Atlassian SourceTree vs Git comparison

Read 38 Git reviews

3,330 Views
3,330 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Atlassian SourceTree

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Git and Atlassian SourceTree compete in version control systems. Git has the upper hand with its robust support and lower pricing, while Atlassian SourceTree is noted for its comprehensive features.

Features: Git's decentralized version control, performance in handling large projects, and flexible branching model are highly valued. Atlassian SourceTree excels in graphical representations, ease of managing both Git and Mercurial repositories, and visual tools integration.

Room for Improvement: Git could enhance its graphical management tool, simplify complex workflows, and improve integration features. Atlassian SourceTree needs performance optimization, better handling of large repositories, and improved customer service responsiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Git offers smooth deployment and extensive community support, easing the learning and troubleshooting process despite some initial setup challenges. Atlassian SourceTree provides quick installation but faces occasional criticism for its customer service and documentation quality.

Pricing and ROI: Git's lower pricing and potential for zero-cost usage are appealing for budget-conscious users and scalable projects. Atlassian SourceTree provides good ROI with its intricate feature set and hybrid support for Git and Mercurial, particularly benefiting teams needing graphical interfaces.

To learn more, read our detailed Atlassian SourceTree vs. Git Report (Updated: June 2026).

Atlassian SourceTree vs. Git

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atlassian SourceTree

Ranking in Version Control

6th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Git

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Atlassian SourceTree is 6.4%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 13.4%, up from 8.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Git	13.4%
Atlassian SourceTree	6.4%
Other	80.2%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

reviewer2845986

dev op engineer at a retailer with 11-50 employees

Visual Git workflow has streamlined branching and commits but still needs better performance

The best features Atlassian SourceTree offers is that you can see the entire branch structure laid out clearly, which makes it much easier to understand what's going on across a project. Atlassian SourceTree has positively impacted my organization because benefits add up over a year when you're bringing in new developers regularly. Avoiding merge disasters has real value. Even one bad merge that takes half a day to untangle costs more than the tool would if it wasn't free. The return on investment is significant.

Read full review

Hari Kathireshan

Sr PHP Developer at GE

An easy-to-use solution that can be used for configuration management

We use Git for configuration management Git is an easy-to-use solution that can be used for parallel working. Git's user interface could be improved. I have been using Git for almost eight years. Git is a stable solution. Git is a scalable solution. Around 2,000 users use the solution in our…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Atlassian SourceTree is a very stable product."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."

"The tool's UI is good."

"Avoiding merge disasters has real value."

"This product has helped because we have been able to fix problems when our code repository breaks."

"For me, the branches ' graph was the most valuable feature of Atlassian SourceTree. I often used the terminal, but during a demo, my boss preferred I not switch to the terminal view. SourceTree's graphical interface for managing branches was handy for that. The demo involved making changes, committing them, pushing to the CI/CD tool, running the pipeline, and seeing the integration, all within about twenty minutes."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."

More Atlassian SourceTree pros

"The best feature is that we can access it from anywhere if we have GitHub credentials."

"We use the tool to store codes."

"Git is a product everyone uses, so it's almost inescapable. I like the fact that there is a large ecosystem around it. You can bolt various graphical user interfaces onto it or sign up for various repositories like GitHub and AWS CodeCommit. Git has a large community, so there are lots of resources and knowledge bases you can use."

"There wasn't any instability at all because when we did our first automation deployment, we hit 100% with zero bugs introduced."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Since I am a very simple user of the tool, its scalability is good for me."

"The most valuable feature of Git is its reliability and user popularity."

"The product is easy to use."

"The best thing about this solution is that it can be learned very quickly, and used very easily."

More Git pros

Cons

"The UI can be improved because it is not always so easy to find the functionality you are looking for."

"The visuals, including the UI and UX, have simple fonts, making it an area where certain enhancements can be done."

"The main issue for improving Atlassian SourceTree is performance."

"The product's UI needs improvement."

"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."

"People think that Visual Studio Code is more intuitive and can serve dual purposes for development and as a client to push or pull code."

"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."

"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."

"I would rate the initial setup process a four, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the most difficult and 10 being the easiest. The reason for this rating is that once there are conflicts, it takes a lot of effort to resolve them."

"The GUI needs to be improved."

"If another person raises a pull request under the same ID assigned to the previous person, and both parties modify the tool, their changes will be grouped together in the same request until it is closed, which is an issue."

"We would like to see tutorials added to the product, for new users to follow so that they can optimize their use of the solution."

"Git can improve the size of the depository it can handle and add the capability to detect the change between common files, such as Excel and PDF documents."

"Some challenges arise when Git is not used correctly, particularly in managing branches. It's easy to get lost, but these challenges can be overcome with proper management. A common advice is maintaining the repository and ensuring developers are in sync with the production branch. Branches should be promptly merged into development to avoid getting lost in many branches."

"If the file changes are on the same line, we need to resolve a merge conflict manually. Let's say there is a merge conflict on line 50 because we have multiple commits on the same line number. Git could add some artificial intelligence to resolve the conflict automatically."

"Synchronization could be better. Sometimes when you create a branch and merge it into another branch, I think it's a bit complex for no reason. The initial setup is also tricky when you do it for the first time."

More Git cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Atlassian SourceTree is a free solution."

"There is a fee for using SourceTree."

"I do not recall the exact pricing details for SourceTree, but generally, Atlassian products are affordable, and SourceTree typically comes as part of a suite."

"We use the open-source version."

"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."

"There are some extra costs to Git, but it depends on your use case."

"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"The platform is less expensive."

"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."

"I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version."

More Git pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Construction Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Marketing Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atlassian SourceTree?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Atlassian SourceTree is that it's completely free, which was a big factor for us. There are no licensing costs, no approvals needed, just d...

What needs improvement with Atlassian SourceTree?

The main issue for improving Atlassian SourceTree is performance.

What is your primary use case for Atlassian SourceTree?

My main use case for Atlassian SourceTree is managing our Git repositories across multiple projects. We use it as a visual Git client so developers who aren't as comfortable with the command line c...

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

What is your primary use case for Git?

I use Git to store our code and maintain different versions, and for some projects, we use CI/CD as part of GitHub.

What advice do you have for others considering Git?

I would recommend Git to other people. I'd rate it nine out of ten.

Bitbucket vs Atlassian SourceTree

Comparisons

Compared 16% of the time

GitHub vs Atlassian SourceTree

Compared 15% of the time

Tower vs Atlassian SourceTree

Compared 12% of the time

Bitbucket Server vs Atlassian SourceTree

Compared 9% of the time

Helix Core vs Atlassian SourceTree

Compared 9% of the time

More Atlassian SourceTree Competitors

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 12% of the time

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 12% of the time

Bitbucket vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 9% of the time

DBmaestro Database Source Control vs Git

Compared 7% of the time

More Git Competitors

Product Reports

Atlassian SourceTree

Download Atlassian SourceTree product report

Download Git product report

Overview

Atlassian SourceTree provides a graphical interface for Git repository management with features like intuitive test summaries and seamless integration with Bitbucket.

Designed for teams handling complex source code environments, Atlassian SourceTree simplifies conflict management, branch switching, and code integration. Its graphical interface allows for easy oversight and control, making it ideal for managing Git repositories while offering efficient importing of XML files and compatibility with tools like KDiff3. However, enhancements like more console shortcuts and improved UI accessibility are often suggested. SourceTree is valued for visual problem-solving in Git management and is a practical tool for anyone integrating with a range of services, including Jira, GitLab, and GitHub.

What are the key features of Atlassian SourceTree?

Intuitive test summaries: Easily review changes and test outcomes.
Automatic conflict merging: Simplify resolution and save time.
Fast branch switching: Navigate between branches with speed and ease.
User-friendly interface: Enjoy a seamless and clear visual experience.
Bitbucket integration: Enhance Git repository reliability with direct integration.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from Atlassian SourceTree?

Visual analysis of repositories: Quickly identify and rectify issues.
Efficient conflict management: Reduce downtime with automated tools.
Effective code integration: Smoothly merge code from different developers.
Streamlined Git operations: Accelerate pushing, pulling, and committing tasks.

In industries utilizing Git for version control and collaboration, Atlassian SourceTree aids teams by providing visual tools to efficiently manage codebases. It is implemented in tech environments that demand reliable code integration with services like Bitbucket, enabling seamless management and deployment of software.

Atlassian

Git offers branch management, version control, and automation to facilitate quick deployments and team collaboration. Supporting CLI and GUI, it integrates seamlessly with platforms like GitHub, providing a stable environment for code management and deployment.

Git's branch management, version control, and seamless integration with other platforms like GitHub make it a fundamental tool for software development. Its capabilities allow multiple users to work simultaneously, making it ideal for collaborative environments. Git is easy to learn and supports both command-line and graphical interfaces, providing flexibility in usage. It maintains a detailed log of modifications, assisting in efficient code tracking and troubleshooting. While its pricing model and merging capabilities could see improvements, as well as UI enhancements, Git still stands out for its reliability and performance.

What are Git's most valuable features?

Branch Management: Facilitates organized work on different features concurrently.
Version Control: Easily track changes and revert to previous versions.
Integration: Compatible with GitHub for enhanced collaboration.
CLI & GUI Support: Offers versatility in user preferences.
Comprehensive Log: Aids in detailed code tracking and issue resolution.

What benefits can users expect from Git?

Stability: Provides a reliable platform for development.
Performance: Efficiently handles multiple users and large projects.
Ecosystem: Extensive resources and community support.
Easy Learning Curve: User-friendly for new developers.

Git is employed extensively in software development for version control and collaborative coding. It's integral in web design and configuration management where maintaining multiple code versions offline is crucial. Organizations leverage Git for project and application development, benefiting IT departments and research activities with its robust repository management capabilities. Both cloud and on-premise deployments enhance productivity across industries.

Sample Customers

Facebook, NASA, Cisco, eBay, Redfin, Toyota, Kaiser Permanente, Gilt, CSIRO, Autodesk, The Daily Telegraph, CODE, Illumnia,

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Atlassian SourceTree vs. Git