No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] vs Splunk Enterprise Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 19, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CA Digital Operational Inte...
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Splunk Enterprise Security
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
387
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (1st), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (1st), IT Operations Analytics (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user1273302 - PeerSpot reviewer
Global Head of Monitoring at AXA Investment Managers
Good performance, efficiency, and focuses on monitoring
When you choose a solution, you compare the bad points and the good points with the requirements that are needed. DOI does have some bad points. The real bad part is that it's impossible to be integrated on-premise. Broadcom chose to build only on the Cloud. In the beginning, I first started to check on-premise solutions to integrate in the future with Cloud models. So when we chose DOI, we knew the bad point was its obligation to use the Cloud or the SaaS model. But it's not a bad point now because Cloud and SaaS computing is the future of IT. But it's too early to really know about the security and what the other companies are seeing and changing. Monitoring information is critical for a company - information about the IPs, names that we keep, and some technical information. Also critical is the security of the monitoring itself. Broadcom manages the security of the data well. If you have securable monitoring and your team is already using Century or other products, DOI is not a good choice because DOI is not open-source. DOI is a static solution so you will not have access to the code. It is difficult with Sharepoint, too. If you are not in the habit of managing your static Broadcom relationship, it's not easy. The support is in India and it's already closed by the midday shift. The Broadcom support is very bad. I had a previous integration of Broadcom and their static software. But I was able to manage the support. But for new customers, it's quite difficult to create this relationship. Please keep in mind, Broadcom is a very huge company and when you're small or medium, about 1,000 or so employees, if you don't have the team, monitoring will be difficult. If you start a new company or are a startup, don't use Broadcom software. You don't have the weight to negotiate with Broadcom. It's not a bad point with DOI, just a bad point with the Broadcom relationship. But if you only choose DOI, keep in mind that the product is not only its technical capabilities, but also it's support relationship with the enterprise. We already plan to integrate automatic recognition in future releases. Now we don't use a major part of the automatic recognition. The plan is to create or automatically correct some command execution or re-run of the image and to integrate the VPN. The next step is to use the automatic recognition and to bypass the human intervention and to have automatic intervention of the critical system.
Sathis-Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager at Bank of America
Helps us detect cyber threats quickly and integrate multiple feeds effectively
Overall, the product is good, but when it comes to some infrastructure issues, we have to dig into more logs. There is no straightforward indication of an issue. Health check kind of dashboards are not available. More AI would help us, and more optimization, since security products run more queries. The AI module could suggest solutions, optimizing queries or workload balancing. If the product itself advises on running queries during peak times, it would be similar to what ChatGPT currently offers. We see quite a few issues on stability. Even last week, we faced something, and identifying bottlenecks is not easy. We need more SMEs, and there is no mechanism to tell us about indexer or search head issues. Self-monitoring dashboards could be beneficial. The technical support still requires more improvement. Often, primary support takes a lot of time and forwards most solutions to the engineering side. The primary support team has very limited knowledge to provide.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We chose DOI because during the proof of concept, the integration of all of our asset management and monitoring payments took three days, which was very short, very quick, and very efficient compared to other solutions where we spent around three or four weeks on integration."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the machine learning and the algorithm. We tried seven solutions. The good points of DOI are performance and efficiency under machine learning systems."
"The two features I appreciate the most in Splunk Enterprise Security are the built-in searches, which have been very easy for us to get started with right out of the box, and the fact that it accesses all of our other systems."
"The ability to quickly search logs, performance data, and other inputs has helped tremendously with troubleshooting."
"The most valuable features include agility and Splunk Enterprise Security's ability to quickly search for alerted items, as well as the capacity to create custom alerts using the SQL language employed by Splunk."
"The solution is the market leader."
"Splunk goes beyond collecting basic metrics like CPU or memory utilization; it comprehensively gathers data from various sources, including networks, applications, and virtualization, eliminating the need for siloed solutions and enhancing the capabilities of existing engineering software."
"Easy to deploy and simple to use."
"If you are an enterprise and you need the best service for critical business analysis, Splunk would be one of the best choices."
"Can ingest data from various data sources, is very useful for organizations who are attempting to meet compliance requirements, and is able to fully configure and integrate various solutions into one tool and provide actionable results."
 

Cons

"The Broadcom support is very bad."
"It's impossible to be integrated on-premise. Broadcom chose to build only on the Cloud."
"The documentation is in definite need of improvement."
"The level of scalability depends on the license you have. You can expand or reduce it based on the environment. It does cost more money to scale, however."
"The solution could improve by giving more email details."
"Splunk can improve its third-party device application plugins."
"Our two main complaints are about the difficulty of the initial setup and the licensing model."
"The search could be improved. Now, it is a bit difficult to write search queries because they become quite long, then maintaining those long search queries is a quite challenging."
"It would be good if the solution had some kind of copilot to automate or help write correlation searches."
"By comparison, I feel QRadar to be better than Splunk Cloud, since it comes with Watson."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution is a little expensive."
"Splunk Enterprise becomes extremely expensive after the 20GB/month license."
"The license for Splunk Enterprise Security is expensive."
"It is expensive, but it is a good tool. It is worth the cost."
"It is expensive. I used to buy it early on, but then they combined it into a higher-up organization. They buy it for multiple systems now. Last time, I paid around 60K for it. There is just the licensing fee. That's all."
"The licensing is good, but the pricing absolutely needs some work. It is very high."
"It is not cheap."
"The cost is on the high end, which makes it difficult for some organizations to use."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Operations Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VS
Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Feb 26, 2015
HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. ​McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm
We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business118
Midsize Enterprise51
Large Enterprise269
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What SOC product do you recommend?
For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...
What is a better choice, Splunk or Azure Sentinel?
It would really depend on (1) which logs you need to ingest and (2) what are your use cases Splunk is easy for ingestion of anything, but the charge per GB/Day Indexed and it gets expensive as log ...
How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?
Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Splunk has more than 7,000 customers spread across over 90 countries. These customers include Telenor, UniCredit, ideeli, McKenney's, Tesco, and SurveyMonkey.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, New Relic, Dell Technologies and others in IT Operations Analytics. Updated: May 2026.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.