AWS CodeDeploy vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Red Hat are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8, while Red Hat is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.0% mindshare in RA, compared to Red Hat’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

AWS CodeDeploy

Read 14 AWS CodeDeploy reviews

715 Views
715 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Read 72 Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform reviews

9,486 Views
1,328 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

AWS CodeDeploy

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 28, 2025

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and AWS CodeDeploy are leading competitors in the automation and deployment category. Red Hat Ansible seems to have an edge due to its agentless architecture and strong community support.

Features: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform stands out with its agentless architecture, eliminating client installations and using SSH-only access. Its user-friendly YAML syntax makes it accessible, and robust documentation supports diverse environments. Community support enhances value through extensive plugins and modules. AWS CodeDeploy excels within the AWS ecosystem, offering reliable integration with AWS services and efficient automation of deployment pipelines.

Room for Improvement: Red Hat Ansible could improve scalability beyond hundreds of servers and enhance support for private package repositories. Documentation, while detailed, may benefit from greater focus on specific modules. AWS CodeDeploy could enhance standalone capabilities to reduce dependency on AWS CodePipeline and expand its documentation and plugin options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is versatile across hybrid, on-premises, and cloud environments, complemented by community and partner support. Faster response times in complex technical support scenarios would be beneficial. AWS CodeDeploy is adaptable in hybrid and cloud settings, greatly benefiting from the supportive AWS environment and straightforward access, leading to high user satisfaction with support.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers an open-source version, with added costs for Ansible Tower based on a per-node model, which may become expensive with scaling. The platform demonstrates ROI in manpower savings. AWS CodeDeploy features usage-based pricing within AWS, providing excellent value, although it may become costly when combining multiple AWS services. Both deliver tangible ROI through automation and efficiency gains.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeDeploy

Ranking in Release Automation

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Ranking in Release Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management (1st), Network Automation (1st), AWS Pro Service Providers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Release Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodeDeploy is 2.0%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is 4.2%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Release Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform	4.2%
AWS CodeDeploy	2.0%
Other	93.8%

Release Automation

Featured Reviews

Mahadev Metre

DevOps Engineer at Paydoh

YAML configuration and cloud integration simplify tasks and enhance AWS resource flexibility

The features and capabilities of AWS CodeDeploy that I have found most valuable are that it is very user-friendly, and the codebase we can use there, specifically the tech stack, is YAML configuration. YAML is quite user-friendly itself, so if you just understand the basic concepts of YAML, then you're good to go. However, people face some problems with the YAML tech stack, as it is very strict with indentation and the placement of attributes. Overall, it's very strict with indentation and how it interprets our input. For example, in a stage where an environment is defined, there should be two spaces followed by an environment key and value. Knowing YAML is essential before working on AWS CodeDeploy, as the YAML file controls the service. AWS CodeDeploy's integration with other AWS services contributes significantly to scaling, monitoring, and security in my deployment processes by requiring IAM permissions. This is the only gateway for it to obtain permission to perform any tasks or triggers. One advantage we have with AWS CodeDeploy is its hassle-free accessibility through IAM roles and permissions. Being an AWS service, it operates on ARNs, which are identifiers. When we refer to these codes in IAM policies, we can give specific permissions while adhering to the least privileges rule of IAM. This makes it quite good and flexible with AWS resources, unlike third-party options.

Read full review

Manas Kashyap

Senior DevOps engineer at Elevenxcapital

Automation has transformed server patching and has reduced months of work to minutes

The best features that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers is that it does not require any additional resources inside the servers. Python is the only requirement, and since Python is already present inside the servers, we can run it from our location and it automatically deploys things and does the work for us. The minimal requirements and easy deployment have definitely impacted my daily work and my team's efficiency. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is one of the best features that we depend on. We have evaluated other options, but Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was the best choice because it has saved us a tremendous amount of time. We do not need to manually intervene in the servers or install third-party software to maintain these things. It is very easy to write playbooks for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. Ansible Galaxy contains many playbooks that are readily available and ready to be used. It is highly configurable with Jinja templating, making it easy to maintain. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has positively impacted my organization. Previously, we needed to go into the servers and maintain them manually, which used to take a lot of time. For 200 to 300 servers, the maintenance took about one to two months. New patches would arrive and we would have to repeat the process. Now, it is a one-night work or a 10 to 15 minutes task. We write a playbook, maintain an inventory, and roll out the updates and it starts working for us. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform uses conditional clauses and has rollback options, functioning like a standard coding language that is simple to use. There is definitely a reduction in errors with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform because we have playbooks written with all the necessary clauses and rollback options. Manual work automatically creates more errors, whereas in automation, we have written sets that we do not forget every time we run it. We have protected written sets that we execute consistently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's just like every other AWS resource I use. It gets the job done."

"The most valuable features of AWS CodeDeploy are its integration with other AWS services to deploy applications."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"CodeDeploy is quite easy to use within the AWS ecosystem."

"CodeDeploy is very stable. I rate it a 10 for stability."

"The biggest feature of AWS CodeDeploy is its scalability."

"You can easily integrate AWS CodeDeploy with multiple services."

"The product is easy to use."

More AWS CodeDeploy pros

"The solution is capable of integrating with many applications and devices in comparison to BigFix."

"Automation tracking is the most valuable feature."

"Feature-wise, the solution is a good open-source software offering broad support. Also, it's reliable."

"The solution can scale."

"We can manage all the configuration consistency between all our servers."

"Ansible is agentless. So, we don't need to set up any agent into the computer we are interacting with. The only prerequisite is that the host with which we are going to interact must have the Python interpreter installed on it. We can connect to a host and do our configuration by using Ansible."

"The most valuable features of the solution are automation and patching."

"It's nice to have the Dashboard where people can see it, have it report to our ELK stack. It's far more convenient, and we can trigger it with API and schedules, which is better than doing it with a whole bunch of scripts."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pros

Cons

"AWS CodeDeploy doesn't provide multiple plugins like Jenkins, which is a shortcoming where improvements are required."

"AWS should provide its own templates in the console so that I don't need to go anywhere else to get the template for AWS CodeDeploy or AWS CodeBuild."

"There will always be room for improvement, however, I cannot think of any specific improvements at the moment."

"We have faced some issues and bugs along the way when it comes to stability."

"The documentation could be more detailed, especially for new users."

"The support and those things are lacking compared to others."

"Improvements could be made to AWS CodeDeploy in terms of its agent's compatibility across different operating systems. Currently, there are instances where the agent may not work seamlessly with certain integrations, leading to issues with registering protocols on authorized servers."

"The documentation could be more detailed, especially for new users."

More AWS CodeDeploy cons

"Ansible could use more public relations and marketing."

"It needs better documentation."

"In Community, there's a lot of effort towards testing, standardizing, and testing for module development to role development, which is why Molecule is now becoming real. Same thing with Zuul, which we are starting to implement. Zulu tests out modules from third-party sources, like ourselves, and verifies that the modules work before they are committed to the code. Currently, Ansible can't do this with all the modules out there."

"Some of the Cisco modules could be expanded, which would be great, along with not having to do so much coding in the background to make it work."

"Additional features could be added."

"At this time, I do not have anything to improve. What we struggle with is the knowledge base, but that is more about us having to go and find it and learn the platform on our own rather than an actual Ansible issue."

"On the Dashboard, when you view a template run, it shows all the output. There is a search filter, but it would be nice to able to select one server in that run and then see all that output from just that one server, instead of having to do the search on that one server and find the results."

"Ansible has just been upgraded, and the only issue that we are seeing at the moment is that the user interface can be slow. We're currently investigating the refresh period with Red Hat when you click a job and run a job. It seems that the buffer no longer runs in real-time. We haven't discovered whether that's partially an issue with our environment, but Red Hat has come back and said that they're working on a couple of bugs in the background. We've upgraded to that version in the last six months, and that's the only issue that we've seen."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS CodeDeploy has proven to be a cost-effective solution for us, especially considering the benefits we gain from using it. In terms of pricing, AWS is quite affordable, providing excellent value for the features and services it offers."

"It is costly."

"The product is free with EC2."

"The product's price is normal."

"Since we are using a dedicated AWS environment, the solution's pricing is fine."

"The solution is inexpensive compared to other products."

"Everything is generally fair. No one ever likes to pay a lot of money, but we are getting the value. We also get support with it. It has been fair and worthwhile."

"Like many Red Hat products, they have a no-cost version of the web application (AWX, formerly Ansible Tower), but you are on your own to install and it is a little more complicated than just installing Ansible."

"The cost is high, but it still works well."

"It’s an open-source tool."

"I don't see the pricing or licensing features, but from what I understand, it is fairly reasonable."

"We use the open-source version of the solution."

"You don't need to buy agents on servers or deploy expense management when using the solution, which affected our decision to go with it."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	48

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeDeploy?

Automation of Deployments

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeDeploy?

Evaluating cost, it is important to note that the services provided by CodeDeploy can be expensive to purchase from other cloud platforms. However, depending on the services, it might be worth the ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS CodeDeploy?

My usual use cases for AWS CodeDeploy involve utilizing it as an AWS service, which is a subservice of CodePipeline. AWS CodePipeline is a whole package of services which consists of AWS CodeDeploy...

See all answers

What is the difference between Red Hat Satellite and Ansible?

Red Hat Satellite has proven to be a worthwhile investment for me. Both its patch management and license management have been outstanding. If you have a large environment, patching systems is much ...

See all answers

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

The most valuable features of the solution are automation and patching.

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Amplify vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 24% of the time

UrbanCode Deploy vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 18% of the time

Octopus Deploy vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 15% of the time

GitLab vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 15% of the time

More AWS CodeDeploy Competitors

VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 4% of the time

BigFix vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

December 2025

Download AWS CodeDeploy product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

January 2026

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report

Download Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Ansible, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Subscription on AWS

Overview

AWS CodeDeploy is a service that automates code deployments to any instance, including Amazon EC2 instances and instances running on-premises. AWS CodeDeploy makes it easier for you to rapidly release new features, helps you avoid downtime during deployment, and handles the complexity of updating your applications. You can use AWS CodeDeploy to automate deployments, eliminating the need for error-prone manual operations, and the service scales with your infrastructure so you can easily deploy to one instance or thousands.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform streamlines IT operations with features like a simplified GUI and extensive module support. Its agentless architecture and YAML ease make it an adaptable choice for managing diverse infrastructures efficiently.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a robust automation framework that supports multiple environments and integrates well with various applications. Its agentless Python-based architecture facilitates efficient server management and rapid update deployment. Users benefit from centralized management through Ansible Tower, role-based access control, and dynamic inventory. However, improvement areas include documentation, API integration, network support, and UI scaling. Enhanced community contributions could address module availability and compatibility gaps.

What are the most important features of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

Agentless Architecture: Leverages Python for seamless management without needing local agents.
Extensive Module Support: Provides modules for managing multiple environments effectively.
Ansible Tower GUI: Offers a centralized interface for easy automation management.
Role-Based Access Control: Ensures user-specific permissions for improved security.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with a variety of applications to enhance functionality.
Dynamic Inventory: Automatically updates inventory, simplifying large infrastructure management.

What benefits and ROI should one consider?

Automation Efficiency: Significantly reduces manual intervention, saving time and resources.
Adaptability: Easily integrates with cloud platforms such as AWS, GCP, and Azure.
Security Compliance: Automates compliance checks, ensuring up-to-date security protocols.
Cost Management: Lower operational costs through streamlined processes.
Scalability: Supports infrastructure growth without requiring major adjustments.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is used for network management, security compliance, and configuration tasks. Organizations utilize its capabilities for cloud and on-premises deployment, infrastructure provisioning, and workflow orchestration. Many integrate it with tools such as Puppet or Terraform to enhance CI/CD processes, benefiting from its agentless design in adapting to cloud environments.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

December 2025

Free Report: AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.