Exabeam Fusion is a cloud-delivered solution that that enables you to:
-Leverage turnkey threat detection, investigation, and response
-Collect, search and enhance data from anywhere
-Detect threats missed by other tools, using market-leading behavior analytics
-Achieve successful SecOps outcomes with prescriptive, threat-centric use case packages
-Enhance productivity and reduce response times with automation
-Meet regulatory compliance and audit requirements with ease
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Exabeam | 1.6% |
| Splunk Enterprise Security | 7.4% |
| Wazuh | 7.3% |
| Other | 83.7% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) | Jan 26, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Jan 26, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Exabeam vs Splunk Enterprise Security | Jan 26, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Exabeam vs Wazuh | Jan 26, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Exabeam vs IBM Security QRadar | Jan 26, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrowdStrike Falcon | 4.3 | 3.3% | 97% | 137 interviewsAdd to research |
| Wazuh | 3.7 | 7.3% | 81% | 50 interviewsAdd to research |
Exabeam's organization is perceived as rigid with delays in response time and a need for improved customer commitment. They lack comprehensive flow analysis and need advancement in the MITRE ATT&CK Framework. Challenges include slow UI, limited customization, inadequate documentation, and integration issues. Users face difficulties with log management, API interaction, false positives, and adaptability. Enhancements in reporting, dashboarding, and cloud integration are suggested. Adding certifications and improving technical support would be beneficial.
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 173 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 89 |
| Large Enterprise | 356 |
Hulu, ADP, Safeway, BBCN Bank
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Solution Architect at CTC | 4.0 | I've worked with Exabeam for over two years, mainly selling its SIEM and SOAR solutions. I find its UEBA and automation features valuable, though integration options are limited and regional visibility, especially in Singapore, could improve. |
| Analyst at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.5 | We use Exabeam primarily for Advanced Analytics, leveraging its machine learning capabilities and custom rules for enhanced security. It complements our SIEM by detecting anomalies but faces limitations with its on-prem version, prompting us to consider a SaaS migration. |
| Cyber Security Analyst at Capgemini | 4.5 | I use Exabeam for its end-to-end detection and user event behavioral analytics, finding it useful for investigating incidents. The user-friendly UI facilitates monitoring, though improvements are needed in event categorization and recent detection filtering on the dashboard. |
| Lead Technical Engineer Security at a tech services company with 11-50 employees | 3.5 | We use Exabeam for monitoring security incidents and running our SOC operation. Its timeline creation and easy search capabilities are valuable. However, documentation, dashboard customization, and technical support need improvement. Exabeam was our first SIEM choice, deployed with another provider. |
| Technical Analyst 4 at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.5 | I used Exabeam primarily for security, collecting data from endpoints and cloud systems like Azure and AWS for threat detection. Its ease of use, advanced analytics, and automation are valuable, but integration and false positives need improvement. |
| Senior SOC Developer at XVE Security | 4.0 | We use Exabeam primarily for its SIEM capabilities, appreciating its automation. While its reporting and dashboard features need enhancement, we chose it over Splunk due to its UEBA and Advanced Analytics, suiting our small team's workload better. |
| Lead Consultant at Neutrino Tech Systems | 4.5 | I used Exabeam to centralize log collection from multiple services, improving efficiency. However, the user interface could be enhanced for better service identification and log filtering, as it currently presents repetitive information and insufficient filtering options, complicating log retrieval. |
| Software Engineer Intern at a tech services company with 11-50 employees | 3.5 | I initially faced challenges with Exabeam, particularly with data ingestion and downtime during IOC searches, though the Data Lake performed well when operational. Exabeam's user-friendly interface stood out but lacked customizable dashboards, while providing quick search results similar to Splunk. |
