Application Architect at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
Jun 16, 2026
To improve Digital.ai Release, I think the user interface could be improved. For example, I have a plan phase before my build phase, and sometimes the toggle button is hidden. I have to toggle it before the step can be executed, or it will be skipped. Many people who did not use Digital.ai Release before do not even know there is a toggle button, and the first time when they run into that phase, they will definitely skip that step. Regarding needed improvements, I did not do extensive reading on documentation or training material directly from Digital.ai Release. My knowledge comes from the team who has been using it. However, I would appreciate standardized training material that would give me hands-on experience.
Release Manager at a consultancy with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 20
Jun 15, 2026
Sometimes it can be tedious when fulfilling multiple different packages with their key and value pairs. If we make any mistakes in the second step and return to the first screen, everything is erased, so there is no way to return to the first screen and start again with the same package or make small updates or changes to the initial screen before restarting the process. Digital.ai Release is very helpful in saving time, but I wish there was the possibility to use the API as a release manager to automate pre-filling the pipelines. If we had an API that could be used on the user side, similar to the one in JIRA where we can create a personal token without granting full access to Digital.ai Release, I could have my script automate the process instead of fulfilling the template field by field, which would be excellent. I chose eight out of ten because I see it is a nice tool. I do not know it in depth to give a higher or lower rating at this point, but for my use and role, I appreciate the parts of the tool I am familiar with. We could have some small enhancements, such as being able to go back to the first screen while keeping everything filled in, but beyond that, I do not have any other suggestions.
One improvement for Digital.ai Release could be to simplify the user interface for beginners. New users may take time to understand release pipelines and templates, so more guided onboarding tutorials and documentation would help them adapt easily. I would suggest documentation and tutorials as needed improvements for Digital.ai Release.
Software Configuration Specialist at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
May 16, 2025
Based on my experience, I would like to improve Digital.ai Release by exploring its cloud capabilities as we are currently in the middle of migrating to the cloud, but I actually have no idea what Digital.ai's cloud capabilities are. As for additional functionality I would like to add to Digital.ai Release, I can't comment on that at the moment, but I think plugins for other deployment tools such as PDQ Deploy, which we use for Windows applications, could make my life easier.
There are many areas of improvement. Currently, we put artifact details manually. What we could improve, in our case, is the deployment instruction base. Developers input all the information, including which artifact and where it needs to be deployed. What Digital.ai could do is automatically go to the deployment instruction page, take those artifact details, and implement them. This way, there would be no need to manually input the details.
Senior, Workload Automation Analyst at a government with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Nov 19, 2020
The backfill could be improved, we could automate that. Right now it's subjective — it's up to the lead developer's memory to remember to backfill. Overall, the price is just too high; especially considering we're in the middle of a pandemic. There's definitely some overkill in these products. To me, they seem to be just a little over-complicated — I think they could skinny it down. It's just based on how many users so I don't know if the different roles are priced differently. The DevOps people might be in it a lot more than a lead. I don't know if pricing by role can be different. If I've got a manager that just wants to go in and audit it, does that person have to have a full license, or is it just a read-only and it's a nickel or something?
Digital.ai Release enhances deployment pipelines, integrating with tools like GitHub and Jenkins. It enables coordination across development, testing, and production while reducing manual efforts, making it ideal for large projects.Digital.ai Release is designed to automate and orchestrate application deployments, offering features like email approvals, deployment notifications, and system communication with XLD. It supports integration with tools such as Bamboo, Jira, and MS Teams to create...
To improve Digital.ai Release, I think the user interface could be improved. For example, I have a plan phase before my build phase, and sometimes the toggle button is hidden. I have to toggle it before the step can be executed, or it will be skipped. Many people who did not use Digital.ai Release before do not even know there is a toggle button, and the first time when they run into that phase, they will definitely skip that step. Regarding needed improvements, I did not do extensive reading on documentation or training material directly from Digital.ai Release. My knowledge comes from the team who has been using it. However, I would appreciate standardized training material that would give me hands-on experience.
Sometimes it can be tedious when fulfilling multiple different packages with their key and value pairs. If we make any mistakes in the second step and return to the first screen, everything is erased, so there is no way to return to the first screen and start again with the same package or make small updates or changes to the initial screen before restarting the process. Digital.ai Release is very helpful in saving time, but I wish there was the possibility to use the API as a release manager to automate pre-filling the pipelines. If we had an API that could be used on the user side, similar to the one in JIRA where we can create a personal token without granting full access to Digital.ai Release, I could have my script automate the process instead of fulfilling the template field by field, which would be excellent. I chose eight out of ten because I see it is a nice tool. I do not know it in depth to give a higher or lower rating at this point, but for my use and role, I appreciate the parts of the tool I am familiar with. We could have some small enhancements, such as being able to go back to the first screen while keeping everything filled in, but beyond that, I do not have any other suggestions.
One improvement for Digital.ai Release could be to simplify the user interface for beginners. New users may take time to understand release pipelines and templates, so more guided onboarding tutorials and documentation would help them adapt easily. I would suggest documentation and tutorials as needed improvements for Digital.ai Release.
Based on my experience, I would like to improve Digital.ai Release by exploring its cloud capabilities as we are currently in the middle of migrating to the cloud, but I actually have no idea what Digital.ai's cloud capabilities are. As for additional functionality I would like to add to Digital.ai Release, I can't comment on that at the moment, but I think plugins for other deployment tools such as PDQ Deploy, which we use for Windows applications, could make my life easier.
There are many areas of improvement. Currently, we put artifact details manually. What we could improve, in our case, is the deployment instruction base. Developers input all the information, including which artifact and where it needs to be deployed. What Digital.ai could do is automatically go to the deployment instruction page, take those artifact details, and implement them. This way, there would be no need to manually input the details.
The solution is a little bit expensive.
The backfill could be improved, we could automate that. Right now it's subjective — it's up to the lead developer's memory to remember to backfill. Overall, the price is just too high; especially considering we're in the middle of a pandemic. There's definitely some overkill in these products. To me, they seem to be just a little over-complicated — I think they could skinny it down. It's just based on how many users so I don't know if the different roles are priced differently. The DevOps people might be in it a lot more than a lead. I don't know if pricing by role can be different. If I've got a manager that just wants to go in and audit it, does that person have to have a full license, or is it just a read-only and it's a nickel or something?