Azure NetApp Files vs CloudSphere comparison

Read 5 CloudSphere reviews

2,063 Views
536 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure NetApp Files

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

CloudSphere and Azure NetApp Files are cloud management products with distinct strengths. Azure NetApp Files is preferred for its comprehensive features, while CloudSphere is recognized for cost-effectiveness and support.

Features: CloudSphere offers advanced cloud security, compliance management, and multi-cloud support. Azure NetApp Files provides enterprise-grade storage, high performance, and integrated data protection.

Room for Improvement: While CloudSphere needs to enhance latency issues, server stability, and user interface, Azure NetApp Files could improve in areas like cost efficiency, learning curve, and offering more support options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudSphere is known for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Azure NetApp Files integrates easily with Microsoft Azure environments, facilitating deployment for existing Azure users.

Pricing and ROI: CloudSphere offers an affordable setup, providing a favorable ROI for budget-conscious businesses. Despite its higher cost, Azure NetApp Files offers extensive features that enhance long-term value and performance, particularly for enterprises with complex storage needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure NetApp Files vs. CloudSphere Report (Updated: June 2026).

Azure NetApp Files vs. CloudSphere

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure NetApp Files

Ranking in Cloud Migration

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Storage (12th), Public Cloud Storage Services (13th)

CloudSphere

Ranking in Cloud Migration

18th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (43rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Cloud Migration category, the mindshare of Azure NetApp Files is 4.4%, down from 15.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudSphere is 3.0%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Migration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Azure NetApp Files	4.4%
CloudSphere	3.0%
Other	92.6%

Cloud Migration

Featured Reviews

Rajat Wadhwa

Cloud Architect at IBM

Cross-region replication has delivered seamless disaster recovery for enterprise storage needs

In terms of improvement, I would say cost reservation; the cost is a bit high. If we compare Azure Files and Azure NetApp Files, I know that customers are using less of Azure NetApp due to the cost. If they bring the cost a little bit closer to what Azure Files offers, it can be a great product in the market and bring a lot of business to NetApp. Backup is quite critical. As of now, Azure NetApp Files requires you to use Azure NetApp Backup solution, which is in public preview at the moment. I would definitely expect NetApp to come up with that solution so that customers can start using it because they do not have confidence in backup as it is still in preview. They are still doing some testing and research on that product, which is not officially released for use by multiple customers.

Read full review

Vibhor Gupta

Migration Customer Solution Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Great discovery, good support, and generally reliable

The area they need to focus most on is the capability of assessment and the landing zones. It’s lacking right now. Cloud transformation has four to five cases, including planning, discovery, assessment, and the MVC, which is called the minimal viable cloud. That comes with the architecture design or landing zone creation, where we will create resources on the cloud which we are provisioning. If we are moving onto the cloud platform, AWS, or zero GCP, we need an account. We need resources to be able to compute the network. Most organizations have their landing zone process and know how to create the resources account, compute the network layer and the security layer. However, this landing zone creation is not there in CloudSphere as a feature. It cannot create any of the cloud providers' accounts or their network security computing as a part of the orchestration layer. That orchestration layer is missing in this product. It will not discover all the applications, although they also have the catalog. They are constantly announcing their catalog to identify applications based on the service which we are discovering. 50% of the time, the application will discover automatically. However, for the other 50%, we need to find the application based on its running process. That's the automation method that we need to follow and that they call blueprint. We need to create those blueprints and then we need to tag those applications. That is the one process that takes time when we do the discovery. One of the cons of this product is that it will not discover all the applications running. It will not discover SAP or some kinds of applications that are running on those inside the application of the servers as well. When we start the scanning of, for example, 500 servers, it will not handle the scan. We need to differentiate the jobs - for example, one job for 100 servers, a second job for another 100 servers, et cetera. We cannot scan the 1,000 servers together. That causes it to take time. There’s a graph missing. It shows where all the servers have interdependencies; however, when we do actual work, it will not work properly in terms of what we present to the customer.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use Azure NetApp Files mainly for backup."

"The critical features of this solution are SnapMirror for replication, data protection, and SnapLock."

"Simply try it out because it's worth the effort to have a look at it."

"The most valuable features of the solution is replication to another region and the performance. The solution is stable. The solution is scalable. The initial setup is straightforward."

"This solution definitely makes us more efficient in being able to provide storage quickly to our customers in the Azure Cloud."

"It's like the Porsche of storage solutions in the cloud."

"The availability is good, meaning downtime or network issues rarely occur. The system also offers flexibility, allowing for increases in data volume, IOPS, and other capabilities without requiring downtime, which is a strong point. Based on the money spent, we can get performance improvements and high availability."

"The performance has improved by about 30 percent, and the solution’s combination of ease of use, simplicity, and reduction in IT management versus the cost has helped a lot."

More Azure NetApp Files pros

"CloudSphere is a good solution that works well and can integrate with multiple clouds and manage all our customers."

"The scalability of the solution is a godsend."

"Provides multiple kinds of services for managing the clouds of multiple customers."

"CloudSphere is very mature and very effective."

"When I started using CloudSphere, it wasn't mature, and it had multiple issues. For example, my team experienced server issues while using the solution, but recently, I noticed how much CloudSphere has improved. There used to be some latency issues with CloudSphere. It even gave error messages in the past when you select an option such as "the web server is not responding", but it has improved a lot, and now I don't get any errors from CloudSphere. What I like best about CloudSphere is that it has a lot of beneficial features, and it has a single pane for managing multi-cloud environments, which I find very helpful, and it's the main benefit you can get from CloudSphere."

"For the customers I work with, it provides flexibility as far as storage is concerned, so it's security and access."

"The product is helpful for the management, optimization, and utilization of resources."

"We do not need to install any appliances or any agents."

Cons

"It is about four times the cost of premium storage on Azure, so in order for us to use it, we'd have to be willing to increase our storage costs by four times."

"Azure NetApp Files is expensive."

"We would like to see more paired regions for the replication."

"In terms of improvement, I would say cost reservation; the cost is a bit high. If we compare Azure Files and Azure NetApp Files, I know that customers are using less of Azure NetApp due to the cost."

"The solution needs to improve it's ABS environment."

"The deployment process is somewhat complex compared to other storage solutions."

"It is expensive in small environments, which could be better. The reason is the four terabyte minimum."

"I have a hunch that storage could be now the most expensive portion of our monthly bill. So I can imagine that, not this year, but next year we will be talking about looking deeper into ways how we can optimize the cost."

More Azure NetApp Files cons

"When we start the scanning of, for example, 500 servers, it will not handle the scan. We need to differentiate the jobs - for example, one job for 100 servers, a second job for another 100 servers, et cetera."

"CloudSphere is not keeping up with the pace of the cloud and there are a number of services that can't be deployed using CloudSphere."

"The next feature I would like to have full disclosure of what's being done with the data."

"One of the cons of this product is that it will not discover all the applications running."

"The main issue I experienced from CloudSphere was recently resolved, but an area for improvement in the solution is that it lacks the functionality of migrating resources from one public cloud to another. If CloudSphere could provide that functionality, that would be very beneficial to users and companies."

"Their customer support leaves a lot to be desired. The standards are not that great."

"The solution must have a single management console for the resources and VMs."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing fees for this solution vary, ranging from a single shelf to a full suite."

"The pricing depends on your scaling and consumption."

"In the cloud, pricing depends on how you manage it. It's not necessarily cheap, but it's all about optimizing charges and showing the cost back. So, it's more about managing the expenses rather than being inherently expensive or cheap."

"We are currently on a pay-as-you-go model with the storage that we use."

"This solution is very expensive compared to the alternatives."

"The solution’s combination of the ease of use, simplicity, and reduction in IT management versus the cost has helped a lot. It is very fast to deploy. It's very easy to maintain. You don't have to do a lot in the cloud to maintain this thing, so it gives good performance. It's fast to deploy, easy to maintain, and it gives a better performance. These are the most basic three criteria for any application. This saves cost because the manpower you need to deploy is going down. You're getting better performance and not buying new resources. You have resources available in the cloud. It's just a couple of clicks, then you're good to go."

"The price of Azure NetApp Files could be better."

"The performance has improved by about 30 percent."

More Azure NetApp Files pricing and cost advice

"The product is very expensive."

"It depends on how that model will be used. It might be anywhere between $4 and $15 per license per month. It’s less expensive than other options."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

11%

Logistics Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

How does Azure NetApp Files compare to NetApp ONTAP?

Azure NetApp Files is a Microsoft Azure file storage service built on NetApp technology. The platform combines the file capabilities of Azure and NetApp to move critical file-based applications to ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure NetApp Files?

On pricing, I would rate it around eight. It's highly priced, and there's no cost reservation option available compared to Azure Files. If NetApp could bring that kind of model for customers to sav...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure NetApp Files?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 8% of the time

Nasuni vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 5% of the time

More Azure NetApp Files Competitors

Densify vs CloudSphere

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudSphere

Compared 8% of the time

Skytap Cloud vs CloudSphere

Compared 5% of the time

Connectria IaaS Cloud vs CloudSphere

Compared 5% of the time

NTT Cloud Management Platform vs CloudSphere

Compared 4% of the time

More CloudSphere Competitors

Product Reports

Azure NetApp Files

Download Azure NetApp Files product report

Download CloudSphere product report

Also Known As

NetApp ANF, ANF

HyperCloud

Overview

Azure NetApp Files offers flexibility, speed, and tight Active Directory integration, making it versatile. Its scalability, rapid response time, and replication capabilities like SnapMirror enhance its value, along with SEC compliance through SnapLock and efficient database management.

Azure NetApp Files is a robust service for unstructured data storage within Microsoft Azure and on-premises environments. It supports NFS and CIFS protocol testing, SQL backups, SAP virtualization, Azure Virtual Desktop, and event collection. This service facilitates seamless provisioning, non-disruptive resizing, and fast snapshots for disaster recovery. Known for high availability and cost-effective throughput, its ease of use and security make it preferred by users. Issues with high pricing and support highlight areas for enhancement, alongside desires for expanded regional availability, better security, and integration with diverse solutions.

What are the key features of Azure NetApp Files?

Flexibility: Supports diverse applications with robust Active Directory integration.
Scalability: Easily adjusts to increased performance demands.
Fast Snapshotting: Enhances disaster recovery capabilities.
SnapMirror: Provides effective replication features.
SnapLock: Ensures SEC compliance.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

High Availability: Delivers reliable performance.
Cost-effective Throughput: Balances performance with expenditure.
Ease of Use: Simplifies data management tasks.
Non-disruptive Resizing: Facilitates seamless storage adjustments.
Enhanced Security: Protects sensitive data effectively.

In educational contexts, Azure NetApp Files shines by offering seamless data handling and high IOPS performance, supporting high-demand environments like research facilities. For enterprises, it aids legacy system migrations and optimizes virtual environments while enhancing data protection and file share performance.

NetApp

CloudSphere offers a unique multi-cloud management solution with features like attack path analysis, cost management, and predictive insights designed to enhance infrastructure reliability.

Providing an agent-less SaaS-based discovery tool, CloudSphere simplifies multi-cloud management with its single-pane interface, ensuring seamless data access in hybrid cloud environments. Its predictive insights and improved infrastructure reliability are valuable for both development and operational teams. However, it could improve in application management, real-time monitoring, and resource migration across clouds. Issues like inefficient large server scans and limitations in CI/CD integration and application discovery can be hindrances for some users.

What are CloudSphere's key features?

Attack Path Analysis: Identifies vulnerabilities to improve security.
Cost Management: Optimizes spending across cloud platforms.
Resource Optimization: Enhances operational efficiency using predictive insights.
Asset Discovery: Agent-less discovery tool assists in managing cloud resources.
Multi-Cloud Management: Single-pane interface aids in auditing and resource utilization.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Infrastructure Reliability: Predictive insights boost stability.
Improved Collaboration: Single-pane interface supports cross-cloud operations.
Risk Management: Attack path analytics bolster security measures.
Operational Efficiency: Cost management features refine cloud spending.

CloudSphere is widely used in DevOps to manage test development networks, monitor application behaviors, and assess risk levels. Ideal for those managing inventories across public clouds, it's found in hyper-converged infrastructures in industries like healthcare, supporting hospital management and integrated services.

Sample Customers

SAP, Restaurant Magic

Affymetrix, Bell Helicopter, Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe, Porterville Unified School District, Interact for Health, VirtueCom, Warren Memorial Hospital, Front Porch, RMH Group, Meyers Nave, Intraworks, Information Technology, ETTE, Clackamas Community College

Azure NetApp Files vs. CloudSphere