AWS CodeDeploy vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Red Hat are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8, while Red Hat is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.9% mindshare in RA, compared to Red Hat’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

AWS CodeDeploy

Read 15 AWS CodeDeploy reviews

771 Views
771 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Read 72 Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform reviews

9,831 Views
1,376 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

AWS CodeDeploy

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 1, 2026

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and AWS CodeDeploy are competing in the automation and deployment category. AWS CodeDeploy seems to have the upper hand due to its seamless integration with AWS services and cost-effective pricing.

Features: Ansible offers an agentless architecture, ease of use with YAML configuration, and extensive community support. It flexibly operates across cloud and on-premises environments without needing to install clients on hosts. AWS CodeDeploy provides seamless integration with other AWS services, flexible rollback capabilities, and consistent deployments within the AWS ecosystem.

Room for Improvement: Red Hat Ansible could improve scalability, enhance its graphical dashboard, and provide better private package repository support. Enhancements in API documentation and Windows management modules are also needed. AWS CodeDeploy could benefit from more plugins, better YAML configuration handling, and reducing AWS CodePipeline dependency. Improving deployment strategies, such as blue-green implementations, would also be advantageous.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat Ansible adapts well to hybrid, private, and public clouds with robust customer support and extensive community resources. However, response speed and clarity in Red Hat support could improve. AWS CodeDeploy offers straightforward integration into AWS environments with varying customer support experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Ansible offers an open-source base with additional feature costs tied to node counts. While this provides a competitive ROI, expenses related to Ansible Tower and licensing are concerns for scaling organizations. AWS CodeDeploy, with its usage-based pricing, offers exceptional value for enterprises within AWS environments, delivering strategic cost-efficiency through its straightforward pricing model.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeDeploy

Ranking in Release Automation

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Ranking in Release Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management (1st), Network Automation (1st), AWS Pro Service Providers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Release Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodeDeploy is 1.9%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is 4.1%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Release Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform	4.1%
AWS CodeDeploy	1.9%
Other	94.0%

Release Automation

Featured Reviews

Harsh Shrivastava

Senior Software Engineer at Thomson Reuters

Automated deployments have reduced downtime and now deliver faster, consistent releases

AWS CodeDeploy offers several valuable features, including deployment to fleets of EC2 servers, on-premises servers deployed to data center infrastructure, AWS Lambda for serverless function updates, and Amazon ECS for containerized applications. The feature I use most frequently is deployment to Amazon EC2 instances, where I deploy backend services to EC2 servers, enabling zero-downtime deployment. AWS CodeDeploy supports rolling updates, blue-green deployments, and canary deployments to minimize or eliminate downtime. Additional standout features include consistent deployments across environments, the ability to deploy to development, staging, and production environments, centralized control, integration with CI/CD pipelines, and automatic rollback. AWS CodeDeploy has positively impacted my organization by significantly reducing deployment times to achieve zero downtime during deployments. Generally, it takes very little time for backend services to be deployed to EC2 instances.

Read full review

Manas Kashyap

Senior DevOps engineer at Elevenxcapital

Automation has transformed server patching and has reduced months of work to minutes

The best features that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers is that it does not require any additional resources inside the servers. Python is the only requirement, and since Python is already present inside the servers, we can run it from our location and it automatically deploys things and does the work for us. The minimal requirements and easy deployment have definitely impacted my daily work and my team's efficiency. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is one of the best features that we depend on. We have evaluated other options, but Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was the best choice because it has saved us a tremendous amount of time. We do not need to manually intervene in the servers or install third-party software to maintain these things. It is very easy to write playbooks for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. Ansible Galaxy contains many playbooks that are readily available and ready to be used. It is highly configurable with Jinja templating, making it easy to maintain. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has positively impacted my organization. Previously, we needed to go into the servers and maintain them manually, which used to take a lot of time. For 200 to 300 servers, the maintenance took about one to two months. New patches would arrive and we would have to repeat the process. Now, it is a one-night work or a 10 to 15 minutes task. We write a playbook, maintain an inventory, and roll out the updates and it starts working for us. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform uses conditional clauses and has rollback options, functioning like a standard coding language that is simple to use. There is definitely a reduction in errors with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform because we have playbooks written with all the necessary clauses and rollback options. Manual work automatically creates more errors, whereas in automation, we have written sets that we do not forget every time we run it. We have protected written sets that we execute consistently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"I found the default settings of AWS CodeDeploy to be highly beneficial for my deployment workflows. For instance, when deploying a Node.js application, I manually installed the necessary components on my AWS instance, such as the web server required by developers. Then, I created deployment scripts for starting and stopping instances and performing the deployment itself. These scripts were stored alongside my code in GitHub, ensuring they executed seamlessly with the CI/CD pipeline. Since the project wasn't overly complex, I opted for the default settings, which proved to be efficient and straightforward for deployment."

"I appreciate the feature for automating the deployment of code to the server."

"The biggest feature of AWS CodeDeploy is its scalability."

"I can integrate it with other AWS services."

"CodeDeploy is quite easy to use within the AWS ecosystem."

"The most valuable features of AWS CodeDeploy are its integration with other AWS services to deploy applications."

"CodeDeploy is very stable. I rate it a 10 for stability."

More AWS CodeDeploy pros

"It was easy to read and learn. It is a YAML-based syntax, which makes it easily understand and pick up."

"Role-based access control and agentless architecture are the main features which may attract users."

"This solution allows us to stitch a lot of different parts of the workflow together."

"We can automate a few host configurations using the product."

"The automation capabilities streamline deployment processes, providing reliability and reducing manual intervention and errors."

"The most valuable feature is that Ansible is agentless."

"The automation manager is very good."

"The most valuable features of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform are the agentless platform and writing the code is simple using the Yaml computer language."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pros

Cons

"The documentation could be more detailed, especially for new users."

"I faced some stability issues."

"The support and those things are lacking compared to others."

"The documentation could be more detailed, especially for new users."

"AWS CodeDeploy doesn't provide multiple plugins like Jenkins, which is a shortcoming where improvements are required."

"An improvement for the end users would be easier implementation, especially regarding local testing tools for deployment."

"AWS CodeDeploy's lack of ability to use independently without CodePipeline or CodeBuild makes it unstable."

"An improvement for the end users would be easier implementation, especially regarding local testing tools for deployment."

More AWS CodeDeploy cons

"There have been some differences between the operating systems that we have noticed. It could be down to cryptographic policies, but we have noticed some speed issues. They should work on the speed of deployment on different operating systems."

"In Community, there's a lot of effort towards testing, standardizing, and testing for module development to role development, which is why Molecule is now becoming real. Same thing with Zuul, which we are starting to implement. Zulu tests out modules from third-party sources, like ourselves, and verifies that the modules work before they are committed to the code. Currently, Ansible can't do this with all the modules out there."

"The area which I feel can be improved is the custom modules. For example, there are something like 106 official modules available in the Ansible library. A year ago, that number was somewhere around 58. While Ansible is improving day by day, this can be improved more. For instance, when you need to configure in the cloud, you need to write up a module for that."

"Some of the Cisco modules could be expanded, which would be great, along with not having to do so much coding in the background to make it work."

"More library support for microservices architecture and Kubernetes would be helpful."

"I have observed that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform could improve by creating modules for upcoming AI and ML tech stacks, as currently, specific modules for these are not available."

"The technical support is not adequate. The Ansible sales and technical support services need significant improvement."

"We are not using the Dashboard a lot because we have higher expectations from it. The default Dashboard from Tower doesn't give that much information. We really want to get down into more than if the job succeeded or what was the percentage of success. We want to get down to task-level success. If, in a job, there are ten tasks, we want to see this task was a success, and this was not, and how many were not. That's the kind of granularity we are looking for, that Tower does not give right now."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS CodeDeploy has proven to be a cost-effective solution for us, especially considering the benefits we gain from using it. In terms of pricing, AWS is quite affordable, providing excellent value for the features and services it offers."

"It is costly."

"The product's price is normal."

"The product is free with EC2."

"Since we are using a dedicated AWS environment, the solution's pricing is fine."

"Ansible Tower is pretty expensive."

"We're charged between $8 to $13 a month per license."

"Red Hat's open source approach was a factor when choosing Ansible, since the solution is free as of right now."

"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is an affordable solution."

"The solution is inexpensive compared to other products."

"If you only need to use Ansible, it's free for any end-user, but when you require Ansible Tower, you need to pay per Ansible Tower server."

"It’s an open-source tool."

"You don't need to buy agents on servers or deploy expense management when using the solution, which affected our decision to go with it."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

University

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	48

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeDeploy?

Automation of Deployments

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeDeploy?

Evaluating cost, it is important to note that the services provided by CodeDeploy can be expensive to purchase from other cloud platforms. However, depending on the services, it might be worth the ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS CodeDeploy?

My usual use cases for AWS CodeDeploy involve utilizing it as an AWS service, which is a subservice of CodePipeline. AWS CodePipeline is a whole package of services which consists of AWS CodeDeploy...

See all answers

What is the difference between Red Hat Satellite and Ansible?

Red Hat Satellite has proven to be a worthwhile investment for me. Both its patch management and license management have been outstanding. If you have a large environment, patching systems is much ...

See all answers

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

The most valuable features of the solution are automation and patching.

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Amplify vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 20% of the time

UrbanCode Deploy vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 17% of the time

GitLab vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 12% of the time

Spinnaker vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 9% of the time

More AWS CodeDeploy Competitors

VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 4% of the time

BigFix vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeDeploy

February 2026

Download AWS CodeDeploy product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

January 2026

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report

Download Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Ansible, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Subscription on AWS

Overview

AWS CodeDeploy is a service that automates code deployments to any instance, including Amazon EC2 instances and instances running on-premises. AWS CodeDeploy makes it easier for you to rapidly release new features, helps you avoid downtime during deployment, and handles the complexity of updating your applications. You can use AWS CodeDeploy to automate deployments, eliminating the need for error-prone manual operations, and the service scales with your infrastructure so you can easily deploy to one instance or thousands.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform streamlines IT operations with features like a simplified GUI and extensive module support. Its agentless architecture and YAML ease make it an adaptable choice for managing diverse infrastructures efficiently.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a robust automation framework that supports multiple environments and integrates well with various applications. Its agentless Python-based architecture facilitates efficient server management and rapid update deployment. Users benefit from centralized management through Ansible Tower, role-based access control, and dynamic inventory. However, improvement areas include documentation, API integration, network support, and UI scaling. Enhanced community contributions could address module availability and compatibility gaps.

What are the most important features of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

Agentless Architecture: Leverages Python for seamless management without needing local agents.
Extensive Module Support: Provides modules for managing multiple environments effectively.
Ansible Tower GUI: Offers a centralized interface for easy automation management.
Role-Based Access Control: Ensures user-specific permissions for improved security.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with a variety of applications to enhance functionality.
Dynamic Inventory: Automatically updates inventory, simplifying large infrastructure management.

What benefits and ROI should one consider?

Automation Efficiency: Significantly reduces manual intervention, saving time and resources.
Adaptability: Easily integrates with cloud platforms such as AWS, GCP, and Azure.
Security Compliance: Automates compliance checks, ensuring up-to-date security protocols.
Cost Management: Lower operational costs through streamlined processes.
Scalability: Supports infrastructure growth without requiring major adjustments.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is used for network management, security compliance, and configuration tasks. Organizations utilize its capabilities for cloud and on-premises deployment, infrastructure provisioning, and workflow orchestration. Many integrate it with tools such as Puppet or Terraform to enhance CI/CD processes, benefiting from its agentless design in adapting to cloud environments.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

February 2026

Free Report: AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.