No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Exabeam Logo

Top 10 Exabeam Alternatives

Vendor: Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top Exabeam Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Exabeam based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, and Wazuh. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Exabeam surpasses its competitors by offering advanced security information and event management with powerful machine learning capabilities, streamlined incident response, and user-friendly interfaces, setting new standards in threat detection and operational efficiency.

Exabeam Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Exabeam, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Exabeam Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in endpoint detection and response with lightweight impact and remote capabilities, while Exabeam uses behavior analytics and SIEM for threat detection. In comparison, Exabeam's usability and interface could improve but integrates well with log management. CrowdStrike Falcon could benefit from better tool integration.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Exabeam Report
CrowdStrike Falcon requires no initial setup costs, offering quick deployment, while Exabeam incurs a substantial setup cost, reflecting its extensive configuration needs.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon requires no initial setup costs, offering quick deployment, while Exabeam incurs a substantial setup cost, reflecting its extensive configuration needs.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Exabeam appeals with its advanced timeline-based analytics and cloud integration, promoting cost-effective threat detection. In comparison, Cortex XDR offers real-time threat detection with AI-driven analytics, providing broad integration and extensive security measures, ideal for enterprises seeking comprehensive endpoint protection.
Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Exabeam Report
Exabeam's setup cost is reported as high but justified by its comprehensive features, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks offers a more budget-friendly initial cost, catering to organizations seeking more affordable security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam's setup cost is reported as high but justified by its comprehensive features, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks offers a more budget-friendly initial cost, catering to organizations seeking more affordable security solutions.
Exabeam Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Exabeam offers advanced analytics with user behavior focus and seamless AWS integration. In comparison, Wazuh excels in flexibility and open-source accessibility, with strong file monitoring. Exabeam's machine learning shines, whereas Wazuh's cost-effectiveness and community support make it appealing to budget-conscious users.
Download Exabeam vs. Wazuh Report
Exabeam setup costs are reported to be higher compared to Wazuh's more affordable configuration expenses. Wazuh provides a cost-effective setup solution in contrast to Exabeam's comparatively expensive initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam setup costs are reported to be higher compared to Wazuh's more affordable configuration expenses. Wazuh provides a cost-effective setup solution in contrast to Exabeam's comparatively expensive initial implementation.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in data ingestion and real-time alerts, ideal for scalability and customization. In comparison, Exabeam provides user behavior analytics and machine learning, essential for detecting complex threats. A tech buyer might choose Splunk for flexibility or Exabeam for analytics.
Download Exabeam vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a high setup cost, whereas Exabeam presents a more budget-friendly alternative.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a high setup cost, whereas Exabeam presents a more budget-friendly alternative.
Exabeam Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Tech buyers may choose Darktrace for its automated threat response, exceptional detection capabilities, and comprehensive security features. In comparison, Exabeam offers an intuitive platform with strong behavior analytics, ease of deployment, and pricing flexibility, appealing to those requiring detailed investigations.
Download Darktrace vs. Exabeam Report
Darktrace has a higher setup cost compared to Exabeam, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, making Exabeam the more economical choice in terms of initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Darktrace has a higher setup cost compared to Exabeam, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, making Exabeam the more economical choice in terms of initial investment.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar excels in scalability and centralized security management but needs enhanced dashboard visualizations and indexing speed. In comparison, Exabeam offers user-focused automation and flexible pricing yet requires improved integration capabilities and performance for tech buyers seeking streamlined security processes.
Download Exabeam vs. IBM Security QRadar Report
IBM Security QRadar typically involves higher setup costs, reflecting its robust, enterprise-focused features. In contrast, Exabeam offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to organizations seeking a budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar typically involves higher setup costs, reflecting its robust, enterprise-focused features. In contrast, Exabeam offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to organizations seeking a budget-friendly option.
Exabeam Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Exabeam excels with advanced analytics and automated incident response, appealing to those seeking cost-effectiveness and quick setup. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel integrates with Azure services and AI-driven threat detection, ideal for complex environments needing extensive features and scalability, justifying its higher cost.
Download Exabeam vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report
Exabeam has a high setup cost with a steep learning curve, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a lower setup cost and easier initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam has a high setup cost with a steep learning curve, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a lower setup cost and easier initial setup.
Exabeam Logo
Varonis Platform
4.2 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Varonis Platform
4.2 out of 5
Exabeam excels in advanced analytics and automation, appealing to buyers focused on threat detection. In comparison, Varonis emphasizes data governance and classification, attracting those prioritizing data protection. Exabeam's adaptive analysis contrasts with Varonis's comprehensive data management, suiting different organizational priorities.
Download Exabeam vs. Varonis Platform Report
Exabeam's setup cost varies with its advanced analytics features, while Varonis Platform presents a more predictable cost structure. This difference impacts the initial investment and budget predictability between the two cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam's setup cost varies with its advanced analytics features, while Varonis Platform presents a more predictable cost structure. This difference impacts the initial investment and budget predictability between the two cybersecurity solutions.
Exabeam Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Exabeam excels in anomaly detection and incident response, making it highly effective at managing threats. In comparison, Elastic Security is noted for its extensive search functionalities and integration capabilities. Exabeam offers straightforward deployment and strong support, while Elastic Security benefits from its extensive documentation and active community.
Download Elastic Security vs. Exabeam Report
Exabeam has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Security, which offers a more economical installation. Elastic Security's affordability in setup costs makes it stand out against Exabeam's higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Security, which offers a more economical installation. Elastic Security's affordability in setup costs makes it stand out against Exabeam's higher initial expense.
Exabeam Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Exabeam excels with user behavior analytics and threat hunting, offering cost-effective pricing and a straightforward deployment process. In comparison, Rapid7 InsightIDR provides expansive features with incident response and cloud integrations, superior customer support, and a simpler cloud-based deployment, justifying its premium price with strong ROI.
Download Exabeam vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR Report
Exabeam has higher initial setup costs compared to Rapid7 InsightIDR, which offers a more straightforward and budget-friendly setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam has higher initial setup costs compared to Rapid7 InsightIDR, which offers a more straightforward and budget-friendly setup process.
Exabeam Logo
Cortex XSIAM
4.3 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Cortex XSIAM
4.3 out of 5
Exabeam offers superior user behavior analytics, making it ideal for automated security investigations with advanced store and SOAR features. In comparison, Cortex XSIAM leverages AI for network threat detection, providing a unified database and comprehensive visibility, appealing to those needing a holistic network approach.
Download Cortex XSIAM vs. Exabeam Report
Exabeam's setup cost is highlighted as user-friendly and efficient, while Cortex XSIAM's setup cost is noted for being higher with more extensive configuration. This difference underscores Exabeam's advantageous setup over Cortex XSIAM.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam's setup cost is highlighted as user-friendly and efficient, while Cortex XSIAM's setup cost is noted for being higher with more extensive configuration. This difference underscores Exabeam's advantageous setup over Cortex XSIAM.
Exabeam Logo
Vectra AI
4.3 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Vectra AI
4.3 out of 5
Vectra AI excels in behavioral analytics and alert precision, offering improved threat visibility. In comparison, Exabeam focuses on user behavior analytics with a robust correlation engine. Vectra is ideal for advanced detection needs, while Exabeam suits streamlined, user-focused threat analysis.
Download Exabeam vs. Vectra AI Report
Vectra AI offers a higher initial setup cost, requiring a larger upfront investment when compared to Exabeam, which provides a more budget-friendly introductory setup. Users may find Exabeam more appealing if keeping initial costs low is a priority.
View comparison
Pricing
Vectra AI offers a higher initial setup cost, requiring a larger upfront investment when compared to Exabeam, which provides a more budget-friendly introductory setup. Users may find Exabeam more appealing if keeping initial costs low is a priority.
Exabeam Logo
AWS Security Hub
3.8 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
AWS Security Hub
3.8 out of 5
Exabeam excels in threat detection, user behavior analytics, and integration, offering comprehensive security. In comparison, AWS Security Hub provides a centralized view, automated compliance checks, and seamless integration with AWS services. Exabeam appeals for feature depth, while AWS Security Hub attracts with cost efficiency and AWS ecosystem integration.
Download AWS Security Hub vs. Exabeam Report
Exabeam has a higher initial setup cost, whereas AWS Security Hub is more cost-effective upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam has a higher initial setup cost, whereas AWS Security Hub is more cost-effective upfront.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
4.2 out of 5
Exabeam focuses on user behavior analytics and simplicity, making it efficient for security investigations. In comparison, Cortex XSOAR offers extensive playbooks and robust orchestration, excelling in threat intelligence. Exabeam's affordability appeals to tech buyers, while Cortex XSOAR's comprehensive features cater to enterprise needs.
Download Exabeam vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Report
Exabeam setup costs tend to be lower compared to Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, making it more budget-friendly for smaller organizations, while Cortex XSOAR provides extensive features that could justify its higher pricing for larger enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam setup costs tend to be lower compared to Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, making it more budget-friendly for smaller organizations, while Cortex XSOAR provides extensive features that could justify its higher pricing for larger enterprises.
Exabeam Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Exabeam excels in threat detection and reporting tools while offering competitive pricing. In comparison, Cynet provides all-in-one security management with endpoint detection and threat intelligence. Exabeam's strength is cost-efficiency, whereas Cynet is chosen for its extensive features despite a higher price.
Download Cynet vs. Exabeam Report
Exabeam's setup cost is generally higher, reflecting its advanced feature set, while Cynet offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam's setup cost is generally higher, reflecting its advanced feature set, while Cynet offers a more budget-friendly setup.
Exabeam Logo
Recorded Future
4.2 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Recorded Future
4.2 out of 5
Recorded Future excels in threat intelligence with capabilities like anonymous searching and customizable dashboards. In comparison, Exabeam focuses on behavior analytics and automation. Recorded Future suits enterprises needing in-depth threat analysis, while Exabeam appeals to those seeking user-friendly incident response solutions.
Download Exabeam vs. Recorded Future Report
Recorded Future offers a straightforward setup cost, while Exabeam typically incurs higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Recorded Future offers a straightforward setup cost, while Exabeam typically incurs higher initial expenses.
Exabeam Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiSIEM excels in network visibility and threat detection, complemented by its straightforward deployment and robust customer support. In comparison, Exabeam's advanced analytics and machine learning capabilities make it ideal for large-scale deployments, despite its steeper learning curve and higher initial cost.
Download Exabeam vs. Fortinet FortiSIEM Report
Fortinet FortiSIEM is noted for its high setup costs, while Exabeam has more affordable initial deployment expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiSIEM is noted for its high setup costs, while Exabeam has more affordable initial deployment expenses.
Exabeam Logo
Anomali
3.9 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Anomali
3.9 out of 5
Exabeam excels in pricing and user behavior analytics, enhancing threat prediction with advanced capabilities. In comparison, Anomali excels with comprehensive threat intelligence, offering context-rich insights. Exabeam's integration advantages contrast with Anomali's enhanced ROI from superior security insights.
Download Anomali vs. Exabeam Report
Exabeam has higher setup costs, focusing on robust features, while Anomali offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam has higher setup costs, focusing on robust features, while Anomali offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
Exabeam Logo
Sentinel
3.8 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Sentinel
3.8 out of 5
Sentinel is preferred for seamless Microsoft integration, while Exabeam's advanced analytics justify its higher cost. Sentinel users seek improved third-party integrations, whereas Exabeam users desire better incident response. Sentinel offers easy cloud deployment, but Exabeam provides flexible options. Sentinel's pricing attracts buyers; Exabeam offers higher ROI.
Download Exabeam vs. Sentinel Report
Sentinel has a lower setup cost, while Exabeam generally requires a higher initial investment. Sentinel's affordability makes it appealing for budget-conscious users compared to Exabeam's premium pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Sentinel has a lower setup cost, while Exabeam generally requires a higher initial investment. Sentinel's affordability makes it appealing for budget-conscious users compared to Exabeam's premium pricing.
Exabeam Logo
VirusTotal
4.4 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
VirusTotal
4.4 out of 5
VirusTotal assists users in monitoring malicious campaigns, analyzing files with antivirus engines, and inspecting IP addresses. Integrated with over 70 antivirus tools, it enhances threat detection, benefiting sectors like retail and FinTech. Challenges include AI model integration and API clarity. Users desire improved UI, automation, and false positive reduction.
Download Exabeam vs. VirusTotal Report
The pricing is very economical.
VirusTotal is an expensive solution.
View comparison
Pricing
The pricing is very economical.
VirusTotal is an expensive solution.
Exabeam Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
USM Anywhere excels in asset discovery and vulnerability assessment, making it attractive for essential security needs, especially for those on smaller budgets. In comparison, Exabeam's user behavior analytics and automated responses cater to advanced threat detection, providing significant long-term ROI despite a higher initial cost.
Download Exabeam vs. USM Anywhere Report
USM Anywhere offers lower setup costs compared to Exabeam, making it a more budget-friendly option. In contrast, Exabeam's higher initial setup costs could be justified by its advanced capabilities and features.
View comparison
Pricing
USM Anywhere offers lower setup costs compared to Exabeam, making it a more budget-friendly option. In contrast, Exabeam's higher initial setup costs could be justified by its advanced capabilities and features.
Exabeam Logo
Lookout
3.8 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Lookout
3.8 out of 5
Lookout offers robust security for mobile devices, providing effective endpoint protection and real-time threat intelligence. Its valuable features include malware detection and data breach prevention. There's room for improvement in its reporting capabilities and integration with other platforms.
Download Exabeam vs. Lookout Report
In terms of feature performance versus cost, they're a good value.
View comparison
Pricing
In terms of feature performance versus cost, they're a good value.
Exabeam Logo
Cymulate
4.2 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Cymulate
4.2 out of 5
Organizations utilize Cymulate for ransomware assessments, cybersecurity tool validation, attack simulations, and vulnerability management. It offers autonomous reporting, seamless integration, and flexible dashboards. Highlighted features include endpoint testing, zero-day scenarios, and robust configuration. Challenges exist in high pricing, EDR issues, and insufficient detailed reporting.
Download Cymulate vs. Exabeam Report
Cymulate's services are expensive.
The product is affordable.
View comparison
Pricing
Cymulate's services are expensive.
The product is affordable.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
Stellar Cyber Open XDR
1 out of 5

Stellar Cyber Open XDR enhances threat detection and response with advanced analytics and integrations. Its valuable features include AI-driven insights and real-time monitoring. Some users point to room for improvement in deployment processes and customizability to better align with diverse industry needs.

Download Exabeam vs. Stellar Cyber Open XDR Report
It’s a single license platform.
View comparison
Pricing
It’s a single license platform.
Exabeam Logo
CyberArk Identity
4.1 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
CyberArk Identity
4.1 out of 5
Exabeam offers advanced analytics and automation capabilities with strong AWS integration. In comparison, CyberArk Identity focuses on user self-service, robust access control, and seamless integration, particularly with UIPath and Azure, making it ideal for integration-heavy environments.
Download CyberArk Identity vs. Exabeam Report
Exabeam's setup cost is competitive and straightforward, while CyberArk Identity's setup cost tends to be higher, reflecting its extensive security features. This difference may impact budget decisions depending on the organization's specific requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam's setup cost is competitive and straightforward, while CyberArk Identity's setup cost tends to be higher, reflecting its extensive security features. This difference may impact budget decisions depending on the organization's specific requirements.
Exabeam Logo
Splunk SOAR
4.1 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Splunk SOAR
4.1 out of 5
Exabeam excels with advanced UEBA, session building, and real-time incident analysis, appealing to those valuing affordability. In comparison, Splunk SOAR, with extensive integrations and flexible playbooks, suits buyers prioritizing integration richness and operational versatility despite higher costs.
Download Exabeam vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Exabeam offers a lower setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, highlighting a key pricing advantage. Splunk SOAR's setup is more expensive, which might impact budget-conscious organizations looking for cost-effective solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam offers a lower setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, highlighting a key pricing advantage. Splunk SOAR's setup is more expensive, which might impact budget-conscious organizations looking for cost-effective solutions.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM
4.3 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is favored for its advanced analytics and robust threat detection features, making it ideal for identifying complex threats. In comparison, Exabeam is appreciated for its integration with multiple platforms and ease of deployment, offering a smoother setup experience.
Download Exabeam vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost compared to Exabeam, which offers more affordable initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost compared to Exabeam, which offers more affordable initial implementation.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
Sumo Logic Security
4.1 out of 5
Sumo Logic Security offers scalable analytics and extensive integrations, providing real-time monitoring and intuitive insights. In comparison, Exabeam delivers advanced threat detection with intelligent automation. While Sumo Logic is praised for easy deployment, Exabeam is noted for comprehensive support but has higher setup costs.
Download Exabeam vs. Sumo Logic Security Report
Sumo Logic Security has a lower setup cost compared to Exabeam, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment. Exabeam, although higher in setup cost, offers advanced features that may justify the investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Sumo Logic Security has a lower setup cost compared to Exabeam, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment. Exabeam, although higher in setup cost, offers advanced features that may justify the investment.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
ManageEngine Log360
3.8 out of 5
Exabeam excels in advanced analytics and threat detection, making it ideal for identifying sophisticated attacks. In comparison, ManageEngine Log360 is praised for its comprehensive features and ease of use, offering extensive integration options and detailed compliance reports. ManageEngine Log360's simpler deployment and cost-effective pricing highly attract diverse organizations.
Download Exabeam vs. ManageEngine Log360 Report
Exabeam has a higher setup cost compared to ManageEngine Log360. ManageEngine Log360 offers a more affordable initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam has a higher setup cost compared to ManageEngine Log360. ManageEngine Log360 offers a more affordable initial setup.
Exabeam Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
Exabeam offers advanced threat detection and user behavior analytics, appealing to those focused on analytics. In comparison, Devo's strong integration capabilities and powerful querying performance cater to versatile needs. Exabeam's higher costs correlate with ROI, while Devo provides competitive pricing and superior customer support.
Download Devo vs. Exabeam Report
Exabeam has a higher initial setup cost compared to Devo, with Devo offering a more cost-effective alternative right from the start.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam has a higher initial setup cost compared to Devo, with Devo offering a more cost-effective alternative right from the start.
Exabeam Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Logpoint is renowned for its competitive pricing and excellent support, making it a favorite among cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Exabeam excels in advanced features and comprehensive threat detection, appealing to larger enterprises seeking detailed analytics and higher ROI despite a more complex deployment.
Download Exabeam vs. Logpoint Report
Logpoint offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Exabeam entails a higher initial investment for a more complex setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Logpoint offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Exabeam entails a higher initial investment for a more complex setup.
Exabeam Logo
AlienVault OSSIM
3.7 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
AlienVault OSSIM
3.7 out of 5
Exabeam offers advanced user behavior analytics and automated incident response, ideal for tech buyers needing sophisticated analytics. In comparison, AlienVault OSSIM provides unified security management and open-source community support, appealing to those seeking a comprehensive, cost-effective security solution.
Download AlienVault OSSIM vs. Exabeam Report
Exabeam's setup is straightforward and cost-effective, whereas AlienVault OSSIM's setup process is more complex and requires higher initial expenses due to its extensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam's setup is straightforward and cost-effective, whereas AlienVault OSSIM's setup process is more complex and requires higher initial expenses due to its extensive feature set.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
Google Chronicle Suite
3.9 out of 5
Exabeam excels in ease of use, competitive pricing, and user-friendly deployment. In comparison, Google Chronicle Suite offers comprehensive features and detailed analytics. Exabeam requires improved scalability options, while Google Chronicle Suite needs simpler configuration. Exabeam provides faster ROI; Google Chronicle Suite justifies higher costs with extensive capabilities.
Download Exabeam vs. Google Chronicle Suite Report
Exabeam typically has a higher setup cost, while Google Chronicle Suite is more cost-effective to implement.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam typically has a higher setup cost, while Google Chronicle Suite is more cost-effective to implement.
Exabeam Logo
Tines
4.4 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Tines
4.4 out of 5
Exabeam excels in SIEM with robust threat detection and deep analysis. In comparison, Tines offers an automation-first approach, ideal for simplifying workflows. Exabeam suits comprehensive security needs, whereas Tines provides cost-effective automation and seamless integration.
Download Exabeam vs. Tines Report
Exabeam has a significant setup cost compared to Tines, which requires minimal initial expenses. This difference underscores Tines as a more accessible option for users looking to minimize upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam has a significant setup cost compared to Tines, which requires minimal initial expenses. This difference underscores Tines as a more accessible option for users looking to minimize upfront investment.
Exabeam Logo
ZeroFOX
4.3 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
ZeroFOX
4.3 out of 5
ZeroFOX enhances threat intelligence and digital risk monitoring, detecting phishing domains and fake profiles on social media and dark web. It supports real-time takedowns and offers a user-friendly interface with precise alerts. Improving AI-driven detection, alert management, and integration is crucial for seamless operations across organizations.
Download Exabeam vs. ZeroFOX Report
View comparison
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
Splunk User Behavior Analytics
4.1 out of 5
Splunk User Behavior Analytics provides powerful machine learning for threat detection and automation. In comparison, Exabeam offers intuitive design with advanced security investigation views. Splunk focuses on data insights; Exabeam emphasizes integration capabilities. Buyers will weigh pricing models and customization features accordingly.
Download Exabeam vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics Report
Splunk User Behavior Analytics has a higher setup cost, while Exabeam offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Splunk's comprehensive features justify its pricing differential compared to Exabeam's simpler and less expensive setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk User Behavior Analytics has a higher setup cost, while Exabeam offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Splunk's comprehensive features justify its pricing differential compared to Exabeam's simpler and less expensive setup.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
TrendAI Tipping Point
4.0 out of 5
Exabeam offers advanced analytics with robust automation, catering to data handling and machine learning needs. In comparison, Trend Micro TippingPoint excels in IPS with strong threat detection. Exabeam's flexible pricing is appealing, whereas TippingPoint's robust security features justify its higher cost.
Download Exabeam vs. TrendAI Tipping Point Report
Exabeam offers a cost-effective setup compared to the higher initial cost of the Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, highlighting Exabeam's advantage for budget-conscious buyers.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam offers a cost-effective setup compared to the higher initial cost of the Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, highlighting Exabeam's advantage for budget-conscious buyers.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
Google Security Operations
4.4 out of 5
Exabeam emphasizes user-centric security with its behavior analytics and detection, appealing to those wanting strong monitoring with favorable pricing and support. In comparison, Google Security Operations integrates threat intelligence and machine learning for comprehensive security, offering greater functionality and robust cloud integration.
Download Exabeam vs. Google Security Operations Report
Exabeam's setup cost is high compared to Google Security Operations, which offers a more budget-friendly setup. This makes Google a cost-effective choice for those focusing on initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam's setup cost is high compared to Google Security Operations, which offers a more budget-friendly setup. This makes Google a cost-effective choice for those focusing on initial expenses.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager
3.9 out of 5
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager offers extensive customization and integration with diverse deployment options. In comparison, Exabeam excels in user behavior analytics and automation. Both solutions address distinct needs, with OpenText focusing on complex environments and Exabeam prioritizing ease of use and advanced analytics.
Download Exabeam vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Report
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager involves a higher setup cost, whereas Exabeam offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. This indicates a significant difference in the entry-level affordability between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager involves a higher setup cost, whereas Exabeam offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. This indicates a significant difference in the entry-level affordability between the two solutions.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)
4.1 out of 5
Exabeam excels in cost-effectiveness and seamless deployment with advanced threat detection and automated responses. In comparison, ThreatConnect TIP appeals for its extensive threat intelligence integration and collaboration tools, offering richer functionality and enhanced long-term value despite higher initial costs.
Download Exabeam vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Report
Exabeam offers a cost-effective setup, while ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) presents a slightly higher investment at the onset.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam offers a cost-effective setup, while ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) presents a slightly higher investment at the onset.
Exabeam Logo
Sophos Central
4.2 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Sophos Central
4.2 out of 5
Sophos Central integrates security management, offering endpoint protection, firewalls, and mobile management. It features VPN, MFA, and ransomware protection, enhancing threat detection and compliance. Users prefer its real-time visibility, synchronized security, and scalability but suggest improved performance and customization. It’s praised for user-friendly interface and cost-effective upkeep.
Download Exabeam vs. Sophos Central Report
The tool is a little more expensive than other solutions.
The solution is moderately expensive.
View comparison
Pricing
The tool is a little more expensive than other solutions.
The solution is moderately expensive.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
Check Point Infinity
4.4 out of 5
Exabeam offers advanced analytics and user-friendly interfaces, focusing on behavior analytics and complex threat detection. In comparison, Check Point Infinity provides a comprehensive security architecture with extensive integration capabilities, leveraging a unified infrastructure for addressing diverse enterprise security needs.
Download Check Point Infinity vs. Exabeam Report
Exabeam features an affordable setup cost, while Check Point Infinity incurs higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam features an affordable setup cost, while Check Point Infinity incurs higher initial expenses.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
NetWitness Platform
3.7 out of 5
NetWitness Platform offers extensive integration capabilities and real-time threat detection, appealing to businesses needing robust integration. In comparison, Exabeam's powerful machine learning algorithms and advanced analytics provide superior threat detection. Exabeam users benefit from quicker deployment times and competitive pricing, making it a cost-effective choice.
Download Exabeam vs. NetWitness Platform Report
NetWitness Platform has higher initial setup costs, while Exabeam offers a lower setup cost. Exabeam's economical setup cost makes it a preferable choice for cost-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
NetWitness Platform has higher initial setup costs, while Exabeam offers a lower setup cost. Exabeam's economical setup cost makes it a preferable choice for cost-conscious users.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
ServiceNow Security Operations
4.0 out of 5
Exabeam's advanced analytics and flexible pricing suit cost-conscious buyers, supporting AWS integration for cloud-focused enterprises. In comparison, ServiceNow Security Operations, though pricier, offers strong ITSM integration, making it suitable for comprehensive enterprise needs with excellent customer support.
Download Exabeam vs. ServiceNow Security Operations Report
Exabeam setup is cost-effective, offering a streamlined integration process, whereas ServiceNow Security Operations incurs higher setup costs due to its complex configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam setup is cost-effective, offering a streamlined integration process, whereas ServiceNow Security Operations incurs higher setup costs due to its complex configuration.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
SentinelOne Singularity AI SIEM
4.3 out of 5
Exabeam excels in user-friendly navigation and flexible integration for insider threat detection. In comparison, SentinelOne's advanced AI and automated threat response provide a technical edge. Exabeam's cost-effectiveness appeals to budget-conscious buyers, while SentinelOne's ROI justifies its higher cost for comprehensive protection.
Download Exabeam vs. SentinelOne Singularity AI SIEM Report
Exabeam has a higher setup cost than SentinelOne Singularity AI SIEM, which offers a more budget-friendly option with similar features.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam has a higher setup cost than SentinelOne Singularity AI SIEM, which offers a more budget-friendly option with similar features.
Exabeam Logo
DNIF HYPERCLOUD
3.8 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
DNIF HYPERCLOUD
3.8 out of 5
Exabeam is favored for its ease of use and seamless deployment, making it attractive for companies prioritizing quick implementation. In comparison, DNIF HYPERCLOUD's advanced features and flexible architecture appeal to those seeking robust long-term capabilities, despite the higher initial setup costs.
Download DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Exabeam Report
Exabeam has a high upfront setup cost, whereas DNIF HYPERCLOUD offers a more affordable setup. Exabeam's setup costs may be prohibitive for smaller enterprises, while DNIF HYPERCLOUD's lower costs make it accessible to a broader market.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam has a high upfront setup cost, whereas DNIF HYPERCLOUD offers a more affordable setup. Exabeam's setup costs may be prohibitive for smaller enterprises, while DNIF HYPERCLOUD's lower costs make it accessible to a broader market.
Exabeam Logo
Cybersixgill
4.3 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Cybersixgill
4.3 out of 5

Cybersixgill empowers organizations with deep web and dark web intelligence, monitoring cyber threats, finding exposed data, and analyzing malware trends. With advanced search operators, alert notifications, and exclusive dark web access, users quickly address threats, reducing effort while accessing various hidden forums to enhance threat intelligence.

Download Cybersixgill vs. Exabeam Report
The pricing is cheap compared with Recorded Future. Sixgill's cost-effectiveness is very good.
Sometimes, Cybersixgill Investigative Portal is cheaper than its competitors.
View comparison
Pricing
The pricing is cheap compared with Recorded Future. Sixgill's cost-effectiveness is very good.
Sometimes, Cybersixgill Investigative Portal is cheaper than its competitors.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
Trellix Helix Connect
4.3 out of 5
Exabeam excels in behavior analytics and machine learning, streamlining security investigations. In comparison, Trellix Helix Connect's strong AI and integration with over 400 connectors enhance incident response and automation. Exabeam offers flexibility in deployment; Trellix Helix Connect provides supportive customer service and diverse environment support.
Download Exabeam vs. Trellix Helix Connect Report
Exabeam has a straightforward setup cost, while Trellix Helix Connect involves a more complex and potentially higher setup cost, highlighting distinct pricing structures.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam has a straightforward setup cost, while Trellix Helix Connect involves a more complex and potentially higher setup cost, highlighting distinct pricing structures.
Exabeam Logo
Dtex Systems
4.5 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Dtex Systems
4.5 out of 5
Dtex Systems enhances security with features like insider threat detection and data loss prevention. Users appreciate its detailed analytics and real-time monitoring capabilities. Some feedback suggests a need for improved integration with existing IT infrastructure and easier customization options for specific industry requirements.
View comparison

Related categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)