

Acunetix and Checkmarx One provide solutions focused on application security. Checkmarx One appears to have an advantage in terms of feature richness, which justifies its higher cost, while Acunetix is praised for its support and effective pricing.
Features: Acunetix offers comprehensive scanning capabilities that ensure reliable vulnerability detection and are easy to use. Checkmarx One provides advanced code analysis features that give developers deeper insights into security issues, with extensive functionality that supports complex security needs.
Room for Improvement: Acunetix users indicate a need for improved scan speed and enhanced integration options. They also seek better documentation for complex configurations. Checkmarx One users desire a more simplified configuration process, reduced learning curve, and enhanced user interface for easier navigation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix offers a straightforward deployment process accompanied by robust customer support, facilitating seamless implementation. Checkmarx One requires greater technical knowledge for setup but is supported by comprehensive assistance, which helps alleviate initial setup challenges for technical teams.
Pricing and ROI: Acunetix is appreciated for its cost-effectiveness combined with a good return on investment due to competitive pricing. Checkmarx One, with a higher upfront cost, offers substantial long-term benefits and is considered a worthwhile investment for users seeking detailed feature sets.
It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.
I have seen a return on investment, as Acunetix helps reduce the man-days and effort needed for scanning bulk applications through automated assessments.
I have seen a return on investment with Acunetix, including time saved and cost reduction, because it provides us threats on our web application servers.
Overall, between the fast scanning, automation, automatic reporting, and easy detection, it has reduced manual effort enough that we did not need an extra reviewer, even as our codebase or team size grew.
Based on my interactions with the clients, I can tell that there is a return on investment because if something is not profitable and it's not helping to save costs or vulnerabilities, clients wouldn't come back to renew their license year after year.
For high-severity issues, they reach out within two to three hours, and for critical issues, a response is received within 15 minutes.
The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.
Support staff not being familiar with the problem.
If you raise a support case with Checkmarx, it is handled smoothly.
The customer support team is amazing and they provide on-phone call, email support, and on-website support.
I have relied on Checkmarx One customer support hundreds of times for several things, and Checkmarx One support is very proactive and very responsive.
Acunetix can handle increasing workloads and more applications easily.
Acunetix's scalability for my growing needs is great; it is a very scalable product compared to others.
Approximately four billion lines of code are being scanned monthly.
Since it is cloud-based, the infrastructure and PaaS, IaaS, and SaaS are taken care of by the cloud marketplace.
Checkmarx One's scalability has changed my organization because the strong collaboration between the development and security team helps us to do things much faster.
I did not need to reach customer support because the product is very stable.
I would rate the stability of this solution a nine on a scale of 1 to 10 where one is low stability and 10 is high.
Checkmarx One is often down when the cloud provider experiences issues.
The main concern is related to false positives; Acunetix needs to work on identifying valid and invalid findings.
Acunetix should have better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps.
I believe Acunetix can improve customer support, as the dedicated support staff are often unfamiliar with problems and troubleshooting, leading to communication gaps that delay issue resolution.
Integration into the IDE being used would be beneficial so that code does not need to be uploaded to the website and an IDE-friendly report could be generated.
It could suggest how the code base is written and automatically populate the source code with three different solution options to choose from.
If you can improve the speed optimization, it takes around 30 to 40 minutes for checking a build. If you can make it within five minutes or 10 minutes, that would be great.
The pricing cost is affordable for small and mid-sized organizations, and when compared to Checkmarx, it is significantly affordable, as Checkmarx is quite expensive.
We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.
The pricing of Acunetix is pretty expensive and could be improved.
For a small team under 50 developers, normal expenses come under 30 to 60K.
Due to the number of years I've implemented Checkmarx One, there are rebates and discounts from the OEM which makes it a lot more profitable.
The pricing should be reasonable, matching what we are paying for.
Its most valuable role is in enhancing security by identifying potential vulnerabilities efficiently.
The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.
The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers.
Since replacing the previous tool, SAST and SCA scans are conducted in a couple of minutes instead of hours or days.
The best features Checkmarx One offers, over the past years, include broad language and technical support that Checkmarx provides, covering most languages.
Checkmarx One has positively impacted our organization as we tend to find vulnerabilities very early in the development cycle.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Checkmarx One | 9.9% |
| Acunetix | 2.1% |
| Other | 88.0% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 32 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 46 |
Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.
Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.
Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:
Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.