ASP.NET vs Adobe Flash [EOL] comparison

Adobe and Microsoft are both solutions in the .NET Development Services category. Additionally, 100% of Adobe users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Adobe Flash [EOL]

Read 5 Adobe Flash [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

ASP.NET

Read 35 ASP.NET reviews

899 Views
881 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Adobe Flash [EOL]

ASP.NET

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ASP.NET and Adobe Flash [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cognosys Inc Hardened Images, Harman and others in .NET Development Services.

To learn more, read our detailed .NET Development Services Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

.NET Development Services

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Flash [EOL]

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ASP.NET

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

.NET Development Services (2nd)

Featured Reviews

Arpit Raj Senapati

Software Engineer Trainee at Inaho Digital Solutions

Easy to set up with good functionality and adaptability.

I'm not sure how it could be better. It has everything I need for my work. It would be ideal if there was more research on the product available. We'd like it to have solutions within the product that can help us complete tasks a bit faster. It would be nice if the solution had some sort of bot or assistant within the solution to help us with work within the product. If we could deploy queries and get an answer faster, within 30 minutes, instead of within a day or two.

Read full review

SasidharParupudi

Principle Consultant at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Building reliable web APIs and sites has become faster and development stays well supported

I think Microsoft can make ASP.NET better by catching up with other frameworks by adopting features that are very popular in those frameworks, such as minimal APIs and other innovations. They have introduced Blazor, which is their newer front-end development software framework, but unfortunately, Blazor is not well adopted in the market. However, I feel that they will catch up in the future as Blazor has a lot of potential. In my opinion, there is not anything extra needed immediately for ASP.NET; the framework is self-sufficient and very mature at this stage. The problem lies with wider adoption, as some people are anti-Microsoft and prefer open-source alternatives such as React. Microsoft could potentially do a better job at marketing these solutions, but other than that, the tool has the potential to be used in any enterprise-level applications. I would say the setup process for ASP.NET is relatively simple, but with the latest generation of user management or integration with OpenID, the documentation is not comprehensive in terms of what you can do with the latest libraries. They support many things and have decoupled themselves from their own identity servers, but still need to improve documentation considerably.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The UI is really good."

"Without Adobe Flash player, I wouldn't be able to do my day-to-day functions."

"I am impressed with the tool’s documentation."

"Adobe Flash is simple and easy-to-use software. It is very familiar and compatible with other Adobe software, making it easier to use."

"With the alliance with Microsoft, the product is perfectly integrated."

"It's a pretty stable solution."

"I have found the entity framework to be a valuable feature. The authentication layer is amazing as well. ASP.NET has a vibrant community, and as a result, we haven't had the need to contact technical support."

"The solution has good scalability."

"The most valuable feature of ASP.NET is its visual side, which makes building Windows forms applications visually efficient."

"I would say that we have seen a return on investment when it comes to this solution."

"While using ASP.net, we can create interactive websites."

"It is easy to install ASP.NET on your laptop."

"We use ASP.NET to develop web applications and web API. I'm working at a government financial institution in Mexico that helps citizens buy a house"

More ASP.NET pros

Cons

"It would be nice to have more integration and faster integration."

"It would be ideal if there was more research on the product available."

"At times it can be slow, but other than that it is a great and helpful product."

"It would be nice to see Adobe Flash as a separate application instead of embedding it with other apps. I want the product to be a simple app. The product’s scalability is also one of its weak points."

"Adobe can focus on the gaming side mode."

"I'd like to be able to run any application from a specific point instead of compiling all the code. For example, if I want to test function A, I should be able to test it even if my other functions aren't working. Like in SQL, you provide parameters to the function, and it executes. I'd like to see something similar in ASP.NET."

"You are required to have knowledge of C#."

"In my opinion, this solution should improve their web toolkit."

"Sometimes it can be really difficult to debug using ASP.NET. When there's an issue, trying to find out the cause is not always easy, so debugging is the top area for improvement, in my opinion."

"Sometimes we have issues with instability and it crashes, which is something that should be made to work better."

"An area for improvement is the structure template."

"It should be open source or deployable to any operating system so that the dependency can be removed."

"In the future, I would like to see more AI and machine learning technologies made available in libraries."

More ASP.NET cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool’s pricing is fair."

"The price is okay so far."

"The solution requires a licensing fee but is worth the investment."

"ASP.NET is not an expensive solution."

"ASP.NET is open-source and free of charge."

"I think ASP.NET, in deployment, is something that's quite costly when you're on a cloud provider such as Azure, and you have to pay the server cost. On average, it can cost approximately $1,000 per month to host a good site with a few databases."

"The pricing is somewhere in the middle. Not too expensive, but not the cheapest either."

"The price of ASP.NET is reasonable. I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"The solution is free to use."

"The pricing is a bit high and I believe that it can be brought down."

More ASP.NET pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which .NET Development Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Performing Arts

17%

Marketing Services Firm

15%

Real Estate/Law Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ASP.NET?

Our solution is deployed in a hybrid setup; we have some on-site on a private cloud and some on Azure. Most of our costing comes from database licensing, as we use SQL Server, which has very costly...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ASP.NET?

With the Aspire project, the community is working well on third-party tools for integration, but as a framework, it is solid for almost all normal use cases. For some advanced use cases, I do not s...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ASP.NET?

I am mainly developing backend solutions, microservices, and monolithic web backends with ASP.NET.I tried Angular and Blazor; I worked with Angular a long time ago, but I worked with a small projec...

See all answers

Comparisons

Adobe AIR SDK vs Adobe Flash [EOL]

Compared 54% of the time

More Adobe Flash [EOL] Competitors

Microsoft Visual Studio vs ASP.NET

Compared 100% of the time

More ASP.NET Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

.NET Development Services

January 2026

Download Adobe Flash [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

ASP.NET

February 2026

Download ASP.NET product report

Also Known As

Flash

No data available

Overview

The Adobe Flash Platform is the leading web design and development platform for creating expressive applications, content, and video that run consistently across operating systems and devices and reach over 98% of Internet-connected desktop users. The Flash Platform consists of an integrated set of technologies - including client runtimes, tools, frameworks, services, and servers - that provide everything you need to deliver applications, content, and high-definition video to the widest possible audience.

Adobe

ASP.NET is a free web framework for building web sites, apps and services with HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

France T_l_visions, Globaloria, Mixamo, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Kienzle Automotive GmbH, Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Vengo Labs, Oneview Healthcare, BookedOut, Ministry of Rural Development, Grupo WRR

Buyer's Guide

.NET Development Services

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cognosys Inc Hardened Images, Harman and others in .NET Development Services. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.

We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.