Aspera Managed File Transfer vs webMethods.io comparison

Aspera Managed File Transfer and webMethods.io are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. Aspera Managed File Transfer is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.0, while webMethods.io is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.9. Aspera Managed File Transfer holds a 3.1% mindshare in MFT, compared to webMethods.io’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Aspera Managed File Transfer users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of webMethods.io users who would recommend it.

Aspera Managed File Transfer

Read 4 Aspera Managed File Transfer reviews

777 Views
754 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 93 webMethods.io reviews

8,870 Views
444 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Aspera Managed File Transfer

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Aspera Managed File Transfer and webMethods.io compete in data management and integration. Aspera excels in transferring large data efficiently, while webMethods.io offers superior integration features, making it a preferred choice for comprehensive integration needs.

Features: Aspera Managed File Transfer is known for high-speed data transmission, scalability, and security, which are suitable for organizations needing quick and secure large file transfers. webMethods.io provides robust integration capabilities allowing seamless connectivity across multiple applications, prioritizing integration flexibility and extensive connectivity options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aspera Managed File Transfer offers a straightforward deployment model with strong customer support. webMethods.io requires a more complex deployment process tailored for large-scale integration projects and is supported by comprehensive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Aspera Managed File Transfer features competitive pricing focused on delivering a high ROI for businesses needing secure, fast file transfers. webMethods.io involves a higher setup cost but promises significant ROI due to its versatile integration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Aspera Managed File Transfer vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Aspera Managed File Transfer vs. webMethods.io

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aspera Managed File Transfer

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

12th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), API Management (11th), Cloud Data Integration (10th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of Aspera Managed File Transfer is 3.1%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.4%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed File Transfer (MFT) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
webMethods.io	2.4%
Aspera Managed File Transfer	3.1%
Other	94.5%

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

Featured Reviews

Michele Illiano

Head of Division at Innovery

Beneficial quick protocol, powerful, but limited use cases

Aspera Managed File Transfer should be packaged into another solution. Explaining to customers you need to have multiple solutions from multiple vendors for their use cases can get complicated for them to understand. The best way to propose a suite is to have an integrated suite where the customer could choose to license part of it. This solution could be one solution not two choices between 10 or 12 different solutions. The main feature of Aspera Managed File Transfer is the communication protocol, which is fast. There are a lot of different clients that are offering features related to these fast protocols. It's possible to create one unique suite that can handle this base protocol. It will be quite easy to propose to the customers.

Read full review

MohanPrasad

Senior Consultant at Brillio

Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost

webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good user interface and ability to set up multiple file transfer jobs."

"We were able to effectively nullify the China firewall since the China firewall was disrupting our data transfer."

"Aspera Managed File Transfer is an optimal solution for customers who want to transfer large files to remote sites with lower bandwidth and in less time."

"We were able to effectively nullify the China firewall since the China firewall was disrupting our data transfer."

"The main feature of Aspera Managed File Transfer is that it's an incredibly fast protocol, you can use all the bandwidth available. If I need to send large amounts of data this is the fastest protocol on the market. I have been using it for some minor projects and it is very powerful."

"The solution's ease-of-use is its most valuable feature, in which complex issues may be resolved."

"One of the most important features is that it gives you the possibility to do low-level integration. It provides a lot of features out of the box, and over the years, it has matured so much that any problem that is there in the market can be solved with this product. We can meet any requirements through customizations, transformations, or the logic that needs to be put in. Some of the other products struggle in this aspect. They cannot do things in a certain way, or they have a product limitation, whereas, with webMethods, I have never faced this kind of problem."

"Ease of implementation and flexibility to hold the business logic are the most valuable features."

"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."

"The development is very fast. If you know what you're doing, you can develop something very easily and very fast."

"A product with good API and EDI components."

"It is a bundled product stack for A2A and B2B usage. It is one of the best products which I have used during my integration career."

"The cloud version of the solution is very easy to set up."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"Deployment is complex and it was difficult to get support."

"If there is any failure in the data transfer and it can automatically detect and reinitiate it, that would be great."

"Aspera Managed File Transfer should be packaged into another solution. Explaining to customers you need to have multiple solutions from multiple vendors for their use cases can get complicated for them to understand."

"The solution's pricing is high and should be reduced."

"If you want to do a file transfer between two countries, and one is not China, then you have other more affordable options."

"A while ago, they were hacked, and it took them a very long time to open their website again in order to download any service packs or any features. I don't know what they could do differently. I know that they were vulnerable, and there was some downtime, but because they were down, we were unable to download any potential service packs."

"A potential drawback of webMethods.io API is its adaptability to legacy systems, which can vary in compatibility."

"The learning curve is a little steep at first."

"The solution should include REST API calls."

"In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather quick."

"The certifications and learning resources are not exposed openly enough. For instance, they have a trial version which comes with only a few basic features, and I think that community-wise they need to offer more free or open spaces where developers can feel encouraged to experiment."

"The solution has big instances when deployed under microservices or in a containerized platform. They need to improve that so that it is competitive with other integration solutions, like Redis and Kafka. Deployments under microservices with those solutions are much more lightweight, in the size of the runtime itself, compared with Software AG."

"Other products have been using AI and cloud enhancements, but webMethods Integration Server is still lagging in that key area."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It was close to $10,000 to $20,000."

"Aspera Managed File Transfer is not an inexpensive solution. I am not aware of many competitors to determine how affordable the price is overall."

"I do think webMethods is coming under increasing pressure when it comes to their price-to-feature value proposition. It's probably the single biggest strategic risk they have. They're very expensive in their industry. They've been raising the price recently, especially when compared with their competitors."

"Based on our team discussions and feedback, it is pretty costly because they charge us for each transmission."

"I do see a lack of capabilities inside of the monetization area for them. They have a cloud infrastructure that is pay per use type of a thing. If you already use 1,000 transactions per se, then you can be charged and billed. I see room for improvement there for their side on that particular capability of the monetization."

"The vendor is flexible with respect to pricing."

"The solution's development license is free for three to six months. We have to pay for other things."

"The solution’s pricing is too high."

"Pricing is the number-one downfall. It's too expensive. They could make more money by dropping the price in half and getting more customers. It's the best product there is, but it's too expensive."

"Initialy good pricing and good, if it comes to Enterprise license agreements."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Insurance Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	63

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Aspera Managed File Transfer?

Aspera Managed File Transfer is an optimal solution for customers who want to transfer large files to remote sites with lower bandwidth and in less time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aspera Managed File Transfer?

There are other products of Aspera which come as add-ons, however, we haven't purchased those, like report generation, since that was not our requirement. The features we needed were included in th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Aspera Managed File Transfer?

We have an office in China, and we wanted to transfer data from China to the UK. We have an office in the UK as well.

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Sterling File Gateway vs Aspera Managed File Transfer

Compared 51% of the time

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Aspera Managed File Transfer

Compared 13% of the time

Kiteworks vs Aspera Managed File Transfer

Compared 8% of the time

CloudDat vs Aspera Managed File Transfer

Compared 8% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Aspera Managed File Transfer

Compared 8% of the time

More Aspera Managed File Transfer Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

August 2025

Download Aspera Managed File Transfer product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

September 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

IBM Aspera takes a different approach to tackling the challenges of big data movement over global WANs. Rather than optimize or accelerate data transfer, Aspera eliminates underlying bottlenecks by using its proprietary fasp technology that fully utilizes available network bandwidth to maximize speed and quickly scale up with no theoretical limit. Using fasp, transfers are secure end-to-end and are largely unaffected by file size, transfer distance, or network conditions, making transfer times up to 100Xs faster than TCP-based protocols.

IBM Aspera offers SaaS, on-prem, and hybrid solutions to meet the needs of modernizing infrastructures. All solutions offer robust security and compliance, intuitive file sharing, workflow automation, central administration, and real-time visibility. Quickly and easily initiate transfers across hybrid infrastructures, including support for cloud-to-cloud transfers. IBM Aspera offers unmatched transfer speeds, end-to-end security, reliability, and exceptional bandwidth control.

IBM

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Gwinnett County Public Schools, Evonik, Voith, BITMARCK, Oracle

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Aspera Managed File Transfer vs. webMethods.io

September 2025

Free Report: Aspera Managed File Transfer vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Aspera Managed File Transfer vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Aspera Managed File Transfer vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.