Bitbucket vs Git comparison

Read 38 Git reviews

1,185 Views
1,007 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Bitbucket

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Bitbucket and Git are two prominent tools widely used for version control in software development. Based on user reviews, Git appears to hold a slight advantage in terms of overall features, despite Bitbucket receiving favorable feedback on pricing and support.

Features: Bitbucket users appreciate its integration with Jira, Atlassian ecosystem, and built-in continuous delivery capabilities. Git users value its distributed version control, branching, and merging capabilities. Git’s feature set, particularly its flexibility in handling large projects, gives it an edge.

Room for Improvement: Bitbucket users highlight issues with performance and the need for better documentation. Git users find the initial setup complex and express a need for improved graphical tools. While both have areas for development, Git's steep learning curve is a common concern among its users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbucket's cloud-based deployment is praised for its simplicity, and user reviews commend its reliable customer service. Git’s deployment, being more versatile with options for both cloud and local setups, is considered harder to configure. Users of Git have mixed feelings about support, suggesting room for improvement in service quality.

Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket users appreciate the competitive pricing, especially for small teams, and consider the ROI satisfactory. Git, although considered worth the investment due to its robust features, receives mixed reviews concerning cost efficiency. Bitbucket’s straightforward pricing appears to be more appealing to budget-conscious users.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitbucket vs. Git Report (Updated: April 2025).

Download the complete report

Bitbucket vs. Git

April 2025

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket

Ranking in Version Control

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Git

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket is 33.8%, up from 33.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 7.9%, down from 8.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Julian Lewis

Senior application performance monitoring and alerting specialist at a aerospace/defense firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better

I'm mainly using Bitbucket as a code repository for storing the configurations and templates of my monitoring tools. We have them stored locally, and Bitbucket manages changes and builds, so we have a means of rolling back if there are any issues. There are about 10 to 15 users in the company at…

Read full review

Srujan Panuganti

Scientist - Instrument II at AbbVie

An excellent open source, software hosting solution that provides strong version control functionality and a user-friendly interface

We use this solution to host our software, and where we need to develop new features and new functionality, we create new branch from our existing software, work on our branch, develop it, test it, validate it, and then merge it with the master or main software The best thing about this solution…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use Bitbucket for Jira, Confluence, and Jenkins and we have an automation pipeline. Whenever the coaching is done in Bitbucket we run an automation pipeline from the build, create installations, and tests all in one pipeline. It is done automatically."

"It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI."

"The tool's automation helped because we onboarded a lot of projects and teams into Bitbucket. The product's automation helped us complete activities in two days which previously used to take around two weeks to complete. We have completely automated processes that were earlier manual. It has good integration with Jira and Jenkins."

"The product's initial setup phase experience was good."

"This is a very dependable product that is easy to use and it has an excellent GUI interface."

"The planning model is good, and so is the suite of applications around it."

"Bitbucket lets me create new projects in a few clicks and check out files in a seamless and integrated manner."

"The most valuable features are the scripts used for migration purposes and to create new repository releases."

More Bitbucket pros

"The repository management and check-in/check-out commands are the most valuable features for ensuring secure code."

"The features I am most impressed by is the automation."

"Git is easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of Git is its ability to track updates, such as firmware documentation. Additionally, many people can make changes to code without problems. It is able to solve conflicts very easily."

"I like that it's easy to use and because it's accessible from a terminal or a graphical user interface if needed. I also like that we can pass comments from Linux if required."

"It is a pretty standard product with features like git clone and development branches."

"Git is easy to manage...It is helpful for me and easy to manage the interface we are using from development to production."

"The tool's most valuable feature is branch workflows."

More Git pros

Cons

"Bitbucket's usability and integration with other tools could be improved somewhat. My other issue is that Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, and all the other ones use slightly different jargon for the same things. They should come up with a standard language for all these tools."

"I would like to see the security logs option on the tool directly. The current way to work with security logs is through an email protocol."

"There is room for improvement in the workflow. Other similar tools offer automation and more streamlined workflows, which Bitbucket currently lacks."

"It would be beneficial to have a straightforward mechanism for integrating the initial tasks defined in Bitbucket with Jira when the need arises."

"There could be more AI features included in the product."

"In terms of the commits, we currently create a pull request, however, we are not able to assign any."

"I think the configuration can be improved because it is getting more complicated and not very well organized."

"I think the developers are constantly working on improving the pull requests support."

More Bitbucket cons

"I believe there is room for improvement in preventing work loss due to conflicts or overwriting. Another area for improvement could be implementing features for automated code verification within Git."

"If another person raises a pull request under the same ID assigned to the previous person, and both parties modify the tool, their changes will be grouped together in the same request until it is closed, which is an issue."

"Git removed the credential feature."

"If the file changes are on the same line, we need to resolve a merge conflict manually. Let's say there is a merge conflict on line 50 because we have multiple commits on the same line number. Git could add some artificial intelligence to resolve the conflict automatically."

"I would like to see an improvement in the way the product owner can review changes."

"If other people are included in their project, you're going to have to make merge requests to merge the code you made, and the code your colleagues have made. So it's a little bit complicated."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing model of Git."

"Git can improve the size of the depository it can handle and add the capability to detect the change between common files, such as Excel and PDF documents."

More Git cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"A full licensing cost is paid for Bitbucket."

"When you increase from ten people to anything higher the price increase to one thousand five hundred. That is unsatisfactory and they should have a gradual price slope."

"I did not pay for the license as I was using a corporate license. But I think the pricing is fair."

"I rate Bitbucket's pricing a five out of ten."

"Sometimes there are issues in obtaining licenses and the pricing could be improved."

"Bitbucket is a cost-effective solution. It is the cheapest in the market. It is lower than GitLab and GitHub."

"We find that the pricing is very affordable."

"I rate the pricing a seven out of ten because it is expensive."

More Bitbucket pricing and cost advice

"Git is completely free."

"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."

"The tool is free."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"We use the open-source version."

"Git is an open-source software."

"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge."

"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."

More Git pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

42%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket?

It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitbucket?

Pricing is not based on low cost. It's based on the quality and satisfaction of the services provided. We are not comparing Bitbucket's pricing with GitLab.

What needs improvement with Bitbucket?

I am not able to recollect any new suggestions. In terms of the commits, we currently create a pull request, however, we are not able to assign any. This could be an area for improvement.

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

Bitbucket Server vs Bitbucket

Comparisons

Compared 67% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket

Compared 12% of the time

GitHub vs Bitbucket

Compared 7% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket

Compared 5% of the time

Apache Subversion vs Bitbucket

Compared 1% of the time

More Bitbucket Competitors

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 37% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 17% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Git

Compared 14% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Liquibase vs Git

Compared 5% of the time

More Git Competitors

Product Reports

Download Bitbucket product report

Bitbucket

May 2025

Download Git product report

May 2025

Overview

Bitbucket is a team-oriented Git-based code hosting and collaboration solution. The best-in-class Jira and Trello integrations in Bitbucket are meant to bring the entire software team together to complete a project. Bitbucket gives your team a single location to collaborate on code from concept to cloud deployment, to generate quality code through automated testing, and to deploy code with confidence.

There are three deployment options for Bitbucket:

Bitbucket Cloud is a web-based version of Bitbucket that is hosted on Atlassian's servers and accessible via a URL. Pipelines, an exclusive built-in CI/CD tool in Bitbucket Cloud, allows you to create, test, and deploy directly from Bitbucket.
Bitbucket Server is installed on your computer and runs in your environment. Bamboo, our robust CI/CD platform, has strong connections with Bitbucket Server, allowing you to totally automate your workflow. The license is unlimited.
Bitbucket Data Center appears to users as a single instance of Bitbucket Server, but it is actually hosted on a cluster of servers in your environment.

This has some advantages over Bitbucket Server:

Availability: If one cluster node fails, the remaining cluster node(s) can continue to service requests, resulting in little or no downtime for customers.
Performance at scale: A cluster of numerous Bitbucket Server-running machines can manage more traffic than a single system.
Mirroring: For distributed teams working with large repositories, smart mirroring can increase Git clone performance.

Bitbucket Features

Bitbucket has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Workflow control: This helps you to enforce a project or team workflow.

Cooperation: Pull requests with inline commentary for code review cooperation.

Customization: If you don't find what you're looking for in our Marketplace, you can use our full Rest API to create unique features for your workflow.

Jira and Trello integration: Bring order to the chaos and keep the entire software company informed. Access to Jira issues and Trello cards' branches, build status, commits, and status.

Code collaboration: From concept to cloud, code collaboration is a must. Create a merging checklist with designated approvers and check for passing builds before transitioning Jira issues based on pull request status.

Consistent delivery: With built-in continuous delivery, you can build and test automatically. Build, test, and deploy with Bitbucket Pipelines, our integrated CI/CD solution. Benefit from code-based configuration and quick feedback loops.

Simple deployment: Keep track of your deployments, preview them, and confidently promote them.

Code security: You can rest easy knowing your code is safe on the cloud, and you can use checks to prevent errors from occurring.

Reviews from Real Users

Bitbucket stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its robust traceability and user-friendly interface. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

One PeerSpot reviewer, a Developer III at an Information Technology at a energy/utilities company, writes, “Bitbucket has improved our organization because it has simplified and streamlined our developer communication code and review process. It is also much more visual.” He adds, “Bitbucket's traceability is great. Being able to see pool requests is just a great thing for collaboration.”

Kajal P., Quality Assurance Manager at a tech services company, notes, “The solution is easy to use. If I need to check out my latest code or I need to send my local code to the depositories it is simple. Overall it has been a good experience from my side using this solution."

Atlassian

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Sample Customers

Oscar Insurance, Fugro Roames, Splunk, Rakuten, Red Giant, Met Office, Trulia, Onfido, TriNet, Orbitz Worldwide, Ames Research Center, Sotheby's

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse