Apache Subversion vs GitHub comparison

Read 94 GitHub reviews

1,524 Views
619 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apache Subversion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Apache Subversion and GitHub operate in the version control systems category. GitHub has the upper hand due to its robust features and comprehensive collaborative platform.

Features: Apache Subversion offers centralized version control that enables linear development and reliable data tracking, handles large files, and provides advanced branching capabilities. GitHub provides distributed version control, social coding features including pull requests and fork management, and seamless integration with third-party services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apache Subversion is straightforward to deploy in local environments but may need more time for managing centralized repositories. Its traditional support model is efficient but lacks modern collaboration tools. GitHub’s cloud-based deployment simplifies setup and offers extensive online resources and community support.

Pricing and ROI: Apache Subversion is appealing for budget-conscious organizations due to its minimal setup costs, delivering reliable performance in controlled environments. GitHub, with a higher initial investment, offers significant returns through enhanced productivity and integration capabilities, with its feature set justifying the pricing for teams focused on collaboration and innovation.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Subversion vs. GitHub Report (Updated: June 2025).

Apache Subversion vs. GitHub

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Subversion

Ranking in Version Control

10th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Apache Subversion is 1.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 6.9%, up from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Vijay Londhe

Assistant Programmer at Mahadis

Enables centralized code management but lacks modern CI/CD integrations

There is room for improvement in Apache Subversion, especially when comparing it with other version control systems such as GitHub or GitLab, where many improvements could be made. Improvements I would like to see in Apache Subversion include configurations, customizations, and functionalities such as those provided by GitHub Actions for immediate pipeline triggers, as well as the version controlling and CI/CD platform offered by GitLab. In future updates of Apache Subversion, I would like to see CI/CD integrations as well as build and deployment servers. The lack of latest features includes basic requirements such as pull requests, CI/CD platform integration, and artifact storage such as GitHub packages, which it does not offer.

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Apache Subversion is a scalable solution."

"We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes."

"The product has a good UI. It's simple and easy to access, and technical help is easily available. The two-factor authentication security is another valuable feature."

"I find the most valuable collaboration between our peers to be a seamless collaboration between our peers. We can connect and change our code, allowing us to be agile in our projects. Since we're talking about DevOps, we're using Jenkins in our pipeline. It helps speed up the process by automating the DevOps workflow."

"We are finding GitHub is very stable."

"I use this solution to store my code in a repository so we can manage version control which is useful."

"GitHub allows us the option to push files from a non-UA method or directly upload files from the UA. You can integrate GitHub with Jenkins to do CI/CD."

"It is very helpful, time saving, and user-friendly."

"Complication free with good ability for third-party integrations."

"This product allows us to easily collaborate on development tasks with our subcontractors, and control the workflow as the project progresses."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"The most valuable feature is CLI."

"Apache Subversion should be easier to use."

"The lack of latest features includes basic requirements such as pull requests, CI/CD platform integration, and artifact storage such as GitHub packages, which it does not offer."

"I think it would be valuable to have more security. Some of the data is very open to everyone."

"The storage for this solution could be improved."

"GitHub uses basic configuration, but messaging is not clear."

"The sign in process is a bit difficult."

"GitHub could expand the limits of the free version."

"There could be more integration into Azure."

"There is nothing that I find that needs improvement in GitHub."

"The solution's cost is high and should be reduced."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's price is good."

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"The price of this solution is reasonable."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache Subversion?

We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Subversion?

The tool's price is good.

What needs improvement with Apache Subversion?

The tool's deployment is complex.

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I am not aware about the pricing, so I will not be able to give feedback.

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area. We have used GitHub mainly for the code generation part. That is the only...

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Apache Subversion

Comparisons

Compared 35% of the time

Bitbucket vs Apache Subversion

Compared 28% of the time

More Apache Subversion Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 16% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Rational ClearCase vs GitHub

Compared 3% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Version Control

Download Apache Subversion product report

Download GitHub product report

Overview

The Apache LuceneTM project develops open-source search software, including Lucene Core (provides Java-based indexing and search technology), Solr (a high performance search server built using Lucene Core), Open Relevance Project (a subproject with the aim of collecting and distributing free materials for relevance testing and performance) and PyLucene (a Python port of the Core project)

Apache

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

IBM, General Electric, Amazon, HP, Facebook, Bank of America, American Express, AT&T, Nike, PayPal, Wells Fargo, Best Buy, Tesla Motors, Citi, The Home Depot

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Apache Subversion vs. GitHub