Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitbucket vs Git comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket
Ranking in Version Control
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Git
Ranking in Version Control
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket is 17.0%, down from 36.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 10.5%, up from 7.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Bitbucket17.0%
Git10.5%
Other72.5%
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

VinodKumar9 - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Developer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Integrated task tracking has improved code collaboration and now supports secure, controlled delivery
The integration with Jira is a feature I really appreciate in Bitbucket because it allows for easy task management integration, which is very beneficial. Bitbucket provides strong Jira integration, which is essential for our client who uses Jira for task management. This integration helps streamline processes and has built-in CI/CD pipelines, private repositories, and provides solid support for managing tasks effectively. The CI/CD pipeline in Bitbucket streamlines our development process as we need built-in pipelines, which are available and easy to use. Bitbucket maintains code quality through branch permissions that alert you if you are pushing directly and there are branch protections or conflicts. It enforces naming conventions for branches, making it secure and easy to manage. Security-wise, Bitbucket has good features such as private repositories, access controls, authentication requirements, and secure pull requests, ensuring safety at various levels. The initial setup for Bitbucket is easy as I log in with the company email to access a workspace. Creating repositories follows a straightforward process involving setting permissions and branch creation.
Vijaya Das - PeerSpot reviewer
Director - Technical Product Management at Visa
A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments
Scalability is something I haven't experienced. So, a bigger team in my company looks after the scalability aspect of the solution. Therefore, I will not be the right person to rate it from a scalability perspective. Around 200 users are using Git in my company. I am not the right person to comment on whether the solution's usage rate will increase in the future.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable thing we have found is the workloads are good in Jira and we are able to control the access."
"It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI."
"Bitbucket works, and it's reliable"
"Bitbucket lets me create new projects in a few clicks and check out files in a seamless and integrated manner."
"You can use Bitbucket to whitelist IP addresses during deployment."
"I find Bitbucket's branching, pull requests, and branch mergers very valuable."
"Bitbucket is very secure and easy to handle compared to GitLab."
"I use the solution for website management."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Since I am a very simple user of the tool, its scalability is good for me."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"The product protects our data."
"Git has a lot of online tutorials and resources available."
"The features I am most impressed by is the automation."
"So far, the product has been stable. Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight to nine out of ten."
"I like Git's merging feature. For example, say there is an instance where I am working on the same code as another developer. Git automatically merges the work of two developers on the same file. If I'm working on line 50 and he's working on 60, and we both commit, it mergest automatically."
 

Cons

"I feel the pricing for Bitbucket is on the higher end."
"Bitbucket can improve by integrating a tool to manage conflict code. This would save time."
"When users are given access for the first time, they should have some basic setups to help them specify their purposes."
"The product could be less expensive for small companies."
"Bitbucket could improve its security. For example, the user access security could improve."
"I rate the support from Bitbucket a four out of five."
"In terms of the commits, we currently create a pull request, however, we are not able to assign any."
"Could provide some default branching options for users to adopt."
"We would like to see tutorials added to the product, for new users to follow so that they can optimize their use of the solution."
"It would be preferable if the updates could be completed at a faster pace."
"I would like to see less updates with the product."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing model of Git."
"If the solution could provide more language support options such as Korean, it would be helpful."
"Git removed the credential feature."
"I believe there is room for improvement in preventing work loss due to conflicts or overwriting. Another area for improvement could be implementing features for automated code verification within Git."
"If the file changes are on the same line, we need to resolve a merge conflict manually. Let's say there is a merge conflict on line 50 because we have multiple commits on the same line number. Git could add some artificial intelligence to resolve the conflict automatically."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Bitbucket is a cost-effective solution. It is the cheapest in the market. It is lower than GitLab and GitHub."
"With our small number of users, our licensing fees are approximately $10 USD per month."
"Sometimes there are issues in obtaining licenses and the pricing could be improved."
"You have to buy additional licenses when you exceed 50 users."
"Licensing is on a monthly basis, it's available on our website. They have a free version, the pro version and then they have an enterprise version, and we're using a kind of the middle of the pro version for about $7 per user per month."
"When you increase from ten people to anything higher the price increase to one thousand five hundred. That is unsatisfactory and they should have a gradual price slope."
"Bitbucket is a low-priced tool."
"We have approximately 40 licenses for Bitbucket."
"I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version."
"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."
"The platform is less expensive."
"The tool is free."
"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge."
"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."
"Git is an open-source software."
"There are some extra costs to Git, but it depends on your use case."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Manufacturing Company
18%
Marketing Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business22
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise22
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise21
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket?
It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitbucket?
Pricing is not based on low cost. It's based on the quality and satisfaction of the services provided. We are not comparing Bitbucket's pricing with GitLab.
What needs improvement with Bitbucket?
Bitbucket has less community support compared to GitHub, which has many users. However, if you are already using Jira, Bitbucket becomes a natural choice. Bitbucket has limitations such as communit...
What do you like most about Git?
You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.
What needs improvement with Git?
There is nothing that could be improved at this time.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Oscar Insurance, Fugro Roames, Splunk, Rakuten, Red Giant, Met Office, Trulia, Onfido, TriNet, Orbitz Worldwide, Ames Research Center, Sotheby's
Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbucket vs. Git and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.