Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Digital.ai Release vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform comparison

Digital.ai and Red Hat are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Digital.ai is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while Red Hat is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9. Digital.ai holds a 1.3% mindshare in RA, compared to Red Hat’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Digital.ai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.
Digital.ai Release
Read 5 Digital.ai Release reviews
  • 970 Views
  • 340 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Red Hat Ansible Automation ...
Read 72 Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform reviews
  • 9,831 Views
  • 1,376 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 1, 2026

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and Digital.ai Release compete in the automation solutions category. Digital.ai Release is favored due to its robust features and perceived value for its cost, despite Red Hat Ansible's competitive pricing and support advantages.

Features: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers agentless architecture, a comprehensive library of modules supporting a wide range of IT environments, and robust role-based access control. Digital.ai Release features strong release management capabilities, integration with a variety of DevOps tools, and effective management of complex release pipelines. These attributes provide significant advantages in managing and automating release processes.

Room for Improvement: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform could benefit from simplifying its initial configuration requirement and enhancing ease of use for beginners. Improving integration with non-Red Hat products would also be advantageous. Digital.ai Release could improve by reducing its upfront cost, enhancing its integration flexibility with more non-Atlassian tools, and refining its user interface for better usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Digital.ai Release is known for its straightforward deployment model and superior customer support, providing seamless integration with existing infrastructures. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, while offering flexible deployment options, requires more initial setup but is backed by strong customer service to aid through these complexities, facilitating successful implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform presents an economical initial investment, appealing to organizations focused on budgets. It offers a substantial ROI through efficient automation. Digital.ai Release demands a higher initial investment but is perceived to offer greater long-term value owing to its extensive release management features, aligning with organizations prioritizing strategic releases.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Digital.ai Release vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report (Updated: February 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Digital.ai Release vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
February 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Digital.ai Release
Ranking in Release Automation
10th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Build Automation (15th), DevSecOps (7th)
Red Hat Ansible Automation ...
Ranking in Release Automation
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
72
Ranking in other categories
Configuration Management (1st), Network Automation (1st), AWS Pro Service Providers (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Release Automation category, the mindshare of Digital.ai Release is 1.3%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is 4.1%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Release Automation Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform4.1%
Digital.ai Release1.3%
Other94.6%
Release Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Jeanne-Mari Chandran - PeerSpot reviewer
Jeanne-Mari Chandran
Software Configuration Specialist at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Experience seamless project management and integration with robust tools
The features I find most valuable in Digital.ai Release are the integration with MS Teams, because we have MS Teams channels that publish or push notifications to that. When we start deployments, it sends a notification to the people that we are doing a deployment to their environment. It notifies them when the deployment is started, completed, or if attention is required. I also appreciate the fact that it has plugins for Bamboo and I use lots of Gradle and JSON scripts, and we do SQL upgrades as well, triggering Flyway scripts via Bamboo, along with the integration with XLD and Jira; it's all Atlassian software. Regarding environment management capabilities, Digital.ai Release is mostly useful for me, as it is more application related and that is managed via my XLD dictionary. We have one artifact that is environment agnostic, which has placeholders that correspond to my XLD keys and values, and at deployment time, it substitutes the placeholders with those environment specific values. We don't need to make a specific deployment artifact for dev, test, or production; it is all the same artifact using environment variables, ensuring what we take to production is what was tested.
Read full review
Manas Kashyap - PeerSpot reviewer
Manas Kashyap
Senior DevOps engineer at Elevenxcapital
Automation has transformed server patching and has reduced months of work to minutes
The best features that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers is that it does not require any additional resources inside the servers. Python is the only requirement, and since Python is already present inside the servers, we can run it from our location and it automatically deploys things and does the work for us. The minimal requirements and easy deployment have definitely impacted my daily work and my team's efficiency. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is one of the best features that we depend on. We have evaluated other options, but Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was the best choice because it has saved us a tremendous amount of time. We do not need to manually intervene in the servers or install third-party software to maintain these things. It is very easy to write playbooks for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. Ansible Galaxy contains many playbooks that are readily available and ready to be used. It is highly configurable with Jinja templating, making it easy to maintain. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has positively impacted my organization. Previously, we needed to go into the servers and maintain them manually, which used to take a lot of time. For 200 to 300 servers, the maintenance took about one to two months. New patches would arrive and we would have to repeat the process. Now, it is a one-night work or a 10 to 15 minutes task. We write a playbook, maintain an inventory, and roll out the updates and it starts working for us. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform uses conditional clauses and has rollback options, functioning like a standard coding language that is simple to use. There is definitely a reduction in errors with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform because we have playbooks written with all the necessary clauses and rollback options. Manual work automatically creates more errors, whereas in automation, we have written sets that we do not forget every time we run it. We have protected written sets that we execute consistently.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Digital.ai Release is its ability to communicate with various deployment systems, such as XLD and batch deployments, as well as integrate with tools, such as Flyway and Bamboo. We use Bamboo as our build orchestrator, and Digital.ai Release also integrates with Jira, another Atlassian solution. These capabilities make it a powerful tool for managing workflow, test automation, and other processes."
"Overall, I would give Digital.ai Release a rating of nine out of ten; there's always room for improvement, but it's really good."
"The orchestration, building the release, and then just executing it and managing that pipeline — the orchestration capabilities are great for that."
"The time is also reduced because the manual work has tremendously decreased. We just have to click one button, and it will create everything for us."
"The solution can apply one template across multiple applications."
"We can manage all the configuration consistency between all our servers."
"Ansible provides great reliability when coupled with a versioning system (git). It helps providing predictability to the network by knowing exactly what's being pushed after validating it in production."
"The solution is capable of integrating with many applications and devices in comparison to BigFix."
"Since it is in YAML, if I have to explain it to somebody else, they can easily understand it."
"Automation is valuable. It saves us time in performing tedious tasks or repetitive tasks."
"We can automate a few host configurations using the product."
"There are new modules available, which help to simplify the workflow. That is what we like about it."
"The initial setup is easy and takes a few hours to complete."
More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pros
 

Cons

"The solution is a little bit expensive."
"Currently, we put artifact details manually. What we could improve, in our case, is the deployment instruction base. Developers input all the information, including which artifact and where it needs to be deployed. What Digital.ai could do is automatically go to the deployment instruction page, take those artifact details, and implement them."
"I would like to improve Digital.ai Release by exploring its cloud capabilities as we are currently in the middle of migrating to the cloud, but I actually have no idea what Digital.ai's cloud capabilities are."
"The backfill could be improved, we could automate that. Right now it's subjective — it's up to the lead developer's memory to remember to backfill."
"Digital.ai Release could improve by having a better plugin that works with Guardian that we use for mainframe migrations. If there could be an interface or plugin for Guardian that would be beneficial."
"There should be consistency. I know that it is always changing, but when we are trying to get some users to do something in basic Ansible that they are not really interested in doing but their job requires them to do it, they start finding inconsistencies."
"It would be helpful to have templates for common configurations. It would make it much easier and faster rather than creating a whole script. The templates would decrease the learning curve as well."
"There needs to be improvement in the orchestration."
"Accessibility. Ansible uses a CLI by default. Those accustomed to it can find their way and adopt the YAML files easily over time. But, some users are more comfortable using UIs..."
"Documentation could be improved. Many times, if I'm looking for something, I have to Google it in a lot of places, then figure out what the best approach will be. There are some best practices documents, but they don't give you the information."
"The support could be better."
"Because Ansible is establishing SSH sessions to perform tasks, there is a limit on scalability."
"Ansible has just been upgraded, and the only issue that we are seeing at the moment is that the user interface can be slow. We're currently investigating the refresh period with Red Hat when you click a job and run a job. It seems that the buffer no longer runs in real-time. We haven't discovered whether that's partially an issue with our environment, but Red Hat has come back and said that they're working on a couple of bugs in the background. We've upgraded to that version in the last six months, and that's the only issue that we've seen."
More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Overall, the price is just too high; especially considering we're in the middle of a pandemic."
"The solution's license includes all features."
"It is a little pricey but it is affordable. It is not that bad."
"We have to be mindful of how we use Ansible because of the licensing model. I am not saying that it is unfair or we do not find value in it. Because we are trying to automate so many different things, we have to be mindful of what we are doing and how we are doing it because we are trying to stay in compliance with it."
"The pricing is okay."
"Ansible Tower is pretty expensive."
"Ansible is a lot more competitive than any of the others. Its setup was also straightforward. In fact, we just implemented Ansible on OpenShift, so that is how we are running the Ansible Automation Platform now."
"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is an expensive solution. There may be additional fees to use advanced features."
"Like many Red Hat products, they have a no-cost version of the web application (AWX, formerly Ansible Tower), but you are on your own to install and it is a little more complicated than just installing Ansible."
"Users have to pay a per-node cost of around $ 100 per node."
More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
12%
Insurance Company
12%
Healthcare Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business24
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise48
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Digital.ai Release ?
The time is also reduced because the manual work has tremendously decreased. We just have to click one button, and it will create everything for us.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Digital.ai Release ?
Based on my experience, I would like to improve Digital.ai Release by exploring its cloud capabilities as we are currently in the middle of migrating to the cloud, but I actually have no idea what ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Digital.ai Release ?
My use case for Digital.ai Release is that I work for an insurance company on a very big project that develops multiple different pieces of software. We use Digital.ai Release to move our software ...
See all answers
What is the difference between Red Hat Satellite and Ansible?
Red Hat Satellite has proven to be a worthwhile investment for me. Both its patch management and license management have been outstanding. If you have a large environment, patching systems is much ...
See all answers
How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...
See all answers
What do you like most about Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?
The most valuable features of the solution are automation and patching.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

CloudBees vs Digital.ai Release Logo
CloudBees vs Digital.ai Release
Compared 9% of the time
Endor Labs vs Digital.ai Release Logo
Endor Labs vs Digital.ai Release
Compared 8% of the time
Jenkins vs Digital.ai Release Logo
Jenkins vs Digital.ai Release
Compared 8% of the time
IBM Rational Build Forge vs Digital.ai Release Logo
IBM Rational Build Forge vs Digital.ai Release
Compared 8% of the time
TeamCity vs Digital.ai Release Logo
TeamCity vs Digital.ai Release
Compared 5% of the time
More Digital.ai Release Competitors
VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 10% of the time
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 9% of the time
Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 6% of the time
Microsoft Intune vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Microsoft Intune vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 4% of the time
BigFix vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
BigFix vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 4% of the time
More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Digital.ai Release
February 2026
Digital.ai Release reportDownload Digital.ai Release product report
Buyer's Guide
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
January 2026
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform reportDownload Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform product report
 

Also Known As

XL Release, XebiaLabs XL Release
Ansible, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Subscription on AWS
 

Overview

Automate, orchestrate, and gain visibility into your release pipelines at scale using Digital.ai Release, a release management tool that is designed for enterprises. Control and track releases, standardize processes, and bake compliance and security into your software release pipelines.

Digital.ai

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform streamlines IT operations with features like a simplified GUI and extensive module support. Its agentless architecture and YAML ease make it an adaptable choice for managing diverse infrastructures efficiently.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a robust automation framework that supports multiple environments and integrates well with various applications. Its agentless Python-based architecture facilitates efficient server management and rapid update deployment. Users benefit from centralized management through Ansible Tower, role-based access control, and dynamic inventory. However, improvement areas include documentation, API integration, network support, and UI scaling. Enhanced community contributions could address module availability and compatibility gaps.

What are the most important features of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?
  • Agentless Architecture: Leverages Python for seamless management without needing local agents.
  • Extensive Module Support: Provides modules for managing multiple environments effectively.
  • Ansible Tower GUI: Offers a centralized interface for easy automation management.
  • Role-Based Access Control: Ensures user-specific permissions for improved security.
  • Integration Capabilities: Connects with a variety of applications to enhance functionality.
  • Dynamic Inventory: Automatically updates inventory, simplifying large infrastructure management.
What benefits and ROI should one consider?
  • Automation Efficiency: Significantly reduces manual intervention, saving time and resources.
  • Adaptability: Easily integrates with cloud platforms such as AWS, GCP, and Azure.
  • Security Compliance: Automates compliance checks, ensuring up-to-date security protocols.
  • Cost Management: Lower operational costs through streamlined processes.
  • Scalability: Supports infrastructure growth without requiring major adjustments.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is used for network management, security compliance, and configuration tasks. Organizations utilize its capabilities for cloud and on-premises deployment, infrastructure provisioning, and workflow orchestration. Many integrate it with tools such as Puppet or Terraform to enhance CI/CD processes, benefiting from its agentless design in adapting to cloud environments.

Red Hat
 

Sample Customers

3M, GE, John Deere, Deutsche Telekom, Cable & Wireless, Xerox, and Société Générale, Liberty Mutual, EA, Rabobank
HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank
Buyer's Guide
Digital.ai Release vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
February 2026
Free Report: Digital.ai Release vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about Digital.ai Release vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Digital.ai Release vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report.
See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.