


Amazon EKS and Microsoft Defender for Cloud compete in the container orchestration and security management categories, respectively. Amazon EKS often has the upper hand in scalability and cloud integration, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers comprehensive security features.
Features: Amazon EKS provides robust container orchestration with features like cluster and pod management, autoscaling, and integration with AWS tools, ensuring scalability and reliability. Microsoft Defender for Cloud emphasizes security management across workloads with regulatory compliance, advanced threat detection, and integration with Microsoft 365 services, providing a comprehensive security suite.
Room for Improvement: Amazon EKS could improve ease of use by addressing network plugin issues and providing better support for on-premise environments. It faces criticism for its AWS-focused ideology, suggesting more flexibility with external tools. Microsoft Defender for Cloud could reduce false alarms, improve alert precision, and enhance pricing transparency. Users suggest clearer documentation and simplified dashboard navigation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon EKS, with its extensive documentation and community support, offers generally accessible deployment, though initial complexity exists. AWS support varies by tier, with better service for enterprise clients. Microsoft Defender for Cloud's integration with Azure services allows smooth deployment in Azure-centric environments, though customer service responsiveness needs improvement for complex multi-cloud setups.
Pricing and ROI: Amazon EKS is cost-effective for large enterprises due to its pay-as-you-go model but can be expensive for smaller businesses. It enhances ROI by reducing infrastructure management costs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers competitive pricing with module selection flexibility, benefiting enterprises with existing Microsoft agreements, though costs may rise with additional features. Both solutions provide strong ROI, focusing on operational efficiency and security management.
It has saved about 90% of our time.
TotalCloud has generated overall savings of 30 to 40 percent across various departments.
CallStream helps us integrate and automate tasks.
Initially, not having them resulted in an unoptimized solution. However, with these tools in place, we witnessed a reduction of costs by approximately a third—if it was $100 beforehand, we brought costs down to $25.
We have cost explorer available, and a bill forecast based on usage allows us to determine whether resources are underutilized or overutilized.
It's a fast deployment, with very good documentation, and it's really helpful.
Defender proactively indexes and analyzes documents, identifying potential threats even when inactive, enhancing preventative security.
Identifying potential vulnerabilities has helped us avoid costly data losses.
Compared to not having Microsoft Defender for Cloud in place, we definitely saw an advantage by not having downtime due to a security threat.
They are helpful, respond to my queries, and can answer any question.
Qualys's tech support is highly responsive, providing multiple ways to interact with them.
Qualys' customer service provides quality answers, but the response time is long, even though it is within the SLA.
We didn't need to manage etcd and those control management tools; it's totally handled from the AWS side, making it very beneficial.
I believe there should be a recovery solution available for at least a few hours so that we might bring it back.
They will set up a call, guide us, or provide solutions regarding integration with AWS or Amazon EKS.
Since security is critical, we prefer a quicker response time.
The support team was very responsive to queries.
They understand their product, but much like us, they struggle with the finer details, especially with new features.
We started our organization about nine months back. We started with about 30 users, and we now have more than 100 users.
Our organization currently uses it to manage over 1200 web applications.
It is absolutely scalable, and I would rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
The ability to scale based on requirements by deploying additional containers is a strong point for Kubernetes.
This allows us to scale our applications or APIs as needed, offering reliability through the automation of scaling processes.
If any node is not ready, the cluster autoscaler ensures that it is removed from the AWS auto-scaling group and replaces it with a new node in the cluster.
As we have reduced our on-premises infrastructure, it is about how we can migrate workloads to the cloud to make it easier, and then having everything fully encompassed and secured within that area makes it much easier for us to scale as needed and grow.
We are using infrastructure as a code, so we do not have any scalability issues with Microsoft Defender for Cloud implementation because our cloud automatically does it.
It has multiple licenses and features, covering infrastructures from a hundred to five hundred virtual machines, without any issues.
Overall, the support provided has been excellent.
It is a stable solution, which is why we chose it.
Continuous monitoring is crucial to ensure system stability and avoid vulnerabilities or threats.
There are multiple availability zones in the regions, meaning no single point of failure.
The control plane is quite stable in Amazon EKS, and I find it to be 100% available.
We haven't faced any challenges, and it consistently delivers on its committed SLA.
Defender's stability has been flawless for us.
I have not experienced any crashes or downtime.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is very stable.
Ideally, the scanner should automatically detect and scan all subdomains, even if not explicitly defined, ensuring comprehensive vulnerability assessment.
Ideally, updates should be more immediate, enabling quicker implementation of solutions.
Our goal is to integrate all these functions into Qualys, creating a single dashboard for comprehensive security monitoring and management.
Simplifying these will enable more people, not just those with strong foundational knowledge, to work effectively with these services.
Amazon EKS can be improved by having the maintenance of Kubernetes versions managed better, as everything is handled by the Kubernetes team and possibly a separate team at AWS.
Adding logging would be a valuable improvement.
Microsoft, in general, could significantly improve its communication and support.
It would be beneficial to streamline recommendations to avoid unnecessary alerts and to refine the severity of alerts based on specific environments or environmental attributes.
The artificial intelligence features could be expanded to allow the system to autonomously manage security issues without needing intervention from admins.
Qualys TotalCloud's pricing is currently acceptable, it is becoming increasingly expensive.
Pricing is managed by our finance team; however, Qualys TotalCloud offers cost-effective licensing flexibility.
Qualys TotalCloud is expensive, but it offers a premier solution with no headaches.
The EKS service itself is free, but you will incur costs for the VMs used as nodes in that cluster.
If you want to monitor costs effectively, applying separate tools and acting accordingly in advance is essential.
I appreciate the overall pricing model of AWS, where you pay based on usage, which allows for a clear understanding of costs associated with services.
Security has essentially no cost when compared to the cost of a breach.
Every time we consider expanding usage, we carefully evaluate the necessity due to cost concerns.
We appreciate the licensing approach based on employee count rather than a big enterprise license.
This view of risk helps reduce the work we would have to do to combine multiple sources to prioritize risk.
It will help cybersecurity professionals monitor the cloud and find vulnerabilities.
We are enjoying the new feature, FlexScan, which is valuable for Internet-facing VMs.
The most beneficial aspect of Amazon EKS is that it helps manage the Kubernetes master node, so I don't need to maintain the master node, including tasks like upgrading.
The main benefits that I received from using Amazon EKS are that it is a managed cluster and offers simplicity.
By default, if you just install Amazon EKS, you can deploy your application, but to have it enterprise-ready, you have to configure a number of other things that will boost productivity.
The most valuable feature for me is the variety of APIs available.
This feature significantly aids in threat detection and enhances the user experience by streamlining security management.
The most valuable feature is the recommendations provided on how to improve security.

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 36 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 18 |
| Large Enterprise | 49 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 31 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 49 |
Qualys TotalCloud enhances security posture across cloud environments with continuous monitoring, vulnerability management, and risk visualization, ensuring efficient threat assessment and automated remediation for improved cyber risk reduction.
Qualys TotalCloud offers a robust suite of security tools essential for organizations managing multi-cloud infrastructures. By integrating cloud accounts and automating workflows, it supports AWS, Azure, and GCP, offering comprehensive vulnerability management and zero-day detection. The platform's user-friendly design, combined with its extensive risk management and unified threat assessment capabilities, enables organizations to prioritize and remediate vulnerabilities effectively. TruRisk Insights provides clear insights on cyber risks, while the automation options streamline patch management and scanning processes. API integration across IaaS and SaaS environments further enhances resource allocation efficiency and saves time, addressing misconfigurations across cloud environments.
What are the most important features of Qualys TotalCloud?Qualys TotalCloud is deployed in sectors needing rigorous vulnerability management, such as finance and healthcare. Companies utilize it to secure multi-cloud environments like AWS, Azure, and GCP, focus on compliance, and integrate security into CI/CD pipelines to detect and remedy threats pre-deployment.
Amazon EKS is a managed Kubernetes service that simplifies deploying containerized applications in the cloud. It automates scaling, enhances integration with AWS, and improves security and reliability for users.
Amazon EKS stands out for its automation, scalability, and seamless integration capabilities with AWS services. It offers auto-scaling and easy deployment while managing Kubernetes services to reduce maintenance efforts. Integration with IAM boosts security, and self-healing nodes enhance reliability. Although user-friendly and cost-effective, EKS requires improvements in user management, AI integration, onboarding, connectivity, and stability. Enhancements are needed in security features, logging, and UI, alongside more robust documentation and cost insights.
What are the key features of Amazon EKS?In industries utilizing cloud-native architectures, Amazon EKS enables the efficient orchestration of containerized applications, supporting microservices and simplifying infrastructure management. Organizations benefit from automated updates, production workload orchestration, and application deployment, ensuring reliable cloud operations.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a comprehensive security platform offering integration with Microsoft services, multi-cloud capability, AI-driven threat detection, compliance, and unified visibility for improved security operations.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud manages security operations by integrating with Microsoft services and supporting multi-cloud environments. Its features include AI-driven threat detection, compliance oversight, and advanced threat protection. It simplifies processes with unified visibility, threat intelligence, and automated workflows, enhancing security posture across various workloads. Despite its robust capabilities, improvements are needed in third-party tool integration, comprehensive AI-driven remediation, and a more intuitive dashboard. Users report complexity in licensing, inadequate documentation, and high costs, with room for enhancements in compliance reporting and multi-cloud support.
What are the key features of Microsoft Defender for Cloud?Industries leverage Microsoft Defender for Cloud for security posture management and endpoint protection. Many companies integrate it with Office 365 for enhanced functionality. It provides comprehensive security overviews by monitoring cloud vulnerabilities, limiting unauthorized access, and replacing existing tools with its extensive capabilities from network security to compliance checks, securing Azure infrastructure, and enhancing client security.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.