No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CYPHER Learning vs Canvas LMS comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Canvas LMS
Ranking in Learning Management Systems (LMS)
5th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
CYPHER Learning
Ranking in Learning Management Systems (LMS)
1st
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
56
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Learning Management Systems (LMS) category, the mindshare of Canvas LMS is 2.0%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CYPHER Learning is 1.2%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Learning Management Systems (LMS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CYPHER Learning1.2%
Canvas LMS2.0%
Other96.8%
Learning Management Systems (LMS)
 

Featured Reviews

RC
Instructional Designer at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Modules and rich feedback have transformed health sciences courses and now improve student success
The best feature Canvas LMS offers is modules. The ability to build a sequential learning path with conditional release, where students complete one item before unlocking the next, is something health sciences faculty love because knowledge builds on itself in their programs. I set up those modules using SpeedGrader, which is another tool that gets used constantly. Being able to grade a submission, view the rubric, leave inline comments, and audio feedback all in one place is a genuine improvement over what we had previously. The LTI integration framework allows us to have Turnitin, Panopto, and Zoom all connected, and they work seamlessly within Canvas rather than feeling bolted on. SpeedGrader specifically has changed how faculty approach feedback. Before, many instructors left minimal feedback because the process was cumbersome. Now, with inline annotation and audio comments, faculty leave much richer feedback because it is actually fast to do. Students have noticed and commented on this in course evaluations. Canvas LMS has positively impacted my organization by increasing student satisfaction with the learning environment noticeably. The LMS-related complaints that used to come up regularly in course evaluations, such as not being able to find things, things not working on phones, and confusing navigation, have basically disappeared. Faculty course build time has also improved. A faculty member who knows Canvas can build a solid course structure in a fraction of the time it took in Blackboard. I can share specific outcomes that show how LMS-related complaints to our help desk dropped by about 40% after the migration. SpeedGrader has meaningfully reduced grading time. Faculty who used to spend whole weekends on grading are getting through it faster.
reviewer2620521 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager of Learning & Development at a healthcare company with 51-200 employees
A game-changer solution that meets our needs and has top-notch customer service
The AI feature needs some fine-tuning or tweaking. They use Microsoft Copilot. I have had courses on and used the AI feature. I find myself having to correct a lot of mistakes that it has made. It is about 75% to 80 % correct when I put things through the AI feature. I have to go for a fine toothcomb. A lot of things are repeated. A lot of videos or pictures are repeated through several pages, and it takes me time to go through them. The AI feature of Articulate 360 is better because I am able to create courses quickly, and their AI feature is almost 100% accurate every single time. The AI feature would be my main criticism. I do not use its AI feature anymore because I find myself having to correct a lot of the things that it puts out. One thing that I wish was different was that it showed the full title in the catalog when I create something outside, such as in Articulate 360, and bring it in. When you go into the catalog title, it does not show you the whole title. If it is a long title, it will just have three dots. I wish it would just show the entire title, even if it goes into the next line so that people can see the whole title. Currently, they have to click on it to see the whole title. It does not give you enough characters to see the title. People look at the catalog and all these great courses. It says something like, "Dental University, How to ..." You do not know what the rest is unless you click on it. It should allow more characters for the actual title in the catalog so that we do not have to click on the title because most people do not. Most people just peruse through it. If it catches their eyes, they click on it, but if they do not know what the title is, they are not going to click on it to find out. Additionally, their course creation capabilities are static compared to alternative solutions like Articulate 360. You can only create very static learning courses. That may be fine for some industries where they want you to read and acknowledge that you took it. You can link to videos on YouTube, Vimeo, etc. However, when the video ends, there are advertisements. There is an application for that for sure. In fact, I was able to use that for this leadership video series that I put on TED Talk through YouTube, but they are still getting clicks and advertisements. The leadership training that we create through Articulate 360 is much nicer looking. We can put the text files, different flashcards, lists, etc. It is a better experience for the learner. This is why for course creation, I do not use much within CYPHER Learning. There is a night and day difference in the courses created in CYPHER Learning versus Articulate 360. CYPHER Learning is not even close. There is a better learning experience for the user in Articulate 360 than it is in CYPHER Learning. A user looking at the courses only in CYPHER Learning would not know any difference, but if you show them Articulate 360, they will find it great. You can put high-resolution pictures and videos. It is just a better experience for the learner.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's easy to follow. It flows well, and it's easy to use."
"They have a more extensive support base in terms of infrastructure."
"Canvas LMS is user-friendly. Its assessment tools help to find the weaknesses and strengths of students."
"The product's flexibility is exceptional."
"The integration with Zoom is a notable feature. It allows for seamless access to live class sessions directly from Canvas after authentication, enabling quick entry into Zoom calls. You can also schedule Zoom calls or private recordings directly within Canvas, making it convenient, especially for situations like self-recording exams. Additionally, Canvas excels in collaboration and discussion capabilities. Users can engage in discussions on various topics, and there's the option to create custom groups for more focused interactions. These groups provide a level of privacy and isolation from the broader class, which is a significant advantage."
"The assessment tools in Canvas significantly contribute to educational outcomes by allowing instructors to create and manage assessments effectively."
"The solution is easy to access."
"Canvas LMS is the best solution because they have enabled scalability and cutting-edge technology transfer through Thomas Bravo, a multi-billion dollar company and will soon have the financial backing and support of KKR at close to $5 Billion."
"The entire system is incredibly valuable, but one of the reasons we chose CYPHER Learning was the social interaction features, such as forums, student groups, and messaging."
"CYPHER Learning is a platform that provides many tools to help develop as an institution and generate educational and training progress for the community."
"Initially, I was very excited about the automations. But when we started using the actual courses, I found that the ability to sync content and settings from parent courses to child courses is what I value the most. But both the automations and syncing are at the top of the list."
"Overall, it is quite good and has the essentials."
"Without CYPHER Learning, I don't think we would have been able to do that."
"It's very easy to monitor and check student progress. I can go in and, with a couple of clicks, see any participant and where they are in the process."
"Another feature that is great for me... is the learning outcomes feature... In CYPHER Learning, it's called the Mastery feature. The learning outcomes feature allows us to measure whether students have achieved competency, based on the encoded learning outcomes."
"In terms of the user availability, there is access to the platform 24 hours. So, we don't need to determine a specific time for training. We just give them a link, password, and period for them to complete, e.g., four days, then it is up to them. What is important is they pass the minimum requirements needed to pass the exams and certification process."
 

Cons

"I don't think that tier one support was incredibly valuable because a lot of times those tickets ended up with our team back at KU anyway and it would have saved time just to contact us directly."
"The product could be integrated with a talent management system."
"The learning curve is not steep, but it is intermediate."
"Integrating more AI capabilities for the product could enhance its functionality, particularly in automating repetitive tasks and personalizing learning experiences."
"The high-tech interactivity with other software, like ArcGIS or RSA Archer, can be better. It is not as easily compatible with them. You can put apps in it that the students can then access, but the routing of apps through the Canvas system slows down functionality on the other types of products."
"There are a couple of areas that could be improved. Firstly, the discussion feature is not very interactive and can be slow to respond, making it less intuitive at the moment. This is an aspect that needs substantial improvement. Another point to consider is related to the cost of the LMS system. It's perceived as relatively expensive, which has led to discussions about transitioning away from Canvas, potentially to a more cost-effective alternative. This cost-related aspect is a significant factor to consider when implementing such a system."
"The new quizzes situation has been going on for a long time, and faculty patience is running thin."
"There are some disadvantages with Canvas LMS and always improvements to be made."
"The list of students needs to be organized according to gender. The list of students in the product contains both male and female students, whereas, in our grading system, we list the male students followed by the female students."
"When they bring on new partners, like Udemy, we do find that there are quite a few bugs in the system. They brought them on more than a year ago and there are still a few bugs, just pulling things through to CYPHER Learning. Integration bugs are a bit of an issue."
"Most of the room for improvement is around my course design, the video content, and the structure of my courses so that they're more engaging and interactive. Whether the platform can help me deliver those outcomes, I'm not sure, but that will probably be my core focus over the next 12 months."
"I would like to see better integration of the platform with Zoom or Meet so that programming of video conferences would be much more interactive within those platforms. Currently, if we have to do a conference in Zoom or Meet, we have to leave the platform because we cannot do so directly within it."
"Screen sorting can be improved by providing more filtering options."
"I would like to see an improvement in peer bonding and the possibility for students to share knowledge among themselves regarding the work that they do. That would greatly help in that it wouldn’t be a one-to-many communication format."
"The ability to communicate with students using CYPHER Learning is very poor."
"There is a great feature that enables self-registration for a user and it comes with an access code. Unfortunately, there is only one access code and it works for all portals. We would appreciate a dedicated access code for different portals."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Canvas LMS is low-priced compared to other vendors."
"Canvas LMS is an affordable solution."
"The platform can be expensive for smaller organizations with fewer students."
"The pricing of Canvas is satisfactory for my university. We have negotiated a good price, especially considering that we are a large university with twenty-six campuses across the country. Canvas offers a favorable pricing model for academic institutions, and the cost is reasonable. However, in continuous education, the challenge lies not in the price itself but in the business model. The requirement to pay for the entire year when our students may only use the license for a shorter duration creates challenges. The inability to adjust the licensing based on actual usage is a significant drawback for us, making the effective cost higher compared to other platforms like Hyper Learning"
"CYPHER Learning is a bit more expensive than our previous solution."
"We have compared pricing with different vendors and found that CYPHER Learning was the most reasonable."
"It has helped us save from 90% to 100% of our costs. The most valuable thing that we have earned in the last three years is time, e.g., my personal time versus my work time. There is more harmony."
"It seems moderate and as per industry standards. In my previous organization, we had to hire an outside company, so I know what companies charge to do just a single course. Considering that, the price of CYPHER Learning is in the typical cost range."
"The pricing is somewhere in the middle. It's not too expensive and, for what it is, it's very reasonable."
"The pricing is good. It's scalable, meaning you can start off at a cost level that is easy for a startup and then build on it from there."
"Our satisfaction with the pricing is a 10 out of 10."
"The price was fair for all the features we received."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Learning Management Systems (LMS) solutions are best for your needs.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
University
20%
Comms Service Provider
16%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Educational Organization
8%
Educational Organization
16%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business30
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Canvas LMS?
The main area where Canvas LMS can be improved is the quiz engine. It is functional, but it is behind where it needs to be for health sciences. Our faculty need complex question types, detailed que...
What advice do you have for others considering Canvas LMS?
Regarding Canvas LMS's AI capabilities, I think its governance and security are carefully considered. Canvas has been rolling out AI features gradually, including AI-generated quiz questions, sugge...
What is your primary use case for Canvas LMS?
Canvas LMS is my main platform for course delivery across our Health Sciences programs, including nursing, pharmacy, medicine, and allied health. All content delivery, assignments, assessments, gra...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NEO LMS?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was easier, as we received our quote on time, and the pricing was not much of a hindrance, with setup costs based on our investment.
What needs improvement with NEO LMS?
One challenge I have experienced with CYPHER Learning is the availability of the internet, which is necessary for accessing the platform and content, especially during online training or video prog...
What advice do you have for others considering NEO LMS?
CYPHER Learning's governance and security are secure, as I have used it without any adverse effects or issues regarding data handling. The output of CYPHER Learning is clear, and since it is an AI-...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
MATRIX LMS, NEO LMS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Pragmatic Group, MRWED Training and Assessment, RedHill Education
Millions of users across business, academia, and entrepreneurs - worldwide.
Find out what your peers are saying about CYPHER Learning vs. Canvas LMS and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.