GitHub vs Helix Core comparison

GitHub and Perforce are both solutions in the Version Control category. GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.0, while Perforce is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.0. GitHub holds a 6.9% mindshare in VC, compared to Perforce’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Perforce users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 94 GitHub reviews

1,524 Views
619 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Helix Core

Read 6 Helix Core reviews

336 Views
155 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub

Helix Core

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Helix Core and GitHub are competing products in the version control domain. GitHub seems to have an upper hand due to its robust feature set, making it worthwhile despite higher pricing.

Features: Helix Core is known for its scalability, effectively handling large file versions, extensive collaboration capabilities, and comprehensive functionality for versioning and managing large files. GitHub offers an integrated development environment with powerful collaboration tools, seamless integration with third-party services, and advanced security features, enhancing its appeal for diverse project requirements.

Room for Improvement: Helix Core could improve in its integration capabilities with other tools and modern cloud services, simplification of its user interface, and expanding its range of third-party integrations. GitHub might enhance its on-premises support for enterprises preferring non-cloud solutions, improve its native support for large binary files, and offer more personalized support options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Helix Core provides an on-premises deployment model tailored for large-scale enterprises with solid customer support. Meanwhile, GitHub's cloud-based model offers greater accessibility and ease of deployment. However, Helix Core's personalized approach to customer service stands out for some enterprises.

Pricing and ROI: Helix Core offers a cost-effective setup with positive ROI outcomes for large enterprises. GitHub, while potentially more expensive, justifies its cost through comprehensive features and integration capabilities, indicating a strong ROI for companies that leverage its full potential.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. Helix Core Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Helix Core

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (7th)

Helix Core

Ranking in Version Control

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of GitHub is 6.9%, up from 6.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Helix Core is 2.4%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Daniel Kirschner

Technical Lead, Methods & Tools at Volkswagen

Configuration management features improve workflow but require a steep learning curve

I need to work more with Helix Core to identify specific areas for improvement. However, it has an extensive feature set that leads to a steep learning curve, where users need to learn quite a bit of features to work with it effectively. While its customization is not an issue, the GUI might not appeal to everyone.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Has great integration with third-party tools."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the version control field."

"You can write the code with AI. But when it comes to implementation, you must upgrade the bits of code that will support this and generate solutions based on that architecture. Then, you need comparable code bits. Therefore, AI can propose how much a specific function can be better optimized. So, AI can help stakeholders reach tasks quicker."

"GitHub is the best tool for source repositories."

"The features that I have found most valuable are that it can support you for most of the road map and it can automate some tasks which works really well with collaboration with the teams. They are really interested in how they organize the history of the code itself which is good."

"The most valuable features are GitHub Actions for triggering workflows, GitHub Secrets for saving credentials without needing a third-party service, and the UI for identifying errors in the code when we commit."

"I like the CI/CD features."

"Even if I'm not in the office, I can access and work on my code from anywhere with my account credentials."

More GitHub pros

"I find the configuration management features of Helix Core particularly valuable."

"The customer service and support are excellent."

Cons

"The GUI design is poor, so I exclusively use the CLI, which is much easier to use and understand. It would be great to see the GUI updated to be more user-friendly."

"Our firewall was blocking cloning and downloading with SSH."

"There is a bit of a learning curve."

"If it had all of the end-to-end integration, then we probably wouldn't have any doubts about what we have installed. However, at this point, we're still trying to figure out how to use it end-to-end."

"It would be beneficial if GitHub provided some security scanning for new libraries to ensure that there are no viruses in it."

"GitHub could add some more security features."

"I think one area where GitHub could improve is its search and navigation functionality within repositories. For example, we use IDEs like IntelliJ or Visual Studio Code when developing code. These IDEs allow us to easily navigate from one piece of code to another file where a method is being called. It would be really helpful if the solution could add this navigation feature."

"The solution's cost is high and should be reduced."

More GitHub cons

"It has an extensive feature set that leads to a steep learning curve, where users need to learn quite a bit of features to work with it effectively."

"However, it has an extensive feature set that leads to a steep learning curve, where users need to learn quite a bit of features to work with it effectively."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

"There are no licensing fees for the features that we use."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I am not aware about the pricing, so I will not be able to give feedback.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area. We have used GitHub mainly for the code generation part. That is the only...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Helix Core?

Pricing is relatively moderate at three to four out of ten. I find this cost justified for the capabilities provided by the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Helix Core?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Helix Core?

We use Helix Core in our software development processes as a configuration management solution. Our typical use cases include system-level configuration management, versioning software, and managin...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 16% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Git vs Helix Core

Compared 67% of the time

Bitbucket vs Helix Core

Compared 33% of the time

More Helix Core Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

June 2025

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Software Configuration Management

June 2025

Download Helix Core product report

Also Known As

No data available

Perforce

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Perforce, the Fast Software Configuration Management System, is a tool that versions and manages source code and digital assets for enterprises. Perforce is easy to install, learn and administer; seamlessly handles distributed development; and supports developers across a large number of platforms. Perforce ensures development integrity by grouping multi-file updates into atomic changes, enables concurrent development, and intelligently manages multiple software releases using its Inter-File Branching system.

Perforce

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Intuit, Disney, Nvidia, Ubisoft, Samsung, Vmware, Adidas, Pixar, salesforce.com, EA

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Helix Core

June 2025

Free Report: GitHub vs. Helix Core

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. Helix Core and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. Helix Core report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.