Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitbucket vs Git comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket
Ranking in Version Control
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Git
Ranking in Version Control
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket is 29.6%, down from 35.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 9.5%, up from 7.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Cuneyt-Gurses - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps us improve our development workflows and enhance team collaboration
Our primary use case for Bitbucket revolves around version control and collaborative development. We utilize it extensively to manage our codebase, facilitate Git operations, and automate our CI/CD pipelines on the Bitbucket Cloud platform. This setup enables seamless collaboration among our team…
Grazvydas Govaras - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps to store and version the code
We use the solution for code management to store and version the code. It is the standard service we use for developing applications and infrastructure services You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.  I would like to see less updates with the product.  I…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The setup was okay, and it was well-integrated."
"The initial setup was straightforward, especially leveraging its cloud platform deployment options."
"The version control feature for our code and the security aspect is valuable to us."
"The code reviews and the ability to support DevSecOps are very important."
"BitBucket is a reliable and user-friendly product."
"Bitbucket has a pull request-based method, similar to Git's merge request feature."
"Bitbucket works fine for what I'm doing. It's slightly different from GitHub, but it's a good tool for storing code."
"Git is Bitbucket's most valuable feature."
"The best feature is that we can access it from anywhere if we have GitHub credentials."
"The most valuable feature of Git is its reliability and user popularity."
"Git is an easy-to-use solution that can be used for parallel working."
"Git is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"I use the solution for website management."
"The setup process is pretty simple."
"Git is a powerful and mature tool that all software engineers use, whether they use it from the command line with the original version or integrate it with various tools. It helps by promoting collaboration and eliminating problems with code in separate locations. This greatly boosts productivity since you're not lost in a massive local repository, and everything remains organized."
"I believe it is beneficial to maintain a detailed log or history of who did what to a project and which user committed to the change."
 

Cons

"We need an improved automation feature for the cloud."
"Even with the automation, we've had some situations where we've had mistakes. They've integrated things into the wrong place, so there's a fairly steep learning curve."
"Bitbucket should come with code review pre-integrated, which would be better than integrating another tool into the solution."
"Integration with Copilot could be beneficial."
"Bitbucket should integrate a static code analyzer."
"Bitbucket could improve pipeline building and deployment. Our deployments are not using the Bitbucket. Deployments we are going through Azure DevOps, but the integration is happening in Bitbucket."
"In future releases, more integration is always a valuable aspect to consider."
"In terms of the commits, we currently create a pull request, however, we are not able to assign any. This could be an area for improvement."
"I would like to see an improvement in the way the product owner can review changes."
"The GUI needs to be improved."
"The product needs to improve its UI."
"Some challenges arise when Git is not used correctly, particularly in managing branches. It's easy to get lost, but these challenges can be overcome with proper management. A common advice is maintaining the repository and ensuring developers are in sync with the production branch. Branches should be promptly merged into development to avoid getting lost in many branches."
"I would like more documentation."
"In a future release, the user interface should be easier to use and more intuitive."
"Git's user interface could be improved."
"If another person raises a pull request under the same ID assigned to the previous person, and both parties modify the tool, their changes will be grouped together in the same request until it is closed, which is an issue."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product price as two on a scale of one to ten, where ten means that it is a very expensive tool."
"I rate the price from Bitbucket a four out of five."
"When you increase from ten people to anything higher the price increase to one thousand five hundred. That is unsatisfactory and they should have a gradual price slope."
"We find that the pricing is very affordable."
"A full licensing cost is paid for Bitbucket."
"Licensing is on a monthly basis, it's available on our website. They have a free version, the pro version and then they have an enterprise version, and we're using a kind of the middle of the pro version for about $7 per user per month."
"I rate the pricing a seven out of ten because it is expensive."
"Bitbucket is a cost-effective solution. It is the cheapest in the market. It is lower than GitLab and GitHub."
"The tool is free."
"Git is an open-source software."
"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge."
"The platform is less expensive."
"We use the open-source version."
"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."
"The tool is an open-source product."
"Git is completely free."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket?
It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitbucket?
Pricing is not based on low cost. It's based on the quality and satisfaction of the services provided. We are not comparing Bitbucket's pricing with GitLab.
What needs improvement with Bitbucket?
I am not able to recollect any new suggestions. In terms of the commits, we currently create a pull request, however, we are not able to assign any. This could be an area for improvement.
What do you like most about Git?
You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.
What needs improvement with Git?
There is nothing that could be improved at this time.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Oscar Insurance, Fugro Roames, Splunk, Rakuten, Red Giant, Met Office, Trulia, Onfido, TriNet, Orbitz Worldwide, Ames Research Center, Sotheby's
Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbucket vs. Git and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.