Apache Subversion vs Git comparison

Read 38 Git reviews

1,057 Views
1,057 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Apache Subversion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Apache Subversion and Git compete in the version control systems category. Git seems to have the upper hand due to its flexibility and powerful features, despite appreciation for Apache Subversion's stability and simplicity.

Features: Apache Subversion offers atomic commits, directory versioning, and efficient handling of binary files. Git provides a distributed system, branching capabilities, and speed which gives it a notable advantage for advanced control needs.

Room for Improvement: Apache Subversion needs better handling of merging conflicts and more modern integrations. Git users find its command set complex and face occasional performance issues in very large repositories.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apache Subversion is straightforward to deploy with dependable customer support. Git deployment is well-regarded but more complex to configure. Git's customer service is effective but varies by provider.

Pricing and ROI: Apache Subversion involves lower setup costs, providing strong ROI through reliability. Git may have higher initial costs but offers significant ROI due to its advanced features and performance gains.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Subversion vs. Git Report (Updated: July 2025).

Apache Subversion vs. Git

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Subversion

Ranking in Version Control

10th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Git

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Apache Subversion is 2.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 9.5%, up from 7.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Vijay Londhe

Assistant Programmer at Mahadis

Enables centralized code management but lacks modern CI/CD integrations

There is room for improvement in Apache Subversion, especially when comparing it with other version control systems such as GitHub or GitLab, where many improvements could be made. Improvements I would like to see in Apache Subversion include configurations, customizations, and functionalities such as those provided by GitHub Actions for immediate pipeline triggers, as well as the version controlling and CI/CD platform offered by GitLab. In future updates of Apache Subversion, I would like to see CI/CD integrations as well as build and deployment servers. The lack of latest features includes basic requirements such as pull requests, CI/CD platform integration, and artifact storage such as GitHub packages, which it does not offer.

Read full review

Grazvydas Govaras

Senior Solution Architect at Danske

Helps to store and version the code

We use the solution for code management to store and version the code. It is the standard service we use for developing applications and infrastructure services You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches. I would like to see less updates with the product. I…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes."

"Apache Subversion is a scalable solution."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"Git is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access."

"You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches."

"The most valuable feature of Git is its ability to track updates, such as firmware documentation. Additionally, many people can make changes to code without problems. It is able to solve conflicts very easily."

"What I find the most valuable about Git is that it is CLI and GUI-supported. People who do not like using the CLI mode can use the GUI mode."

"The tool's most valuable feature is branch workflows."

"The features I am most impressed by is the automation."

More Git pros

Cons

"The most valuable feature is CLI."

"Apache Subversion should be easier to use."

"The lack of latest features includes basic requirements such as pull requests, CI/CD platform integration, and artifact storage such as GitHub packages, which it does not offer."

"I believe there is room for improvement in preventing work loss due to conflicts or overwriting. Another area for improvement could be implementing features for automated code verification within Git."

"If the file changes are on the same line, we need to resolve a merge conflict manually. Let's say there is a merge conflict on line 50 because we have multiple commits on the same line number. Git could add some artificial intelligence to resolve the conflict automatically."

"It would be preferable if the updates could be completed at a faster pace."

"More security is always welcome in my opinion."

"If the solution could provide more language support options such as Korean, it would be helpful."

"Some challenges arise when Git is not used correctly, particularly in managing branches. It's easy to get lost, but these challenges can be overcome with proper management. A common advice is maintaining the repository and ensuring developers are in sync with the production branch. Branches should be promptly merged into development to avoid getting lost in many branches."

"There is nothing that could be improved at this time."

"If another person raises a pull request under the same ID assigned to the previous person, and both parties modify the tool, their changes will be grouped together in the same request until it is closed, which is an issue."

More Git cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's price is good."

"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."

"The platform is less expensive."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"Git is an open-source software."

"Git is completely free."

More Git pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache Subversion?

We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Subversion?

I am satisfied with the pricing and licensing cost of Apache Subversion; it is very low compared to other products.

What needs improvement with Apache Subversion?

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

GitHub vs Apache Subversion

Comparisons

Compared 43% of the time

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Apache Subversion

Compared 34% of the time

Bitbucket vs Apache Subversion

Compared 23% of the time

More Apache Subversion Competitors

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 38% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 14% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 12% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

More Git Competitors

Product Reports

Download Apache Subversion product report

Version Control

August 2025

Download Git product report

August 2025

Overview

The Apache LuceneTM project develops open-source search software, including Lucene Core (provides Java-based indexing and search technology), Solr (a high performance search server built using Lucene Core), Open Relevance Project (a subproject with the aim of collecting and distributing free materials for relevance testing and performance) and PyLucene (a Python port of the Core project)

Apache

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Sample Customers

IBM, General Electric, Amazon, HP, Facebook, Bank of America, American Express, AT&T, Nike, PayPal, Wells Fargo, Best Buy, Tesla Motors, Citi, The Home Depot

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse