Exabeam and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR compete as leading security solutions, each with unique advantages. Exabeam seems to have an advantage in advanced analytics and user behavior analysis, whereas Cortex XSOAR excels in integration and automation for incident management.
Features: Exabeam offers advanced analytics, user behavior analysis, and comprehensive automation, enabling effective threat detection and investigation timeline creation. It is favored for its easy-to-use interface and cost-efficient pricing. Cortex XSOAR, known for its extensive playbook library and plugins, provides superior integration and automation capabilities. Users appreciate its machine learning integrations and adaptability, making it excellent for efficient incident management.
Room for Improvement: Exabeam requires faster updates, better documentation, and improved real-time flow analysis. Users highlight issues with false positives and request more customizable dashboards and better cloud integrations. Meanwhile, Cortex XSOAR's challenges include complex setup and high licensing costs, with users desiring easier configuration, improved pricing models, and better non-security solution integrations. More automation options and a simpler interface are also desired.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Exabeam is primarily deployed on-premises and in public clouds, with support feedback indicating occasional slow responses. Cortex XSOAR supports diverse deployment options, including hybrid environments, and receives generally positive customer support feedback, although regional support could be improved. XSOAR offers more deployment flexibility compared to Exabeam.
Pricing and ROI: Exabeam is viewed as reasonably priced, offering flexible pricing models and positive ROI through tool consolidation. It is recognized for its affordability. In contrast, Cortex XSOAR is considered expensive, especially after pricing adjustments by Palo Alto. While it’s seen as valuable, the high cost is a barrier for smaller enterprises, though discounts are available for repeat purchases. Both solutions ensure substantial ROI, with pricing being a primary purchasing consideration.
Since we started working with Torq, I am handling much fewer alerts. It is becoming really easy for me to handle an alert.
By the time we officially bought Torq, we already had two workflows that were very helpful to us.
It pretty much took until we got to our first renewal where we said that this is the value we see, this is the things we want more, but that is the first place where we said we are happy enough that we want to renew.
Exabeam offers more machine learning models that detect anomalies.
We are positioning Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, which can be used in the SOC and do a lot of automation for the customer.
The speed and quality of their answers have been pretty good, as I usually get a response within 24 hours, and they follow up well.
We can always get an answer, and the support team are experts in their own system.
Nine out of ten times, they give me a solution even if it is not the solution I wanted, and I still can get to the result.
Even with TAM support from Exabeam, many issues go unresolved.
I also had the chance to look at the documentation, and the documentation is good.
Eight out of ten times, they provide valuable help.
Their support has been better than Anomali's and they are more responsive.
The technical support provided by Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is good.
Our case management is super scalable.
In terms of scalability, you can do as long as you can build it, and they can support it.
Regarding the ability of the solution to grow in your work environment, if it is scalable, if it fits your business requirements, and if there is room to scale up, the answer is yes, for sure.
Regarding Exabeam's scalability and how well it adapts to its customers' needs, I would rate it an eight.
The scalability of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR supports our growth and security needs because we can integrate various tools and continuously add more capability.
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR has very good application capabilities and is highly scalable.
The issues with scalability arise from the speed of some integrations, as not all are perfectly tuned by Palo.
Most of the time, the system is stable as long as the components that they integrate with are stable.
Regarding stability, I have noticed some lagging, crashing, and downtime, which is one of my largest gripes.
I would rate Torq's product stability at eight, acknowledging that there are bugs, glitches, and downtimes.
These problems were not frequent, and the last six to eight months have been stable.
Overall, I think Exabeam's stability level is good.
The system works smoothly even when I navigate deep into the playbook section.
I would rate the stability and reliability of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR as a nine.
It was able to capture data but was unable to differentiate between the agent hostname we are using and the hostname that resides on the back end of the Internet.
From an engineering perspective, I think more error messages and error handling information for our engineering team would be very helpful.
If a step is failing, the system could try to autocorrect it with AI or open a ticket from the workflow itself.
Exabeam needs to improve its documentation and provide more customization for dashboards and case management.
I have explored the SaaS version; it offers many new features.
Exabeam's integration capabilities are not good, as Exabeam has a very limited number of integrations and no out-of-box integration.
The deployment requires integration and the development of integration modules.
One of the significant issues we encounter is system slowdown when we receive an influx of alerts, which inhibits how quickly we can access the information needed for investigation.
To improve the solution, it needs to have complete features that are low-code, no-code, and should be plug-and-play.
When they bring more and more value into the platform, it makes more sense to pay that price, but still, it is expensive.
Before deciding to implement Torq, I considered that compared to our old case management platform, Torq was a much better price and had a lot better value for what you get out of the platform, which was a key consideration for the company.
It is an expensive solution, not an inexpensive solution, but we get through the flexibility.
For customers, it is zero versus $20 million, which is why they have to make a decision.
Torq's unified platform approach to AI SOC automation and case management has significantly benefited us by integrating the case management platform with the automation, which saves time compared to managing multiple point solutions across our security stack.
The fact that I can build whatever I want within my own imagination and skills without relying on code is the best thing about Torq.
You can copy and paste a cURL command. If you have documentation or APIs, you usually have an example on the side. You basically have all the information on how the API call should be. You can just copy that and paste it into a step, and it will just build the step for you.
Exabeam's AI capabilities, like the natural language mode, convert natural language into Exabeam queries, enhancing ease of use.
The product offers useful features like the dashboard, timeline, and session views, which enhance our security tools.
Exabeam's UEBA is the most valuable feature that I have found so far.
Execution of automatic tasks for collecting, enriching, and correlating security events from hundreds of different technologies.
If I already have an established process, I do not have to change my process to fit into the tool. I can modify the tool to fit into my process, which makes things considerably easier.
We have implemented automation features, such as automated responses to email threats and automatic configuration of target devices for blocking specific IPs.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR | 8.8% |
| Torq | 4.2% |
| Exabeam | 2.9% |
| Other | 84.1% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 26 |
Torq is the enterprise AI SOC solution that effectively combines adaptive insights and automation to handle critical threats efficiently. It manages threat lifecycles, swiftly moving from triage to response, ensuring effective risk management.
Torq is designed to streamline security operations by aggregating telemetry across your security stack. It investigates significant risks and manages threats from triage to containment and remediation. This AI-driven tool enhances the capabilities of your SecOps team, allowing them to achieve more impactful results without introducing complicated processes.
What are the key features of Torq?In industries like finance and healthcare, Torq shows effectiveness by adapting to specific risk scenarios often encountered in these fields. Its integration with existing infrastructures makes it a valuable asset for maintaining stringent security standards, essential for protecting critical data and operations in diverse high-stakes environments.
Exabeam Fusion is a cloud-delivered solution that that enables you to:
-Leverage turnkey threat detection, investigation, and response
-Collect, search and enhance data from anywhere
-Detect threats missed by other tools, using market-leading behavior analytics
-Achieve successful SecOps outcomes with prescriptive, threat-centric use case packages
-Enhance productivity and reduce response times with automation
-Meet regulatory compliance and audit requirements with ease
Palo Alto Networks delivers a complete solution that helps Tier-1 through Tier-3 analysts and SOC managers to optimize the entire incident life cycle while auto documenting and journaling all the evidence. More than 100+ integrations enable security orchestration workflows for incident management and other critical security operation tasks.
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is a piece of Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response software that redefines what it means for a program to orchestrate security in an automated manner. It is a next-generation solution that offers all of the features of dozens of siloed security operations center tools in one place. Cortex XSOAR combines case management, automation, real-time collaboration, and threat intelligence management to create a platform that can handle all aspects of system security. Teams that make use of Cortex XSOAR can expect to cut the number of issues that they will have to deal with by 75%. At the same time, the speed at which they resolve those issues that slip through will rise by 90%.
Cortex XSOAR ensures that all of the IT and security tools that you employ function as a unified system. It does this by employing hundreds of integrations that allow you to run a wide variety of programs at once without ever worrying about them interfering with each other. These integrations are limited only by your imagination. They can be used immediately as they are, if that is what you need. However, they can also be customized according to the requirements of your system. This approach provides you with the maximum levels of both flexibility and utility.
The model that this platform uses is based on a machine learning algorithm. The level of automation allows you to provide more than an unchanging and inflexible blanket of coverage. Cortex XSOAR takes all of the data that it gathers and uses it to expand its protective capabilities. This creates recommendations that you can use to create a threat playbook that can be deployed uniformly throughout your organization.
Benefits of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Some of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR’s benefits include:
Reviews from Real Users
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR’s centralized monitoring interface and automation are two features that help it stand out. This might help explain why one quarter of the Fortune 500 companies choose Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR over the competition.
Peerspot users note the effectiveness of these features. One user wrote, “We were looking for a single pane of glass type of solution that would allow us to physically be in one appliance - be able to work in concert with other servers that we have within our environment. We wanted orchestration and automation. The single pane of glass was the most important part.” Another noted, "The automation part and the playbook creation part are awesome. The way it is responding to the customers and incidents is also very good. In the SOC environment, I guess it will carry out around 50% of the work."
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.