

Splunk User Behavior Analytics and Anomali are leading cybersecurity tools that enhance threat detection and response. In the realm of advanced analytics capabilities, Splunk seems to gain an edge due to its user satisfaction ratings. Meanwhile, Anomali's specialized threat intelligence often marks it as a standout choice within its focus area.
Features: Splunk User Behavior Analytics offers advanced machine learning, data analytics, and real-time data collection from multiple sources. Its customizable dashboards provide updates and insights into user behavior anomalies. Anomali, on the other hand, excels with its threat modeling capability, robust threat intelligence integration, and powerful API for automation.
Room for Improvement: Splunk could enhance the accuracy of data presented on dashboards and improve its credential monitoring feature. It may also benefit from expanding its dataset in comparison to other solutions. Anomali might address some deployment complexities and enhance its customer service accessibility. Additionally, expanding its application versatility could widen its impact.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk is praised for its seamless deployment and strong customer support, integrating efficiently into existing systems. Anomali, while offering comprehensive support, presents more complex deployment steps which may delay operational readiness compared to Splunk's more straightforward process.
Pricing and ROI: Splunk's initial costs are high but often justified by the ROI delivered through comprehensive analytics. Anomali offers a more cost-effective entry point, with ROI closely tied to its specific application focus. The choice often involves a balance between upfront expenditure and the specialized value provided.
Analyst productivity has improved significantly, with hours saved because of automation and AI-driven work that Anomali performs.
There is a return on investment concerning time and effort saved by 40% after implementing Anomali.
The solution can save costs by improving incident resolution times and reducing security incident costs.
They have strong onboarding and deployment assistance, provide a dedicated technical account manager for large customers, and engage in regular product updates and customer interaction.
The technical support at Anomali is excellent.
It doesn't seem very professional how they're handling support anymore.
Mission-critical offering a dedicated team, proactive monitoring, and fast resolution.
From the responsiveness perspective, Splunk is very responsive with SLA-bound support for premium tiers.
I would rate their technical support as 8.5 out of 10.
The scalability is massive, allowing us to store millions of indicators.
I believe Anomali's scalability is good; whether it is an organization for ten people or one hundred thousand people, the job a threat intel platform has to do will be the same.
Anomali's scalability is impressive as a mature platform capable of processing large amounts of threat intelligence and indicators of compromise data.
Splunk User Behavior Analytics is highly scalable, designed for enterprise scalability, allowing expansion of data ingestion, indexing, and search capabilities as log volumes grow.
From a reliability perspective, Anomali consistently injects threat feeds, works on automation, performs reliable API integrations, and supports enterprise scale globally.
For example, while Microsoft allows ample time for users to adapt to deprecated features, Anomali only gave us three weeks before switching, so they need to be more cognizant of customer use cases from their engineering side.
The good thing is that they have a health check page, and if any issues arise, they notify us.
With built-in redundancy across zones and regions, 99.9% uptime is achievable.
Splunk User Behavior Analytics is a one hundred percent stable solution.
Splunk User Behavior Analytics is highly stable and reliable, even in large-scale enterprise environments with high log injection rates.
Combining all aliases into a coherent solution would be beneficial, as we had to review each individual source ourselves.
Anomali should increase their capability to fetch details from various dark web solutions where threat actors post compromised credentials.
Anomali's ability to correlate and integrate different Threat Intel platforms, such as Mandiant and PolySwarm, is another valuable feature, removing duplicacy and enabling the application of specific IOCs across various security controls.
Global reach allows deployment of apps and services closer to users worldwide, but data sovereignty concerns exist and region selection must align with compliance requirements.
I encountered several issues while trying to create solutions for this advanced version, which seem unrelated to query or data issues.
High data ingestion costs can be an issue, especially for large enterprises, as Splunk charges based on the amount of data processed.
Pricing and licensing are good, but the costs for purchasing threat feeds are somewhat complicated and a bit on the higher side.
Reserved instances with one or three-year commitments offer lower rates, providing up to 70% savings.
Compared to all other products in the market, it is the most expensive one in all aspects including professional service and licenses, even the cloud version.
Comparing with the competitors, it's a bit expensive.
Regarding integration, Anomali has capabilities to integrate with different downstream applications such as Palo Alto, allowing us to create playbooks to block domains, URLs, or IPs directly within the firewall.
Correlating IOCs with the telemetry data we are ingesting from our data sources allows us to pull monthly reports identifying how many assets and users interacted with malicious content, giving insight into whether communications failed or users accessed restricted content, providing complete visibility of the IOCs traveling throughout our environment.
It aggregates intelligence from hundreds of sources, automatically de-duplicates, applies risk scoring, applies context, and reduces much manual effort.
I also utilize it for anomaly detection and behavior analysis, particularly using Splunk's machine learning environment.
The dashboards themselves are nice, very good, and very helpful, but the accuracy of the data or the information that will be presented on the dashboard is something that needs to be questioned.
Features like alerts and auto report generation are valuable.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Splunk User Behavior Analytics | 5.0% |
| Anomali | 3.3% |
| Other | 91.7% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
Anomali delivers user-friendly cyber threat intelligence, offering concise insights with robust capabilities for evolving scenarios.
Anomali offers a powerful platform for cyber threat intelligence, allowing organizations to efficiently stream and analyze threat feeds. It excels in threat modeling, prioritizing intelligence, and supporting large-scale automation through its API, fostering a proactive security approach.
What are Anomali's Key Features?Anomali serves as a crucial tool for threat intelligence in industries ranging from finance to healthcare. Organizations stream threat feeds into Anomali to correlate and aggregate data, enhancing security measures and facilitating thorough threat investigations. Its adaptability makes it suitable across different sectors.
Splunk User Behavior Analytics focuses on data aggregation and threat detection with automation, deepening insights into user behavior. It offers usability, stability, and strong integration capabilities, making it a preferred choice for organizations needing comprehensive security management.
This platform enhances security management through customizable dashboards and real-time updates. Advanced analytics for anomaly detection and behavioral profiling, coupled with powerful indexing and search capabilities, enable thorough user behavior analysis. Users experience streamlined integration with Active Directory and other monitoring tools. However, improvements are needed in dashboard customization, customer support, and analytics tools to boost user experience. Organizations use Splunk User Behavior Analytics primarily for monitoring and analyzing user behavior, integrating various data sources for effective threat detection while maintaining governance.
What are the key features of Splunk User Behavior Analytics?Splunk User Behavior Analytics is widely implemented across industries for threat detection and insider threat identification. By integrating with tools like Active Directory for monitoring and anomaly detection, organizations benefit from robust security management and effective log analysis. It underpins efforts in security, data indexing, and combining data for comprehensive threat prevention.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.