No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

ASP.NET vs Adobe Flash [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Flash [EOL]
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ASP.NET
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
.NET Development Services (2nd)
 

Featured Reviews

Arpit Raj Senapati - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer Trainee at Inaho Digital Solutions
Easy to set up with good functionality and adaptability.
I'm not sure how it could be better. It has everything I need for my work. It would be ideal if there was more research on the product available. We'd like it to have solutions within the product that can help us complete tasks a bit faster. It would be nice if the solution had some sort of bot or assistant within the solution to help us with work within the product. If we could deploy queries and get an answer faster, within 30 minutes, instead of within a day or two.
SasidharParupudi - PeerSpot reviewer
Principle Consultant at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Building reliable web APIs and sites has become faster and development stays well supported
I think Microsoft can make ASP.NET better by catching up with other frameworks by adopting features that are very popular in those frameworks, such as minimal APIs and other innovations. They have introduced Blazor, which is their newer front-end development software framework, but unfortunately, Blazor is not well adopted in the market. However, I feel that they will catch up in the future as Blazor has a lot of potential. In my opinion, there is not anything extra needed immediately for ASP.NET; the framework is self-sufficient and very mature at this stage. The problem lies with wider adoption, as some people are anti-Microsoft and prefer open-source alternatives such as React. Microsoft could potentially do a better job at marketing these solutions, but other than that, the tool has the potential to be used in any enterprise-level applications. I would say the setup process for ASP.NET is relatively simple, but with the latest generation of user management or integration with OpenID, the documentation is not comprehensive in terms of what you can do with the latest libraries. They support many things and have decoupled themselves from their own identity servers, but still need to improve documentation considerably.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I am impressed with the tool’s documentation."
"With the alliance with Microsoft, the product is perfectly integrated."
"The UI is really good."
"Without Adobe Flash player, I wouldn't be able to do my day-to-day functions."
"Adobe Flash is simple and easy-to-use software. It is very familiar and compatible with other Adobe software, making it easier to use."
"ASP.NET works well with Windows applications and more generally, the Windows platform."
"I have found the entity framework to be a valuable feature. The authentication layer is amazing as well. ASP.NET has a vibrant community, and as a result, we haven't had the need to contact technical support."
"The most valuable feature of ASP.NET is its visual side, which makes building Windows forms applications visually efficient."
"The developer support for ASP.NET is a big positive. It's actually very good, and since there are so many people who use ASP.NET, it's easy to get responses to questions about ASP.NET in the broader community."
"It's a pretty stable solution."
"The ability to customize ASP.NET is valuable, with a great community and the way the framework is built around customizable components, configurations, dependency injection, security, and excellent documentation."
"While using ASP.net, we can create interactive websites."
"My feedback about ASP.NET modular frameworks is that it is one of the fastest frameworks available in the market, which helps in optimizing resources and makes the APIs respond faster."
 

Cons

"It would be nice to have more integration and faster integration."
"It would be ideal if there was more research on the product available."
"At times it can be slow, but other than that it is a great and helpful product."
"Adobe can focus on the gaming side mode."
"It would be nice to see Adobe Flash as a separate application instead of embedding it with other apps. I want the product to be a simple app. The product’s scalability is also one of its weak points."
"ASP.NET is a very slow tool, and it should be faster."
"Not best for SEO out of the box."
"There are frameworks such as Blazor that have been injected into it, or there are lots of new things such as cloud-enabled services or mobile app functionality which do not yet have enough documentation on how to implement them, though Microsoft provides good online documentation."
"The most important thing to improve in the next release would be support in tooling and high-level designer toolbox for cross-platform mobile app development."
"The pages are relatively large and hence may be slow."
"Improving the project ready templates will add a great amount of value."
"Performance is an area that can always be improved."
"The technology to integrate with cloud information could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool’s pricing is fair."
"The price is okay so far."
"This is a free solution. However, we have some server licensing costs which are not directly a cost of using the solution."
"The solution requires a licensing fee but is worth the investment."
"The pricing is somewhere in the middle. Not too expensive, but not the cheapest either."
"The price of ASP.NET is reasonable. I rate the pricing a five out of ten."
"I think ASP.NET, in deployment, is something that's quite costly when you're on a cloud provider such as Azure, and you have to pay the server cost. On average, it can cost approximately $1,000 per month to host a good site with a few databases."
"The solution is free to use."
"The solution is comparatively cheaper, and you don't have to pay anything for a developer license."
"ASP.NET is open-source and free of charge."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which .NET Development Services solutions are best for your needs.
920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Outsourcing Company
14%
Construction Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Performing Arts
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business16
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise13
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ASP.NET?
Our solution is deployed in a hybrid setup; we have some on-site on a private cloud and some on Azure. Most of our costing comes from database licensing, as we use SQL Server, which has very costly...
What needs improvement with ASP.NET?
With the Aspire project, the community is working well on third-party tools for integration, but as a framework, it is solid for almost all normal use cases. For some advanced use cases, I do not s...
What is your primary use case for ASP.NET?
I am mainly developing backend solutions, microservices, and monolithic web backends with ASP.NET.I tried Angular and Blazor; I worked with Angular a long time ago, but I worked with a small projec...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Flash
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

France T_l_visions, Globaloria, Mixamo, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Kienzle Automotive GmbH, Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Vengo Labs, Oneview Healthcare, BookedOut, Ministry of Rural Development, Grupo WRR
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Zend, Harman and others in .NET Development Services. Updated: October 2026.
920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.