Apache Web Server vs SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management comparison

Apache and SAP are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. Apache is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.8, while SAP is ranked #25. Apache holds a 10.5% mindshare in AIS, compared to SAP’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution.

Apache Web Server

Read 23 Apache Web Server reviews

1,904 Views
1,610 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP NetWeaver Business Rule...

Read 2 SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management reviews

97 Views
58 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Apache Web Server

SAP NetWeaver Business Rule...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management and Apache Web Server compete in enterprise solution deployment, each catering to distinct organizational needs. SAP NetWeaver seems to have an advantage in specialized enterprise applications, whereas Apache offers flexibility and value.

Features: SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management provides seamless integration with SAP environments, advanced rule management, and decision automation. Apache Web Server is known for reliable performance, extensive module support, and cross-platform functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apache Web Server offers straightforward deployment with significant community support, facilitating adaptation across various environments. In contrast, SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management involves a more complex deployment process, with the benefit of specialized consultancy within SAP ecosystems.

Pricing and ROI: SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management incurs higher initial setup costs, suited for large enterprises, offering substantial ROI within SAP-focused organizations. Apache Web Server typically has lower setup expenses due to its open-source licensing, providing an economical solution with satisfactory ROI through decreased operational costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Web Server

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP NetWeaver Business Rule...

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

25th

Average Rating

6.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of Apache Web Server is 10.5%, up from 10.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

Saurav Kumar

Senior security architecture at National Payment Corporation Of India

Offers security features that are reliable

When it comes to Apache Web Server, I don't have any suggestions for improvement because we use it in the UAT environment. For production, my company mainly uses NGINX. There is no direct package provided by the product if I want to use WAF. In NGINX, NGINX Plus has the signature update capability, but in Apache, the same feature is not available, making it an area where improvements are required. If WAF can be introduced in Apache Web Server, it would be a good improvement so that its users can implement either the WAF module or ModSecurity, as they choose. For NGINX, I think it has NGINX Management Suite, which is GUI-based and allows you to manage your configuration via the user interface, but Apache fails to offer such capabilities to users. Apache Web Server should provide users with the same capabilities offered under NGINX Management Suite with the help of a simple GUI so that our company doesn't have to do anything on the terminal while directly getting to use the user interface, which can help us with the configuration part.

Read full review

Herve Guerin

Architecte SAP & Infrastructure at Teamwork

Good stability and good visibility but requires a better user interface

We're an SAP partner. We do also deploy some clients to the cloud, but 95% of the work we do with the solution is on-premises. I'd rate the solution six out of ten. I'm an architect, so I don't know enough about the implementation side to really be able to share any relevant first-hand experience in regards to setting the solution up.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is more secure to use Apache and you will have fewer problems than other web services."

"The open-source nature is one of its most significant advantages."

"The most significant advantage is the ability to swiftly enable HTTPS services when my DNS is configured correctly."

"The solution's most valuable feature is reporting."

"It's very stable, and it hosts one of the biggest of many biggest web applications in the world."

"The product is very cheap and stable."

"The control panel is very easy to navigate. It's similar to most hosting platforms, so it's user-friendly. Once you get used to it, managing your hosting becomes easy, too."

"Apache has proven to be incredibly reliable, and everything has operated smoothly without encountering any issues."

More Apache Web Server pros

"There are many features of the solution that are quite useful. For us, the most valuable aspect may be visibility."

Cons

"It would be great if technical support for Apache were available in Iran. It is a very important need."

"The major issue occurs with ports. So, I would like to see easier port management."

"Lacks integration with some cloud solutions."

"A monitoring interface would be great for this product. The monitoring dashboards for Apache's models are not included in the basic installation. You can install the basic monitoring model, then connect this model to another monitoring system."

"The product's initial setup process could be easier for users."

"Things change very fast. We're always on the lookout for better approaches and tools. If the solution falls behind, we may have to switch."

"The GUI for the less experienced users needs some improvement. For some companies, it is hard to configure it if they have not had any experience."

"The interface has room for improvement."

More Apache Web Server cons

"The solution could improve its user interface."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The apache software is free, open-source."

"There is no licensing cost for the product."

"It is an open-source solution."

"It is a free-of-cost solution."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache Web Server?

The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Web Server?

Apache Web Server is a free product, with no associated setup costs or licensing fees.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache Web Server?

There is no need for substantial improvements as we have a dedicated team managing the server, ensuring everything runs smoothly.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IIS vs Apache Web Server

Compared 42% of the time

NGINX Plus vs Apache Web Server

Compared 28% of the time

Microsoft .NET Framework vs Apache Web Server

Compared 8% of the time

Zend PHP Engine vs Apache Web Server

Compared 7% of the time

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs Apache Web Server

Compared 7% of the time

More Apache Web Server Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server

March 2025

Download Apache Web Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

March 2025

SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management report

Download SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management product report

Also Known As

Apache HTTP Server

NetWeaver Business Rules Management

Overview

The Apache HTTP Server Project was founded in 1995 by a group of webmasters, known as The Apache Group, with the aim of developing robust, richly-featured, freely-available and commercial-standard Web (HTTP) server source code. The result was Apache Web Server or Apache HTTP Server, which is an open-source public-domain web server.

This collaborative project has been enhanced ever since with contributions from the core development team and other volunteers situated all over the globe. Also, hundreds of users of this open-source web server have contributed code, ideas, and documentation. The project falls under The Apache Software Foundation, which manages many open-source projects.

Apache

SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management (SAP NetWeaver BRM) is part of the SAP NetWeaver AS Java. SAP NetWeaver BRM enables your organization to externalize business rules and manage them flexibly across multiple installations for greater agility, for consistent and transparent enforcement of policies across the entire enterprise.

SAP

Sample Customers

Cisco, Intuit, General Electric, Adobe, VMware, PayPal, HP, EMC, eBay, Apple, SAP, Qualcomm, SanDisk, Allstate, FedEx

Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren, Lenovo

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

March 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.