Checkmarx One vs GitHub comparison

Read 93 GitHub reviews

2,347 Views
1,098 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Checkmarx One and GitHub compete in the software development security industry. GitHub seems to have the upper hand due to its integration capabilities with third-party tools and version control functionalities, which are key strengths in a collaborative development environment.

Features: Checkmarx One is equipped with a range of tools for identifying code vulnerabilities, such as SAST and application tracking, along with incremental scanning capabilities and support for multiple languages. GitHub is known for its version control capabilities, seamless third-party tool integration, and project organization features. It also benefits from its open-source nature, which encourages community-driven innovation.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One could benefit from reducing false positives and expanding language support. Additionally, enhancing its user interface and exploring more flexible pricing models would be advantageous. GitHub could improve user-friendliness, particularly in handling code conflicts, and enhance support documentation for beginners.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One offers deployment flexibility across on-premises, private, and public clouds but receives mixed feedback on technical support, highlighting a need for quicker resolutions. GitHub efficiently deploys on public and hybrid clouds with a straightforward setup, often requiring minimal customer service due to its user-friendly nature and strong community support.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One is priced as a premium product, which reflects its extensive security offerings and generally results in a favorable ROI through improved security and development cycles. GitHub offers cost-effectiveness, particularly with its free tier for open-source projects, and its competitive pricing makes it accessible for wider use while maintaining a collaborative, secure environment.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. GitHub Report (Updated: April 2025).

Download the complete report

Checkmarx One vs. GitHub

April 2025

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Application Security Tools

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (24th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (4th), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (10th)

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 10.3%, down from 14.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code

We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Helps us check vulnerabilities in our SAP Fiori application."

"The most valuable feature is that it actually identifies the different criteria you can set to meet whatever standards you're trying to get your system accredited for."

"It allows for SAST scanning of uncompiled code. Further, it natively integrates with all key repos formats (Git, TFS, SVN, Perforce, etc)."

"Less false positive errors as compared to any other solution."

"Both automatic and manual code review (CxQL) are valuable."

"Overall, the ability to find vulnerabilities in the code is better than the tool that we were using before."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is that its number of false positives is less than the other security application platforms. Its ease of use is another good feature. It also supports most of the languages."

"One of the most valuable features is it is flexible."

More Checkmarx One pros

"The product's initial setup phase is easy but it is always good to connect with GitHub's team that manages APIs."

"The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code."

"The product helps our team collaborate across different locations."

"The learning curve is small."

"The most valuable feature is help offered by the community for open-source projects."

"GitHub is the best tool for source repositories."

"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"Checkmarx being Windows only is a hindrance. Another problem is: why can't I choose PostgreSQL?"

"I would like to see the DAST solution in the future."

"We are trying to find out if there is a way to identify the run-time null values. I am analyzing different tools to check if there is any tool that supports run-time null value identification, but I don't think any of the tools in the market currently supports this feature. It would be helpful if Checkmarx can identify and throw an exception for a null value at the run time. It would make things a lot easier if there is a way for Checkmarx to identify nullable fields or hard-coded values in the code. The accessibility for customized Checkmarx rules is currently limited and should be improved. In addition, it would be great if Checkmarx can do static code and dynamic code validation. It does a lot of security-related scanning, and it should also do static code and dynamic code validation. Currently, for security-related validation, we are using Checkmarx, and for static code and dynamic code validation, we are using some other tools. We are spending money on different tools. We can pay a little extra money and use Checkmarx for everything."

"Checkmarx needs to improve the false positives and provide more accuracy in identifying vulnerabilities. It misses important vulnerabilities."

"In terms of dashboarding, the solution could provide a little more flexibility in terms of creating more dashboards. It has some of its own dashboards that come out of the box. However, if I have to implement my own dashboards that are aligned to my organization's requirements, that dashboarding feature has limited capability right now."

"The Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) feature should be better."

"We have received some feedback from our customers who are receiving a large number of false positives."

"The reports are good, but they still need to be improved considering what the UI offers."

More Checkmarx One cons

"Specifically, I want the solution to offer AI-based merging support, as it is the only area where the product has certain shortcomings."

"GitHub should provide more integration in their next release, including integrating with Jenkins, CI/CD and Jira."

"It is difficult to merge a code or restore it to an older version."

"It would be beneficial if GitHub provided some security scanning for new libraries to ensure that there are no viruses in it."

"I would want to see some form of code security scanning implemented."

"This solution could be improved if migration was fully automated to make it easy, for example, to migrate repositories into GitHub."

"GitHub could add some more security features."

"From the recruiting standpoint, I would like to see email IDs and phone numbers and a brief introduction about their profile."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Checkmarx is comparatively costlier than other products, which is why some of the customers feel reluctant to go for it, though performance-wise, Checkmarx can compete with other products."

"We're using a commercial version of Checkmarx, and we paid for the solution for one year. The price is high and could be reduced."

"The price of Checkmarx could be reduced to match their competitors, it is expensive."

"For around 250 users or committers, the cost is approximately $500,000."

"Most of my customers opted for a perpetual license. They prefer to pay the highest amount up front for the perpetual license and then pay for additional support annually."

"This solution is expensive. The customized package allows you to buy additional users at any time."

"It's relatively expensive."

"We have a subscription license that is on a yearly basis, and it's a pretty competitive solution."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"GitHub is an open-source product, but when using the free-to-use version, anyone can see the code we're working on."

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Comparisons

Compared 39% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Download Checkmarx One product report

Checkmarx One

May 2025

Download GitHub product report

May 2025

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent