Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo

Top 10 Splunk Enterprise Security Alternatives

Vendor: Splunk
4.2 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top Splunk Enterprise Security Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Splunk Enterprise Security based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Wazuh, and Dynatrace. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Splunk Enterprise Security surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat detection, streamlined analytics, customizable dashboards, and rapid response capabilities, empowering organizations with unparalleled security insights and operational intelligence, ensuring robust protection in dynamic threat landscapes.

Splunk Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Splunk, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in managing large data environments with superior log management and data visualization. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon focuses on advanced threat detection and AI-driven analytics. Splunk offers extensive functionality; CrowdStrike provides robust endpoint protection with seamless deployment across cloud environments.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security often involves higher setup costs, while CrowdStrike Falcon tends to offer a more cost-effective initial setup. Splunk provides extensive features, whereas CrowdStrike focuses on streamlined efficiency and lower initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security often involves higher setup costs, while CrowdStrike Falcon tends to offer a more cost-effective initial setup. Splunk provides extensive features, whereas CrowdStrike focuses on streamlined efficiency and lower initial investment.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in log management and data integration, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Wazuh offers cost-effective AWS integration and file monitoring, suitable for budget-conscious users. Splunk supports diverse deployments, while Wazuh requires more manual setup but saves on cost.
Download Splunk Enterprise Security vs. Wazuh Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Wazuh, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Wazuh, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup option.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers customizable dashboards and extensive log management ideal for security-focused environments. In comparison, Dynatrace excels with AI-driven insights and automation, appealing to those seeking streamlined deployment and advanced real-time monitoring across dynamic IT ecosystems.
Download Dynatrace vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost is higher than Dynatrace, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two. Splunk's enterprise-level capabilities may justify the cost, while Dynatrace offers a budget-friendly approach with comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost is higher than Dynatrace, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two. Splunk's enterprise-level capabilities may justify the cost, while Dynatrace offers a budget-friendly approach with comprehensive features.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in robust analytics and incident response across environments, suited for large enterprises needing deep analytics. In comparison, Datadog excels in real-time monitoring and offers integration across multi-cloud environments, appealing to those seeking seamless operation and cost management.
Download Datadog vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security tends to have a higher setup cost compared to Datadog, which offers a more flexible pricing approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security tends to have a higher setup cost compared to Datadog, which offers a more flexible pricing approach.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers robust data analysis features for complex environments. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel, with its cloud-native architecture, provides scalability and seamless Microsoft 365 integration. Splunk's extensive capabilities appeal to analytics-focused users, whereas Sentinel's automation benefits those prioritizing efficiency and integration.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security often incurs higher setup costs than Microsoft Sentinel, which provides a more budget-friendly initial setup option. This significant cost difference can be a deciding factor for organizations evaluating these two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security often incurs higher setup costs than Microsoft Sentinel, which provides a more budget-friendly initial setup option. This significant cost difference can be a deciding factor for organizations evaluating these two solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar emphasizes log management and vulnerability detection, appealing to enterprises valuing comprehensive security management. In comparison, Splunk Enterprise Security offers flexibility and powerful analytics, suitable for organizations seeking advanced data insights and adaptable deployment options, despite its higher cost.
Download IBM Security QRadar vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
IBM Security QRadar features a more affordable setup cost compared to Splunk Enterprise Security, which generally requires higher initial investment. The pricing reflects the differences in their targeted user base and deployment flexibility.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar features a more affordable setup cost compared to Splunk Enterprise Security, which generally requires higher initial investment. The pricing reflects the differences in their targeted user base and deployment flexibility.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security is ideal for security-focused tasks with its advanced threat intelligence and robust data modeling. In comparison, New Relic's strength lies in application performance monitoring, offering real-time metrics and error tracking for enhancing server and application efficiency.
Download New Relic vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has an initial setup cost that can be high, while New Relic's setup cost is typically more affordable, highlighting the cost disparity between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has an initial setup cost that can be high, while New Relic's setup cost is typically more affordable, highlighting the cost disparity between the two solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers advanced threat detection and detailed dashboards, appealing to large enterprises seeking comprehensive solutions. In comparison, Elastic Security provides flexibility and cost-effectiveness, ideal for smaller organizations or open-source deployments needing adaptable, budget-friendly options.
Download Elastic Security vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security requires significant setup costs compared to Elastic Security, which offers a more flexible approach with potentially lower initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security requires significant setup costs compared to Elastic Security, which offers a more flexible approach with potentially lower initial expenses.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Grafana Loki
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Grafana Loki
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers robust operational intelligence with extensive search capabilities and scalability for complex environments. In comparison, Grafana Loki provides simplicity and cost-effectiveness, ideal for organizations seeking lightweight, seamless integration into existing systems with strong dashboard and monitoring features.
Download Grafana Loki vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has higher setup costs compared to Grafana Loki, highlighting Splunk's comprehensive features and market focus, while Loki's lower setup cost offers a cost-effective solution with efficient performance tailored for specific monitoring requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has higher setup costs compared to Grafana Loki, highlighting Splunk's comprehensive features and market focus, while Loki's lower setup cost offers a cost-effective solution with efficient performance tailored for specific monitoring requirements.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Elastic Observability
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in diverse data manipulation and seamless integration for robust security solutions, attracting enterprises with its comprehensive features. In comparison, Elastic Observability appeals with affordability and open-source flexibility, making it suitable for cost-effective cloud and hybrid monitoring.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher initial setup cost compared to Elastic Observability's more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a significant difference in upfront expenses between these two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher initial setup cost compared to Elastic Observability's more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a significant difference in upfront expenses between these two solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Graylog Enterprise
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Graylog Enterprise
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels with data analysis and machine learning but can be complex and costly. In comparison, Graylog Enterprise offers simplicity and affordability, appealing to those needing flexible, real-time log management without extensive features of Splunk.
Download Graylog Enterprise vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Graylog Enterprise, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup, making it a budget-friendly alternative.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Graylog Enterprise, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup, making it a budget-friendly alternative.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Security Onion
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Security Onion
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in threat detection and analytics, offering ease of deployment with strong customer support. In comparison, Security Onion is a cost-effective, open-source solution with robust intrusion detection, suitable for organizations with technical expertise seeking budget-friendly security insights.
Download Security Onion vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security typically incurs a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive features, while Security Onion offers a more cost-effective setup, often valued for its open-source nature.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security typically incurs a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive features, while Security Onion offers a more cost-effective setup, often valued for its open-source nature.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Cortex XSIAM
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Cortex XSIAM
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in data ingestion and indexing, making it ideal for larger setups seeking robust third-party support. In comparison, Cortex XSIAM offers seamless integration and automation, appealing to those prioritizing simplicity and cost-effectiveness in endpoint protection and forensic investigation.
Download Cortex XSIAM vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security setup cost is considered high, reflecting its comprehensive features and implementation efforts, whereas Cortex XSIAM offers a more cost-effective setup option, appealing to organizations seeking efficiency with budget-conscious deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security setup cost is considered high, reflecting its comprehensive features and implementation efforts, whereas Cortex XSIAM offers a more cost-effective setup option, appealing to organizations seeking efficiency with budget-conscious deployment.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Palantir Foundry
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Palantir Foundry
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in log management and real-time data search, attracting buyers focused on operational intelligence. In comparison, Palantir Foundry integrates robust analytics and data visualization, appealing to those seeking end-to-end data management with custom application capabilities.
Download Palantir Foundry vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security requires significant investment upfront, while Palantir Foundry involves notable initial setup costs, making budget considerations vital when choosing between the two.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security requires significant investment upfront, while Palantir Foundry involves notable initial setup costs, making budget considerations vital when choosing between the two.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers advanced data ingestion and log management, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Rapid7 InsightIDR prioritizes ease of use with simpler integrations. Splunk appeals to organizations needing flexible deployment, while Rapid7 is suitable for those valuing quicker cloud deployment and cost-effective pricing.
Download Rapid7 InsightIDR vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security often involves higher setup costs but is known for comprehensive features, whereas Rapid7 InsightIDR offers a more cost-effective setup for users seeking efficient and streamlined deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security often involves higher setup costs but is known for comprehensive features, whereas Rapid7 InsightIDR offers a more cost-effective setup for users seeking efficient and streamlined deployment.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in data aggregation and compliance support with flexible querying and robust analytics, ideal for operational intelligence. In comparison, LogRhythm SIEM focuses on AI-driven analytics and cost-effective solutions with effective log management, integration, and automated response mechanisms.
Download LogRhythm SIEM vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security offers a higher setup cost, while LogRhythm SIEM provides a more budget-friendly option, highlighting a notable difference in initial investment for organizations considering these security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security offers a higher setup cost, while LogRhythm SIEM provides a more budget-friendly option, highlighting a notable difference in initial investment for organizations considering these security solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in data ingestion with powerful search capabilities, making it ideal for compliance and log management. In comparison, Fortinet FortiSIEM integrates network and security operations, offering a comprehensive solution with affordability and seamless integration within Fortinet's ecosystem, appealing to budget-conscious buyers.
Download Fortinet FortiSIEM vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security involves higher setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiSIEM, which offers a more cost-effective solution for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves higher setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiSIEM, which offers a more cost-effective solution for initial deployment.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Cribl
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Cribl
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security efficiently manages large data volumes with advanced log management and visualization options. In comparison, Cribl offers flexible data routing and reduced costs. Splunk's scalability suits enterprise needs, while Cribl's affordability appeals to mid-sized companies seeking cost-effective solutions.
Download Cribl vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has higher setup costs compared to Cribl, making it a more expensive initial investment. Cribl provides a cost-effective alternative with lower setup expenses, offering potential savings for users with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has higher setup costs compared to Cribl, making it a more expensive initial investment. Cribl provides a cost-effective alternative with lower setup expenses, offering potential savings for users with budget constraints.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Amazon OpenSearch Service
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in advanced analytics, offering extensive customization and integration for complex environments. In comparison, Amazon OpenSearch Service provides affordable solutions with reliable search capabilities, making it suitable for organizations prioritizing cost-effective search and analytics over extensive customization.
Download Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Amazon OpenSearch Service, reflecting its advanced feature set and premium support. Amazon OpenSearch Service offers a more budget-friendly option with simplified deployment and maintenance.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Amazon OpenSearch Service, reflecting its advanced feature set and premium support. Amazon OpenSearch Service offers a more budget-friendly option with simplified deployment and maintenance.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Amazon CloudWatch
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Amazon CloudWatch
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in real-time monitoring with scalable log management and data analytics capabilities. In comparison, Amazon CloudWatch offers seamless AWS integration for monitoring AWS resources and applications. Splunk is suited for comprehensive security analysis, while CloudWatch is ideal for AWS-centric monitoring.
Download Amazon CloudWatch vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security involves substantial setup costs compared to Amazon CloudWatch, which offers more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves substantial setup costs compared to Amazon CloudWatch, which offers more cost-effective initial setup.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
AlienVault OSSIM
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
AlienVault OSSIM
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers advanced log management, data analysis with rapid search, and customizable dashboards, ideal for larger enterprises. In comparison, AlienVault OSSIM is open-source, integrates well across domains, and is suitable for cost-effective, simpler deployment needs.
Download AlienVault OSSIM vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a higher setup cost, while AlienVault OSSIM offers a more cost-effective setup option. Each provides unique features, highlighting the balance between investment and functionality tailored to different needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a higher setup cost, while AlienVault OSSIM offers a more cost-effective setup option. Each provides unique features, highlighting the balance between investment and functionality tailored to different needs.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
syslog-ng
4.5 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
syslog-ng
4.5 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers robust analytics and integration, ideal for comprehensive security needs. In comparison, syslog-ng is efficient in log management, being cost-effective for specific needs. Tech buyers choose Splunk for advanced analytics, while syslog-ng appeals for straightforward setup and focused log capabilities.
Download Splunk Enterprise Security vs. syslog-ng Report
Splunk Enterprise Security typically involves a higher setup cost compared to syslog-ng, which is often noted for its lower initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security typically involves a higher setup cost compared to syslog-ng, which is often noted for its lower initial expenses.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Google Chronicle Suite
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security focuses on customization and complex visualizations, appealing to users needing extensive flexibility and detailed insights. In comparison, Google Chronicle Suite prioritizes speed and automation with cost-effective pricing, suiting organizations seeking seamless integration within Google's ecosystem while prioritizing budget.
Download Google Chronicle Suite vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has high setup costs, while Google Chronicle Suite offers a more affordable setup. Splunk is often seen as more robust, whereas Chronicle focuses on efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has high setup costs, while Google Chronicle Suite offers a more affordable setup. Splunk is often seen as more robust, whereas Chronicle focuses on efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels with advanced features like schema-on-read technology and diverse data source integration, offering operational intelligence. In comparison, ScienceLogic offers flexibility with customizable dashboards and automation features, appealing to those needing adaptable solutions across various environments, including AWS and network devices.
Download ScienceLogic vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security may have higher setup costs compared to ScienceLogic, highlighting a potentially significant pricing difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security may have higher setup costs compared to ScienceLogic, highlighting a potentially significant pricing difference.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Sentinel
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Sentinel
3.8 out of 5
Splunk excels with advanced log management and flexibility in data analysis. In comparison, Sentinel integrates with Microsoft tools, leveraging cloud and machine learning for threat detection. Splunk's customization suits large data volumes, whereas Sentinel's seamless Azure integration appeals to Microsoft-focused environments.
Download Sentinel vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a high setup cost compared to Sentinel, which offers a more economical setup option. However, differences in setup costs may influence budget allocation for Splunk's comprehensive security features versus Sentinel's streamlined deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a high setup cost compared to Sentinel, which offers a more economical setup option. However, differences in setup costs may influence budget allocation for Splunk's comprehensive security features versus Sentinel's streamlined deployment.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels with scalability and diverse data search capabilities, supporting compliance requirements. In comparison, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer specializes in centralized event logging within Fortinet ecosystems. Splunk offers extensive features for larger enterprises, while Fortinet is ideal for existing Fortinet users.
Download Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security setup costs are described as high, while Fortinet FortiAnalyzer offers a lower-cost setup, making Fortinet a more budget-friendly choice.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security setup costs are described as high, while Fortinet FortiAnalyzer offers a lower-cost setup, making Fortinet a more budget-friendly choice.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM
4.3 out of 5
Securonix excels in user behavior analytics and cloud integration, making it ideal for identity-based pricing models. In comparison, Splunk offers robust data correlation and extensive integrations, appealing to users needing powerful search capabilities and scalability in large-scale environments.
Download Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM offers a streamlined initial setup with lower costs, while Splunk Enterprise Security involves higher upfront expenses. These differences highlight how each solution approaches implementation cost effectively.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM offers a streamlined initial setup with lower costs, while Splunk Enterprise Security involves higher upfront expenses. These differences highlight how each solution approaches implementation cost effectively.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in data indexing and integration, enhancing search and analysis capabilities for large enterprises. In comparison, Exabeam offers advanced behavior analytics and machine learning, appealing to those prioritizing user-friendly interfaces and identity management for smaller to mid-sized organizations.
Download Exabeam vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security often requires a significant initial setup investment, while Exabeam typically offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, highlighting a key difference in financial commitment for organizations considering these security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security often requires a significant initial setup investment, while Exabeam typically offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, highlighting a key difference in financial commitment for organizations considering these security solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Coralogix
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Coralogix
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers extensive log management and compliance tools with a focus on operational intelligence. In comparison, Coralogix appeals to those seeking ease of use and cost-effectiveness, especially in cloud deployments.
Download Coralogix vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Coralogix, highlighting a notable difference in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Coralogix, highlighting a notable difference in initial investment.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security emphasizes scalability and advanced analytics, making it ideal for large organizations. In comparison, SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server offers simplicity and cost-effectiveness, appealing to smaller businesses seeking straightforward log management. Splunk provides detailed insights, while SolarWinds ensures efficient deployment and usage.
Download SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security generally requires higher setup costs compared to SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server. While SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is known for its budget-friendly setup, Splunk Enterprise Security justifies its expense through comprehensive features designed for large-scal...
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security generally requires higher setup costs compared to SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server. While SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is known for its budget-friendly setup, Splunk Enterprise Security justifies its expense through comprehensive features designed for large-scal...
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
ManageEngine Log360
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels with data visualization and query language ideal for deep log analysis. In comparison, ManageEngine Log360 suits hybrid environments with modular deployment. Splunk's complex pricing reflects its feature set, while ManageEngine provides affordable options for smaller firms.
Download ManageEngine Log360 vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security involves higher setup costs, offering robust data analytics features, while ManageEngine Log360 presents a more cost-effective option, ideal for budget-conscious users seeking comprehensive log management without advanced data analytics.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves higher setup costs, offering robust data analytics features, while ManageEngine Log360 presents a more cost-effective option, ideal for budget-conscious users seeking comprehensive log management without advanced data analytics.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5

Explore and manage your entire network infrastructure effortlessly with WhatsUp Gold's robust layer 2/3 discovery, creating a detailed interactive map from the edge to the cloud. Monitor devices, wireless controllers, servers, virtual machines, applications, and traffic flows across various environments. Real-time alerts ensure optimal performance, allowing you to meet or exceed SLAs. The platform offers customizable maps, dashboards, and alerts for easy network management. Quickly resolve issues with intuitive workflows, reducing Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR). WhatsUp Gold's integrated log management provides easy visibility and control of device log data, allowing monitoring, filtering, searching, and alerting on syslogs or Windows logs. Archive logs to comply with regulatory requirements and preserve historical data, all through a user-friendly interface. Streamline network monitoring and issue resolution with WhatsUp Gold, making network management efficient and hassle-free.

Download Splunk Enterprise Security vs. WhatsUp Gold Report
Pricing is reasonable compared to other products.
I'm not sure, but it's expensive. We don't pay any additional fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Pricing is reasonable compared to other products.
I'm not sure, but it's expensive. We don't pay any additional fees.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in real-time operational intelligence with strong log management and machine learning integrations. In comparison, IBM SevOne NPM specializes in detailed network performance metrics with scalability and flexible licensing, appealing to organizations prioritizing network insights and budget management.
Download IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost tends to be higher, while IBM SevOne NPM offers a more moderate initial investment, highlighting a key difference in upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost tends to be higher, while IBM SevOne NPM offers a more moderate initial investment, highlighting a key difference in upfront expenses.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Stellar Cyber Open XDR
1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers comprehensive data insights with a modular deployment model, making it ideal for detailed analytics needs. In comparison, Stellar Cyber Open XDR provides ease of integration and cost-effectiveness, appealing to those seeking swift ROI and streamlined threat response capabilities.
Download Splunk Enterprise Security vs. Stellar Cyber Open XDR Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has higher setup costs compared to Stellar Cyber Open XDR. Stellar Cyber offers a cost-effective initial setup, providing more affordable access to its features.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has higher setup costs compared to Stellar Cyber Open XDR. Stellar Cyber offers a cost-effective initial setup, providing more affordable access to its features.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in scalability and complex environments, making it ideal for compliance and rapid incident response. In comparison, Google Cloud's operations suite offers cost-effective application management with strong cloud integration and cost transparency, appealing to cloud-focused organizations.
Download Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher initial setup cost compared to Google Cloud's operations suite, making the latter a more budget-friendly choice for businesses with financial constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher initial setup cost compared to Google Cloud's operations suite, making the latter a more budget-friendly choice for businesses with financial constraints.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Anomali
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Anomali
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers comprehensive threat detection and strong correlation capabilities, making it suitable for organizations needing robust support and a wide feature set. In comparison, Anomali excels with competitive pricing and threat intelligence integration, appealing to those prioritizing data enrichment and cost-effectiveness.
Download Anomali vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Anomali, providing a robust security platform with intricate analytics, while Anomali offers a more affordable setup with efficient threat intelligence capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Anomali, providing a robust security platform with intricate analytics, while Anomali offers a more affordable setup with efficient threat intelligence capabilities.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers powerful log management and advanced features for compliance despite a complex setup. In comparison, Devo provides high-speed search with an intuitive interface, making it ideal for real-time data handling and easier deployment with a straightforward pricing model.
Download Devo vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has higher setup costs compared to Devo, which offers a more budget-friendly initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has higher setup costs compared to Devo, which offers a more budget-friendly initial implementation.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in advanced threat detection and user behavior analytics with extensive customization options. In comparison, USM Anywhere integrates SIEM, IDS, and vulnerability management effectively. Splunk targets large enterprises; USM Anywhere suits mid-sized businesses with its cost-effective, all-in-one capabilities.
Download Splunk Enterprise Security vs. USM Anywhere Report
Splunk Enterprise Security features higher setup costs compared to USM Anywhere, which offers more budget-friendly setup options. This difference may influence users when considering initial financial commitments.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security features higher setup costs compared to USM Anywhere, which offers more budget-friendly setup options. This difference may influence users when considering initial financial commitments.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Logs
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in log management with extensive integration and flexible deployment across cloud environments. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations for Logs offers cost-effective infrastructure visibility and solid log source support, benefiting organizations focused on data center virtualization and VMware ecosystem integration.
Download Splunk Enterprise Security vs. VMware Aria Operations for Logs Report
Splunk Enterprise Security setup cost is noted for being substantial with advanced capabilities, while VMware Aria Operations for Logs offers a more budget-friendly setup suitable for streamlined operations, highlighting a difference in upfront investment and initial setup complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security setup cost is noted for being substantial with advanced capabilities, while VMware Aria Operations for Logs offers a more budget-friendly setup suitable for streamlined operations, highlighting a difference in upfront investment and initial setup complexity.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in data handling and operational intelligence but can improve machine learning and simplicity. In comparison, OpenText Enterprise Security Manager offers strong correlation capabilities yet needs better integration and adaptability for real-time threats, appealing to buyers focused on structured rule-based environments.
Download OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a straightforward setup cost, while OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is known for a more complex pricing structure with additional fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a straightforward setup cost, while OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is known for a more complex pricing structure with additional fees.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in managing large datasets with powerful log management and complex data analysis. In comparison, ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer offers simpler integration and cost-effectiveness, ideal for SMBs not needing extensive customization. Splunk demands skilled deployment, whereas ManageEngine offers easier adoption.
Download ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security is associated with higher setup costs, while ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security is associated with higher setup costs, while ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Sumo Logic Security
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels with its powerful search and operational intelligence, beneficial for diverse environments. In comparison, Sumo Logic Security offers strong log management and cloud-native scalability. A tech buyer might choose Splunk for flexibility, while Sumo Logic offers cost-effective, streamlined integration.
Download Splunk Enterprise Security vs. Sumo Logic Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a high setup cost, whereas Sumo Logic Security offers a more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a high setup cost, whereas Sumo Logic Security offers a more cost-effective setup.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Moogsoft
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Moogsoft
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in scalability and operational intelligence, ideal for handling large data volumes. In comparison, Moogsoft focuses on noise reduction and AI-driven event correlation. While Splunk offers extensive deployment options, Moogsoft's cost-effective licensing attracts budget-conscious buyers.
Download Moogsoft vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has higher setup costs, making it a pricier option, while Moogsoft offers a more economical setup, highlighting cost efficiency as a key difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has higher setup costs, making it a pricier option, while Moogsoft offers a more economical setup, highlighting cost efficiency as a key difference.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers extensive data integration and scalable analytics for rapid threat response, ideal for large enterprises. In comparison, Logpoint emphasizes cost-effective log management and UBA capabilities, integrating SIEM and SOAR functions for organizations seeking transparent pricing and ease of use.
Download Logpoint vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost can be significant, while Logpoint offers a more affordable initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost can be significant, while Logpoint offers a more affordable initial setup.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Google Security Operations
4.5 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers holistic visibility with advanced analytics, ideal for comprehensive security insights. In comparison, Google Security Operations provides exceptional integration and automation within Google's ecosystem, appealing to enterprises prioritizing cloud-centric operations. Splunk excels in data management, while Google is preferred for simplified deployment.
Download Google Security Operations vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security often incurs significant setup costs, while Google Security Operations typically presents lower initial financial barriers, highlighting a distinct difference in upfront investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security often incurs significant setup costs, while Google Security Operations typically presents lower initial financial barriers, highlighting a distinct difference in upfront investment requirements.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Seq
1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Seq
1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security provides comprehensive data integration and advanced analytics for detailed threat detection, suitable for extensive security needs. In comparison, Seq offers a straightforward approach with efficient log parsing and search capabilities, appealing to organizations seeking cost-effective application diagnostics and simplicity.
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs higher setup costs, while Seq offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. This difference highlights Splunk's robust capabilities compared to Seq's streamlined approach at a lower entry price.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs higher setup costs, while Seq offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. This difference highlights Splunk's robust capabilities compared to Seq's streamlined approach at a lower entry price.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Trellix ESM
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Trellix ESM
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in data ingestion, operational intelligence, and cloud integration, ideal for environments demanding flexibility and comprehensive tools. In comparison, Trellix ESM offers cost-effective log monitoring, appealing to budget-conscious buyers with simpler needs.
Download Splunk Enterprise Security vs. Trellix ESM Report
Splunk Enterprise Security requires significant setup investment, while Trellix ESM offers a more straightforward setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security requires significant setup investment, while Trellix ESM offers a more straightforward setup cost.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
NetWitness Platform
3.7 out of 5
NetWitness Platform offers efficient network traffic analysis and threat intelligence with lower setup costs, making it suitable for smaller budgets. In comparison, Splunk Enterprise Security's scalability and extensive feature set justify its higher cost for larger enterprises seeking comprehensive data handling and analytics.
Download NetWitness Platform vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
NetWitness Platform has a higher initial setup cost, while Splunk Enterprise Security offers a more cost-effective setup, making it a suitable option for those seeking savings in initial expenditures.
View comparison
Pricing
NetWitness Platform has a higher initial setup cost, while Splunk Enterprise Security offers a more cost-effective setup, making it a suitable option for those seeking savings in initial expenditures.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Falcon LogScale
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Falcon LogScale
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security is ideal for advanced analytics and extensive integration capabilities. In comparison, Falcon LogScale attracts with its agile setup and cost-effectiveness, making it appealing for businesses seeking efficient real-time log monitoring with quick deployment and lower initial expenses.
Download Falcon LogScale vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a substantial initial setup cost, while Falcon LogScale offers a more user-friendly setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a substantial initial setup cost, while Falcon LogScale offers a more user-friendly setup process.

Related categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Log Management
IT Operations Analytics