Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitbucket vs Git comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket
Ranking in Version Control
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Git
Ranking in Version Control
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket is 15.9%, down from 35.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 11.4%, up from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Bitbucket15.9%
Git11.4%
Other72.7%
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

VinodKumar9 - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Developer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Integrated task tracking has improved code collaboration and now supports secure, controlled delivery
The integration with Jira is a feature I really appreciate in Bitbucket because it allows for easy task management integration, which is very beneficial. Bitbucket provides strong Jira integration, which is essential for our client who uses Jira for task management. This integration helps streamline processes and has built-in CI/CD pipelines, private repositories, and provides solid support for managing tasks effectively. The CI/CD pipeline in Bitbucket streamlines our development process as we need built-in pipelines, which are available and easy to use. Bitbucket maintains code quality through branch permissions that alert you if you are pushing directly and there are branch protections or conflicts. It enforces naming conventions for branches, making it secure and easy to manage. Security-wise, Bitbucket has good features such as private repositories, access controls, authentication requirements, and secure pull requests, ensuring safety at various levels. The initial setup for Bitbucket is easy as I log in with the company email to access a workspace. Creating repositories follows a straightforward process involving setting permissions and branch creation.
Vijaya Das - PeerSpot reviewer
Director - Technical Product Management at Visa
A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments
Scalability is something I haven't experienced. So, a bigger team in my company looks after the scalability aspect of the solution. Therefore, I will not be the right person to rate it from a scalability perspective. Around 200 users are using Git in my company. I am not the right person to comment on whether the solution's usage rate will increase in the future.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We can watch the newly implemented code. So it's quite nice to organize the teams to see what part of the work is done and what part of the code is already old or new. It is very good for that kind of management."
"Bitbucket is feasible and friendly compared to Visual Studio DevOps on the Microsoft platform."
"We have a couple of different tools that allow us to tie source code changes to report bugs. It's integrated with a bug tracking system and also integrated with what requires a tracking system. So we have better facilities. We get with the command line and can type all that stuff in and get the same kind of trust, but when we d it all manually, it's not likely to happen."
"The setup was okay, and it was well-integrated."
"It seems to be quite scalable."
"The most valuable thing we have found is the workloads are good in Jira and we are able to control the access."
"It is easy to write code and store it in the central repository."
"The tool's UI is better."
"Git is easy to manage...It is helpful for me and easy to manage the interface we are using from development to production."
"The best thing about this solution is that it can be learned very quickly, and used very easily."
"The setup process is pretty simple."
"The implementation is easy."
"I believe it is beneficial to maintain a detailed log or history of who did what to a project and which user committed to the change."
"The most valuable feature of Git is its reliability and user popularity."
"The scalability of the solution is good."
"Git is easy to use."
 

Cons

"The product could be less expensive for small companies."
"Bitbucket can improve by integrating a tool to manage conflict code. This would save time."
"It goes well with other Atlassian solutions like Jira or Bamboo, but integration with other third-party solutions is more complex."
"I would like to see the tool's desktop version."
"I think the developers are constantly working on improving the pull requests support."
"I think the configuration can be improved because it is getting more complicated and not very well organized."
"The tool offers a limited pipeline structure."
"Bitbucket doesn't currently offer AI functionalities."
"The solution could improve by having more customization."
"The solution works perfectly fine so far."
"There is nothing that could be improved at this time."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"If the file changes are on the same line, we need to resolve a merge conflict manually. Let's say there is a merge conflict on line 50 because we have multiple commits on the same line number. Git could add some artificial intelligence to resolve the conflict automatically."
"The platform could have a feature for monitoring data recovery similar to Azure."
"The GUI needs to be improved."
"I believe there is room for improvement in preventing work loss due to conflicts or overwriting. Another area for improvement could be implementing features for automated code verification within Git."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When you increase from ten people to anything higher the price increase to one thousand five hundred. That is unsatisfactory and they should have a gradual price slope."
"Bitbucket may be perceived as costly for smaller companies."
"Bitbucket is a cost-effective solution. It is the cheapest in the market. It is lower than GitLab and GitHub."
"Licensing is on a monthly basis, it's available on our website. They have a free version, the pro version and then they have an enterprise version, and we're using a kind of the middle of the pro version for about $7 per user per month."
"When it comes to licensing we have the standard plan."
"I rate Bitbucket's pricing a five out of ten."
"We have approximately 40 licenses for Bitbucket."
"Sometimes there are issues in obtaining licenses and the pricing could be improved."
"The platform is less expensive."
"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."
"There are some extra costs to Git, but it depends on your use case."
"I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version."
"Git is completely free."
"The tool is an open-source product."
"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."
"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Manufacturing Company
19%
Marketing Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business22
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise22
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise21
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket?
It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitbucket?
Pricing is not based on low cost. It's based on the quality and satisfaction of the services provided. We are not comparing Bitbucket's pricing with GitLab.
What needs improvement with Bitbucket?
Bitbucket has less community support compared to GitHub, which has many users. However, if you are already using Jira, Bitbucket becomes a natural choice. Bitbucket has limitations such as communit...
What needs improvement with Git?
There is nothing that could be improved at this time.
What is your primary use case for Git?
I use Git to store our code and maintain different versions, and for some projects, we use CI/CD as part of GitHub.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Oscar Insurance, Fugro Roames, Splunk, Rakuten, Red Giant, Met Office, Trulia, Onfido, TriNet, Orbitz Worldwide, Ames Research Center, Sotheby's
Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbucket vs. Git and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.