Bitwarden vs CyberArk Identity comparison

Bitwarden and CyberArk are both solutions in the Enterprise Password Managers category. Bitwarden is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.3, while CyberArk is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.8. Bitwarden holds a 6.3% mindshare in EPM, compared to CyberArk’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Bitwarden users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of CyberArk users who would recommend it.

Bitwarden

Read 7 Bitwarden reviews

1,785 Views
1,350 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CyberArk Identity

Read 23 CyberArk Identity reviews

457 Views
370 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Bitwarden

CyberArk Identity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

CyberArk Identity and Bitwarden operate in the identity management and password management sectors respectively. CyberArk Identity stands out due to its advanced integration and security features. Bitwarden is preferred for its affordability and ease of use.

Features: CyberArk Identity integrates seamlessly with on-premise Active Directory, offers robust SSO and MFA features, and ensures high security for privileged accounts with its password management and adaptive integration capabilities. Bitwarden is open-source, provides an emergency access feature, and suggests strong passwords, offering a straightforward and effective password management solution.

Room for Improvement: CyberArk Identity users note issues with mobile device management, complex usability, and seek better network and scalability management along with improved user-friendliness. Bitwarden users suggest refining device synchronization and enhancing the speed of credential management while appreciating its overall functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk Identity can be deployed in both public and private cloud environments, offering flexibility but requiring technical expertise due to its complexity. Customer support is mixed, with some users praising knowledgeable assistance. Bitwarden, mainly deployed on-premises, is easier to implement and receives consistent praise for rapid and effective customer service.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk Identity is seen as a costly yet valuable solution, offering substantial long-term benefits and security to avoid potential penalties. Bitwarden provides a cost-effective approach with its open-source model, affordable pricing plans, and free tier, making it accessible to smaller budgets.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitwarden vs. CyberArk Identity Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bitwarden vs. CyberArk Identity

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitwarden

Ranking in Enterprise Password Managers

6th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CyberArk Identity

Ranking in Enterprise Password Managers

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (8th), Identity Management (IM) (10th), Authorization Software (3rd), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (9th), Access Management (6th), Active Directory Management (8th), Cloud Resource Access Management (2nd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Enterprise Password Managers category, the mindshare of Bitwarden is 6.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CyberArk Identity is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Password Managers

Featured Reviews

Alex Maftei

Head of Information Technology at AllX Technologies

An affordable and easy-to-use tool that enables users to save all their passwords in one place

We also use 1Password. 1Password is available like a small window. We can just load it up. It is really fast. 1Password has enterprise features and a lot more visibility and control for admins to secure things a bit more. I have also used LastPass and NordPass. I lost trust in LastPass after we had multiple breaches, so I didn't want to keep my passwords in there. NordPass was limited. It was so hard to use. We could have only one device in sync with the free account. We could not use the platform manager on more than one device at the same time. I chose Bitwarden because I really enjoyed the idea of having the option to store my passwords and information there. I don't have to rely on any other tool.

Read full review

Julio Montero

Access Management Analyst at Telefónica

Access management system provides strong security and effortless user authentication

The solution can be deployed on cloud or on-premises. CyberArk is more on the cloud than on local hardware. The deployment is initially quite difficult. That said, when you are doing the implementation of CyberArk, there are so many tutorials that make the learning process very easy. The only complaint could be the language barrier. It's difficult if you don't have a very good level of English. Otherwise, it is very easy. You can have it set up within three months without much difficulty. It's hard to get started, however, once you get going, it gets easier. A full deployment takes half a year or less. There is some maintenance necessary. A company is constantly hiring and letting go of employees. The access is always changing, so access must always be adjusted. Or, if we need another law of filter, we would need to add those, or even take them away. That's another aspect of maintenance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The customer service and support are good. The technician is on time and the follow-up is amazing."

"Having all the passwords in one place is helpful."

"Its integration capabilities and versatility, like the ability to securely save passwords and other critical information, make it incredibly useful."

"I've found something else that is extremely valuable. Bitwarden refers to it as "emergency access". It's essentially a digital legacy where you can assign approved users who can request access. If you don't decline within a certain timeframe, they can access it in case you're incapacitated or deceased. When I last checked, only a few services offered this feature. Bitwarden had the simplest and best implementation."

"The product has a very friendly community."

"In our organization, we use Bitwarden for managing product credentials. Bitwarden's collection feature enables us to securely create and store credentials, and we can easily provide team members with access to the relevant collections."

"It is open source and the premium package is reasonable."

"CyberArk Identity provides identity governance and gives me control over who and how access to environments occurs, offering significant confidentiality in what is accessed."

"CyberArk Identity's ability to safeguard financial services infrastructure is good."

"The user identification is simplified, and managing user privileges, whether adding or revoking them, is also quite straightforward when utilizing CyberArk SaaS."

"The initial setup is straightforward. It takes me up to an hour and a half."

"It is very easy to use and is a trusted platform. It protects our platform, application, network, and infrastructure resources on any device."

"It has machine learning and can help clients to learn the environment and understand what is happening."

"Being able to integrate CyberArk Identity with Microsoft Defender is valuable."

"I found the solution to be stable."

More CyberArk Identity pros

Cons

"The product must be a bit more unified and refined."

"I often use another password manager as well to keep my passwords separate, ensuring redundancy. But one simple thing Bitwarden could improve is providing an option to duplicate credentials. Often, you're creating many sets of credentials for the same thing. If they all have the same information, notes, login, collection, and naming - all you're changing is the password. The ability to duplicate credential records quickly would be a big win. It doesn't do that right now."

"I would like to log in with a master account using a passkey, that would be easy."

"The product could be cheaper."

"It would be ideal if the application could be seamlessly integrated into our open-source software, especially for the purpose of enabling straightforward logging."

"The solution should be made more secure as it has the banking sector and assets saved."

"Enhancing the tool by including additional security variables would be a valuable improvement."

"The user interface could be improved."

"I'm not sure what needs improvement. It is a good platform."

"More integrations would be better."

"The OpenID features could improve in CyberArk Identity."

"The solution's difficulty in gaining skill sets should be improved because it's a vertical product."

"CyberArk Identity's GUI is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."

"They can include the Mobile Device Management (MDM) feature."

"They could improve their UI and make everything more user-friendly."

More CyberArk Identity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an open-source tool."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"I use a free version and it works well for me."

"The product is not costly. I pay $10 per month."

"In our region, it comes at an affordable price."

"The solution is cheap and I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."

"We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market."

"The pricing is acceptable. It is worth considering what we are protecting with the amount charged."

"The pricing point is very good. I compared it with other products, and it does not require a heavy investment."

"There is an initial license and then there is a subscription needed."

"CyberArk Identity is an expensive solution."

"I would rate the tool’s pricing a seven out of ten. The product’s pricing is expensive and is on a yearly basis. You will need to pay around 10,000 GBP for 500 users."

"There could be some additional costs apart from the licensing costs of the solution when you want to develop connectors in CyberArk Identity."

More CyberArk Identity pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Password Managers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitwarden?

I've found something else that is extremely valuable. Bitwarden refers to it as "emergency access". It's essentially a digital legacy where you can assign approved users who can request access. If ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitwarden?

The product is not costly. I pay $10 per month. I use the basic plan, so I don't need the higher plan with more compliance features.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bitwarden?

The functionality to fully utilize passkeys could be improved. The last time I spoke to support, they said the development team was working on it. So far, it's working okay on my personal devices. ...

See all answers

What do you like most about CyberArk Identity?

The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Identity?

The pricing point is very good. I compared it with other products, and it does not require a heavy investment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CyberArk Identity?

It does not have global market penetration, and sometimes, there are support issues. CyberArk Identity can definitely improve on the IAM rules when I create them. The stability can also be better.

See all answers

Comparisons

HashiCorp Vault vs Bitwarden

Compared 39% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Bitwarden

Compared 19% of the time

Azure Key Vault vs Bitwarden

Compared 16% of the time

AWS Secrets Manager vs Bitwarden

Compared 6% of the time

Uniqkey vs Bitwarden

Compared 2% of the time

More Bitwarden Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 13% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 11% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 2% of the time

More CyberArk Identity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bitwarden

May 2025

Download Bitwarden product report

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity

May 2025

Download CyberArk Identity product report

Also Known As

No data available

Idaptive

Overview

Bitwarden stands out with its open-source platform and cost-effective premium options, offering password suggestions and alerts, secure sharing via the "send" feature, and reliable performance. Its digital legacy management through emergency access is unmatched at its price.

Bitwarden provides an open-source platform suitable for individual and team password management. Users benefit from password suggestions and alerts, secure sharing, and constant performance reliability. Emergency access sets Bitwarden apart by allowing digital legacy management. The mobile app offers quick password autofill and vault health reports, enhancing usability. Challenges include improving security features, better integration of automated functions, and reducing costs relative to competitors. Users value the open-source nature, cross-platform compatibility, and self-hosting capabilities, which ensure portability and permissions management.

What are Bitwarden's Key Features?

Open-Source Platform: Ensures transparency and flexibility.
Emergency Access: Provides digital legacy management.
Password Suggestions and Alerts: Enhances password security.
Secure Sharing: Allows safe information exchange.
Mobile App Usability: Offers quick password autofill.

What Benefits Should Users Look for in Reviews?

Reliability: Consistent performance across devices.
Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive pricing for the features offered.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Operates on multiple devices and systems.
Flexibility with Self-Hosting: Control over data storage and management.
Digital Legacy Management: Provides access to accounts in emergencies.

In industries where data security is crucial, Bitwarden's open-source platform is favored for managing sensitive credentials, allowing secure information sharing among team members. Its compatibility with different platforms and self-hosting options provides the flexibility and control needed to maintain data security without vendor lock-in.

Bitwarden

CyberArk Identity is a versatile identity management solution suitable for a wide range of enterprises. It is designed to enhance enterprise security and improve user experience. Its focus on security, compliance, and operational efficiency, combined with positive user feedback, makes it a strong contender in the identity management space.

CyberArk Identity offers a robust suite of features to manage user identities and access privileges. It focuses on securing access to resources across various environments, including cloud and on-premises applications. Its capabilities include single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), lifecycle management, and privileged access management. These features are engineered to streamline access control, enhance security, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.

Single Sign-On (SSO) simplifies user access by providing a single authentication point for multiple applications.
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds an extra layer of security by requiring additional verification methods.
Lifecycle Management automates user account provisioning and deprovisioning, aligning with HR processes and compliance requirements.
Privileged Access Management secures and monitors access to critical systems and data by privileged users.

According to our user interviews, CyberArk Identity is praised for its reliability and user-friendly interface. IT professionals highlight the ease of integration with existing systems, while business executives appreciate the visibility it provides into access and identity management across the organization. Users also commend the responsive customer support, which is crucial for enterprise-level solutions.

IT Professionals found that CyberArk Identity's focus on multi-layered security significantly reduced the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. With a centralized dashboard and automation features, you can streamline identity and access management tasks, saving time and reducing complexity. Finally, it helps meet various compliance requirements.

CyberArk

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido

Buyer's Guide

Bitwarden vs. CyberArk Identity

April 2025

Free Report: Bitwarden vs. CyberArk Identity

Find out what your peers are saying about Bitwarden vs. CyberArk Identity and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bitwarden vs. CyberArk Identity report.

See our list of best Enterprise Password Managers vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.