Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform comparison

Broadcom and Red Hat are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Additionally, 86% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Read 13 Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] reviews

86% willing to recommend

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Read 72 Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform reviews

13,225 Views
1,984 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 28, 2025

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and Automic Continuous Delivery Automation are solutions for IT automation and delivery. Ansible holds an edge in pricing and support, while Automic provides superior features and comprehensive delivery capabilities.

Features: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform supports numerous modules and plugins, enabling extensive automation integrations. Its ease of use is particularly advantageous for orchestrating complex IT tasks. Ansible's modular approach stands out, making it adaptable to various systems. Automic Continuous Delivery Automation offers robust pipeline management and enterprise-grade release automation, with strength in detailed process controls and prebuilt integrations across numerous enterprise systems.

Room for Improvement: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform could enhance its user interface for greater user-friendliness and add more robust reporting features to provide better insights. Increasing integration capabilities with legacy systems would broaden its applicability. Automic Continuous Delivery Automation, while feature-rich, might improve by simplifying its deployment processes to reduce setup time. Enhancing its documentation and community support could address user adoption challenges it faces. EOL status presents a challenge in maintaining up-to-date support and resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a simplified deployment experience with extensive community and documentation support. Its straightforward setup process facilitates quick installation. Automic Continuous Delivery Automation, despite its more complex deployment steps requiring dedicated resources, provides tailored enterprise support to align with customer needs and ensures reliability.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform features a competitive pricing model providing a high ROI with lower upfront costs, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. Automic Continuous Delivery Automation, while presenting higher initial costs, offers substantial long-term returns due to its advanced features and scalability, making it suitable for enterprises looking for robust automation solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Release Automation (3rd), Configuration Management (1st), Network Automation (1st), AWS Pro Service Providers (1st)

Featured Reviews

reviewer895359

Principal Project Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Automatic installation for complex deployments and environments, with good workflow support

I like that really complex deployments are possible with it. It's very good. You have everything you need. You can design your workflows for your needs. You can do so much more, it's not just an automatic installation tool. It's a real deployment tool. I can do the complete deployment with everything that is possible.

Read full review

Manas Kashyap

DevOps Engineer at Elevenxcapital

Automation has transformed server patching and has reduced months of work to minutes

The best features that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers is that it does not require any additional resources inside the servers. Python is the only requirement, and since Python is already present inside the servers, we can run it from our location and it automatically deploys things and does the work for us. The minimal requirements and easy deployment have definitely impacted my daily work and my team's efficiency. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is one of the best features that we depend on. We have evaluated other options, but Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was the best choice because it has saved us a tremendous amount of time. We do not need to manually intervene in the servers or install third-party software to maintain these things. It is very easy to write playbooks for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. Ansible Galaxy contains many playbooks that are readily available and ready to be used. It is highly configurable with Jinja templating, making it easy to maintain. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has positively impacted my organization. Previously, we needed to go into the servers and maintain them manually, which used to take a lot of time. For 200 to 300 servers, the maintenance took about one to two months. New patches would arrive and we would have to repeat the process. Now, it is a one-night work or a 10 to 15 minutes task. We write a playbook, maintain an inventory, and roll out the updates and it starts working for us. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform uses conditional clauses and has rollback options, functioning like a standard coding language that is simple to use. There is definitely a reduction in errors with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform because we have playbooks written with all the necessary clauses and rollback options. Manual work automatically creates more errors, whereas in automation, we have written sets that we do not forget every time we run it. We have protected written sets that we execute consistently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The agents are one of the solution's most valuable features, and I like agents for file transfers so you can transfer the files from agent to agent on the different platforms."

"The IT process automation is the most valuable aspect of this solution."

"It can support very complex environments and dependencies."

"Gives people insight into what's happening during the deployment."

"They have gained efficiency that they cannot achieve in any other way."

"Self-service for developers, because they are able to deploy to development departments on their own, without needing people from operations."

"You can design your workflows for your needs."

"It is a very stable solution and we can rely on pressing a button to perform a full-stack automatic installation that reliably finishes in eight hours instead of a problematic three-week manual installation."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] pros

"Since it is in YAML, if I have to explain it to somebody else, they can easily understand it."

"The solution is very simple to use."

"Ansible Tower provides a GUI, which is an enhancement, and a well-liked feature by operation teams."

"It saves time when it comes to service deployment, moves, or updates."

"I like the fact that Ansible is agentless."

"It is very easy to use, and there is less room for error."

"The API for exposing all our infrastructure services is the most valuable feature."

"Ansible automation has benefited our organization."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pros

Cons

"At the moment, the version that we are using (version 12.0), the environment is complex with multiple installations. Therefore, the monitoring is not scalable, but this should be improved in 12.1 and 12.2."

"Not a perfect ten because the user interface is brand new and it needs improvement."

"The stability of the solution can be improved."

"There is an issue with the stability in the tool. The process of agent will stop, then the monitoring agent can't be recognized because the process is running, but you can talk with the system."

"If you have a technical problem and need development of the tool, the support team is terrible, because they cannot help with the technical details."

"One of the biggest features I've been asked by my team to put in there is opening more scripting languages to be part of the platform. There is a little bit of a learning curve in learning how to code some of the workflows in Automic at this time. If widely used languages like Perl and Python were integrated, on top of what's already there, the proprietary language, it would make it easier to on-board new resources."

"Stability-wise I think it still needs to be improved; performance-wise. It crashes from time to time."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] cons

"I have seen indications that the documentation needs improvement. They are providing a "How to Improve Your Documentation" presentation at this conference."

"It would be helpful to have templates for common configurations. It would make it much easier and faster rather than creating a whole script. The templates would decrease the learning curve as well."

"There should be consistency. I know that it is always changing, but when we are trying to get some users to do something in basic Ansible that they are not really interested in doing but their job requires them to do it, they start finding inconsistencies."

"The web GUI can be a little bit better. There should be a couple of more features."

"Some of the modules in Ansible could be a bit more mature. There is still a little room for further development. Some performance aspects could be improved, perhaps in the form of parallelism within Ansible."

"The solution costs a lot. It's not cheap."

"There are challenges in using the graphical interface, particularly in open-source versions."

"Some of the modules in Ansible could be a bit more mature. There is still a little room for further development."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you have a fixed contract, it has limits to spreading out. If you have a flexible enterprise license contract, then you have a lot of scalability for this tool."

"We increased our quality and reduced our time costs."

"Customers often complain about the price."

"I can save time and money more quickly."

"Ansible Tower is free. Until they lower the cost, we are holding off on purchasing the product."

"It is a little pricey but it is affordable. It is not that bad."

"Users have to pay a per-node cost of around $ 100 per node."

"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is an affordable solution."

"You don't need to buy agents on servers or deploy expense management when using the solution, which affected our decision to go with it."

"The pricing is pretty standard."

"I don't see the pricing or licensing features, but from what I understand, it is fairly reasonable."

"Red Hat's open source approach was a factor when choosing Ansible, since the solution is free as of right now."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

15%

Marketing Services Firm

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	51

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is the difference between Red Hat Satellite and Ansible?

Red Hat Satellite has proven to be a worthwhile investment for me. Both its patch management and license management have been outstanding. If you have a large environment, patching systems is much ...

See all answers

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was very simple. There is no pricing and no licensing required, as Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform ...

See all answers

Comparisons

UrbanCode Deploy vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

Nolio Release Automation vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

AWS CodeStar vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

Chef vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Plutora vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Competitors

VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 5% of the time

BigFix vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

May 2026

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] report

Download Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

April 2026

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report

Download Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform product report

Also Known As

CA Continuous Delivery Automation, Automic Release Automation, Automic ONE Automation, UC4 Automation Platform

Ansible, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Subscription on AWS

Overview

Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar.

Today, the pressure is on to transform how you deliver applications to market. Get release agility and speed without compromising quality and stability with CA Continuous Delivery Automation. Deliver apps reliably on demand from development through production—mobile to mainframe. Agilely scale as the cadence, volume and complexity of your apps grow. It’s DevOps-ready release management and automation for your dynamic enterprise.

Broadcom

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform streamlines IT operations with features like a simplified GUI and extensive module support. Its agentless architecture and YAML ease make it an adaptable choice for managing diverse infrastructures efficiently.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a robust automation framework that supports multiple environments and integrates well with various applications. Its agentless Python-based architecture facilitates efficient server management and rapid update deployment. Users benefit from centralized management through Ansible Tower, role-based access control, and dynamic inventory. However, improvement areas include documentation, API integration, network support, and UI scaling. Enhanced community contributions could address module availability and compatibility gaps.

What are the most important features of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

Agentless Architecture: Leverages Python for seamless management without needing local agents.
Extensive Module Support: Provides modules for managing multiple environments effectively.
Ansible Tower GUI: Offers a centralized interface for easy automation management.
Role-Based Access Control: Ensures user-specific permissions for improved security.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with a variety of applications to enhance functionality.
Dynamic Inventory: Automatically updates inventory, simplifying large infrastructure management.

What benefits and ROI should one consider?

Automation Efficiency: Significantly reduces manual intervention, saving time and resources.
Adaptability: Easily integrates with cloud platforms such as AWS, GCP, and Azure.
Security Compliance: Automates compliance checks, ensuring up-to-date security protocols.
Cost Management: Lower operational costs through streamlined processes.
Scalability: Supports infrastructure growth without requiring major adjustments.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is used for network management, security compliance, and configuration tasks. Organizations utilize its capabilities for cloud and on-premises deployment, infrastructure provisioning, and workflow orchestration. Many integrate it with tools such as Puppet or Terraform to enhance CI/CD processes, benefiting from its agentless design in adapting to cloud environments.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

BET365, Charter Communications, TASC

HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.