Broadcom Clarity vs LiquidPlanner comparison

Broadcom and LiquidPlanner are both solutions in the Project Management Software category. Broadcom is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.6, while LiquidPlanner is ranked #28. Broadcom holds a 2.5% mindshare in PMS, compared to LiquidPlanner’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of LiquidPlanner users who would recommend it.

Broadcom Clarity

Read 143 Broadcom Clarity reviews

8,848 Views
5,220 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

LiquidPlanner

Read 3 LiquidPlanner reviews

1,464 Views
1,215 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Broadcom Clarity

LiquidPlanner

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Broadcom Clarity and LiquidPlanner compete in the project management and planning software space. It appears that LiquidPlanner has an upper hand in terms of flexibility and adaptability, whereas Broadcom Clarity is more powerful in enterprise environments.

Features: Broadcom Clarity provides extensive project portfolio management, resource planning, and financial management, well-suited for large organizations with complex requirements. LiquidPlanner offers predictive project scheduling, automatic resource leveling, and real-time adaptability, benefits to smaller teams seeking flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Broadcom Clarity's deployment is intricate due to its comprehensive features, needing significant setup and integration, complemented by strong enterprise-focused support. LiquidPlanner allows for simpler, cloud-based deployment with efficient onboarding and responsive customer service, suitable for quick adoption by smaller to mid-sized businesses.

Pricing and ROI: Broadcom Clarity typically involves higher setup costs, justifiable for large-scale operations that can leverage its comprehensive capabilities, resulting in substantial potential ROI. LiquidPlanner offers a more affordable option with lower initial investment and competitive ROI for teams prioritizing flexibility and speed over extensive feature sets.

To learn more, read our detailed Broadcom Clarity vs. LiquidPlanner Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom Clarity vs. LiquidPlanner

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Clarity

Ranking in Project Management Software

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

143

Ranking in other categories

Project Portfolio Management (1st)

LiquidPlanner

Ranking in Project Management Software

28th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Broadcom Clarity is 2.5%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LiquidPlanner is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Broadcom Clarity	2.5%
LiquidPlanner	1.0%
Other	96.5%

Project Management Software

Featured Reviews

George Anghelache

Delivery Transformation Lead at Banca Transilvania

Broad perspective on strategic management exists but integration challenges hinder efficiency

The product execution part, such as planning and executing, is done through Atlassian tools, specifically Jira. We wanted to upgrade our ability to understand how all these products and teams are working against strategic goals, tracking expenses and time, but the integration between Broadcom Clarity and Atlassian Jira is very cumbersome and not straightforward. Their integration, even with ConnectALL, is just adequate, but it's never going to be great because they are actively trying to sell Rally. To make Broadcom Clarity a perfect product, I think with Jira, nothing can be done. To be fair, I don't know exactly how Rally integration works as I've only read about it, but I know that in marketing papers, it seems amazing with full-on integration, whereas with Jira, it just doesn't work that effectively.

Read full review

Paul Gruver

Sr. Project Manager at Stradley Ronon

Good for reporting, but a little rigorous in its methodology and not conducive to real project management

It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome. For example, I have a hard stop date and I would like a project to end by a specific date, but this is not how this solution works. It sorts of spits out the project date based on your resource availability, dependencies, and so on. This sort of project planning works in theory, but that's not always the case. It also relies heavily on resources entering their time into the system, that is, how much time they worked on each of the tasks so that it can sort of consistently update the project. I know that in a lot of organizations, including ours, it is almost impossible to get them to track the time. In terms of additional features, they can include more integration with Microsoft because integration is going to be a key functionality.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Many features of this product are valuable to our organization, such as project management, where PMs can see the availability of resources across the organization and leverage their skills, which reduces the load on the PM and provides access to all resource data in one tool."

"The dynamism of the application where you can modify it to fit your needs is valuable. For example, you can create fields, metrics, and measures on the fly. You don't have to be limited to what the out-of-the-box format would be. It allows you to generate fields, metrics, and reports off of that with relative ease."

"The most valuable features are the project, resource, and portfolio management processes are combined in one solution. The data is possible to use either in the one or the other process, and we do not need to enter the data multiple times."

"Being able to track all of the projects with all of the details of those projects, and being able to move projects along from a process perspective, that is really beneficial."

"It is technically fine, is very user friendly, and is a good tool, and we get pretty good support from Broadcom as well."

"CA PPM provides an integrated view of the total set of projects in the organization."

"Overall budgeting is probably the best use of Clarity for us, because we can see how much we are allowed to spend, how much we have spent, and then how much is left over."

"Visibility is the number one feature, as they can see where the bottlenecks are, they can see what their project statuses are, why things are being held up, and have tangible financial specifics for accurate cost recovery and client billing."

More Broadcom Clarity pros

"Its dashboards and reports are the most valuable, and we are able to share these reports and other information with our leadership."

"LiquidPlanner is a great tool for Getting Things Done enthusiasts and project managers in general."

"The entire organisation is now on the same page, with one source of truth."

Cons

"We want to get to know the CR functionality. We want to get a better picture of how to incorporate CR into our regular functionality."

"Portfolio Management Solution for Project Strategizing" What is our primary use case? It is mainly used for project management, developing the portfolio of the project and the budget process of all projects. What is most valuable? For a very long time, Broadcom Clarity had not developed the old interface that Broadcom no and we were not able to see any new features on the system because of the older UEX. We switched to the new UX at the end of March and it needs some time for the user to react to the new features. But if overall main features are being talked about, the financial part of Clarity is really appreciated. What needs improvement? Among things to be improved, Clarity can really work on its SAP interface. The current interface lacks out-of-the-box connectors for different applicators in the system. Therefore, this requires external support, which is beyond our expertise. In-house development is done for the interface, but as the system becomes complex, there is a building need to maintain the necessity of updates. If the updates aren’t maintained, then the system might be compatible. Additionally, the report generation process using a different software poses difficulties, leading to the need for external consultancy to create specific reports. Certain features, also face compatibility issues with our existing system. Despite these limitations, we find the system satisfactory overall, although a learning curve exists, especially for those unfamiliar with its particularities."

"Whenever that second instance of Clarity came about, it was overwhelming even to people who were accustomed to working with program management tools."

"I'd like to see blueprints. I'd also like to see the user interface simplified, and to have a lot of templates available on each blueprint."

"It would be good for them to work on the user interface to make it more interactive."

"We're on a SaaS environment, so we don't have direct access to the database."

"They've really failed to innovate on the user-interface perspective."

"We have not been overwhelmingly happy with that. The documentation wasn’t always correct or thorough, or necessarily updated from version to version."

More Broadcom Clarity cons

"It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome. For example, I have a hard stop date and I would like a project to end by a specific date, but this is not how this solution works. It sorts of spits out the project date based on your resource availability, dependencies, and so on. This sort of project planning works in theory, but that's not always the case. It also relies heavily on resources entering their time into the system, that is, how much time they worked on each of the tasks so that it can sort of consistently update the project. I know that in a lot of organizations, including ours, it is almost impossible to get them to track the time. In terms of additional features, they can include more integration with Microsoft because integration is going to be a key functionality."

"Perhaps my only comment is that it is not cheap but in saying that, it is worth every penny."

"It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome."

"I'd like to see more power and triggers in the iOS app."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing costs are a little bit high, and unfortunately, it has been a while since I've had that paperwork in front of me. I don't remember how much it was, but it seemed like it was fairly high. It is probably comparable to some of the other solutions because I do know that, for example, on a lot of the AWS stuff, they found that the costs wound up being higher than having some on-prem solution. Comparatively, Clarity is within the price range of other solutions."

"It is a little bit costly compared to others, but it is mature. Customer should understand this product is geared towards project management, not financial management."

"There are different licensing models with Broadcom Clarity PPM. With the software as a service model, you pay as you go, and if you are on-premises, you can buy a perpetual license and an annual fee for maintenance."

"It is hard for them to say, "I have a person on my team who is going to be available, I am going to move that task to them". That requires a project management license, it doesn't require a team member license, so the licensing model does not sometimes support the way the business world is going."

"We're also moving to the latest version for less than $20,000 for a major corporate system. It's just amazing."

"In recent times, I have been involved in the purchase of the license for this solution. However, the process of procurement changed and the option to buy individual licenses was no more available. The new subscription model was introduced, as a followed-up trend in the industry. The subscription costs put us in shock because it was double what we paid in the past as the yearly maintenance. We negotiated and the price was dropped. But this incident made me observe a lack of transparency from Broadcom in terms of licensing expenses. This isn't unique to Broadcom but seems to be a broader industry issue."

"The price of Broadcom Clarity PPM is reasonable. My customers pay a license to use this solution on an annual basis."

"Broadcom Clarity PPM costs us $500K, and that's only for the installation and kick off within the first year. For each succeeding year, it could cost $200K."

More Broadcom Clarity pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

29%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	21
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	117

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Broadcom Clarity PPM?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Broadcom Clarity PPM?

The purpose for using Broadcom Clarity is strategic portfolio management, connecting the strategic teams with expenses and linking it to the execution of the product to understand what we're spendi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Broadcom Clarity PPM?

When assessing the flexibility of Broadcom Clarity in adapting to industry-specific requirements, it can do many things, but the biggest challenge is that it has traditional project management impl...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Planview Portfolios vs Broadcom Clarity

Compared 6% of the time

Jira vs Broadcom Clarity

Compared 4% of the time

Planisware vs Broadcom Clarity

Compared 4% of the time

SAP Portfolio and Project Management vs Broadcom Clarity

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Broadcom Clarity

Compared 3% of the time

More Broadcom Clarity Competitors

Wrike vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 9% of the time

Ninety vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 8% of the time

CMW Platform vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 8% of the time

Smartsheet vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 8% of the time

Planview ProjectPlace vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 7% of the time

More LiquidPlanner Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom Clarity

June 2026

Download Broadcom Clarity product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Management Software

June 2026

Download LiquidPlanner product report

Also Known As

Clarity PPM, CA Clarity, CA PPM, CA Clarity PPM

No data available

Overview

Broadcom Clarity is a comprehensive project and portfolio management tool offering global resource management, financial reporting, and customization to meet diverse organizational demands.

Broadcom Clarity provides extensive project management capabilities with modules for task tracking, risk management, and time entry. Its flexibility allows for integration, improving automation and reporting. Despite its strengths, areas like reporting, tool integration, and interface design need enhancements. It aids strategic planning, demand management, and lifecycle management across industries like finance and government.

What are Broadcom Clarity's Key Features?

Project and Portfolio Management: Comprehensive tools for managing projects and portfolios efficiently.
Resource Management: Capabilities for managing resources on a global scale.
Financial Reporting: Robust financial reporting features ensuring transparent budgeting.
Task Tracking and Risk Management: Modules enhancing project transparency and visibility.
Customization: Users can tailor features to fit specific operational requirements.

What Benefits and ROI Can Users Expect?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines processes, improving time management and resource allocation.
Strategic Planning Support: Assists in effective decision-making through comprehensive planning tools.
Improved Transparency: Increases visibility into project statuses and risks.
Integration Flexibility: Seamless integration with other systems enhances process coherence.
User-Friendly Experience: Intuitive configuration contributes to ease of use.

Companies in the finance, telecommunications, and petrochemical sectors leverage Broadcom Clarity for strategic planning and resource balancing. In government operations, it aids in managing complex project lifecycles and capital budgeting, delivering improved decision-making capabilities.

Broadcom

LiquidPlanner offers a dynamic planning solution tailored for businesses that require precise forecasting and task prioritization. It's designed to enhance project visibility and improve time management through sophisticated algorithms.

The tool integrates predictive scheduling, allowing teams to plan with confidence by automatically adjusting tasks and deadlines based on real-time data. Supporting effective collaboration, LiquidPlanner helps eliminate bottlenecks and align team efforts towards shared objectives. The platform suits teams seeking optimized project timelines and data-driven insights.

What are the most valuable features of LiquidPlanner?

Predictive Scheduling: Automatically adjusts timelines based on real-time inputs.
Task Prioritization: Enables clear ranking of tasks to ensure resource focus.
Resource Management: Allocates resources efficiently to maximize output.
Time Tracking: Facilitates accurate monitoring of time spent on projects.
Collaboration Tools: Enhances team communication and data sharing.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Time Efficiency: Streamlined processes reduce project duration.
Improved Forecasting: Accurate predictions help in achieving deadlines.
Enhanced Productivity: Prioritization aids in focusing efforts where needed most.
Cost Savings: Optimal resource use contributes to budget management.

LiquidPlanner is implemented across industries such as IT, consulting, and engineering where project complexity demands adaptable planning tools. Its predictive capabilities make it a suitable choice for environments needing flexibility and precise adjustments to timeframes and resources.

LiquidPlanner

Sample Customers

Toyota Financial Services, GameStop, Polycom, Sky, Qantas, Cox Enterprises, Banco Mercantil, Borealis

Amazon, Redapt, Toshiba, LinkedIn, Nintendo, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cummins

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom Clarity vs. LiquidPlanner

June 2026

Free Report: Broadcom Clarity vs. LiquidPlanner

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Clarity vs. LiquidPlanner and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Broadcom Clarity vs. LiquidPlanner report.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors and best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.