No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Amazon AWS CloudSearch vs Elastic Search comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon AWS CloudSearch
Ranking in Search as a Service
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Elastic Search
Ranking in Search as a Service
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
100
Ranking in other categories
Indexing and Search (1st), Cloud Data Integration (5th), Vector Databases (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Search as a Service category, the mindshare of Amazon AWS CloudSearch is 5.5%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Elastic Search is 16.2%, down from 18.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Search as a Service Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Elastic Search16.2%
Amazon AWS CloudSearch5.5%
Other78.3%
Search as a Service
 

Featured Reviews

HM
Software Developer at ECFY Consulting Private Limited
Search workflows have become faster and our team manages operational records more efficiently
Improvements for Amazon AWS CloudSearch can be made, but I will first start with the biggest improvement. The biggest improvement area is that Amazon AWS CloudSearch feels a little older compared to newer AWS services. The second thing about improvement is the documentation. The documentation could definitely be refreshed with more practical examples and troubleshooting scenarios. During setup, a few indexing issues took longer to diagnose because error messages were pretty generic. Better debugging visibility would reduce trial-and-error work. Monitoring is decent through Amazon CloudWatch, but I would like more detailed search-level diagnostics out of the box. Sometimes it is not obvious why certain queries rank results differently unless you manually test a lot. More transparent query analysis, indexing, and insights would be useful. Logging exists, but deeper visibility would help during optimization.
reviewer2817942 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Logging and vector search have transformed observability and empowered reliable ai agents
Elastic Search is not specifically being used for certain purposes. I deploy Elastic Search database on the cloud and use cloud services so that nobody can attack. However, I do not use Elastic Search to resolve attack issues. The basic main purpose of Elastic Search, as of now, I feel it can do more in the AI area. Sometime I saw that when I am developing RAG and have to generate the embeddings, which I call metadata, sometimes it tries to fail. That durability or issue handling should be improved, but apart from that, I did not find anything as of now. As per my use case, whatever I am using seems pretty good. Apart from that, some definitely improvement will be there. One improvement is that it should be faster. Whenever I am searching any logs, it takes much time. For example, if I open my log in Notepad or a similar tool, I can search the text within a second. With Elastic Search, it takes a little bit of time, ten to fifteen seconds. That can be improved. Sometimes, engineers take time to assign when I create a ticket.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It will remain alive in the market. The solution will be stable in the market."
"The best feature is its scalability in that Cloud is always on the fly."
"It's the best solution for any company. It has a hosting ERP system for any task. AWS is stable. AWS is more flexible and its elastic concept is a new concept. AWS is also very secure. It has many layers of security, like hardware security and software security. This is a big issue."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon AWS CloudSearch is the cloud aspect. I do not need to have the physical infrastructure, everything is in the cloud."
"There are plenty of services from the database, with many valuable features, good scalability and agility, okay pricing, good solution quality, strong optimization, and customization that can work with any other cloud platforms."
"Storage of photos and files which can be accessed anyplace, anytime, extremely quickly."
"It is remarkably efficient and beneficial."
"AWS CloudSearch's best features are good performance under high CPU and memory use, and ease of deployment and scaling."
"The product is scalable with good performance."
"The solution has a lot of features; they have machine learning jobs they can implement, I'm not there yet, but I can use anomaly detection to see there are various processes that can find users that aren't supposed to log onto certain machines."
"Overall, considering key aspects like cost, learning curve, and data indexing architecture, Elasticsearch is a very good tool."
"The solution has great scalability."
"The AI-based attribute tagging is a valuable feature."
"Using real-time search functionality to support operational decisions has been helpful."
"There's lots of processing power. You can actually just add machines to get more performance if you need to. It's pretty flexible and very easy to add another log. It's not like 'oh, no, it's going to be so much extra data'. That's not a problem for the machine. It can handle it."
"Elastic Search, being a vector database, quickly indexes data, allowing for searches based on text and data directly, which I found fascinating."
 

Cons

"The price of the solution can be expensive."
"Latlon data type only supports single value per document. All other types support multiple values. We faced issues with this because we had scenarios where, for each document, we needed to store multiple latlon values for different geographical locations."
"We'd like to see more database features."
"The biggest improvement area is that Amazon AWS CloudSearch feels a little older compared to newer AWS services."
"A reboot should be enhanced."
"Maybe they are common in Egypt, but you should make a request on Amazon to create a function to monitor CPU performance, memory, and files. It is very difficult in AWS. I would tell them it should be simple, just drag and drop. I think they could develop this option so we can drag and drop to monitor performance of the processor and memory."
"In terms of what needs improvement, I would say that it needs to keep its cost competitive in the market, especially in comparison to other clouds."
"Regarding the period of propagation on CDN servers, sometimes we update photos or files and we don't see the update instantly. We need to wait for sometime, which is quite boring because we may be setting up a marketing campaign which is related to the product's photo and we need to wait to start."
"Elasticsearch should have simpler commands for window filtering."
"This is not exactly a stable solution, which is why we are considering another compatible tool, and whether we go on with Elasticsearch or change it."
"There should be more stability."
"Elastic Enterprise Search can improve by adding some kind of search that can be used out of the box without too much struggle with configuration. With every kind of search engine, there is some kind of special function that you need to do. A simple out-of-the-box search would be useful."
"More AI would be beneficial. I would also appreciate more simplicity in dashboards."
"New Relic could be more flexible, similar to Elasticsearch."
"Elastic Enterprise Search's tech support is good but it could be improved."
"This product could be improved with additional security, and the addition of support for machine learning devices."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There was no license needed to use this solution."
"Amazon AWS CloudSearch charging is based on how many resources you consume or and the solution is known to be a bit expensive."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one point is cheap, and ten points are expensive, I rate the pricing as medium or reasonable."
"I'm not sure how much we pay a year. It might be around $30,000 a year."
"Our license costs around $4,000 per month."
"We chose AWS because of its cost and stability."
"In comparison to IBM and Microsoft, the pricing is more favorable."
"It can move from $10,000 US Dollars per year to any price based on how powerful you need the searches to be and the capacity in terms of storage and process."
"we are using a licensed version of the product."
"The version of Elastic Enterprise Search I am using is open source which is free. The pricing model should improve for the enterprise version because it is very expensive."
"We use the free version for some logs, but not extensive use."
"There is a free version, and there is also a hosted version for which you have to pay. We're currently using the free version. If things go well, we might go for the paid version."
"We are using the free open-sourced version of this solution."
"The pricing model is questionable and needs to be addressed because when you would like to have the security they charge per machine."
"ELK has been considered as an alternative to Splunk to reduce licensing costs."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Search as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
12%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Educational Organization
8%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Outsourcing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business40
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise50
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon AWS CloudSearch?
We purchased Amazon AWS CloudSearch through the AWS Marketplace. Pricing was understandable once we estimated indexing volume and query traffic. Though it can grow if you scale instances aggressive...
What needs improvement with Amazon AWS CloudSearch?
Improvements for Amazon AWS CloudSearch can be made, but I will first start with the biggest improvement. The biggest improvement area is that Amazon AWS CloudSearch feels a little older compared t...
What is your primary use case for Amazon AWS CloudSearch?
The main use case for us was to search the operational records from our company databases and perform full-text search across operational records and uploaded documents. We needed something where u...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ELK Elasticsearch?
The pricing for Elastic Search is mainly budgeted according to the organization budget, so we take it as a yearly subscription, and that is acceptable since we do get a fair discount when we are ta...
What needs improvement with ELK Elasticsearch?
When we get the logs, it is mostly about how we edit the configurations and how we make changes according to the requirements of our organization. In these cases, the logs sometimes can be a bit in...
What is your primary use case for ELK Elasticsearch?
I am the Elastic Search admin for my organization, and we are using Elastic Search to handle the traffic to GCP. The monitoring of all the clusters and all the deployments are quite good, and compa...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Elastic Enterprise Search, Swiftype, Elastic Cloud
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

SmugMug
T-Mobile, Adobe, Booking.com, BMW, Telegraph Media Group, Cisco, Karbon, Deezer, NORBr, Labelbox, Fingerprint, Relativity, NHS Hospital, Met Office, Proximus, Go1, Mentat, Bluestone Analytics, Humanz, Hutch, Auchan, Sitecore, Linklaters, Socren, Infotrack, Pfizer, Engadget, Airbus, Grab, Vimeo, Ticketmaster, Asana, Twilio, Blizzard, Comcast, RWE and many others.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon AWS CloudSearch vs. Elastic Search and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.