AWS CodeDeploy vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform comparison

AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeDeploy

Ranking in Release Automation

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Ranking in Release Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management (1st), Network Automation (1st), AWS Pro Service Providers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Release Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodeDeploy is 1.9%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is 4.2%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Release Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform	4.2%
AWS CodeDeploy	1.9%
Other	93.9%

Release Automation

Featured Reviews

Harsh Shrivastava

Senior Software Engineer at Thomson Reuters

Automated deployments have reduced downtime and now deliver faster, consistent releases

AWS CodeDeploy offers several valuable features, including deployment to fleets of EC2 servers, on-premises servers deployed to data center infrastructure, AWS Lambda for serverless function updates, and Amazon ECS for containerized applications. The feature I use most frequently is deployment to Amazon EC2 instances, where I deploy backend services to EC2 servers, enabling zero-downtime deployment. AWS CodeDeploy supports rolling updates, blue-green deployments, and canary deployments to minimize or eliminate downtime. Additional standout features include consistent deployments across environments, the ability to deploy to development, staging, and production environments, centralized control, integration with CI/CD pipelines, and automatic rollback. AWS CodeDeploy has positively impacted my organization by significantly reducing deployment times to achieve zero downtime during deployments. Generally, it takes very little time for backend services to be deployed to EC2 instances.

Read full review

Manas Kashyap

DevOps Engineer at Elevenxcapital

Automation has transformed server patching and has reduced months of work to minutes

The best features that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers is that it does not require any additional resources inside the servers. Python is the only requirement, and since Python is already present inside the servers, we can run it from our location and it automatically deploys things and does the work for us. The minimal requirements and easy deployment have definitely impacted my daily work and my team's efficiency. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is one of the best features that we depend on. We have evaluated other options, but Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was the best choice because it has saved us a tremendous amount of time. We do not need to manually intervene in the servers or install third-party software to maintain these things. It is very easy to write playbooks for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. Ansible Galaxy contains many playbooks that are readily available and ready to be used. It is highly configurable with Jinja templating, making it easy to maintain. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has positively impacted my organization. Previously, we needed to go into the servers and maintain them manually, which used to take a lot of time. For 200 to 300 servers, the maintenance took about one to two months. New patches would arrive and we would have to repeat the process. Now, it is a one-night work or a 10 to 15 minutes task. We write a playbook, maintain an inventory, and roll out the updates and it starts working for us. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform uses conditional clauses and has rollback options, functioning like a standard coding language that is simple to use. There is definitely a reduction in errors with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform because we have playbooks written with all the necessary clauses and rollback options. Manual work automatically creates more errors, whereas in automation, we have written sets that we do not forget every time we run it. We have protected written sets that we execute consistently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is easy to use."

"CodeDeploy is very stable. I rate it a 10 for stability."

"I can integrate it with other AWS services."

"You can easily integrate AWS CodeDeploy with multiple services."

"The most valuable features of AWS CodeDeploy are its integration with other AWS services to deploy applications."

"CodeDeploy is quite easy to use within the AWS ecosystem."

"I appreciate the feature for automating the deployment of code to the server."

"I would suggest using AWS CodeDeploy if your applications are on AWS cloud platform, as it integrates well with multiple AWS services and automates scalability and infrastructure management."

More AWS CodeDeploy pros

"RBAC is great around Organizations and I can use that backend as our lab. Ingesting stuff into the JSON logs, into any sort of logging collector; it works with Splunk and there are other collectors as well. It supports Sumo and that helps, I can go create reports in Sumo Logic. Workflows are an interesting feature. I can collect a lot of templates and create a workflow out of them."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"I like the inventory management. It's a very nice, simple, concise way to keep all that data together. And the API allows us to use it even for things that are not Ansible."

"It is very extensible. There are many plugins and modules out there that everybody helps create to interact with different cloud providers as well."

"The biggest thing I liked about Ansible is the check mode so that we can verify, after we've pushed, that the config there is actually what we intended."

"Automation is valuable. It saves us time in performing tedious tasks or repetitive tasks."

"The initial setup is easy and takes a few hours to complete."

"Since it is in YAML, if I have to explain it to somebody else, they can easily understand it."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pros

Cons

"AWS CodeDeploy doesn't provide multiple plugins like Jenkins, which is a shortcoming where improvements are required."

"An improvement for the end users would be easier implementation, especially regarding local testing tools for deployment."

"The documentation could be more detailed, especially for new users."

"I faced some stability issues."

"There will always be room for improvement, however, I cannot think of any specific improvements at the moment."

"Improvements could be made to AWS CodeDeploy in terms of its agent's compatibility across different operating systems. Currently, there are instances where the agent may not work seamlessly with certain integrations, leading to issues with registering protocols on authorized servers."

"AWS should provide its own templates in the console so that I don't need to go anywhere else to get the template for AWS CodeDeploy or AWS CodeBuild."

"The support and those things are lacking compared to others."

More AWS CodeDeploy cons

"Performance has been an issue on larger environments, but it has gotten a lot better over the past two years."

"The scalability of the solution has some shortcomings."

"Some of the Cisco modules could be expanded, which would be great, along with not having to do so much coding in the background to make it work."

"The user interface on the Ansible Tower product could be better, but it is functional."

"The solution should add a nice self-service portal."

"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is not the best at server provisioning. Terraform is better."

"At this time, I do not have anything to improve. What we struggle with is the knowledge base, but that is more about us having to go and find it and learn the platform on our own rather than an actual Ansible issue."

"The documentation for the installation step of deployment, OpenStack, etc., and these things have to be a bit more detailed."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is free with EC2."

"It is costly."

"Since we are using a dedicated AWS environment, the solution's pricing is fine."

"AWS CodeDeploy has proven to be a cost-effective solution for us, especially considering the benefits we gain from using it. In terms of pricing, AWS is quite affordable, providing excellent value for the features and services it offers."

"The product's price is normal."

"The pricing is okay."

"Red Hat's open source approach was a factor when choosing Ansible, since the solution is free as of right now."

"We use the open-source version of the solution."

"It is a little pricey but it is affordable. It is not that bad."

"The cost is high, but it still works well."

"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is an affordable solution."

"You don't need to buy agents on servers or deploy expense management when using the solution, which affected our decision to go with it."

"Customers need to pay yearly for the license."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

11%

University

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	48

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeDeploy?

Automation of Deployments

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeDeploy?

The pricing for AWS CodeDeploy has been quite reasonable. It is better compared to peers like Azure, and the licensing cost and setup cost are both quite good for AWS.

What is your primary use case for AWS CodeDeploy?

AWS CodeDeploy is a deployment service that automates application deployments to various compute services. My main use cases include automated application deployments to Amazon EC2 instances, on-pr...

What is the difference between Red Hat Satellite and Ansible?

Red Hat Satellite has proven to be a worthwhile investment for me. Both its patch management and license management have been outstanding. If you have a large environment, patching systems is much ...

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was very simple. There is no pricing and no licensing required, as Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform ...

AWS Amplify vs AWS CodeDeploy

Comparisons

Compared 17% of the time

UrbanCode Deploy vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 13% of the time

Octopus Deploy vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 13% of the time

GitLab vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 12% of the time

More AWS CodeDeploy Competitors

VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 5% of the time

BigFix vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Competitors

Product Reports

AWS CodeDeploy

Download AWS CodeDeploy product report

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Download Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform product report

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report

Also Known As

No data available

Ansible, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Subscription on AWS

Overview

AWS CodeDeploy is a service that automates code deployments to any instance, including Amazon EC2 instances and instances running on-premises. AWS CodeDeploy makes it easier for you to rapidly release new features, helps you avoid downtime during deployment, and handles the complexity of updating your applications. You can use AWS CodeDeploy to automate deployments, eliminating the need for error-prone manual operations, and the service scales with your infrastructure so you can easily deploy to one instance or thousands.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform streamlines IT operations with features like a simplified GUI and extensive module support. Its agentless architecture and YAML ease make it an adaptable choice for managing diverse infrastructures efficiently.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a robust automation framework that supports multiple environments and integrates well with various applications. Its agentless Python-based architecture facilitates efficient server management and rapid update deployment. Users benefit from centralized management through Ansible Tower, role-based access control, and dynamic inventory. However, improvement areas include documentation, API integration, network support, and UI scaling. Enhanced community contributions could address module availability and compatibility gaps.

What are the most important features of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

Agentless Architecture: Leverages Python for seamless management without needing local agents.
Extensive Module Support: Provides modules for managing multiple environments effectively.
Ansible Tower GUI: Offers a centralized interface for easy automation management.
Role-Based Access Control: Ensures user-specific permissions for improved security.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with a variety of applications to enhance functionality.
Dynamic Inventory: Automatically updates inventory, simplifying large infrastructure management.

What benefits and ROI should one consider?

Automation Efficiency: Significantly reduces manual intervention, saving time and resources.
Adaptability: Easily integrates with cloud platforms such as AWS, GCP, and Azure.
Security Compliance: Automates compliance checks, ensuring up-to-date security protocols.
Cost Management: Lower operational costs through streamlined processes.
Scalability: Supports infrastructure growth without requiring major adjustments.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is used for network management, security compliance, and configuration tasks. Organizations utilize its capabilities for cloud and on-premises deployment, infrastructure provisioning, and workflow orchestration. Many integrate it with tools such as Puppet or Terraform to enhance CI/CD processes, benefiting from its agentless design in adapting to cloud environments.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank

AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform