Aerospike Database 7 vs MongoDB comparison

Aerospike and MongoDB are both solutions in the NoSQL Databases category. Aerospike is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while MongoDB is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.1. Aerospike holds a 3.6% mindshare in ND, compared to MongoDB’s 14.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Aerospike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of MongoDB users who would recommend it.

Aerospike Database 7

Read 1 Aerospike Database 7 review

502 Views
372 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MongoDB

Read 81 MongoDB reviews

3,151 Views
1,638 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Aerospike Database 7

MongoDB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aerospike Database 7 and MongoDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, ScyllaDB, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases.

To learn more, read our detailed NoSQL Databases Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aerospike Database 7

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MongoDB

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (5th), Managed NoSQL Databases (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Aerospike Database 7 is 3.6%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MongoDB is 14.7%, down from 25.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Manikandan Gunasekaran

Director of Engineering at Ola

Boost authentication and session management with reliable and fast data handling

There is a lot of technical debt in our company, and we need to update to the latest versions. The lack of automation in upgrading clusters from development to production is a concern. A tool for automatically handling such upgrades would reduce operational huddle. Additionally, it would be beneficial if Aerospike had a community version to encourage broader adoption and experimentation.

Read full review

Uzair Faruqi

Head Of Analytics at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Transforms data flow with adaptable schema and smooth public cloud deployment

One of our business units uses MongoDB, and we developed an ETL pipeline that extracts data from MongoDB and transfers it into our data warehouse MongoDB is a NoSQL database that is similar to a document database. It offers flexibility in schema adaptation, allowing us to change the schema and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It shows better compression and compaction, which is valuable."

"MongoDB is scalable and stable. The initial setup is very easy, and deployment and maintenance can be done by one person."

"Easier to maintain the data with its document-based storage."

"It's super easy to develop a couple of solutions for clients with MongoDB, like a quick web page with no clear data structure that they need to spin up quickly to validate some sort of MDTP."

"MongoDB is cool. There is a difference between relational databases and newer databases like MongoDB. MongoDB is scalable and fast."

"The solution does not hold data in tabular format like SQL does but rather clusters data so that it can link on a large scale."

"It's easy to add and remove things in MongoDB. You can alter the tables. MongoDB is faster at reading, slower at writings."

"One of the most valuable features is the ability to Text Search can be used anywhere and anytime."

"Sharding is an excellent feature of MongoDB."

More MongoDB pros

Cons

"The lack of automation in upgrading clusters from development to production is a concern."

"The free tools, like MongoDB Compass, could be enhanced."

"Actually, with MongoDB, it's difficult to calculate the return on investment; it's too expensive for our use."

"There was a need for integrating relational database capabilities, however, MongoDB has introduced a relational converter that allows conversion between SQL and NoSQL."

"At the start, connecting to the database via Compass or through a direct ID was a challenge."

"The auto transaction feature is something that I found a little bit problematic. If we want to run two or three transactions at a time, we get write conflicts. So, it becomes really difficult when concurrency comes into the picture."

"More stable indexes would be helpful in a future release. That's been an issue for some time. I don't know if it's been fixed now but we transitioned to it because we needed a search index to be able to search for things and if that goes or starts disappearing, we have to move away from that solution. I don't know if they fixed it, last time I had this issue was three years ago so they might have solved it."

"Data encryption is possible using third-party tools but they should have their own encryption capability built-in to this solution."

"The product's data consistency could be more efficient than traditional SQLs."

More MongoDB cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use around half a TB of data and spend approximately $36,000 to $40,000 USD per year on Aerospike."

"There is an annual subscription for the use of this solution."

"You only have to pay for the paid version, not the open-source version."

"At the moment, all customers are using the community version."

"It's a community edition, so we do not pay anything."

"The pricing is normal. Price-wise, the product is not too much expensive."

"I currently use the solution's community edition which is free."

"The solution is open source so is free."

"There are different licenses available to be purchased, such as individual, premium, or enterprise."

More MongoDB pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aerospike Database 7?

We use around half a TB of data and spend approximately $36,000 to $40,000 USD per year on Aerospike.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aerospike Database 7?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Aerospike Database 7?

Aerospike is mainly used as the first step for authentication, authorization, and session persistence in our organization. It is a critical part of our workflow, as without it, we wouldn't be able ...

See all answers

What do you like most about MongoDB?

MongoDB's approach to handling data in documents rather than traditional tables has been particularly beneficial.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB?

We use the free version of MongoDB, so there are no licensing costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MongoDB?

There is room for improvement in integrating MongoDB with agentive AI solutions. While solutions for other databases like SQL or PostgreSQL ( /products/postgresql-reviews ) already exist, MongoDB r...

See all answers

Comparisons

ScyllaDB vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 31% of the time

Neo4j Graph Database vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 16% of the time

Apache HBase vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 15% of the time

Cassandra vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 11% of the time

Couchbase vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 8% of the time

More Aerospike Database 7 Competitors

InfluxDB vs MongoDB

Compared 14% of the time

Couchbase vs MongoDB

Compared 9% of the time

Cassandra vs MongoDB

Compared 8% of the time

Milvus vs MongoDB

Compared 8% of the time

Qdrant vs MongoDB

Compared 5% of the time

More MongoDB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

June 2025

Download Aerospike Database 7 product report

Buyer's Guide

MongoDB

June 2025

Download MongoDB product report

Overview

Aerospike is an enterprise-class, NoSQL database solution for real-time operational applications that delivers predictable performance at scale, superior uptime, and high availability at the lowest Total Cost of Ownership compared to first-generation NoSQL and relational databases.

Aerospike

MongoDB is a flexible and scalable NoSQL database solution that efficiently handles both structured and unstructured data. It is known for its ease of use, JSON capabilities, and efficient data handling, making it ideal for developer-friendly environments.

MongoDB stands out with features like sharding, geospatial indexing, and its open-source nature. Users find it fast and appreciate its seamless integration into different applications. Despite being powerful, it remains straightforward to set up and use, bolstered by a clustering and aggregation framework that enhances its functionality. While generally appreciated for its cost-effectiveness and broad application compatibility, there is room for improvement in security, enterprise integration, and the creation of more robust training and documentation resources. Enhancing performance and adding support for traditional relational database concepts could also prove beneficial.

What are MongoDB's most important features?

Scalability: Efficiently manages growing data volumes.
Flexibility: Supports structured and unstructured data with ease.
Sharding: Distributes data across multiple servers.
Geospatial Indexing: Enables location-based data handling.
Open-source: Wide community support and customization.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Cost-effectiveness: Reduces overall database management expenses.
Ease of Use: Simplifies database setup and maintenance.
Developer-friendly: Accelerates application development with supportive tools.
Scalable Solutions: Adapts to evolving business requirements.

MongoDB finds widespread application across industries like healthcare, logistics, and telecommunications. It efficiently powers IoT platforms, data analytics, and document management systems. Its schema flexibility and JSON storage capabilities make it ideal for real-time processing and multi-server databases, essential for handling large-scale data volumes in modern applications.

MongoDB

Sample Customers

AppNexus, Adform, KAYAK, Williams-Sonoma Inc., The Trade Desk, GREE, BlueKai, Chango CTO, InMobi, Yashi, eXelate CTO, Snapdeal, adMarketplace, Tapad, Komli Media, Neustar, So-net Media Networks, IMHO Vi, Vizury

Facebook, MetLife, City of Chicago, Expedia, eBay, Google

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, ScyllaDB, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.