ADOIT vs erwin Evolve comparison

BOC Group and Quest Software are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. BOC Group is ranked #10 with an average rating of 10.0, while Quest Software is ranked #14. BOC Group holds a 2.5% mindshare in AM, compared to Quest Software’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BOC Group users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

ADOIT

Read 2 ADOIT reviews

896 Views
896 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

erwin Evolve

Read 19 erwin Evolve reviews

1,706 Views
1,194 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

ADOIT

erwin Evolve

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

erwin Evolve and ADOIT compete in the enterprise architecture management field. erwin Evolve leads in data management capabilities and user reviews, while ADOIT stands out in integration and customization, catering to businesses with specific needs.

Features: erwin Evolve offers comprehensive data modeling, business process modeling, and a user-friendly interface. ADOIT provides powerful analytics, superior integration possibilities, and a customizable approach.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: erwin Evolve is known for a smooth deployment process and strong customer support that addresses issues quickly. ADOIT offers flexible deployment and extensive support, enriching the implementation experience. erwin Evolve is recognized for a quicker onboarding process.

Pricing and ROI: erwin Evolve has a favorable setup cost, attractive for organizations balancing price and functionality, offering high ROI through its comprehensive data features. ADOIT may require a higher initial investment but provides significant ROI with customizable features catering to specific business needs. The decision often depends on the importance of initial costs versus long-term adaptability and customization benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed ADOIT vs. erwin Evolve Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ADOIT vs. erwin Evolve

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ADOIT

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

10th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

erwin Evolve

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of ADOIT is 2.5%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of erwin Evolve is 3.3%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ADOIT	2.5%
erwin Evolve	3.3%
Other	94.2%

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer1289670

Solution Architect at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

A good tool that's great for modelling and building heat maps

During the first 18 months, for at least three months, we tried to get some training. We started working on the modeling part and we are still evolving in this tool. There are a few recommendations that have been put to the vendor, and we've gotten some answers and the team is evolving the tool in this space. I don't have anything to complain about right now, although there are a few things that we are discussing with the team who is connecting with the vendor to get that resolved. Specifically, we need to understand how the data could be segregated. We need to know how the enterprise-level metadata and master data could be managed in this tool. There are multiple open questions.

Read full review

Asish Sahu

SPM at Infosys

The reverse engineering capabilities are quite useful.

Evolve is primarily focused on the entity's licenses diagrams, but it would be nice if erwin could integrate case development, so that it shows the ER diagram plus certain inputs on the use cases and how the data is used. That deviates somewhat from the overall scope, so maybe they could call it a different product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool allows us to track the life cycle of products and resources. When the metadata is set up correctly, we can see where things are in their life cycle and how they fit into our processes. It helps us understand which core processes are active and whether any underlying elements need renewal. We can also keep tabs on the costs."

"It helps me to model the architecture at an enterprise level."

"The initial setup was really straightforward and the deployment was done within one day."

"I have not seen capabilities for web-sharing and interaction with the architecture from any other supplier. It's a great capability..."

"Evolve's reverse engineering ability is quite useful."

"Evolve is like a tank. You can do whatever you want with the solution, but you need to customize it. I think that it's not very aligned with the framework for enterprise architecture. MEGA is focused on these enterprise architectures, but it's only for that. With Evolve, you can do everything you want with professional services."

"By placing the data and the metadata into a model, which is what the tool does, you gain the abilities for linkages between different objects in the model, linkages that you cannot get on paper or with Visio or PowerPoint. That is a huge discriminator."

"You can use different kinds of diagrams to represent the architecture setting."

"Forward and reverse engineering were valuable features."

"The most valuable features for us are impact analysis, where I can easily visualize the impact of change."

More erwin Evolve pros

Cons

"The tool's data lineage could be enhanced. It would be great to see the data flow and understand where it's going within the system."

"We need to understand how the data could be segregated."

"I feel that the UML drawing capability needs to be improved."

"If it had fewer features to model all kinds of architecture, it would be less complicated."

"The way that we are using it for application management, we have several KPIs. We want to follow and monitor them regarding a number of solutions. We cannot calculate this today. We would like real-time calculations along with the KPIs in order to improve the user experience. We would like the tool to be able to display this, not only as signals, but as charts."

"erwin Evolve by Quest could have additional features to manage the architecture of enterprises and businesses."

"Business process modelling could be improved."

"With the Excel importing, the "up to date" part is the challenge. If we had a real-time integration, we could keep things up to date for whatever kinds of change points we had. With Excel, it is more that you have to export from one system then import it to another, so it's better for data that doesn't change that often."

"I would like it to be easier to make changes and then deploy them into production, especially when you have multiple web servers or front-ends. It would be nice to make a change and then have it propagate to the production servers in a more automated fashion."

"I would like to see an improvement in the output of the solution."

More erwin Evolve cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I use ADOIT's open-source version."

"On a yearly basis, our licensing costs are 50,000 euro. There are no additional costs because we are on a SaaS model."

"The licensing enables you to differentiate between people who edit the content and the people who consume it. We are able to keep the licensing costs down by keeping the "contributor" licenses to a minimum, and we then just roll out the content in a read-only version for the rest of our users."

"Yearly, our cost is €100,000."

"I think erwin is quite expensive. I have difficulty selling the portal, in fact."

"Unless you are a one person shop – always go with the Workgroup edition and Concurrent licensing."

"I estimate that we pay between $40,000 and $50,000 a year for the solution, not including the upfront costs to buy things the first time."

"The cost is something like $15,000, per license. But I haven't looked at those numbers in three years. It was over $100,000 to initially set everything up and get it all configured."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Government

Energy/Utilities Company

University

Computer Software Company

19%

Performing Arts

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ADOIT?

The tool's data lineage could be enhanced. It would be great to see the data flow and understand where it's going within the system.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ADOIT?

The solution describes the enterprise architecture for the company, encompassing everything from the business side to the technical aspects.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ADOIT?

The tool is still being integrated into our enterprise architecture. It serves as a tool for gathering and providing information, but it hasn't yet directly solved a critical business issue for me....

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

LeanIX vs ADOIT

Compared 22% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs ADOIT

Compared 17% of the time

Ardoq vs ADOIT

Compared 15% of the time

OrbusInfinity vs ADOIT

Compared 11% of the time

More ADOIT Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs erwin Evolve

Compared 11% of the time

SAP PowerDesigner vs erwin Evolve

Compared 8% of the time

IDERA ER/Studio vs erwin Evolve

Compared 7% of the time

erwin Data Modeler vs erwin Evolve

Compared 6% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs erwin Evolve

Compared 5% of the time

More erwin Evolve Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

February 2026

Download ADOIT product report

Buyer's Guide

erwin Evolve

February 2026

Download erwin Evolve product report

Also Known As

No data available

erwin EA, erwin Business Process, erwin Enterprise Architecture

Overview

ADOIT Enterprise Architecture suite is users' best-rated tool for deriving data-driven insights and architecture analysis, trusted by SMEs and large corporations worldwide. ADOIT helps you to take smart and fast decisions, manage digital portfolios, discover cross-functional dependencies and drive growth. ADOIT is intuitive, powerful, and flexible. It is the ultimate way to do EA. You can start building your outcome-driven EA initiative already today, as the cloud-based ADOIT:Community Edition is available for free. For more information please visit: www.boc-group.com/en/adoit

BOC Group

erwin Evolve provides comprehensive graphical support for handling large data models. It offers features such as metadata access, version control, and model comparison, enhancing operational reports and system analytics through its collaborative web-driven design.

erwin Evolve facilitates reverse engineering and database integration, fostering collaboration and process exploration through its web interface. Customizable and easy to configure, it supports workflow configuration and architectural modeling. Users can utilize its capabilities for developing industry models, managing transformation programs, and presenting standard operating procedures. Despite its strengths, there are demands for improved integration, enhanced UML support, and a more modern user experience. Users also express challenges with legacy system updates and call for better connectors and collaborative features.

What are the key features of erwin Evolve?

Graphical Support for Large Data Models: Provides visualization capabilities for complex data structures.
Metadata Access via API: Allows integration and management of metadata across platforms.
Version Control and Model Comparison: Enhances tracking and analysis of model changes.
Collaborative Web Interface: Facilitates teamwork and process exploration remotely.
Architectural Modeling: Supports the design and configuration of enterprise architecture.

What are the benefits and ROI of using erwin Evolve?

Customization and Ease of Configuration: Reduces setup time and adapts to specific organizational workflows.
Enhanced Accessibility and Mobile Usability: Offers access to critical information on the go.
Operational Reports Creation: Generates insights and facilitates informed decision-making.
System Analytics Handling: Provides robust tools for analyzing system performance and integration.

Data-driven organizations in sectors like finance and healthcare implement erwin Evolve for data warehousing, enterprise architecture, and business process modeling. They leverage its capabilities for cataloging architectural elements, linking to CMDBs, analyzing system interfaces, and describing business processes. Utilization extends to IT solution registration, business capability planning, and strategic modeling, with frequent deployments on cloud platforms to support transformation initiatives.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Trusted by small to large enterprises worldwide: Volksbank Vienna, Austrian Ministry of Finance, Hilti

AT&T, Bank of America, Chevron, Duke University, ESPN, Fidelity, GE, JP Morgan Chase, KPMG, McGraw Hill, NASA, Pfizer, Royal Bank of Scotland, Teradata, Union Pacific, Vodafone, Wells Fargo.

Buyer's Guide

ADOIT vs. erwin Evolve

February 2026

Free Report: ADOIT vs. erwin Evolve

Find out what your peers are saying about ADOIT vs. erwin Evolve and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ADOIT vs. erwin Evolve report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.