One improvement for Digital.ai Release could be to simplify the user interface for beginners. New users may take time to understand release pipelines and templates, so more guided onboarding tutorials and documentation would help them adapt easily. I would suggest documentation and tutorials as needed improvements for Digital.ai Release.
Software Configuration Specialist at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
May 16, 2025
Based on my experience, I would like to improve Digital.ai Release by exploring its cloud capabilities as we are currently in the middle of migrating to the cloud, but I actually have no idea what Digital.ai's cloud capabilities are. As for additional functionality I would like to add to Digital.ai Release, I can't comment on that at the moment, but I think plugins for other deployment tools such as PDQ Deploy, which we use for Windows applications, could make my life easier.
There are many areas of improvement. Currently, we put artifact details manually. What we could improve, in our case, is the deployment instruction base. Developers input all the information, including which artifact and where it needs to be deployed. What Digital.ai could do is automatically go to the deployment instruction page, take those artifact details, and implement them. This way, there would be no need to manually input the details.
Senior, Workload Automation Analyst at a government with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Nov 19, 2020
The backfill could be improved, we could automate that. Right now it's subjective — it's up to the lead developer's memory to remember to backfill. Overall, the price is just too high; especially considering we're in the middle of a pandemic. There's definitely some overkill in these products. To me, they seem to be just a little over-complicated — I think they could skinny it down. It's just based on how many users so I don't know if the different roles are priced differently. The DevOps people might be in it a lot more than a lead. I don't know if pricing by role can be different. If I've got a manager that just wants to go in and audit it, does that person have to have a full license, or is it just a read-only and it's a nickel or something?
Digital.ai Release enhances deployment pipelines, integrating with tools like GitHub and Jenkins. It enables coordination across development, testing, and production while reducing manual efforts, making it ideal for large projects.Digital.ai Release is designed to automate and orchestrate application deployments, offering features like email approvals, deployment notifications, and system communication with XLD. It supports integration with tools such as Bamboo, Jira, and MS Teams to create...
One improvement for Digital.ai Release could be to simplify the user interface for beginners. New users may take time to understand release pipelines and templates, so more guided onboarding tutorials and documentation would help them adapt easily. I would suggest documentation and tutorials as needed improvements for Digital.ai Release.
Based on my experience, I would like to improve Digital.ai Release by exploring its cloud capabilities as we are currently in the middle of migrating to the cloud, but I actually have no idea what Digital.ai's cloud capabilities are. As for additional functionality I would like to add to Digital.ai Release, I can't comment on that at the moment, but I think plugins for other deployment tools such as PDQ Deploy, which we use for Windows applications, could make my life easier.
There are many areas of improvement. Currently, we put artifact details manually. What we could improve, in our case, is the deployment instruction base. Developers input all the information, including which artifact and where it needs to be deployed. What Digital.ai could do is automatically go to the deployment instruction page, take those artifact details, and implement them. This way, there would be no need to manually input the details.
The solution is a little bit expensive.
The backfill could be improved, we could automate that. Right now it's subjective — it's up to the lead developer's memory to remember to backfill. Overall, the price is just too high; especially considering we're in the middle of a pandemic. There's definitely some overkill in these products. To me, they seem to be just a little over-complicated — I think they could skinny it down. It's just based on how many users so I don't know if the different roles are priced differently. The DevOps people might be in it a lot more than a lead. I don't know if pricing by role can be different. If I've got a manager that just wants to go in and audit it, does that person have to have a full license, or is it just a read-only and it's a nickel or something?