Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs UrbanCode Deploy comparison

Red Hat and IBM are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Red Hat is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9, while IBM is ranked #8. Red Hat holds a 4.2% mindshare in RA, compared to IBM’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Read 72 Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform reviews

9,486 Views
1,328 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

UrbanCode Deploy

Read 27 UrbanCode Deploy reviews

1,427 Views
1,356 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

UrbanCode Deploy

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 28, 2025

UrbanCode Deploy and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform compete in the deployment space, each with distinct strengths. While UrbanCode Deploy is favored for its pricing and support, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has the upper hand due to its robust features, offering significant value for the investment.

Features: UrbanCode Deploy is known for its server/agent architecture that supports repeatable deployments and robust plugin support, offering features like visual process design and self-service APIs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform emphasizes simplicity with script-based YAML configuration, providing agentless management and broad community support. It quickly scales from single servers to complex data centers, making automation accessible even to users without deep technical knowledge.

Room for Improvement: UrbanCode Deploy faces hurdles in plugin performance and integration with new technologies, with users seeking improved upgrade processes, reporting features, and reduced memory footprint for agents. Ansible could improve scalability, create a more intuitive GUI, and offer enhanced documentation. Both systems require stronger support networks, but UrbanCode Deploy needs more advanced plugin and compatibility enhancements with diverse environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: UrbanCode Deploy is popular in on-premises setups but also supports hybrid environments. Customer service experiences are mixed, with praise for technical expertise tempered by slow response times. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers flexibility across on-premises, private, and public clouds. Its deployment ease is highlighted, often needing less direct support due to robust community resources and intuitive features. Some enterprise support challenges arise from its open-source nature and licensing complexities.

Pricing and ROI: UrbanCode Deploy generally incurs higher costs due to agent-based licensing and specialized support, yet achieves substantial ROI through more efficient deployments and reduced staffing. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's open-source nature significantly cuts costs, though expenses can rise with enterprise features like Ansible Tower. Both platforms offer considerable productivity gains that validate their costs within modern IT infrastructures.

To learn more, read our detailed Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. UrbanCode Deploy Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. UrbanCode Deploy

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Ranking in Release Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management (1st), Network Automation (1st), AWS Pro Service Providers (1st)

UrbanCode Deploy

Ranking in Release Automation

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Release Automation category, the mindshare of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is 4.2%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UrbanCode Deploy is 3.9%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Release Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform	4.2%
UrbanCode Deploy	3.9%
Other	91.9%

Release Automation

Featured Reviews

Manas Kashyap

Senior DevOps engineer at Elevenxcapital

Automation has transformed server patching and has reduced months of work to minutes

The best features that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers is that it does not require any additional resources inside the servers. Python is the only requirement, and since Python is already present inside the servers, we can run it from our location and it automatically deploys things and does the work for us. The minimal requirements and easy deployment have definitely impacted my daily work and my team's efficiency. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is one of the best features that we depend on. We have evaluated other options, but Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was the best choice because it has saved us a tremendous amount of time. We do not need to manually intervene in the servers or install third-party software to maintain these things. It is very easy to write playbooks for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. Ansible Galaxy contains many playbooks that are readily available and ready to be used. It is highly configurable with Jinja templating, making it easy to maintain. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has positively impacted my organization. Previously, we needed to go into the servers and maintain them manually, which used to take a lot of time. For 200 to 300 servers, the maintenance took about one to two months. New patches would arrive and we would have to repeat the process. Now, it is a one-night work or a 10 to 15 minutes task. We write a playbook, maintain an inventory, and roll out the updates and it starts working for us. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform uses conditional clauses and has rollback options, functioning like a standard coding language that is simple to use. There is definitely a reduction in errors with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform because we have playbooks written with all the necessary clauses and rollback options. Manual work automatically creates more errors, whereas in automation, we have written sets that we do not forget every time we run it. We have protected written sets that we execute consistently.

Read full review

AK13

DevOps Engineer at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

A handy interface that includes buttons or drag-and-drop options for all functionality

Our company uses the solution for standard, blue-green, and complex deployments. We have 250 users throughout our company. The solution handles complex deployments very efficiently. The user interface includes buttons or drag-and-drop options for all functionality. It is easy to create component…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most useful features are the playbooks. We can develop our playbooks and simplify them doing something like a cross platform."

"The automation manager is very good."

"The solution is capable of integrating with many applications and devices in comparison to BigFix."

"When you have an enterprise-level number of network devices, the ability to quickly push out security updates to thousands of devices is the biggest thing"

"Ansible Tower provides a GUI, which is an enhancement, and a well-liked feature by operation teams."

"The biggest thing I liked about Ansible is the check mode so that we can verify, after we've pushed, that the config there is actually what we intended."

"The solution can scale."

"Its checking and validating ensures our packages are properly patched."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pros

"Stable solution that's good for automating the CI/CD pipeline: from development to production."

"The most valuable functionality is the ability to define the deployment process, schedule the deployment and automatically execute the deployments to different environments."

"The stability is good. I haven't experienced any issues."

"It is very easy to make a software release. It used to take us at least a couple of hours to make a release, now we went to production with a new one last night. This new release took me five minutes."

"The solution handles complex deployments very efficiently."

"The most valuable feature is the snapshot functionality, which allows us to access previous versions of the artifacts."

Cons

"More library support for microservices architecture and Kubernetes would be helpful."

"It could be easier to integrate Ansible with other solutions. No single tool can do everything. For example, we use Terraform for infrastructure and other solutions for configuration management and VMs."

"Networking needs to be improved."

"Ansible has just been upgraded, and the only issue that we are seeing at the moment is that the user interface can be slow. We're currently investigating the refresh period with Red Hat when you click a job and run a job. It seems that the buffer no longer runs in real-time. We haven't discovered whether that's partially an issue with our environment, but Red Hat has come back and said that they're working on a couple of bugs in the background. We've upgraded to that version in the last six months, and that's the only issue that we've seen."

"Some of the modules in Ansible could be a bit more mature. There is still a little room for further development. Some performance aspects could be improved, perhaps in the form of parallelism within Ansible."

"We are not using the Dashboard a lot because we have higher expectations from it. The default Dashboard from Tower doesn't give that much information. We really want to get down into more than if the job succeeded or what was the percentage of success. We want to get down to task-level success. If, in a job, there are ten tasks, we want to see this task was a success, and this was not, and how many were not. That's the kind of granularity we are looking for, that Tower does not give right now."

"The technical support is not adequate. The Ansible sales and technical support services need significant improvement."

"The support could be better."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform cons

"I would like to have the agent up and running at all times, as opposed to only while it is in the DevOps pipeline."

"The scalability of this application needs improvement. Changes and variations in the application become bottlenecks as they need to be more seamless and comfortable."

"I certainly would like to have a better way to pass information between deployment steps using UrbanCode Deploy because that's really difficult to do."

"The technical support of the solution could definitely be improved as PMRs take long to resolve."

"The interface allows access in a number of ways but that can be confusing."

"I would like to see more reporting for container architecture."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We went with product because we have a subscription for Red Hat."

"Customers need to pay yearly for the license."

"You don't need to buy agents on servers or deploy expense management when using the solution, which affected our decision to go with it."

"The solution is inexpensive compared to other products."

"The cost is determined by the number of endpoints."

"Red Hat's open source approach was a factor when choosing Ansible, since the solution is free as of right now."

"We use the open-source version of the solution."

"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is an expensive solution. There may be additional fees to use advanced features."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pricing and cost advice

"The cost of the solution is high but it offers great ROI."

"The licensing fees for this solution are based on the number of servers that are being deployed and the number of agents that you have."

"Considering COVID-19, the price is too high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

37%

Insurance Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	48

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What is the difference between Red Hat Satellite and Ansible?

Red Hat Satellite has proven to be a worthwhile investment for me. Both its patch management and license management have been outstanding. If you have a large environment, patching systems is much ...

See all answers

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

The most valuable features of the solution are automation and patching.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Competitors

GitLab vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 17% of the time

Chef vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 10% of the time

Octopus Deploy vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 9% of the time

AWS CodeDeploy vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 8% of the time

More UrbanCode Deploy Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

January 2026

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report

Download Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

UrbanCode Deploy

January 2026

Download UrbanCode Deploy product report

Also Known As

Ansible, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Subscription on AWS

uDeploy

Overview

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform streamlines IT operations with features like a simplified GUI and extensive module support. Its agentless architecture and YAML ease make it an adaptable choice for managing diverse infrastructures efficiently.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a robust automation framework that supports multiple environments and integrates well with various applications. Its agentless Python-based architecture facilitates efficient server management and rapid update deployment. Users benefit from centralized management through Ansible Tower, role-based access control, and dynamic inventory. However, improvement areas include documentation, API integration, network support, and UI scaling. Enhanced community contributions could address module availability and compatibility gaps.

What are the most important features of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

Agentless Architecture: Leverages Python for seamless management without needing local agents.
Extensive Module Support: Provides modules for managing multiple environments effectively.
Ansible Tower GUI: Offers a centralized interface for easy automation management.
Role-Based Access Control: Ensures user-specific permissions for improved security.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with a variety of applications to enhance functionality.
Dynamic Inventory: Automatically updates inventory, simplifying large infrastructure management.

What benefits and ROI should one consider?

Automation Efficiency: Significantly reduces manual intervention, saving time and resources.
Adaptability: Easily integrates with cloud platforms such as AWS, GCP, and Azure.
Security Compliance: Automates compliance checks, ensuring up-to-date security protocols.
Cost Management: Lower operational costs through streamlined processes.
Scalability: Supports infrastructure growth without requiring major adjustments.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is used for network management, security compliance, and configuration tasks. Organizations utilize its capabilities for cloud and on-premises deployment, infrastructure provisioning, and workflow orchestration. Many integrate it with tools such as Puppet or Terraform to enhance CI/CD processes, benefiting from its agentless design in adapting to cloud environments.

Red Hat

IBM UrbanCode Deploy orchestrates and automates the deployment of applications, middleware configuration, and database changes into development, test, and production environments—local, dedicated or shared cloud environments—accelerating time to market and reducing cost by shrinking manual efforts from days to minutes with automation, while reducing risk by cutting deployment errors by up to 90 percent.

IBM

Sample Customers

HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank

As policy, IBM does not release customer names on non-IBM web sites. However, public DevOps and UrbanCode Deploy case studies can be found here. IBM's UrbanCode Deploy customers span Small-Medium Businesses to Fortune 500 companies across all industries worldwide.

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. UrbanCode Deploy

December 2025

Free Report: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. UrbanCode Deploy

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. UrbanCode Deploy and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. UrbanCode Deploy report.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.