No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Apache Subversion vs Git comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.0
Apache Subversion offers a cost-free solution for small teams but lacks ROI compared to Bitbucket's CI/CD integrations.
Sentiment score
1.0
Git significantly boosts productivity and efficiency, widely adopted as an essential and effective free development tool with positive ROI.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
Apache Subversion users often rely on community support and online resources, rating direct support between 5 to 8 out of 10.
Sentiment score
4.5
Git users rely on online resources and community support, with mixed satisfaction due to limited formal customer service options.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
5.5
Apache Subversion is scalable, supporting multiple instances and accommodating 10-20 users per instance, and is well-rated for scalability.
Sentiment score
4.8
Git is highly regarded for scalability and reliability, suitable for both small teams and large collaborative projects, despite merging challenges.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
4.5
Feedback on Apache Subversion's stability is mixed, with ratings ranging from six to eight out of ten.
Sentiment score
8.4
Git is praised for its stability, reliability, and bug-free performance, with users noting its exceptional branching and commit features.
Git's reliable branching model and fast commits stand out along with its stability over time.
Ed Tech Project Manager at Aulab
 

Room For Improvement

Apache Subversion users seek improved merging, ease of use, and features like CI/CD integration and customized configurations akin to GitHub.
Git needs a more intuitive interface, improved documentation, enhanced security, streamlined onboarding, and simplified pricing to satisfy users.
 

Setup Cost

Apache Subversion is valued by enterprises for being open-source, cost-effective, and providing quality without licensing fees.
Git is cost-effective for enterprises, with open-source access and optional affordable subscriptions like GitLab for additional features.
 

Valuable Features

Apache Subversion provides centralized version control, easy collaboration, and integration capabilities, enhancing code management and team productivity.
Git enables collaborative development with branch management, version control, secure repositories, automation, and strong community support.
When a critical bug appeared in production, Git's history and diff made it easier to identify the exact commit that introduced the issue and rollback safely without disrupting the ongoing development.
Ed Tech Project Manager at Aulab
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache Subversion
Ranking in Version Control
10th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Git
Ranking in Version Control
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Apache Subversion is 4.8%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 18.4%, up from 9.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Git18.4%
Apache Subversion4.8%
Other76.8%
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Vijay Londhe - PeerSpot reviewer
Assistant Programmer at Mahadis
Enables centralized code management but lacks modern CI/CD integrations
There is room for improvement in Apache Subversion, especially when comparing it with other version control systems such as GitHub or GitLab, where many improvements could be made. Improvements I would like to see in Apache Subversion include configurations, customizations, and functionalities such as those provided by GitHub Actions for immediate pipeline triggers, as well as the version controlling and CI/CD platform offered by GitLab. In future updates of Apache Subversion, I would like to see CI/CD integrations as well as build and deployment servers. The lack of latest features includes basic requirements such as pull requests, CI/CD platform integration, and artifact storage such as GitHub packages, which it does not offer.
Davide Cariola - PeerSpot reviewer
Ed Tech Project Manager at Aulab
Branching has streamlined collaboration and now ensures safer, accountable code changes
I feel that the best features of Git are its reliable branching model and fast commits. The ability to track every change with a full history and accountability is invaluable. Git's branching model and change tracking have helped my projects significantly, especially in a recent multi-developer Laravel project where several features were developed in parallel. By isolating each feature on its own branch, the team avoided conflicts and could review work incrementally. When a critical bug appeared in production, Git's history and diff made it easier to identify the exact commit that introduced the issue and rollback safely without disrupting the ongoing development. This combination of isolated branches, clear commit history, and reliable rollback capability kept the project stable while allowing fast iteration. Git has positively impacted my organization by standardizing collaboration, reducing integration conflicts, and making parallel development far more efficient. The branching model allowed teams to work independently without blocking each other. The clear commit history improved code reviews and accountability.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Marketing Services Firm
10%
Construction Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise21
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Subversion?
I am satisfied with the pricing and licensing cost of Apache Subversion; it is very low compared to other products.
What needs improvement with Apache Subversion?
There is room for improvement in Apache Subversion, especially when comparing it with other version control systems such as GitHub or GitLab, where many improvements could be made. Improvements I w...
What is your primary use case for Apache Subversion?
The typical use case for Apache Subversion is to store the application code repositories, which is how we use this product in our company. For multiple projects, we are using Apache Subversion, and...
What needs improvement with Git?
Git works perfectly as is. The CLI works well with Git, and I don't have any recommendations about it.
What is your primary use case for Git?
My main use case for Git is for versioning and controlling and sharing my code. In a recent Laravel project, I used Git to manage versioning and collaboration by adopting a branching strategy. Spec...
What advice do you have for others considering Git?
The best advice that I can give is that you have to treat Git as a core part of the development process and not just as a storage tool. This way it leads to cleaner collaboration, safer experimenta...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IBM, General Electric, Amazon, HP, Facebook, Bank of America, American Express, AT&T, Nike, PayPal, Wells Fargo, Best Buy, Tesla Motors, Citi, The Home Depot
Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Subversion vs. Git and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.