Google Cloud Storage and Azure NetApp Files are two prominent data storage solutions. Azure NetApp Files is favored for its extensive features and is considered worth the price by users.
Features: Users value Google Cloud Storage for its scalability, integration capabilities, and competitive setup costs. Azure NetApp Files is praised for its enterprise-level performance, robust data management functionalities, and superior feature sets catering to complex storage needs.
Room for Improvement: Google Cloud Storage users suggest enhancing security, simplifying management tools, and improving documentation. For Azure NetApp Files, users indicate a need for cost reduction, better documentation, and enhanced customer service response times.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Storage is noted for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Azure NetApp Files is equally easy to deploy but has mixed reviews on customer service efficiency.
Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Storage offers competitive setup costs and good ROI per user feedback. Azure NetApp Files has higher initial costs but delivers significant ROI through its superior features, making users willing to invest more in it due to its long-term benefits.
They have top-notch people.
We have self-studied to learn the services.
For SAP loads, Google provided a specific team, which resulted in good support.
Google Cloud Storage is scalable, but there are limitations.
There was no direct experience with any instability during my involvement.
I would like for them to have more compression so that it can avoid using more storage.
They cover a broad range of products, which might affect their ability to compete well in certain niches.
It is expensive, especially with NetApp Ultra Storage.
Google Cloud was cheaper compared to AWS and Azure.
Depending on your setup, Google Cloud Storage is economical, especially if you do not need high stability and scalability.
The most valuable feature is that the sixty-terabyte database snapshot can be done in less than two to three minutes.
The user interface of Google Cloud Storage is easy and consistent across all their products.
We do not experience any disruptions, and the service meets our needs and requirements.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Google Cloud Storage | 8.3% |
Azure NetApp Files | 7.6% |
Other | 84.1% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 4 |
Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
Large Enterprise | 13 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 31 |
Midsize Enterprise | 17 |
Large Enterprise | 34 |
Azure NetApp Files offers flexibility, speed, and tight Active Directory integration, making it versatile. Its scalability, rapid response time, and replication capabilities like SnapMirror enhance its value, along with SEC compliance through SnapLock and efficient database management.
Azure NetApp Files is a robust service for unstructured data storage within Microsoft Azure and on-premises environments. It supports NFS and CIFS protocol testing, SQL backups, SAP virtualization, Azure Virtual Desktop, and event collection. This service facilitates seamless provisioning, non-disruptive resizing, and fast snapshots for disaster recovery. Known for high availability and cost-effective throughput, its ease of use and security make it preferred by users. Issues with high pricing and support highlight areas for enhancement, alongside desires for expanded regional availability, better security, and integration with diverse solutions.
What are the key features of Azure NetApp Files?In educational contexts, Azure NetApp Files shines by offering seamless data handling and high IOPS performance, supporting high-demand environments like research facilities. For enterprises, it aids legacy system migrations and optimizes virtual environments while enhancing data protection and file share performance.
Google Cloud Storage is praised for its fast performance, seamless integration, high security, and scalability. Users store and access large amounts of data easily, backup files, host websites, and collaborate on projects. The platform's reliability and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for data storage and management.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.