Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo

Top 10 Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Alternatives

Vendor: Red Hat
4.3 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Intune, GitLab, and Microsoft Azure DevOps. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive automation capabilities, scalability, and a user-friendly interface, enabling efficient orchestration, management, and provisioning across diverse environments with its robust community support and extensive integration options.

Red Hat Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Red Hat, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Microsoft Intune
4.1 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Microsoft Intune
4.1 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform excels in agentless architecture and straightforward configuration, appealing for automation needs. In comparison, Microsoft Intune provides strong integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, ideal for centralized device management and security. Both provide cost-effective solutions within their respective strengths.
Download Microsoft Intune vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Intune, highlighting a significant price differential in their initial implementation expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Intune, highlighting a significant price differential in their initial implementation expenses.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
GitLab
4.2 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
GitLab
4.2 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers simplicity and flexibility in automation. In comparison, GitLab excels in CI/CD integration and code management. Ansible's strong community support contrasts with GitLab's comprehensive repository management and seamless integration capabilities.
Download GitLab vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's setup cost is significantly lower than GitLab's. GitLab, on the other hand, offers more comprehensive features that might justify its higher setup cost for some users.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's setup cost is significantly lower than GitLab's. GitLab, on the other hand, offers more comprehensive features that might justify its higher setup cost for some users.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps
4.1 out of 5
Ansible attracts tech buyers with its agentless architecture and ease of automation across platforms, ideal for rapid deployment. In comparison, Azure DevOps offers a comprehensive toolset for CI/CD, appealing to organizations seeking extensive project management and integration within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Download Microsoft Azure DevOps vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a flexible setup cost which can vary based on deployment needs, while Microsoft Azure DevOps often includes setup costs within its subscription model, offering an integrated experience in cloud environments.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a flexible setup cost which can vary based on deployment needs, while Microsoft Azure DevOps often includes setup costs within its subscription model, offering an integrated experience in cloud environments.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Configuration Manager offers extensive features like software deployment and patch management, making it ideal for Windows-focused environments. In comparison, Ansible Automation Platform is valued for its flexibility through agentless architecture and hybrid deployments, appealing to diverse operational needs.
Download Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Microsoft Configuration Manager involves a higher initial setup cost, while Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform presents a more cost-effective setup. The clear difference in initial investment is significant for budget-conscious buyers.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Configuration Manager involves a higher initial setup cost, while Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform presents a more cost-effective setup. The clear difference in initial investment is significant for budget-conscious buyers.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
BigFix excels in endpoint management with real-time patching and robust inventory capabilities, appealing to those needing extensive control over endpoints. In comparison, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's agentless architecture and flexibility are ideal for dynamic automation across cloud environments.
Download BigFix vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
BigFix setup costs are typically higher upfront than those for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, which often offers more flexible pricing structures for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix setup costs are typically higher upfront than those for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, which often offers more flexible pricing structures for initial deployment.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
VMware Aria Automation
4.0 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers simplicity with agentless architecture and strong documentation, making it ideal for efficient operations. In comparison, VMware Aria Automation excels in integration and scalability for complex hybrid deployments, appealing to enterprises investing in long-term infrastructure management.
Download Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. VMware Aria Automation Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is praised for its low setup cost, offering affordability and simplicity, while VMware Aria Automation is noted for its higher initial expense, reflecting its extensive capabilities and comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is praised for its low setup cost, offering affordability and simplicity, while VMware Aria Automation is noted for its higher initial expense, reflecting its extensive capabilities and comprehensive features.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Cisco DNA Center
4.0 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Cisco DNA Center
4.0 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers affordability and ease of use with agentless architecture and YAML configuration. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center provides advanced network management, excelling in network visibility and security, justifying its higher cost for enterprises seeking comprehensive control.
Download Cisco DNA Center vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform setup costs are reportedly low, whereas Cisco DNA Center incurs higher setup expenses, making budget considerations a key factor in choosing between them.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform setup costs are reportedly low, whereas Cisco DNA Center incurs higher setup expenses, making budget considerations a key factor in choosing between them.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
VMware NSX
4.0 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
VMware NSX
4.0 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers simplicity and cost-effectiveness, ideal for flexible deployment and operational efficiency. In comparison, VMware NSX provides comprehensive network management and security for virtual environments, appealing to those needing robust integration and virtualization despite higher costs.
Download Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. VMware NSX Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a lower setup cost compared to VMware NSX, making it a more budget-friendly option for organizations looking for cost-effective automation solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a lower setup cost compared to VMware NSX, making it a more budget-friendly option for organizations looking for cost-effective automation solutions.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
AWS Systems Manager
4.1 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers agentless architecture and flexibility across various environments, appealing to hybrid cloud needs. In comparison, AWS Systems Manager integrates seamlessly within AWS, providing cost benefits for AWS users. Ansible supports hybrid infrastructure, while AWS Systems Manager focuses on public cloud deployment.
Download AWS Systems Manager vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has notable setup costs, while AWS Systems Manager offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. This reflects a significant difference in initial financial commitment for businesses considering these automation solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has notable setup costs, while AWS Systems Manager offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. This reflects a significant difference in initial financial commitment for businesses considering these automation solutions.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
NetBrain
3.6 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
NetBrain
3.6 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform appeals for its cost-effective, simplified setup, making it ideal for smaller-scale operations. In comparison, NetBrain excels in multi-vendor network automation with specialized visualization, which justifies its higher cost for larger enterprises needing complex network management.
Download NetBrain vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform generally requires a lower setup cost compared to NetBrain, which may have higher initial expenses. This distinction highlights potential financial implications when choosing between the two automation solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform generally requires a lower setup cost compared to NetBrain, which may have higher initial expenses. This distinction highlights potential financial implications when choosing between the two automation solutions.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager
4.1 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform provides cost-effective, flexible IT automation with extensive community support. In comparison, SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager offers comprehensive network features but requires significant initial investment due to device-based licensing, ideal for detailed network management across large infrastructures.
Download Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform shows a higher setup cost, focusing on extensive automation capabilities, while SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager offers a more affordable setup with strengths in network management, highlighting key differences in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform shows a higher setup cost, focusing on extensive automation capabilities, while SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager offers a more affordable setup with strengths in network management, highlighting key differences in initial investment.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
IBM Rapid Network Automation
1 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is preferred for its cost-effectiveness and flexibility in diverse environments. In comparison, IBM Rapid Network Automation delivers advanced features with superior network tools and deep analytics, appealing to enterprises seeking comprehensive automation despite higher initial costs.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a straightforward setup, while IBM Rapid Network Automation involves a more intricate initial configuration process.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a straightforward setup, while IBM Rapid Network Automation involves a more intricate initial configuration process.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
HashiCorp Terraform
4.3 out of 5
Ansible's agentless architecture offers simplicity and scalability with YAML configuration and strong community support. In comparison, Terraform excels with a platform-agnostic approach and modularity. While Ansible suits ease of deployment, Terraform's efficiency in managing infrastructure as code appeals to tech buyers.
Download HashiCorp Terraform vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform incurs higher setup costs, while HashiCorp Terraform offers a more economical setup alternative, highlighting the financial contrast in deploying these automation tools.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform incurs higher setup costs, while HashiCorp Terraform offers a more economical setup alternative, highlighting the financial contrast in deploying these automation tools.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Chef
4.0 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Chef
4.0 out of 5
Chef offers strong configuration management and integration capabilities, useful for organizations seeking headless operations. In comparison, Ansible provides agentless architecture and YAML simplicity, appealing for those favoring straightforward deployments. Chef supports flexible environments; Ansible excels in hybrid and cloud integrations.
Download Chef vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Chef has an easier setup process, whereas Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers more costly initial deployment due to its extensive features and support.
View comparison
Pricing
Chef has an easier setup process, whereas Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers more costly initial deployment due to its extensive features and support.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
CloudBees
4.2 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
CloudBees
4.2 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, with its cost-effective, agentless architecture and extensive community support, appeals to organizations seeking open-source solutions. In comparison, CloudBees justifies its higher cost by offering robust CI/CD capabilities, advanced security, and scalability for large enterprise applications.
Download CloudBees vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform incurs a one-time setup cost, while CloudBees requires ongoing setup expenses, highlighting differing investment approaches for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform incurs a one-time setup cost, while CloudBees requires ongoing setup expenses, highlighting differing investment approaches for initial deployment.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Digital.ai Agility
4.3 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Digital.ai Agility
4.3 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is ideal for those seeking scalability and ease of deployment with competitive pricing. In comparison, Digital.ai Agility appeals to organizations needing advanced integration and a comprehensive feature set, justifying its higher initial investment with long-term strategic value.
Download Digital.ai Agility vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a higher setup cost, while Digital.ai Agility offers a more affordable initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a higher setup cost, while Digital.ai Agility offers a more affordable initial investment.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
UrbanCode Deploy
3.9 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
UrbanCode Deploy
3.9 out of 5
UrbanCode Deploy offers robust features like custom workflows and traceable deployments, ideal for large environments. In comparison, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform provides ease with its agentless architecture and YAML configuration, suitable for hybrid cloud flexibility and community support.
Download Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. UrbanCode Deploy Report
UrbanCode Deploy requires an initial investment, making it potentially costlier upfront, while Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is known for its competitive installation costs, providing a budget-friendly alternative.
View comparison
Pricing
UrbanCode Deploy requires an initial investment, making it potentially costlier upfront, while Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is known for its competitive installation costs, providing a budget-friendly alternative.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
SUSE Manager
4.3 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
SUSE Manager
4.3 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers robust automation capabilities and a low entry cost for automation tasks. In comparison, SUSE Manager excels in comprehensive management features and supports complex environments, appealing to buyers seeking advanced system management despite higher upfront costs.
Download Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. SUSE Manager Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is praised for a straightforward setup with minimal initial cost, while SUSE Manager is noted for higher upfront expenses. Differences in setup costs highlight varying entry barriers between these automation solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is praised for a straightforward setup with minimal initial cost, while SUSE Manager is noted for higher upfront expenses. Differences in setup costs highlight varying entry barriers between these automation solutions.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
GoCD
3.8 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
GoCD
3.8 out of 5
GoCD supports streamlined pipelines and low costs, appealing to teams focused on continuous delivery. In comparison, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers comprehensive automation and flexibility, justifying higher investment for enterprises seeking extensive integration and orchestration capabilities.
Download GoCD vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
GoCD has lower setup costs, making it a budget-friendly choice, whereas Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform involves higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive functionality.
View comparison
Pricing
GoCD has lower setup costs, making it a budget-friendly choice, whereas Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform involves higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive functionality.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
BMC TrueSight Server Automation
4.2 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers simplicity with agentless architecture and broad integration capabilities. In comparison, BMC TrueSight Server Automation provides comprehensive compliance and patching features, appealing to enterprises needing robust automation despite higher complexity and cost.
Download BMC TrueSight Server Automation vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform typically offers a lower setup cost compared to BMC TrueSight Server Automation, providing a more budget-friendly option. On the other hand, BMC TrueSight may incorporate a more extensive initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform typically offers a lower setup cost compared to BMC TrueSight Server Automation, providing a more budget-friendly option. On the other hand, BMC TrueSight may incorporate a more extensive initial expense.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager
2.8 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is valued for its scalable open-source automation and straightforward deployment. In comparison, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager provides comprehensive network management features with automated monitoring and analysis, catering to complex network needs despite higher initial investment.
Download Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform often involves lower setup costs, making it more accessible for organizations with budget constraints, while SolarWinds Network Automation Manager may entail higher initial investments, reflecting its comprehensive feature set and scalability.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform often involves lower setup costs, making it more accessible for organizations with budget constraints, while SolarWinds Network Automation Manager may entail higher initial investments, reflecting its comprehensive feature set and scalability.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
AWS CloudFormation
4.2 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
AWS CloudFormation
4.2 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers simplicity with agentless architecture and Python, ideal for diverse environments. In comparison, AWS CloudFormation provides infrastructure as code, automating AWS deployments with templates, beneficial for those deeply integrated within the AWS ecosystem.
Download AWS CloudFormation vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform requires higher setup costs compared to AWS CloudFormation, which offers a more straightforward initialization process.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform requires higher setup costs compared to AWS CloudFormation, which offers a more straightforward initialization process.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Perforce Puppet
4.1 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Perforce Puppet
4.1 out of 5
Perforce Puppet offers scalability and affordable pricing, attracting cost-sensitive enterprises. In comparison, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform excels with extensive features and broad integrations. Ansible suits organizations seeking comprehensive solutions, while Puppet appeals to those prioritizing cost-efficiency and straightforward deployment.
Download Perforce Puppet vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Perforce Puppet incurs significant setup costs, while the Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Perforce Puppet incurs significant setup costs, while the Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Digital.ai Release
4.2 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Digital.ai Release
4.2 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers cost-effectiveness and strong customer support. In comparison, Digital.ai Release excels with robust release orchestration and pipeline automation. Tech buyers might prefer the former for pricing or the latter for advanced release management capabilities.
Download Digital.ai Release vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is recognized for its straightforward setup, while Digital.ai Release offers a more intricate installation process, emphasizing a clear distinction in ease of implementation between these two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is recognized for its straightforward setup, while Digital.ai Release offers a more intricate installation process, emphasizing a clear distinction in ease of implementation between these two solutions.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Nuage Networks
4.4 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Nuage Networks
4.4 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers ease of use and cost-effective automation, ideal for broad market adoption. In comparison, Nuage Networks delivers extensive networking features and robust security, appealing to those needing advanced capabilities in complex network environments despite higher setup costs.
Download Nuage Networks vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform incurs a higher initial setup cost compared to Nuage Networks, which offers a more budget-friendly option with simpler setup processes.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform incurs a higher initial setup cost compared to Nuage Networks, which offers a more budget-friendly option with simpler setup processes.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks
3.8 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform appeals with its scalable performance and integration ease, attracting cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks justifies its higher price with advanced diagnostics and regulatory compliance, attracting those needing robust network capabilities.
Download BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a lower setup cost, while BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks involves higher initial expenses, highlighting a significant cost-effective advantage for Ansible in terms of establishing the automation environment.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a lower setup cost, while BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks involves higher initial expenses, highlighting a significant cost-effective advantage for Ansible in terms of establishing the automation environment.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
AWS Config
4.3 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
AWS Config
4.3 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers flexibility and ease of use, making it ideal for varied IT environments. In comparison, AWS Config excels in monitoring AWS resources, making it suitable for AWS-centric operations. Ansible provides adaptable automation, while AWS Config integrates seamlessly within AWS ecosystems.
Download AWS Config vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform involves a moderate setup cost, while AWS Config's setup is typically less expensive, highlighting a cost efficiency difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform involves a moderate setup cost, while AWS Config's setup is typically less expensive, highlighting a cost efficiency difference.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
AWS CodeDeploy
3.9 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
AWS CodeDeploy
3.9 out of 5
Ansible's agentless setup simplifies deployments with SSH and YAML scripting, ideal for hybrid environments. In comparison, AWS CodeDeploy's robust cloud-native integrations support efficient management of AWS services. Ansible appeals for ease and cost-effectiveness, while AWS CodeDeploy excels in seamless AWS service integration.
Download AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has higher setup costs compared to AWS CodeDeploy, making CodeDeploy a more budget-friendly option. However, Ansible's robust features can justify its initial expense for enterprises seeking comprehensive automation solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has higher setup costs compared to AWS CodeDeploy, making CodeDeploy a more budget-friendly option. However, Ansible's robust features can justify its initial expense for enterprises seeking comprehensive automation solutions.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Nolio Release Automation
3.9 out of 5
Nolio Release Automation offers flexible visual design enabling deployment without scripting, ideal for reducing times. In comparison, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's agentless architecture and YAML playbooks offer intuitive automation, with strong integration. Both present unique deployment, pricing, and documentation strengths and weaknesses.
Download Nolio Release Automation vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Nolio Release Automation involves higher setup costs compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting a clear difference in initial expenditure necessary for integrating these automation solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Nolio Release Automation involves higher setup costs compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting a clear difference in initial expenditure necessary for integrating these automation solutions.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Octopus Deploy
4.0 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Octopus Deploy
4.0 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform excels in integration capabilities, offering extensive automation workflows suited for complex IT operations. In comparison, Octopus Deploy's strengths lie in its specialized deployment features and efficient release management, attracting organizations prioritizing streamlined application deployment.
Download Octopus Deploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Octopus Deploy. Meanwhile, Octopus Deploy offers a more affordable initial cost, making it a more budget-friendly option for those concerned about immediate expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Octopus Deploy. Meanwhile, Octopus Deploy offers a more affordable initial cost, making it a more budget-friendly option for those concerned about immediate expenses.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Spring Cloud
3.3 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Spring Cloud
3.3 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform excels in straightforward automation and low initial costs, appealing to cost-sensitive operations. In comparison, Spring Cloud offers extensive cloud-native features justifying its higher cost for enhanced scalability, making it attractive for long-term cloud strategy implementations.
Download Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. Spring Cloud Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while Spring Cloud offers a more flexible pricing model. This setup cost difference highlights Red Hat's simplicity and Spring Cloud's adaptability to various deployment scenarios.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while Spring Cloud offers a more flexible pricing model. This setup cost difference highlights Red Hat's simplicity and Spring Cloud's adaptability to various deployment scenarios.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
OpenText Network Automation
3.8 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is praised for its cost-effectiveness and broad community support, making it ideal for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, OpenText Network Automation offers advanced features and detailed insights, appealing to those needing comprehensive network assessments despite higher initial costs.
Download OpenText Network Automation vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform presents a straightforward setup without significant initial investment, whereas OpenText Network Automation requires a more substantial setup cost. This difference highlights cost considerations that may influence initial deployment decisions.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform presents a straightforward setup without significant initial investment, whereas OpenText Network Automation requires a more substantial setup cost. This difference highlights cost considerations that may influence initial deployment decisions.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
ManageEngine Network Configuration Management
1 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers superior adaptability and integration, excelling in broad automation tasks and supporting diverse IT operations. In comparison, ManageEngine Network Configuration Management focuses on comprehensive network management, providing cost-effective solutions for businesses prioritizing in-depth network oversight and monitoring.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's setup cost is higher, offering advanced automation capabilities, while ManageEngine Network Configuration Management provides a budget-friendly option with basic features suitable for smaller networks.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's setup cost is higher, offering advanced automation capabilities, while ManageEngine Network Configuration Management provides a budget-friendly option with basic features suitable for smaller networks.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
ManageEngine OS Deployer
3.0 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform excels in scalability and integration for comprehensive IT automation, making it ideal for complex environments. In comparison, ManageEngine OS Deployer offers an intuitive OS deployment process and attractive pricing, appealing to budget-conscious buyers seeking efficient OS solutions.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a higher initial setup cost, while ManageEngine OS Deployer offers more economical setup options. This noticeable difference may influence preference based on budget considerations for deployment automation solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a higher initial setup cost, while ManageEngine OS Deployer offers more economical setup options. This noticeable difference may influence preference based on budget considerations for deployment automation solutions.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Digital.ai Deploy
3.7 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Digital.ai Deploy
3.7 out of 5
Digital.ai Deploy offers better pricing and responsive customer support. In comparison, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform provides superior features and orchestration capabilities, excelling in large-scale implementations. Tech buyers may choose Digital.ai for cost-effectiveness or Red Hat for feature-rich scalability.
Download Digital.ai Deploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Digital.ai Deploy's setup cost is typically higher compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, which offers a more straightforward initial cost structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Digital.ai Deploy's setup cost is typically higher compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, which offers a more straightforward initial cost structure.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Itential Automation Platform
1 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is favored for its competitive pricing and broad IT automation. In comparison, Itential Automation Platform attracts those seeking advanced network capabilities with integration options. Red Hat's simplicity contrasts with Itential's specialized focus, influencing buyer choices based on specific technology needs.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a relatively lower initial setup cost compared to Itential Automation Platform, which may influence organizations with budget constraints when considering initial implementation expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a relatively lower initial setup cost compared to Itential Automation Platform, which may influence organizations with budget constraints when considering initial implementation expenses.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
BackBox
1 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
BackBox
1 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform excels in comprehensive automation and scalability across IT operations. In comparison, BackBox provides strong network automation and backup management, appealing to organizations needing specialized network solutions. Red Hat's support and pricing suit diverse systems, while BackBox maximizes network ROI.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a competitive setup cost, while BackBox is known for its affordability. BackBox's budget-friendly nature makes it a preferred choice for cost-sensitive users compared to the more premium pricing of Ansible.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a competitive setup cost, while BackBox is known for its affordability. BackBox's budget-friendly nature makes it a preferred choice for cost-sensitive users compared to the more premium pricing of Ansible.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Apstra Operating System
4.0 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is valued for its extensive module library and flexible automation capabilities. In comparison, Apstra Operating System appeals to buyers interested in intent-based networking and advanced analytics. Red Hat's lower cost enhances appeal, while Apstra's premium features justify its higher price.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform setup costs are comprehensive, while Apstra Operating System offers a streamlined approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform setup costs are comprehensive, while Apstra Operating System offers a streamlined approach.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
SolarWinds Kiwi CatTools
1 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers scalability and robust automation across diverse IT environments. In comparison, SolarWinds Kiwi CatTools provides immediate ROI with network-focused features like backup and scheduling. Tech buyers may choose based on whether they prioritize broad automation or specific network management capabilities.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform typically involves a higher setup cost, while SolarWinds Kiwi CatTools offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting their distinct pricing approaches for automation needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform typically involves a higher setup cost, while SolarWinds Kiwi CatTools offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting their distinct pricing approaches for automation needs.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
BlueCat Gateway
4.5 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
BlueCat Gateway
4.5 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers comprehensive IT process automation for diverse environments, favored for flexibility. In comparison, BlueCat Gateway excels in DNS management with a focus on security. Ansible's adaptability contrasts with BlueCat's efficient DNS-specific deployment, catering to different strengths.
Download BlueCat Gateway vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while BlueCat Gateway provides a more complex pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while BlueCat Gateway provides a more complex pricing structure.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Unimus
1 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Unimus
1 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is ideal for complex enterprise tasks with extensive automation capabilities. In comparison, Unimus focuses on efficient network management with quick deployment. A tech buyer might choose Ansible for its broad spectrum or Unimus for its simplicity and cost-effectiveness.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Unimus, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Unimus, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
CFEngine Enterprise
1 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform appeals with favorable pricing and support through YAML playbooks and integrations. In comparison, CFEngine Enterprise offers scalability and policy-based management, suitable for large environments with minimal resource needs, guiding tech buyers based on simplicity or scalability priorities.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform involves minimal initial setup costs, while CFEngine Enterprise features a more complex setup process that could incur higher expenses. This makes Ansible potentially more accessible for organizations with limited budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform involves minimal initial setup costs, while CFEngine Enterprise features a more complex setup process that could incur higher expenses. This makes Ansible potentially more accessible for organizations with limited budgets.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Anuta ATOM
1 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Anuta ATOM
1 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform excels in community support and IT automation versatility, appealing to diverse environments. In comparison, Anuta ATOM stands out for advanced network orchestration, attracting businesses needing robust multi-vendor automation for managing complex networks.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a higher initial setup cost compared to Anuta ATOM, highlighting its comprehensive feature set and large-scale enterprise focus, while Anuta ATOM offers a more cost-effective setup for smaller or mid-sized organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a higher initial setup cost compared to Anuta ATOM, highlighting its comprehensive feature set and large-scale enterprise focus, while Anuta ATOM offers a more cost-effective setup for smaller or mid-sized organizations.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
HCL Launch
1 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
HCL Launch
1 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform attracts tech buyers with its cost-effectiveness and ease of use. In comparison, HCL Launch entices those requiring advanced deployment capabilities with its comprehensive feature set and superior pipeline features, appealing to businesses managing intricate deployment scenarios.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a lower setup cost, providing a budget-friendly entry, whereas HCL Launch involves a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a lower setup cost, providing a budget-friendly entry, whereas HCL Launch involves a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive capabilities.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
OpenText Release Control
1 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is favored for integration flexibility and scalable ROI. In comparison, OpenText Release Control excels in structured release management, offering specialized features despite higher costs, appealing to tech buyers valuing comprehensive governance and process control over immediate financial returns.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is praised for its cost-effective setup, while OpenText Release Control requires a higher upfront investment. This key difference may influence the decision-making process for organizations evaluating these automation solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is praised for its cost-effective setup, while OpenText Release Control requires a higher upfront investment. This key difference may influence the decision-making process for organizations evaluating these automation solutions.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
AppViewX AUTOMATION+
5.0 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform excels in complex environments with scalable playbook automation and integration capabilities. In comparison, AppViewX AUTOMATION+ offers application-centric automation and intuitive interface, appealing for its simplicity and dedicated support, making it ideal for specific applications and faster integration.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform involves a straightforward setup cost, while AppViewX AUTOMATION+ requires a more detailed configuration process. This highlights the ease-of-setup difference between the two.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform involves a straightforward setup cost, while AppViewX AUTOMATION+ requires a more detailed configuration process. This highlights the ease-of-setup difference between the two.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Attune
1 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Attune
1 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform attracts large enterprises with its extensive libraries and broad integration capabilities. In comparison, Attune offers tailored solutions with superior automation customization, making it ideal for niche requirements. Ansible's cost-effectiveness contrasts with Attune's perceived high initial costs but enhanced productivity.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform requires an initial setup cost that can be higher than Attune, which offers a more affordable setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform requires an initial setup cost that can be higher than Attune, which offers a more affordable setup.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Inedo Otter
1 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Inedo Otter
1 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform excels with strong integration and scalability, attracting enterprises needing extensive automation. In comparison, Inedo Otter attracts buyers seeking agile configuration management and customization, delivering flexible deployment and responsive support, with a lower initial cost enhancing its investment appeal.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform typically incurs lower setup costs, offering cost-effective initial deployment, whereas Inedo Otter presents higher initial fees, impacting upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform typically incurs lower setup costs, offering cost-effective initial deployment, whereas Inedo Otter presents higher initial fees, impacting upfront investment.

Related categories

Configuration Management
Release Automation
Network Automation