and documentation quality.

Pricing and ROI: Git's lower pricing and potential for zero-cost usage are appealing for budget-conscious users and scalable projects. Atlassian SourceTree provides good ROI with its intricate feature set and hybrid support for Git and Mercurial, particularly benefiting teams needing graphical interfaces.

To learn more, read our detailed Atlassian SourceTree vs. Git Report (Updated: August 2026).

Atlassian SourceTree vs. Git

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atlassian SourceTree

Ranking in Version Control

7th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Git

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Atlassian SourceTree is 6.3%, up from 6.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 18.4%, up from 9.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Git	18.4%
Atlassian SourceTree	6.3%
Other	75.3%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

reviewer2845986

dev op engineer at a retailer with 11-50 employees

Visual Git workflow has streamlined branching and commits but still needs better performance

The best features Atlassian SourceTree offers is that you can see the entire branch structure laid out clearly, which makes it much easier to understand what's going on across a project. Atlassian SourceTree has positively impacted my organization because benefits add up over a year when you're bringing in new developers regularly. Avoiding merge disasters has real value. Even one bad merge that takes half a day to untangle costs more than the tool would if it wasn't free. The return on investment is significant.

Read full review

Davide Cariola

Ed Tech Project Manager at Aulab

Branching has streamlined collaboration and now ensures safer, accountable code changes

I feel that the best features of Git are its reliable branching model and fast commits. The ability to track every change with a full history and accountability is invaluable. Git's branching model and change tracking have helped my projects significantly, especially in a recent multi-developer Laravel project where several features were developed in parallel. By isolating each feature on its own branch, the team avoided conflicts and could review work incrementally. When a critical bug appeared in production, Git's history and diff made it easier to identify the exact commit that introduced the issue and rollback safely without disrupting the ongoing development. This combination of isolated branches, clear commit history, and reliable rollback capability kept the project stable while allowing fast iteration. Git has positively impacted my organization by standardizing collaboration, reducing integration conflicts, and making parallel development far more efficient. The branching model allowed teams to work independently without blocking each other. The clear commit history improved code reviews and accountability.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Atlassian SourceTree is a very stable product."

"I was doing a very complex file change merge using SourceTree and it took me less than half of the time I estimated."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."

"This product has helped because we have been able to fix problems when our code repository breaks."

"For me, the branches ' graph was the most valuable feature of Atlassian SourceTree. I often used the terminal, but during a demo, my boss preferred I not switch to the terminal view. SourceTree's graphical interface for managing branches was handy for that. The demo involved making changes, committing them, pushing to the CI/CD tool, running the pipeline, and seeing the integration, all within about twenty minutes."

"The tool's UI is good."

"The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."

"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."

More Atlassian SourceTree pros

"All of the features in Git are useful."

"The most valuable feature of Git is its ability to track updates, such as firmware documentation. Additionally, many people can make changes to code without problems. It is able to solve conflicts very easily."

"I believe it is beneficial to maintain a detailed log or history of who did what to a project and which user committed to the change."

"The repository management and check-in/check-out commands are the most valuable features for ensuring secure code."

"There wasn't any instability at all because when we did our first automation deployment, we hit 100% with zero bugs introduced."

"The features I am most impressed by is the automation."

"You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches."

"Git is an easy-to-use solution that can be used for parallel working."

More Git pros

Cons

"The visuals, including the UI and UX, have simple fonts, making it an area where certain enhancements can be done."

"The UI can be improved because it is not always so easy to find the functionality you are looking for."

"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."

"The main issue for improving Atlassian SourceTree is performance."

"People think that Visual Studio Code is more intuitive and can serve dual purposes for development and as a client to push or pull code."

"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."

"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."

"The product's UI needs improvement."

"The solution could be more user-friendly."

"The solution works perfectly fine so far."

"I would rate the initial setup process a four, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the most difficult and 10 being the easiest. The reason for this rating is that once there are conflicts, it takes a lot of effort to resolve them."

"The GUI needs to be improved."

"About the configuration it is a little bit difficult, it can be improved."

"If the file changes are on the same line, we need to resolve a merge conflict manually. Let's say there is a merge conflict on line 50 because we have multiple commits on the same line number. Git could add some artificial intelligence to resolve the conflict automatically."

"There is nothing that could be improved at this time."

"Git's user interface could be improved."

More Git cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I do not recall the exact pricing details for SourceTree, but generally, Atlassian products are affordable, and SourceTree typically comes as part of a suite."

"Atlassian SourceTree is a free solution."

"There is a fee for using SourceTree."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"The platform is less expensive."

"I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"We use the open-source version."

"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."

"Git is completely free."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."

More Git pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Marketing Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atlassian SourceTree?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Atlassian SourceTree is that it's completely free, which was a big factor for us. There are no licensing costs, no approvals needed, just d...

What needs improvement with Atlassian SourceTree?

The main issue for improving Atlassian SourceTree is performance.

What is your primary use case for Atlassian SourceTree?

My main use case for Atlassian SourceTree is managing our Git repositories across multiple projects. We use it as a visual Git client so developers who aren't as comfortable with the command line c...

What needs improvement with Git?

Git works perfectly as is. The CLI works well with Git, and I don't have any recommendations about it.

What is your primary use case for Git?

My main use case for Git is for versioning and controlling and sharing my code. In a recent Laravel project, I used Git to manage versioning and collaboration by adopting a branching strategy. Spec...

What advice do you have for others considering Git?

The best advice that I can give is that you have to treat Git as a core part of the development process and not just as a storage tool. This way it leads to cleaner collaboration, safer experimenta...

Bitbucket vs Atlassian SourceTree

Comparisons

Compared 17% of the time

GitHub vs Atlassian SourceTree

Compared 12% of the time

Tower vs Atlassian SourceTree

Compared 10% of the time

Helix Core vs Atlassian SourceTree

Compared 8% of the time

Bitbucket Server vs Atlassian SourceTree

Compared 8% of the time

More Atlassian SourceTree Competitors

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Bitbucket vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

Apache Subversion vs Git

Compared 9% of the time

DBmaestro Database Source Control vs Git

Compared 8% of the time

More Git Competitors

Product Reports

Download Atlassian SourceTree product report

Atlassian SourceTree

August 2026

Download Git product report

July 2026

Overview

Atlassian SourceTree provides a graphical interface for Git repository management with features like intuitive test summaries and seamless integration with Bitbucket.

Designed for teams handling complex source code environments, Atlassian SourceTree simplifies conflict management, branch switching, and code integration. Its graphical interface allows for easy oversight and control, making it ideal for managing Git repositories while offering efficient importing of XML files and compatibility with tools like KDiff3. However, enhancements like more console shortcuts and improved UI accessibility are often suggested. SourceTree is valued for visual problem-solving in Git management and is a practical tool for anyone integrating with a range of services, including Jira, GitLab, and GitHub.

What are the key features of Atlassian SourceTree?

Intuitive test summaries: Easily review changes and test outcomes.
Automatic conflict merging: Simplify resolution and save time.
Fast branch switching: Navigate between branches with speed and ease.
User-friendly interface: Enjoy a seamless and clear visual experience.
Bitbucket integration: Enhance Git repository reliability with direct integration.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from Atlassian SourceTree?

Visual analysis of repositories: Quickly identify and rectify issues.
Efficient conflict management: Reduce downtime with automated tools.
Effective code integration: Smoothly merge code from different developers.
Streamlined Git operations: Accelerate pushing, pulling, and committing tasks.

In industries utilizing Git for version control and collaboration, Atlassian SourceTree aids teams by providing visual tools to efficiently manage codebases. It is implemented in tech environments that demand reliable code integration with services like Bitbucket, enabling seamless management and deployment of software.

Atlassian

Git offers branch management, version control, and automation to facilitate quick deployments and team collaboration. Supporting CLI and GUI, it integrates seamlessly with platforms like GitHub, providing a stable environment for code management and deployment.

Git's branch management, version control, and seamless integration with other platforms like GitHub make it a fundamental tool for software development. Its capabilities allow multiple users to work simultaneously, making it ideal for collaborative environments. Git is easy to learn and supports both command-line and graphical interfaces, providing flexibility in usage. It maintains a detailed log of modifications, assisting in efficient code tracking and troubleshooting. While its pricing model and merging capabilities could see improvements, as well as UI enhancements, Git still stands out for its reliability and performance.

What are Git's most valuable features?

Branch Management: Facilitates organized work on different features concurrently.
Version Control: Easily track changes and revert to previous versions.
Integration: Compatible with GitHub for enhanced collaboration.
CLI & GUI Support: Offers versatility in user preferences.
Comprehensive Log: Aids in detailed code tracking and issue resolution.

What benefits can users expect from Git?

Stability: Provides a reliable platform for development.
Performance: Efficiently handles multiple users and large projects.
Ecosystem: Extensive resources and community support.
Easy Learning Curve: User-friendly for new developers.

Git is employed extensively in software development for version control and collaborative coding. It's integral in web design and configuration management where maintaining multiple code versions offline is crucial. Organizations leverage Git for project and application development, benefiting IT departments and research activities with its robust repository management capabilities. Both cloud and on-premise deployments enhance productivity across industries.

Sample Customers

Facebook, NASA, Cisco, eBay, Redfin, Toyota, Kaiser Permanente, Gilt, CSIRO, Autodesk, The Daily Telegraph, CODE, Illumnia,

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse