Check Point Infinity vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Trellix are both solutions in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.8, while Trellix is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.0. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 2.7% mindshare in ATP, compared to Trellix’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Check Point Infinity

Read 40 Check Point Infinity reviews

2,560 Views
1,126 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trellix Advanced Threat Def...

Read 9 Trellix Advanced Threat Defense reviews

776 Views
729 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Check Point Infinity

Trellix Advanced Threat Def...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Check Point Infinity and Trellix Advanced Threat Defense are competing security platforms in the cybersecurity category. Check Point Infinity leads in pricing and customer support satisfaction, while Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is seen as superior in feature offerings, justifying its higher cost.

Features: Check Point Infinity offers threat prevention capabilities, a unified security management platform, and real-time threat intelligence. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense provides advanced malware detection, dynamic threat analysis, and extensive integration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Check Point Infinity could benefit from enhanced feature offerings to compete with Trellix's advanced technical capabilities. Expanding integration options and malware detection features may also enhance Check Point's value. Trellix could improve its deployment simplicity and cost efficiency, making its solution more accessible to users with budget constraints.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point Infinity features straightforward deployment along with efficient support services. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense endorses a complex deployment model but balances it with responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point Infinity is notable for a lower setup cost and reasonable ROI, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense involves higher setup costs yet offers superior ROI through its advanced feature set. While Check Point emphasizes cost-efficiency, Trellix provides higher ROI potential.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Infinity vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Infinity vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Infinity

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

9th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (8th), AI Security (4th), AI Observability (5th)

Trellix Advanced Threat Def...

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

22nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Check Point Infinity is 2.7%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is 2.1%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point Infinity	2.7%
Trellix Advanced Threat Defense	2.1%
Other	95.2%

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

Chetan Bhati

Network Security Engineer at Arrow PC Network Pvt Ltd

Improves daily threat prevention with real-time detection and requires better alert tuning for faster prioritization

Check Point Infinity is powerful, but there are a few areas that could improve. The learning curve for new users can be steep, especially when managing multiple modules like CloudGuard, Quantum, and Harmony together. Some alerts can be overwhelming, making it harder to prioritize without fine-tuning. While automation helps, occasional manual adjustments are still needed. Overall, it is strong, but simplifying onboarding and alert management would make it even better. Integration with third-party tools could be smoother. The reporting dashboard could be more customizable for quick insights. Performance on very large networks can sometimes slow during updates. Overall, while the platform is strong, improving user experience, alert management, and integration would make it even more efficient for daily operations.

Read full review

Philippe Panardie

RSSI at SDIS49

Ensuring long-term reliability while seeking internal email management enhancements

Prisma is a commercial name of the firewall now, but we don't work with the cloud product. Only our company is using it and we do not recommend it to customers. For us, it's transparent because it's a cloud product, so we don't really know the version as it's always updated. We have not had any problem, but it's difficult to report on what's going on because some days they can wash out perhaps 100 mails, and then it's difficult to say how many attacks you have reached. The right email has been washed out and then nobody has complained. We do not use the Threat Visualization feature; as we are in MX, the mail is washed out before it is in the mail inbox of the user, thus avoiding any problem requiring a reservation. In fact, there is no integration with existing security frameworks. The only problem we can have is that as we have no API interface, there is no inspection of internal mail. I rate Trellix Advanced Threat Defense a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. Stability is always important. I haven't faced any issues with the Infinity Portal in the last six or seven years."

"The detection and reaction rates are good."

"The solution is very stable. I would estimate it's 99.9% stable, if not more."

"We have seen a faster response time and reduced effort from the network and security engineers while going through logs."

"One of the valuable aspects of Check Point Infinity is that I can use one unified portal for the administration of all these tools."

"Check Point Infinity has impacted my organization positively, as I have seen a reduction in security incidents and response times, with threats that used to slip through different point solutions now being blocked automatically thanks to the unified prevention layers."

"New Check Point technologies can be found via this portal."

"The Infinity portal combines all Check Point solutions in one place, including the endpoint, SASE, and the SMP."

More Check Point Infinity pros

"The most valuable features are the administration console and its detection and response module."

"It is stable and reliable."

"It is very scalable."

"Its greatest strength is the DXL client which can rapidly disseminate attack information to all clients via the McAfee Agent instead of going through the ePO server."

"It stops in excess of twenty-five malware events per month, all of which could be critical to the business."

"The fact that in 10 years, we have had no problem is the most valuable feature for us; it's really a washing machine, but the only problem we face is that it's difficult to report on this product."

"I recommend this solution because of its ease of use."

"The features I find most valuable are: the management, the ability for automatic remediation of threats and it can successfully detect a threat, and to act upon it."

More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense pros

Cons

"Something that should be better in Check Point Infinity is the customization, though I don't have any specific suggestions at this time."

"The portal is provisioned in AWS. They should improve the cloud to make it faster."

"One area where Check Point Infinity could improve is in the reporting and analytics customization."

"The cost of maintaining and purchasing the security components is high."

"The improvements needed for Check Point Infinity include that the documentation is not intuitive, and we needed more pictures or steps to make it more intuitive for all people when deploying it for the first time."

"One of the main improvements that can be made is the latency in the portal."

"We'd like to see support for fiber connections."

"The updates could be less frequent."

More Check Point Infinity cons

"Make the ATD system a part of the whole product and take the whole thing onto the cloud. While it is there already, it is not to the same level as the on-premise version."

"The only problem we can have is that as we have no API interface, there is no inspection of internal mail."

"The support on their side is not readily available. It takes a while."

"Lacks remote capabilities not dependent on the internet."

"We'd like them to be better at dealing with script threats."

"There could be a tool that automatically updates all-new Microsoft IPs, which are available for free to connect to the client."

"The initial setup was industry standard complex. It takes awhile and has a lot of planning involved. It could be simplified with product redesign."

"This solution needs to be made "cloud ready"."

More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of Check Point Infinity could be better. There is a license needed to use the solution and we pay annually."

"Check Point should provide an enterprise-wide license where the organization should be provided free hand of using any license or services for an agreed period of time (EULA)."

"Choosing the correct set of licenses is essential because, without the additional software blade licenses, the Check Point gateways are just a stateful firewall."

"The solution's price is quite high, and the licensing model requires extra licenses for various features like SD-WAN."

"The flexibility in pricing is advantageous, and being a special partner allows for negotiating special rates based on the project requirements."

"The product has good pricing considering the features and a global approach."

"I rate the product's price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"When it comes to price, the paramount consideration is the strength of the security. If the security measures provided by the product, such as Check Point Infinity, are robust and meet our requirements, price becomes a secondary concern."

"The product is expensive, but it is better than the rest of them in the industry."

"Our licensing fees for this solution are approximately one million dollars per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Security Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Performing Arts

12%

University

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	40
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Infinity?

Check Point Infinity's threat prevention capabilities benefitted our organization.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Check Point Infinity?

Check Point Infinity could be improved with more intuitive documentation.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Check Point Infinity?

Check Point Infinity is used primarily for consolidating security across networks, including cloud and on-premise, and endpoints under one architecture. It is relied upon most for unified threat pr...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee Advanced Threat Defense?

I recommend this solution because of its ease of use.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee Advanced Threat Defense?

I would like to see an API interface for internal email and control of outgoing email to make it closer to 10. It's necessary; today we have an MX interface, and it would be interesting to have an ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for McAfee Advanced Threat Defense?

We are working with Palo Alto products, specifically firewalls. We are only using Palo Alto Firewalls and not Cortex. With FireEye and Trellix, we only work with ETP now because the NDR function wh...

See all answers

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Check Point Infinity

Compared 10% of the time

Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs Check Point Infinity

Compared 9% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point Infinity

Compared 8% of the time

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Check Point Infinity

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs Check Point Infinity

Compared 4% of the time

More Check Point Infinity Competitors

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 12% of the time

Digital Guardian vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Identity vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 8% of the time

Anomali vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 7% of the time

More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Infinity

March 2026

Download Check Point Infinity product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

February 2026

Download Trellix Advanced Threat Defense product report

Also Known As

R80, Infinity

McAfee Advanced Threat Defense

Overview

Check Point Infinity is the only fully consolidated cyber security architecture that provides unprecedented protection against Gen V mega-cyber attacks as well as future cyber threats across all networks, endpoint, cloud and mobile. The architecture is designed to resolve the complexities of growing connectivity and inefficient security. Learn more about Check Point Infinity

Check Point Software Technologies

Powerful advanced threat detection

Uncover Hidden Threats

Combine in-depth static code analysis, dynamic analysis (malware sandboxing), and machine learning to increase zero-day threat and ransomware detection.

Threat Intelligence Sharing

Immediately share threat intelligence across your entire infrastructure—including multi-vendor ecosystems—to reduce time from threat encounter to containment.

Enable Investigation

Validate threats and access critical indicators of compromise (IoCs) needed for investigation and threat hunting.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Edel AG

The Radicati Group, Florida International University, MGM Resorts International, County Durham andDarlington NHS Foundation Trust

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Infinity vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

March 2026

Free Report: Check Point Infinity vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Infinity vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point Infinity vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense report.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.