Digital.ai Release vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform comparison

Digital.ai and Red Hat are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Digital.ai is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while Red Hat is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9. Digital.ai holds a 1.2% mindshare in RA, compared to Red Hat’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Digital.ai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Digital.ai Release

Read 5 Digital.ai Release reviews

823 Views
305 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Read 72 Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform reviews

9,486 Views
1,328 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Digital.ai Release

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 28, 2025

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and Digital.ai Release are competing products in the automation and release management domain. Digital.ai Release is noted for its feature-rich offering, while Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is favored for its pricing and support.

Features: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has an extensive library of pre-configured modules, which aids in simplifying automation across various environments. It also offers an agentless architecture, significantly reducing the setup overhead. The integration with multiple applications and platforms without the need for installing agents contributes to its scalability. Digital.ai Release is distinguished by its robust release management capabilities with strong integration options for tools like Jira, Flyway, and Bamboo. It also provides detailed reporting tools and environment management, ensuring streamlined deployments and error monitoring.

Room for Improvement: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform could enhance its user interface to accommodate more non-technical users and expand its native support for Windows environments. It would also benefit from more advanced out-of-the-box reporting features. Digital.ai Release might improve by reducing its complexity for smaller-scale users and offering more affordable pricing plans. Some users have noted that its documentation could be more comprehensive, particularly for less common configurations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Digital.ai Release provides a flexible deployment model supported by comprehensive documentation, facilitating smoother integration within organizations. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a streamlined setup process and strong customer support, simplifying the initial deployment phase. However, the flexibility and documentation provided by Digital.ai Release offer a slight edge in deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has competitive pricing, which supports faster ROI, making it appealing for cost-conscious organizations. In contrast, Digital.ai Release, though initially more expensive, offers advanced features leading to long-term value. The investment in Digital.ai Release can be justified by its capabilities in broader release management, thus influencing organizations aiming for extensive management solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Digital.ai Release vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Release vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Digital.ai Release

Ranking in Release Automation

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (15th), DevSecOps (7th)

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Ranking in Release Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management (1st), Network Automation (1st), AWS Pro Service Providers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Release Automation category, the mindshare of Digital.ai Release is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is 4.2%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Release Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform	4.2%
Digital.ai Release	1.2%
Other	94.6%

Release Automation

Featured Reviews

Jeanne-Mari Chandran

Software Configuration Specialist at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Experience seamless project management and integration with robust tools

The features I find most valuable in Digital.ai Release are the integration with MS Teams, because we have MS Teams channels that publish or push notifications to that. When we start deployments, it sends a notification to the people that we are doing a deployment to their environment. It notifies them when the deployment is started, completed, or if attention is required. I also appreciate the fact that it has plugins for Bamboo and I use lots of Gradle and JSON scripts, and we do SQL upgrades as well, triggering Flyway scripts via Bamboo, along with the integration with XLD and Jira; it's all Atlassian software. Regarding environment management capabilities, Digital.ai Release is mostly useful for me, as it is more application related and that is managed via my XLD dictionary. We have one artifact that is environment agnostic, which has placeholders that correspond to my XLD keys and values, and at deployment time, it substitutes the placeholders with those environment specific values. We don't need to make a specific deployment artifact for dev, test, or production; it is all the same artifact using environment variables, ensuring what we take to production is what was tested.

Read full review

Manas Kashyap

Senior DevOps engineer at Elevenxcapital

Automation has transformed server patching and has reduced months of work to minutes

The best features that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers is that it does not require any additional resources inside the servers. Python is the only requirement, and since Python is already present inside the servers, we can run it from our location and it automatically deploys things and does the work for us. The minimal requirements and easy deployment have definitely impacted my daily work and my team's efficiency. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is one of the best features that we depend on. We have evaluated other options, but Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was the best choice because it has saved us a tremendous amount of time. We do not need to manually intervene in the servers or install third-party software to maintain these things. It is very easy to write playbooks for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. Ansible Galaxy contains many playbooks that are readily available and ready to be used. It is highly configurable with Jinja templating, making it easy to maintain. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has positively impacted my organization. Previously, we needed to go into the servers and maintain them manually, which used to take a lot of time. For 200 to 300 servers, the maintenance took about one to two months. New patches would arrive and we would have to repeat the process. Now, it is a one-night work or a 10 to 15 minutes task. We write a playbook, maintain an inventory, and roll out the updates and it starts working for us. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform uses conditional clauses and has rollback options, functioning like a standard coding language that is simple to use. There is definitely a reduction in errors with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform because we have playbooks written with all the necessary clauses and rollback options. Manual work automatically creates more errors, whereas in automation, we have written sets that we do not forget every time we run it. We have protected written sets that we execute consistently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Digital.ai Release is its ability to communicate with various deployment systems, such as XLD and batch deployments, as well as integrate with tools, such as Flyway and Bamboo. We use Bamboo as our build orchestrator, and Digital.ai Release also integrates with Jira, another Atlassian solution. These capabilities make it a powerful tool for managing workflow, test automation, and other processes."

"Overall, I would give Digital.ai Release a rating of nine out of ten; there's always room for improvement, but it's really good."

"The solution can apply one template across multiple applications."

"The time is also reduced because the manual work has tremendously decreased. We just have to click one button, and it will create everything for us."

"The orchestration, building the release, and then just executing it and managing that pipeline — the orchestration capabilities are great for that."

"Its checking and validating ensures our packages are properly patched."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that we don’t need an agent for it to work."

"It is very easy to use, and there is less room for error."

"It is quick to production. It has an API in the back which allows for integrations."

"The initial setup is easy and takes a few hours to complete."

"Ansible Tower offers use a UI where we can see all the pushes that have gone into the server."

"Having the Dashboard from an admin point of view, and seeing how all the projects and all the jobs lay out, is helpful."

"The most valuable feature is that Ansible is agentless."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pros

Cons

"I would like to improve Digital.ai Release by exploring its cloud capabilities as we are currently in the middle of migrating to the cloud, but I actually have no idea what Digital.ai's cloud capabilities are."

"Digital.ai Release could improve by having a better plugin that works with Guardian that we use for mainframe migrations. If there could be an interface or plugin for Guardian that would be beneficial."

"Currently, we put artifact details manually. What we could improve, in our case, is the deployment instruction base. Developers input all the information, including which artifact and where it needs to be deployed. What Digital.ai could do is automatically go to the deployment instruction page, take those artifact details, and implement them."

"The solution is a little bit expensive."

"The backfill could be improved, we could automate that. Right now it's subjective — it's up to the lead developer's memory to remember to backfill."

"The technical support is not adequate. The Ansible sales and technical support services need significant improvement."

"What I'm trying to figure out, personally, is, when doing mass updates, how I can parallelize that a little bit better. It seems right now - and maybe, it's a shortcoming on my end - that I run through one set of servers, and then another set of servers, ad then another set of servers, but it seems like I could throw a lot of these checks out. Different types of servers, like web servers and DB servers, if I could parallelize that a little bit to make everything run a little bit more efficiently, that would help."

"There have been some differences between the operating systems that we have noticed. It could be down to cryptographic policies, but we have noticed some speed issues. They should work on the speed of deployment on different operating systems."

"More library support for microservices architecture and Kubernetes would be helpful."

"It could be easier to integrate Ansible with other solutions. No single tool can do everything. For example, we use Terraform for infrastructure and other solutions for configuration management and VMs."

"The area which I feel can be improved is the custom modules. For example, there are something like 106 official modules available in the Ansible library. A year ago, that number was somewhere around 58. While Ansible is improving day by day, this can be improved more. For instance, when you need to configure in the cloud, you need to write up a module for that."

"It would be helpful to have templates for common configurations. It would make it much easier and faster rather than creating a whole script. The templates would decrease the learning curve as well."

"I have seen indications that the documentation needs improvement. They are providing a "How to Improve Your Documentation" presentation at this conference."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's license includes all features."

"Overall, the price is just too high; especially considering we're in the middle of a pandemic."

"Ansible is a lot more competitive than any of the others. Its setup was also straightforward. In fact, we just implemented Ansible on OpenShift, so that is how we are running the Ansible Automation Platform now."

"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is an expensive solution. There may be additional fees to use advanced features."

"Everything is generally fair. No one ever likes to pay a lot of money, but we are getting the value. We also get support with it. It has been fair and worthwhile."

"Customers need to pay yearly for the license."

"We went with product because we have a subscription for Red Hat."

"The cost is high, but it still works well."

"Ansible Tower is pretty expensive."

"I don't see the pricing or licensing features, but from what I understand, it is fairly reasonable."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

29%

Computer Software Company

11%

Insurance Company

11%

Healthcare Company

10%

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	48

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Digital.ai Release ?

The time is also reduced because the manual work has tremendously decreased. We just have to click one button, and it will create everything for us.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Digital.ai Release ?

Based on my experience, I would like to improve Digital.ai Release by exploring its cloud capabilities as we are currently in the middle of migrating to the cloud, but I actually have no idea what ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Digital.ai Release ?

My use case for Digital.ai Release is that I work for an insurance company on a very big project that develops multiple different pieces of software. We use Digital.ai Release to move our software ...

See all answers

What is the difference between Red Hat Satellite and Ansible?

Red Hat Satellite has proven to be a worthwhile investment for me. Both its patch management and license management have been outstanding. If you have a large environment, patching systems is much ...

See all answers

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

The most valuable features of the solution are automation and patching.

See all answers

Comparisons

CloudBees vs Digital.ai Release

Compared 12% of the time

IBM Rational Build Forge vs Digital.ai Release

Compared 11% of the time

Jenkins vs Digital.ai Release

Compared 11% of the time

Plutora vs Digital.ai Release

Compared 10% of the time

GitHub Actions vs Digital.ai Release

Compared 8% of the time

More Digital.ai Release Competitors

VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 4% of the time

BigFix vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Release

January 2026

Download Digital.ai Release product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

January 2026

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report

Download Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform product report

Also Known As

XL Release, XebiaLabs XL Release

Ansible, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Subscription on AWS

Overview

Automate, orchestrate, and gain visibility into your release pipelines at scale using Digital.ai Release, a release management tool that is designed for enterprises. Control and track releases, standardize processes, and bake compliance and security into your software release pipelines.

Digital.ai

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform streamlines IT operations with features like a simplified GUI and extensive module support. Its agentless architecture and YAML ease make it an adaptable choice for managing diverse infrastructures efficiently.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a robust automation framework that supports multiple environments and integrates well with various applications. Its agentless Python-based architecture facilitates efficient server management and rapid update deployment. Users benefit from centralized management through Ansible Tower, role-based access control, and dynamic inventory. However, improvement areas include documentation, API integration, network support, and UI scaling. Enhanced community contributions could address module availability and compatibility gaps.

What are the most important features of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

Agentless Architecture: Leverages Python for seamless management without needing local agents.
Extensive Module Support: Provides modules for managing multiple environments effectively.
Ansible Tower GUI: Offers a centralized interface for easy automation management.
Role-Based Access Control: Ensures user-specific permissions for improved security.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with a variety of applications to enhance functionality.
Dynamic Inventory: Automatically updates inventory, simplifying large infrastructure management.

What benefits and ROI should one consider?

Automation Efficiency: Significantly reduces manual intervention, saving time and resources.
Adaptability: Easily integrates with cloud platforms such as AWS, GCP, and Azure.
Security Compliance: Automates compliance checks, ensuring up-to-date security protocols.
Cost Management: Lower operational costs through streamlined processes.
Scalability: Supports infrastructure growth without requiring major adjustments.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is used for network management, security compliance, and configuration tasks. Organizations utilize its capabilities for cloud and on-premises deployment, infrastructure provisioning, and workflow orchestration. Many integrate it with tools such as Puppet or Terraform to enhance CI/CD processes, benefiting from its agentless design in adapting to cloud environments.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

3M, GE, John Deere, Deutsche Telekom, Cable & Wireless, Xerox, and Société Générale, Liberty Mutual, EA, Rabobank

HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Release vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

December 2025

Free Report: Digital.ai Release vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Digital.ai Release vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Digital.ai Release vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.