Amazon DynamoDB vs Neo4j AuraDB comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Neo4j are both solutions in the Managed NoSQL Databases category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while Neo4j is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.9. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 10.6% mindshare in MND, compared to Neo4j’s 5.3% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Neo4j users who would recommend it.

Amazon DynamoDB

Read 45 Amazon DynamoDB reviews

1,253 Views
1,253 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Neo4j AuraDB

Read 8 Neo4j AuraDB reviews

634 Views
634 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Amazon DynamoDB

Neo4j AuraDB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 15, 2026

Amazon DynamoDB and Neo4j AuraDB are both highly competitive in the field of database solutions, each offering unique advantages suited to different needs. Amazon DynamoDB is particularly strong due to its high scalability and seamless integration with AWS services, making it suitable for large-scale infrastructures, while Neo4j AuraDB excels with its graph database capabilities, which are ideal for managing complex relationships in data.

Features: Amazon DynamoDB stands out for its automated scaling, fast performance, and integration with the AWS ecosystem. Its key-value store allows scalability without needing a fixed schema, which is ideal for applications requiring rapid adaptation. Neo4j AuraDB offers powerful graph database functionalities, excelling in relationship-centric data models and providing a dedicated Cypher query language for efficient querying and data management. The platform's ability to handle complex relationships makes it highly valuable for tasks involving intricate data connectivity.

Room for Improvement: Amazon DynamoDB could enhance its capabilities in advanced querying which currently may limit complex data analysis. Improving transaction management features and reducing costs could also make it more competitive. Neo4j AuraDB could improve its service lifecycle management, ensuring better communication with users regarding service suspensions and transitions. Enhancing migration processes and providing clearer guidance in the user interface could significantly improve user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Neo4j AuraDB is praised for its straightforward, cloud-based deployment process tailored for graph-specific applications, while offering robust support. Amazon DynamoDB benefits from extensive AWS resources and documentation, making deployment manageable across varied distributed infrastructures. However, its customer support could be enhanced by offering more personalized service options.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon DynamoDB uses a pay-as-you-go model that efficiently scales with usage, beneficial for managing variable workloads. This presents a cost-effective solution for enterprises needing scalable infrastructure. Neo4j AuraDB, on the other hand, offers competitive pricing, particularly advantageous for graph-based data analysis, which can lead to higher ROI in projects where understanding complex data relationships is critical to business success.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon DynamoDB vs. Neo4j AuraDB Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon DynamoDB vs. Neo4j AuraDB

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon DynamoDB

Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Neo4j AuraDB

Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Managed NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Amazon DynamoDB is 10.6%, down from 18.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Neo4j AuraDB is 5.3%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed NoSQL Databases Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Amazon DynamoDB	10.6%
Neo4j AuraDB	5.3%
Other	84.1%

Managed NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

DeepakGurung

Lead SRE at JavaTech

Has improved infrastructure availability and simplified integration through reliable cloud-based data management

Amazon DynamoDB is readily available, and we do not have to worry about downtime unless there is a global outage. From a cost perspective, it presents a challenge. The primary feature is constant availability without concerns about server maintenance or ensuring database uptime, as AWS manages everything from their end. We simply set up the database and allocate it to customers according to their requirements, making it an easy and smooth transition. Regarding security, being in the cloud provides numerous security features. Amazon DynamoDB operates at the backend within our three-tier architecture. We have front hosting, business logic or application server in the middle, and databases at the backend. Additionally, we implement security layers such as SSL, creating a highly secure environment. The solution has proven to be reliable thus far.

Read full review

Jeff Dalgliesh

Founder at data2

Room for improvement in interface capabilities while rapidly solving domain-specific problems

Neo4j AuraDB is a great tool for understanding connections between things. The best features Neo4j AuraDB offers are that it is easy to quickly build a solution with their tooling. Regarding the tooling, I love how fast it is that you can use NeoDash to quickly mock up a UI, and it is really nice that you can build a GraphQL endpoint to connect it to third-party applications, such as Retool or custom applications that we build for clients. Neo4j AuraDB has impacted my organization positively as it has helped me solve problems much more quickly. A specific example of a problem I solved more quickly with Neo4j AuraDB is that I was able to work with an LLM to build graph data models for domain-specific problems. The collaboration with the LLM and Neo4j AuraDB sped up my process as I'm building a tool on top of Neo4j that allows me to control how I can access data in the graph, and Neo4j had a nice interface that allowed us to work with their underlying data model.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon DynamoDB is easy to use because of its nature of scaling and IO, and everything is very fast."

"Offers a vital query-handling feature"

"It has helped us build our product from zero point to the end."

"The primary feature is constant availability without concerns about server maintenance or ensuring database uptime, as AWS manages everything from their end."

"The platform is easy to develop and configure."

"The most valuable features are the flexibility and the compatibility options without needing to use any additional services or software. It is an independent solution that doesn't need other solutions to operate."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the non-relational database."

"Amazon DynamoDB is serverless and fast, and we can use different keys along with it in our code."

More Amazon DynamoDB pros

"The most valuable features of Neo4j AuraDB include its flexible data model and broad language support."

"I like the idea of graphs and nodes and the possibilities Neo4j AuraDB offers."

"Integrating the front-end language with Neo4j AuraDB is a very easy process."

"The best features Neo4j AuraDB offers are that it is easy to quickly build a solution with their tooling."

"The most beneficial things in terms of AuraDB are its speed, its good pricing, the multi-cloud availability."

"From my experience, I particularly like the professional version. Initially, developers often start with the free variant. Once the project grows, we switch to the professional version, which offers multiple databases, expanded memory, and better scalability. This allows us to handle more data and use cloud scaling features."

"The tool is easy to use."

Cons

"Amazon DynamoDB can be quite expensive due to regional differences, so I have to be careful with the pricing."

"Previously, only 64 KB could be used, and later, I think, it was about 400 KB. If the tool could have an additional 10 MB to offer, then the tool could be easier to use."

"I would rate the stability a seven out of ten. We faced some configuration issues."

"If you have no prior experience with this type of non-relational database, the syntaxes, implementation, or understanding may be difficult."

"Maybe the documentation could be improved a bit. Sometimes, it's a little confusing, and people can easily be mistaken about DynamoDB."

"The solution could be cheaper."

"The documentation is not good enough."

"Having an import option, whether through browsing or local file uploads, would significantly improve the efficiency of data migration, enabling users to swiftly transfer large volumes of data into DynamoDB."

More Amazon DynamoDB cons

"Some features can help if they can visualize graphs better."

"I've experienced it crashing a few times, so stability could be better."

"During the product's initial setup phase, there were some issues due to disconnections in the tool's network."

"I would love to see a Retool type of interface builder with Neo4j AuraDB."

"In terms of AuraDB, the conversations have always been around scalability."

"There’s room for improvement in Neo4j AuraDB, especially on the developer side. The learning curve can be steep, and the interface for developing and pushing code can be unnecessarily complex. It might be beneficial to simplify this process to help developers ramp up more quickly. Working with graph databases like Neo4j can be more challenging than standard databases, particularly for juniors and those new to graph technology. Streamlining the development process could make it easier for new users to get up to speed. This would be particularly useful for teams with less experience in graph databases. If I could add a feature to Neo4j AuraDB, I’d focus on improving the Bloom interface. It’s excellent for visualizing smaller datasets, but navigating through it becomes challenging as the data grows—say, past 100,000nodes. The interface works well for beginners but doesn’t scale effectively for more advanced users of large datasets. I want a UI that bridges the gap between the easy-to-use Bloom interface and more complex, text-based tools. This would help manage larger datasets more efficiently and improve performance."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to a high-end relational database, it's cheap."

"Amazon DynamoDB is a cheap solution."

"It is costly. To reduce the costs, users need to read the node in front of it. For read-heavy groups, cache optimization can help manage costs.I can't disclose specific pricing, but it's competitive compared to others in the market, and this information is easily accessible online"

"The solution's pricing is good, and it's not expensive."

"It's an expensive solution"

"I would rate the pricing for this solution a four out of five."

"I can say that it is not the cheapest one because if we had our own kind of storage solution, our own hosting, and instead of using the cloud, we opted for some other method, it would have been a tool of a lower cost."

"It is a little expensive."

More Amazon DynamoDB pricing and cost advice

"I am using an open-source version of Neo4j AuraDB."

"Neo4j AuraDB is reasonably priced, especially considering it removes the need for cloud administration and associated costs. It's a good deal for the professional version, as it includes managed services, which reduces the overhead compared to setting up your own infrastructure. The cost can be higher for enterprise-scale projects, but that's often due to the scale and complexity of the project rather than the product itself. Startups sometimes overestimate their needs and jump to enterprise pricing too quickly, leading to higher costs than necessary."

"I used the free tier."

"The tool's enterprise edition is very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

33%

Educational Organization

11%

University

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	19

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon DynamoDB?

We don't have to administer the tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon DynamoDB?

The only challenge I face with Amazon DynamoDB is that with the partition key and secondary key, the query doesn't become very easy. The construction of that schema is a bit tricky because once you...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon DynamoDB?

Our main use case for Amazon DynamoDB is storing quick metadata information about any of the image artifacts that we collect from our customers. We generally store this in Amazon DynamoDB in multip...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Neo4j AuraDB?

It has fair pricing.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Neo4j AuraDB?

My main use case for Neo4j AuraDB is solving water optimization problems for oil and gas operations. Neo4j AuraDB helps us resolve those water optimization problems by allowing us to store knowledg...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Neo4j AuraDB?

My advice to others looking into using Neo4j AuraDB is to consider how many graphs you can create as quickly as needed. I think Neo4j AuraDB is doing some amazing things. On a scale of 1-5, I rate ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Amazon DynamoDB

Compared 28% of the time

Amazon Keyspaces vs Amazon DynamoDB

Compared 19% of the time

Google Cloud Bigtable vs Amazon DynamoDB

Compared 12% of the time

Google Cloud Firestore vs Amazon DynamoDB

Compared 10% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Amazon DynamoDB

Compared 3% of the time

More Amazon DynamoDB Competitors

Amazon Neptune vs Neo4j AuraDB

Compared 31% of the time

MongoDB Atlas vs Neo4j AuraDB

Compared 29% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Neo4j AuraDB

Compared 21% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Neo4j AuraDB

Compared 8% of the time

More Neo4j AuraDB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon DynamoDB

January 2026

Download Amazon DynamoDB product report

Buyer's Guide

Neo4j AuraDB

January 2026

Download Neo4j AuraDB product report

Also Known As

No data available

Neo4j Aura

Overview

Amazon DynamoDB offers unmatched scalability, fast performance, and seamless cloud integration. It's designed to handle diverse data types with NoSQL flexibility, providing automatic scaling, low latency, and easy AWS integration.

Amazon DynamoDB stands out for its ability to efficiently manage unstructured and semi-structured data, integrating smoothly with AWS services. It features automatic scaling, global tables, and predictable latency, supporting both JSON storage and serverless operations. Users appreciate the flexibility offered by its schema design, ensuring data accessibility and security. Despite its strengths, improvements such as better documentation, enhanced querying, and expanded integration with AWS services could enhance usability. Additional features like built-in server-side encryption, cross-region replication, and data refresh scheduling would be beneficial.

What are Amazon DynamoDB's most important features?

Unmatched Scalability: Handles large data volumes effortlessly.
Automatic Scaling: Adjusts capacity based on demand.
Global Tables: Simplifies data replication across regions.
JSON Storage: Stores data in a versatile format.
Predictable Latency: Ensures consistent response times.

What benefits and ROI should be considered in reviews?

Data Flexibility: Manages both structured and unstructured data seamlessly.
Cost Efficiency: Offers competitive pricing for large data storage.
Fast Retrieval: Delivers quick data access and response.
Seamless AWS Integration: Smoothly integrates with other AWS services.

Amazon DynamoDB is utilized in industries like IoT, e-commerce, and gaming for handling sensor data, managing real-time analytics, and storing game states. Its scalability and flexibility make it ideal for companies managing extensive metadata and localization tasks. Many also utilize it for MongoDB emulation and integrating with services like AWS Lambda for streamlined automation processes.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Neo4j AuraDB offers a flexible data model with extensive language integration and seamless multi-cloud accessibility. Known for scalability and performance, it supports efficient graph-based data handling across diverse applications.

Neo4j AuraDB is recognized for its comprehensive graph database capabilities, providing scalability, speed, and integration with multiple programming languages and tools. Its dedicated query language and AWS Cloud hosting enhance reliability and performance. While improvements in stability and GUI are necessary, its ability to handle graph data effectively aids in AI-driven projects and relationship-centric modeling. Researchers utilize it for cipher language studies and scalable databases, tackling diverse industry challenges.

What are the key features of Neo4j AuraDB?

Flexible Data Model: Adapts to varied workloads and requirements.
Broad Language Integration: Supports multiple programming languages for development versatility.
Multi-cloud Availability: Provides seamless deployment across different cloud platforms.
Graph-based Data Handling: Efficiently manages complex data relationships.
NeoDash Support: Facilitates quick application development with comprehensive tools.
Dedicated Query Language: Optimized for performance and reliability for graph queries.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating Neo4j AuraDB?

Scalability: Suitable for both small and large-scale graph database projects.
Performance: High-speed data processing for efficient application performance.
Reliability: AWS Cloud hosting ensures consistent uptime and security.
AI Integration: Provides contextual insights beneficial for data-driven initiatives.
Development Versatility: Supports a range of programming languages for diverse development needs.

Neo4j AuraDB is employed in industries like oil and gas, where companies address water optimization and construct knowledge graphs. It excels in relationship-centric modeling, handling structured and unstructured data for comprehensive insights, proving essential for graph-based reasoning in diverse applications.

Neo4j

Sample Customers

Samsung, Snapchat, Capital One, Expedia, Tinder, Airbnb, Comcast, Lyft, Redfin, Netflix, Adobe

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Amazon DynamoDB vs. Neo4j AuraDB

December 2025

Free Report: Amazon DynamoDB vs. Neo4j AuraDB

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon DynamoDB vs. Neo4j AuraDB and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon DynamoDB vs. Neo4j AuraDB report.

See our list of best Managed NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all Managed NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.