Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitbucket vs Git comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket
Ranking in Version Control
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
49
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Git
Ranking in Version Control
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket is 34.9%, up from 33.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 7.7%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Prathamesh DMarathe - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamless collaboration and merge conflict resolution improve code management
I use the Bitbucket tool to store the code repository and maintain a CI/CD pipeline, allowing multiple developers to work on different code branches. We can integrate with the developer Marathe bridge branch, enabling it to be pushed into the production environment within the CI/CD.  I use…
Srujan Panuganti - PeerSpot reviewer
An excellent open source, software hosting solution that provides strong version control functionality and a user-friendly interface
We use this solution to host our software, and where we need to develop new features and new functionality, we create new branch from our existing software, work on our branch, develop it, test it, validate it, and then merge it with the master or main software The best thing about this solution…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features are the scripts used for migration purposes and to create new repository releases."
"The tool's UI is better."
"We have approximately 300 to 400 users using this solution. Our whole organization uses it. I rate the scalability of Bitbucket an eight out of ten."
"The most valuable feature of Bitbucket is its capabilities."
"Its key strength lies in securing and centralizing code repositories."
"Bitbucket is definitely a tool to consider if somebody is still on CVS. It is a great tool and well integrated with Bamboo."
"Bitbucket is very secure and easy to handle compared to GitLab."
"The setup of Bitbucket is simple."
"So far, the product has been stable. Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight to nine out of ten."
"The setup process is pretty simple."
"Git is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"We use the tool to store codes."
"The most valuable feature of Git is the ease of tracking in time what the snapshot of the code was at a particular moment. The versioning is good."
"Git's learning curve is shallow, making the solution easy to use after a few tutorials."
"The scalability of the solution is good."
"The repository management and check-in/check-out commands are the most valuable features for ensuring secure code."
 

Cons

"Bitbucket's stability isn't flawless. It has crashed on me occasionally, but I haven't yet lost anything after a crash."
"The installation of Bitbucket on our server was not as easy as other Atlassian products, so it is something that can be improved."
"It would be beneficial to have a straightforward mechanism for integrating the initial tasks defined in Bitbucket with Jira when the need arises."
"Bitbucket could improve pipeline building and deployment. Our deployments are not using the Bitbucket. Deployments we are going through Azure DevOps, but the integration is happening in Bitbucket."
"Bitbucket could improve its security. For example, the user access security could improve."
"The online documentation isn't sufficient for configuration at an enterprise level. If new issues arise, vendor support may be necessary."
"I would like to see the tool's desktop version."
"In terms of the commits, we currently create a pull request, however, we are not able to assign any. This could be an area for improvement."
"The tool is complicated for a beginner. You need to have some training to use it. It is also hard to find a parameter."
"In our company, we sometimes feel the need to have certain kinds of reports, but we never get those customized reports in Git's dashboard."
"The scalability could be better. I think it requires some discipline to have large teams working on the same project without facing problems merging code. I'm using Git for personal projects, but I know companies face merge conflicts when more than one person is working on code simultaneously."
"The solution works perfectly fine so far."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing model of Git."
"I would like more documentation."
"The main problem for me is the frequent upgrades in the solution because every other upgrade is a minefield. When you do the upgrade, there is always something that doesn't work."
"We would like to see tutorials added to the product, for new users to follow so that they can optimize their use of the solution."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the price from Bitbucket a four out of five."
"When you increase from ten people to anything higher the price increase to one thousand five hundred. That is unsatisfactory and they should have a gradual price slope."
"Bitbucket may be perceived as costly for smaller companies."
"I rate the pricing a seven out of ten because it is expensive."
"We find that the pricing is very affordable."
"I did not pay for the license as I was using a corporate license. But I think the pricing is fair."
"You have to buy additional licenses when you exceed 50 users."
"Sometimes there are issues in obtaining licenses and the pricing could be improved."
"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."
"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."
"We use the open-source version."
"The platform is less expensive."
"The tool is an open-source product."
"I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version."
"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge."
"The tool is free."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
49%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket?
It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitbucket?
Pricing is not based on low cost. It's based on the quality and satisfaction of the services provided. We are not comparing Bitbucket's pricing with GitLab.
What needs improvement with Bitbucket?
I am not able to recollect any new suggestions. In terms of the commits, we currently create a pull request, however, we are not able to assign any. This could be an area for improvement.
What do you like most about Git?
You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.
What needs improvement with Git?
There is nothing that could be improved at this time.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Oscar Insurance, Fugro Roames, Splunk, Rakuten, Red Giant, Met Office, Trulia, Onfido, TriNet, Orbitz Worldwide, Ames Research Center, Sotheby's
Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbucket vs. Git and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.