Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BIG-IP Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT) vs Nokia Virtualized Service Router comparison

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

BIG-IP Carrier-Grade Networ...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Carrier Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT) (3rd)
Nokia Virtualized Service R...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Virtual Routers (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

BIG-IP Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT) and Nokia Virtualized Service Router aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. BIG-IP Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT) is designed for Carrier Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT) and holds a mindshare of 21.8%, up 3.9% compared to last year.
Nokia Virtualized Service Router, on the other hand, focuses on Virtual Routers, holds 4.0% mindshare.
Carrier Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
BIG-IP Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT)21.8%
Juniper MX Series Routers21.2%
A10 Networks Thunder CGN19.8%
Other37.2%
Carrier Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT)
Virtual Routers Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Nokia Virtualized Service Router4.0%
VyOS Universal Router25.5%
Netgate TNSR20.6%
Other49.9%
Virtual Routers
 

Overview