Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform comparison

Broadcom and Red Hat are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Additionally, 86% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Read 13 Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] reviews

86% willing to recommend

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Read 72 Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform reviews

17,085 Views
2,734 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 28, 2025

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and Automic Continuous Delivery Automation are solutions for IT automation and delivery. Ansible holds an edge in pricing and support, while Automic provides superior features and comprehensive delivery capabilities.

Features: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform supports numerous modules and plugins, enabling extensive automation integrations. Its ease of use is particularly advantageous for orchestrating complex IT tasks. Ansible's modular approach stands out, making it adaptable to various systems. Automic Continuous Delivery Automation offers robust pipeline management and enterprise-grade release automation, with strength in detailed process controls and prebuilt integrations across numerous enterprise systems.

Room for Improvement: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform could enhance its user interface for greater user-friendliness and add more robust reporting features to provide better insights. Increasing integration capabilities with legacy systems would broaden its applicability. Automic Continuous Delivery Automation, while feature-rich, might improve by simplifying its deployment processes to reduce setup time. Enhancing its documentation and community support could address user adoption challenges it faces. EOL status presents a challenge in maintaining up-to-date support and resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a simplified deployment experience with extensive community and documentation support. Its straightforward setup process facilitates quick installation. Automic Continuous Delivery Automation, despite its more complex deployment steps requiring dedicated resources, provides tailored enterprise support to align with customer needs and ensures reliability.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform features a competitive pricing model providing a high ROI with lower upfront costs, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. Automic Continuous Delivery Automation, while presenting higher initial costs, offers substantial long-term returns due to its advanced features and scalability, making it suitable for enterprises looking for robust automation solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,877 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Release Automation (3rd), Configuration Management (2nd), Network Automation (1st)

Featured Reviews

reviewer895359

Principal Project Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Automatic installation for complex deployments and environments, with good workflow support

I like that really complex deployments are possible with it. It's very good. You have everything you need. You can design your workflows for your needs. You can do so much more, it's not just an automatic installation tool. It's a real deployment tool. I can do the complete deployment with everything that is possible.

Read full review

Manas Kashyap

Senior Dev Ops Engineer at 11 East Capital

Automation has transformed server patching and has reduced months of work to minutes

The best features that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers is that it does not require any additional resources inside the servers. Python is the only requirement, and since Python is already present inside the servers, we can run it from our location and it automatically deploys things and does the work for us. The minimal requirements and easy deployment have definitely impacted my daily work and my team's efficiency. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is one of the best features that we depend on. We have evaluated other options, but Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was the best choice because it has saved us a tremendous amount of time. We do not need to manually intervene in the servers or install third-party software to maintain these things. It is very easy to write playbooks for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. Ansible Galaxy contains many playbooks that are readily available and ready to be used. It is highly configurable with Jinja templating, making it easy to maintain. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has positively impacted my organization. Previously, we needed to go into the servers and maintain them manually, which used to take a lot of time. For 200 to 300 servers, the maintenance took about one to two months. New patches would arrive and we would have to repeat the process. Now, it is a one-night work or a 10 to 15 minutes task. We write a playbook, maintain an inventory, and roll out the updates and it starts working for us. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform uses conditional clauses and has rollback options, functioning like a standard coding language that is simple to use. There is definitely a reduction in errors with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform because we have playbooks written with all the necessary clauses and rollback options. Manual work automatically creates more errors, whereas in automation, we have written sets that we do not forget every time we run it. We have protected written sets that we execute consistently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The metrics gathered after deployment, for example, the rate of success versus the rate of failure."

"It provides a wonderful user interface which is easy to use."

"Self-service for developers, because they are able to deploy to development departments on their own, without needing people from operations."

"What we like about the product is that it is more or less an umbrella system that allows us to integrate many different systems into our heterogeneous environment."

"Deployment workflow (WF) can be designed this way, so that it is not necessary to provide all applications (systems) artifacts of which an application consists."

"The product provides efficiency, in terms time, cost, and resources."

"It can support very complex environments and dependencies."

"The event monitor is very good. You can monitor when the file is created so you can pick up the file once it's done."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] pros

"I like the agentless feature, which means we don't install any agent in worker nodes."

"The most valuable features of the solution are automation and patching."

"The easy-to-read syntax for YAML files and the interoperability between modules are valuable."

"Role-based access control and agentless architecture are the main features which may attract users."

"One of the most valuable features is that Ansible is agentless. It does not have dependencies, other than Python, which is very generic in terms of dependencies for all systems and for any environment. Being agentless, Ansible is very convenient for everything."

"It saves time when it comes to service deployment, moves, or updates."

"There are new modules available, which help to simplify the workflow. That is what we like about it."

"Ansible is agentless. So, we don't need to set up any agent into the computer we are interacting with. The only prerequisite is that the host with which we are going to interact must have the Python interpreter installed on it. We can connect to a host and do our configuration by using Ansible."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pros

Cons

"We're a WebSphere shop so I would like to see more support for WebSphere, only because it's the platform that they seem to want to use the most."

"The stability of the solution can be improved."

"If you have a technical problem and need development of the tool, the support team is terrible, because they cannot help with the technical details."

"The dashboard should allow you to see the current state of packages in each environment, not only on an individual application basis, but across the entire application platform."

"File transfer is not very efficient. It takes a bit longer than some other methods and when you send the file from one platform to another, especially from the mainframe, the results consumption is quite high compared to other methods."

"The first time setup can be very complicated."

"There are some bugs. For example, during the design of a workflow, important information is lost, it vanishes."

"Stability-wise I think it still needs to be improved; performance-wise. It crashes from time to time."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] cons

"There needs to be improvement in the orchestration."

"Because Ansible is establishing SSH sessions to perform tasks, there is a limit on scalability."

"For Ansible Tower, there are three tiers with ten nodes. I would like them to expand those ten nodes to 20, because ten nodes is not enough to test on."

"It is a little slow on the network side because every time you call a module, it's initiating an SSH or an API call to a network device, and it just slows things down."

"I rate it a seven out of ten because there are a couple of things which I expect from Tower which are not there yet."

"The solution must be made easier to configure."

"There are some options not available in the community edition of the solution."

"I would like to see improvements in the dashboards. More detailed dashboards would be beneficial because there is a lack of dashboards on Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Customers often complain about the price."

"If you have a fixed contract, it has limits to spreading out. If you have a flexible enterprise license contract, then you have a lot of scalability for this tool."

"We increased our quality and reduced our time costs."

"I can save time and money more quickly."

"Users have to pay a per-node cost of around $ 100 per node."

"I don't see the pricing or licensing features, but from what I understand, it is fairly reasonable."

"Like many Red Hat products, they have a no-cost version of the web application (AWX, formerly Ansible Tower), but you are on your own to install and it is a little more complicated than just installing Ansible."

"Ansible is a lot more competitive than any of the others. Its setup was also straightforward. In fact, we just implemented Ansible on OpenShift, so that is how we are running the Ansible Automation Platform now."

"The cost is determined by the number of endpoints."

"We went with product because we have a subscription for Red Hat."

"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is an affordable solution."

"Customers need to pay yearly for the license."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	52

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is the difference between Red Hat Satellite and Ansible?

Red Hat Satellite has proven to be a worthwhile investment for me. Both its patch management and license management have been outstanding. If you have a large environment, patching systems is much ...

See all answers

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was very simple. There is no pricing and no licensing required, as Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform ...

See all answers

Comparisons

UrbanCode Deploy vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 25% of the time

Nolio Release Automation vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

Chef vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

GitLab vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Competitors

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 5% of the time

BigFix vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

August 2026

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] report

Download Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

July 2026

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report

Download Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform product report

Also Known As

CA Continuous Delivery Automation, Automic Release Automation, Automic ONE Automation, UC4 Automation Platform

Ansible, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Subscription on AWS

Overview

Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar.

Today, the pressure is on to transform how you deliver applications to market. Get release agility and speed without compromising quality and stability with CA Continuous Delivery Automation. Deliver apps reliably on demand from development through production—mobile to mainframe. Agilely scale as the cadence, volume and complexity of your apps grow. It’s DevOps-ready release management and automation for your dynamic enterprise.

Broadcom

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform streamlines IT operations with features like a simplified GUI and extensive module support. Its agentless architecture and YAML ease make it an adaptable choice for managing diverse infrastructures efficiently.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a robust automation framework that supports multiple environments and integrates well with various applications. Its agentless Python-based architecture facilitates efficient server management and rapid update deployment. Users benefit from centralized management through Ansible Tower, role-based access control, and dynamic inventory. However, improvement areas include documentation, API integration, network support, and UI scaling. Enhanced community contributions could address module availability and compatibility gaps.

What are the most important features of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

Agentless Architecture: Leverages Python for seamless management without needing local agents.
Extensive Module Support: Provides modules for managing multiple environments effectively.
Ansible Tower GUI: Offers a centralized interface for easy automation management.
Role-Based Access Control: Ensures user-specific permissions for improved security.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with a variety of applications to enhance functionality.
Dynamic Inventory: Automatically updates inventory, simplifying large infrastructure management.

What benefits and ROI should one consider?

Automation Efficiency: Significantly reduces manual intervention, saving time and resources.
Adaptability: Easily integrates with cloud platforms such as AWS, GCP, and Azure.
Security Compliance: Automates compliance checks, ensuring up-to-date security protocols.
Cost Management: Lower operational costs through streamlined processes.
Scalability: Supports infrastructure growth without requiring major adjustments.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is used for network management, security compliance, and configuration tasks. Organizations utilize its capabilities for cloud and on-premises deployment, infrastructure provisioning, and workflow orchestration. Many integrate it with tools such as Puppet or Terraform to enhance CI/CD processes, benefiting from its agentless design in adapting to cloud environments.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

BET365, Charter Communications, TASC

HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.