AWS CodeDeploy vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform comparison

AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Download the complete report

Helped 913,924 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeDeploy

Ranking in Release Automation

5th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Ranking in Release Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management (2nd), Network Automation (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Release Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodeDeploy is 2.4%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is 5.2%, up from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Release Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform	5.2%
AWS CodeDeploy	2.4%
Other	92.4%

Release Automation

Featured Reviews

Harsh Shrivastava

Senior Software Engineer at Thomson Reuters

Automated deployments have reduced downtime and now deliver faster, consistent releases

AWS CodeDeploy offers several valuable features, including deployment to fleets of EC2 servers, on-premises servers deployed to data center infrastructure, AWS Lambda for serverless function updates, and Amazon ECS for containerized applications. The feature I use most frequently is deployment to Amazon EC2 instances, where I deploy backend services to EC2 servers, enabling zero-downtime deployment. AWS CodeDeploy supports rolling updates, blue-green deployments, and canary deployments to minimize or eliminate downtime. Additional standout features include consistent deployments across environments, the ability to deploy to development, staging, and production environments, centralized control, integration with CI/CD pipelines, and automatic rollback. AWS CodeDeploy has positively impacted my organization by significantly reducing deployment times to achieve zero downtime during deployments. Generally, it takes very little time for backend services to be deployed to EC2 instances.

Read full review

Manas Kashyap

Senior Dev Ops Engineer at 11 East Capital

Automation has transformed server patching and has reduced months of work to minutes

The best features that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers is that it does not require any additional resources inside the servers. Python is the only requirement, and since Python is already present inside the servers, we can run it from our location and it automatically deploys things and does the work for us. The minimal requirements and easy deployment have definitely impacted my daily work and my team's efficiency. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is one of the best features that we depend on. We have evaluated other options, but Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was the best choice because it has saved us a tremendous amount of time. We do not need to manually intervene in the servers or install third-party software to maintain these things. It is very easy to write playbooks for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. Ansible Galaxy contains many playbooks that are readily available and ready to be used. It is highly configurable with Jinja templating, making it easy to maintain. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has positively impacted my organization. Previously, we needed to go into the servers and maintain them manually, which used to take a lot of time. For 200 to 300 servers, the maintenance took about one to two months. New patches would arrive and we would have to repeat the process. Now, it is a one-night work or a 10 to 15 minutes task. We write a playbook, maintain an inventory, and roll out the updates and it starts working for us. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform uses conditional clauses and has rollback options, functioning like a standard coding language that is simple to use. There is definitely a reduction in errors with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform because we have playbooks written with all the necessary clauses and rollback options. Manual work automatically creates more errors, whereas in automation, we have written sets that we do not forget every time we run it. We have protected written sets that we execute consistently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I would suggest using AWS CodeDeploy if your applications are on AWS cloud platform, as it integrates well with multiple AWS services and automates scalability and infrastructure management."

"I can integrate it with other AWS services."

"The product is easy to use."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"The most valuable features of AWS CodeDeploy are its integration with other AWS services to deploy applications."

"CodeDeploy is quite easy to use within the AWS ecosystem."

"CodeDeploy is very stable. I rate it a 10 for stability."

"Customer service was very helpful."

More AWS CodeDeploy pros

"We can now go to a customer and deploy all software in a few minutes instead of hours."

"Instead of spending several days going to each device and ripping out config and putting new config in, I just batched our branches, batched our data center, ran three jobs, and called it a day."

"Ansible Tower offers use a UI where we can see all the pushes that have gone into the server."

"It is all modular-based. If there is not a module for it today, someone will write it."

"The playbooks and the code the solution uses are quite useful."

"I like the fact that Ansible is agentless."

"The solution is very simple to use."

"Some colleagues and other companies use it and comment that it is easy to use, easy to understand, and offers good features."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pros

Cons

"AWS should provide its own templates in the console so that I don't need to go anywhere else to get the template for AWS CodeDeploy or AWS CodeBuild."

"AWS CodeDeploy's lack of ability to use independently without CodePipeline or CodeBuild makes it unstable."

"The support and those things are lacking compared to others."

"AWS CodeDeploy doesn't provide multiple plugins like Jenkins, which is a shortcoming where improvements are required."

"The documentation could be more detailed, especially for new users."

"An improvement for the end users would be easier implementation, especially regarding local testing tools for deployment."

"I faced some stability issues."

"In terms of pricing and return on investment with AWS CodeDeploy, I reflect on the initial period where we faced numerous errors and troubleshooting challenges, resulting in significant bills."

More AWS CodeDeploy cons

"Because some documentation needs to be improved - while getting started with it is getting better - it's hard to give it a perfect ten."

"Networking needs to be improved."

"I feel if we took this to the customer now and asked the customer to start using the product as it is, we'd be getting a lot of pushback because as an automation platform, it feels as if it is very early in its life cycle and development."

"For Ansible Tower, there are three tiers with ten nodes. I would like them to expand those ten nodes to 20, because ten nodes is not enough to test on."

"The job workflow needs to be worked on. It's not really clear to how you actually link things together. What they probably could do is provide an example workflow on how to stitch things together. I think that would be very helpful."

"The governance features could be improved."

"In Community, there's a lot of effort towards testing, standardizing, and testing for module development to role development, which is why Molecule is now becoming real. Same thing with Zuul, which we are starting to implement. Zulu tests out modules from third-party sources, like ourselves, and verifies that the modules work before they are committed to the code. Currently, Ansible can't do this with all the modules out there."

"The communication on it is not probably where it could be. We could use some real life examples where we could point customers to them and say, "This is what you are trying to do. If you follow these steps, it would at least get you started a bit quicker.""

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is costly."

"Since we are using a dedicated AWS environment, the solution's pricing is fine."

"The product's price is normal."

"The product is free with EC2."

"AWS CodeDeploy has proven to be a cost-effective solution for us, especially considering the benefits we gain from using it. In terms of pricing, AWS is quite affordable, providing excellent value for the features and services it offers."

"It is a little pricey but it is affordable. It is not that bad."

"Ansible Tower is free. Until they lower the cost, we are holding off on purchasing the product."

"If you only need to use Ansible, it's free for any end-user, but when you require Ansible Tower, you need to pay per Ansible Tower server."

"Users have to pay a per-node cost of around $ 100 per node."

"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is an affordable solution."

"I don't see the pricing or licensing features, but from what I understand, it is fairly reasonable."

"We're charged between $8 to $13 a month per license."

"The cost is high, but it still works well."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Construction Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

18%

Outsourcing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	52

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeDeploy?

The pricing for AWS CodeDeploy has been quite reasonable. It is better compared to peers like Azure, and the licensing cost and setup cost are both quite good for AWS.

What is your primary use case for AWS CodeDeploy?

AWS CodeDeploy is a deployment service that automates application deployments to various compute services. My main use cases include automated application deployments to Amazon EC2 instances, on-pr...

What advice do you have for others considering AWS CodeDeploy?

My advice to others looking into using AWS CodeDeploy is to use it to maximize capabilities in terms of reducing deployment times. It scales with infrastructure so you can deploy to one instance or...

What is the difference between Red Hat Satellite and Ansible?

Red Hat Satellite has proven to be a worthwhile investment for me. Both its patch management and license management have been outstanding. If you have a large environment, patching systems is much ...

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was very simple. There is no pricing and no licensing required, as Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform ...

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs AWS CodeDeploy

Comparisons

Compared 16% of the time

AWS Amplify vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 16% of the time

AWS CodeStar vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 14% of the time

UrbanCode Deploy vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 11% of the time

Digital.ai Agility vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 5% of the time

More AWS CodeDeploy Competitors

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 5% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 5% of the time

BigFix vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Competitors

Product Reports

AWS CodeDeploy

Download AWS CodeDeploy product report

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Download Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform product report

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report

Also Known As

No data available

Ansible, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Subscription on AWS

Overview

AWS CodeDeploy integrates with AWS services to enhance scalability, monitoring, and security. It supports zero-downtime deployments using rolling updates and blue-green strategies, offering cost-efficiency, automation, and flexibility.

AWS CodeDeploy streamlines code deployments across EC2, EKS, and container services. It excels in integration, automatically executing upon code push and playing a critical role in continuous integration pipelines. Its drag-and-drop functionality and cloud infrastructure support ease deployment script management. Integration with GitHub and Jenkins further streamlines deployments. YAML configuration eases management, though precision is vital. Default settings facilitate efficient workflows, and automated rollback, multi-environment support, and IAM-based permissions ensure smooth operations.

What are AWS CodeDeploy's most important features?

Zero-Downtime Deployments: Supports rolling updates and blue-green deployment strategies.
Integration: Easily integrates with EC2, EKS, and S3, boosting productivity.
Automation: Automates deployment processes, reducing manual intervention.
Security: IAM-based permissions enhance security management.
Flexibility: Provides YAML configuration for precise deployment management.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Cost-Efficiency: Reduces deployment-related expenses.
Improved Productivity: Streamlines deployment workflows.
Seamless Integration: Facilitates easy integration with other services.
Deployment Efficiency: Enhances deployment speed and stability.

AWS CodeDeploy is widely adopted in industries for efficient deployment across EC2 and container environments. Extensive application in continuous integration pipelines, alongside GitHub and Jenkins, leads to faster, more reliable deployments. Industries capitalize on its automatic execution and configuration flexibility to support dynamic operations.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform streamlines IT operations with features like a simplified GUI and extensive module support. Its agentless architecture and YAML ease make it an adaptable choice for managing diverse infrastructures efficiently.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a robust automation framework that supports multiple environments and integrates well with various applications. Its agentless Python-based architecture facilitates efficient server management and rapid update deployment. Users benefit from centralized management through Ansible Tower, role-based access control, and dynamic inventory. However, improvement areas include documentation, API integration, network support, and UI scaling. Enhanced community contributions could address module availability and compatibility gaps.

What are the most important features of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

Agentless Architecture: Leverages Python for seamless management without needing local agents.
Extensive Module Support: Provides modules for managing multiple environments effectively.
Ansible Tower GUI: Offers a centralized interface for easy automation management.
Role-Based Access Control: Ensures user-specific permissions for improved security.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with a variety of applications to enhance functionality.
Dynamic Inventory: Automatically updates inventory, simplifying large infrastructure management.

What benefits and ROI should one consider?

Automation Efficiency: Significantly reduces manual intervention, saving time and resources.
Adaptability: Easily integrates with cloud platforms such as AWS, GCP, and Azure.
Security Compliance: Automates compliance checks, ensuring up-to-date security protocols.
Cost Management: Lower operational costs through streamlined processes.
Scalability: Supports infrastructure growth without requiring major adjustments.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is used for network management, security compliance, and configuration tasks. Organizations utilize its capabilities for cloud and on-premises deployment, infrastructure provisioning, and workflow orchestration. Many integrate it with tools such as Puppet or Terraform to enhance CI/CD processes, benefiting from its agentless design in adapting to cloud environments.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank

AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform