No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Azure NetApp Files Logo

Azure NetApp Files pros and cons

Vendor: NetApp
4.0 out of 5

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Azure NetApp Files is highly valued for its flexibility, allowing users to easily adjust storage options dynamically without downtime.
SnapMirror and SnapLock features enhance data protection and replication, offering reliable data security and management.
The scalability of Azure NetApp Files is seamless, allowing businesses to expand storage to meet growing demands without any service disruption.
Users appreciate the impressive performance capabilities, delivering high throughput at a reasonable cost.
The stability and reliability of Azure NetApp Files ensure continuity and peace of mind with efficient backups and quick data recovery.

CONS

Azure NetApp Files could benefit from the addition of a recycle bin feature for file recovery.
Cost optimization is a concern as storage expenses might become a leading financial factor.
Azure NetApp Files pricing is a significant barrier, with a need for cost reduction to compete with cheaper alternatives.
Improved integration with other services and solutions like Splunk would enhance versatility.
There is a need for a streamlined and straightforward deployment process compared to other storage solutions.
 

Azure NetApp Files Pros review quotes

AjayKumar13 - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud/Data/Database Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees
Mar 26, 2025
It is faster. It is quicker. It is reliable.
Manpreet_Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Principal Infrastructure Engineer at Mphasis
May 6, 2024
I like the SnapMirror feature in Azure NetApp Files. It helps me create backups with snapshots and makes data recovery and compression.
SS
Digital Systems Engineer at British Petroleum
Apr 16, 2024
We use Azure NetApp Files mainly for backup.
Learn what your peers think about Azure NetApp Files. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.
893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1487220 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Storage Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
May 2, 2022
This solution definitely makes us more efficient in being able to provide storage quickly to our customers in the Azure Cloud.
reviewer2387976 - PeerSpot reviewer
Pre-sales consultant at a engineering company with 10,001+ employees
Apr 8, 2024
I think the easiest part is, when you do a comparison, it is the throughput versus the cost. And it's much easier to set up.
Murali Mohan Athota - PeerSpot reviewer
Technology Lead at Infosys
Apr 24, 2024
The availability is good, meaning downtime or network issues rarely occur. The system also offers flexibility, allowing for increases in data volume, IOPS, and other capabilities without requiring downtime, which is a strong point. Based on the money spent, we can get performance improvements and high availability.
HP
Cloud Consultant at Ensono
Nov 14, 2023
The most valuable features of the solution is replication to another region and the performance. The solution is stable. The solution is scalable. The initial setup is straightforward.
AS
Microsoft Azure Cloud Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Nov 20, 2023
One aspect of Azure NetApp Files that I truly appreciate is its remarkable performance capabilities.
Vladislav Malicevic - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
Feb 22, 2022
It's elastic, so it scales with our demands. We can start small, then with the addition of customer loads, we can expand on-the-fly without the need to reprovision something.
DH
Storage / Virtualisation & Infrastructure Contractor at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Jun 16, 2021
Since we have NetApp's internally, we use the SnapMirror predominantly for this process in the cloud which is beneficial.
 

Azure NetApp Files Cons review quotes

AjayKumar13 - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud/Data/Database Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees
Mar 26, 2025
Its pricing can be better.
Manpreet_Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Principal Infrastructure Engineer at Mphasis
May 6, 2024
The main area for improvement is in the support ticket system. Since it's a SaaS platform, support tickets are managed by Microsoft or NetApp backend. This can sometimes lead to cross-functional challenges for organizations.
SS
Digital Systems Engineer at British Petroleum
Apr 16, 2024
I don’t like the solution’s configuration and support.
Learn what your peers think about Azure NetApp Files. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.
893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1487220 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Storage Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
May 2, 2022
The pricing definitely needs to be improved.
reviewer2387976 - PeerSpot reviewer
Pre-sales consultant at a engineering company with 10,001+ employees
Apr 8, 2024
The solution needs to improve it's ABS environment.
Murali Mohan Athota - PeerSpot reviewer
Technology Lead at Infosys
Apr 24, 2024
Azure NetApp Files is expensive.
HP
Cloud Consultant at Ensono
Nov 14, 2023
We would like to see more paired regions for the replication.
AS
Microsoft Azure Cloud Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Nov 20, 2023
The deployment process is somewhat complex compared to other storage solutions.
Vladislav Malicevic - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
Feb 22, 2022
I have a hunch that storage could be now the most expensive portion of our monthly bill. So I can imagine that, not this year, but next year we will be talking about looking deeper into ways how we can optimize the cost.
DH
Storage / Virtualisation & Infrastructure Contractor at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Jun 16, 2021
We were looking for a clustered solution that has over-complicated things because we had it in AWS, which is Amazon. There was a solution for clustered NetApp. That meant there would be two NetApps that were not clustered because there was no solution for a cluster. We would like there to be an HA cluster solution.