Cisco Container Platform [EOL] vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform comparison

Cisco and Red Hat are both solutions in the Container Management category. Additionally, 100% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Cisco Container Platform [EOL]

Read 1 Cisco Container Platform [EOL] review

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat OpenShift Container...

Read 52 Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform reviews

9,753 Views
9,655 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Cisco Container Platform [EOL]

Red Hat OpenShift Container...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Container Platform [EOL] and Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Kubernetes and others in Container Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Container Management Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Container Management

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,417 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Container Platform [EOL]

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat OpenShift Container...

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Management (1st)

Featured Reviews

Cole McKnight

Cloud Architect, Feltus Lab at Clemson University

Enables the deployment/management of Kubernetes clusters from multiple resource providers at one location

One thing I have not really had the chance to explore too much is the Cisco Container Platform command-line interface. I've been told that exists and it's functional, but I'm not sure if it's really made for end-users. It might just be for admins or developers. One thing that is a little bit annoying about Cisco Container Platform is that for each cluster you create you have to go through the same web form each time. If you're creating two identical clusters, you still have to go through that web form twice. What's really nice about most platforms is that they have command-line interfaces where you can just copy a single command which has all the flags with all the configurations you want and put that in a text file. Then, when you want to create another cluster you can just paste that in and edit one or two flags if you want to. You don't have to go through a web form every time and that is a feature that I would like to see in the future with CCP. It would be nice, at the end, once you create a cluster using the web form, if it would give you a single command that you could copy and put somewhere and then paste it, in the future, to create an identical cluster or an almost identical cluster. I would like the ability to save cluster configurations to CCP. I've provided that feedback to the development team. There might even be a version that is out which already has that functionality integrated into it. I think it's safe to say that at some point in the future that feature will be provided.

Read full review

Saleem Tamton

Open Shift Lead at Al Rajhi Bank

Seamless upgrades have protected business operations and support secure, flexible deployments

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform needs some improvements, for example, in upgrade time, as normally, an extended upgrade method should be allowed, but sometimes if anyone clicks twice, it tries to upgrade the second level and gets stuck, so that area should be enhanced. The strictness of the SSD and HDD also should be aligned, because in some environments, we cannot strictly make some rules related to HDD, since Red Hat is strictly making a rule after 4.16 to adopt SSD instead of HDD, which in some environments will not allow, so some workaround should be done on that. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is the best option, but as many companies and the world are mainly looking for security purposes, the clear text format needs to be adopted instead of any third party. Red Hat has to develop its own product, as HashiCorp and CyberArk Conjur exist, but Red Hat needs to protect the clear text format because the secret should not be seen by anyone. Currently, it is a clear text method allowing anyone in the namespace to see the username and password, which should be controlled in that way. The major improvements needed are related to upgrade time and strict rule-making.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is definitely the fact that you can use a single platform to deploy to different resource providers. Right now, the version I'm using has vSphere and AWS, but I know in the future they're planning on adding more. The ability to deploy clusters on-prem or to any number of public cloud providers is really valuable because you don't need to relearn or switch platforms to switch resource providers."

"The platform is easy to scale as it supports Windows worker node."

"The most valuable are security features, particularly when operating in the cloud."

"It is very lightweight and can be deployed very fast, especially when it comes to containers."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its scalability on demand, which allows for potentially lower costs, and Built-in resiliency."

"The operating system has a live update and is more secure than any other. It's made for Atomic OS, a lightweight OS new to the market. I also like the source-to-image capabilities. The customer can directly deploy their applications from the repository. It's a highly flexible and easy way to deploy into production."

"I find the security features and use of operators in OpenShift Container Platform highly valuable."

"The banking transactions, inquiries, and account opening have been the most valuable."

"For us, the fully automated upgrades are valuable. We have to maintain the clusters in production. For us, it is very important that it does not take too much time to manage all the clusters and do life cycle management and upgrades."

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform pros

Cons

"One thing that is a little bit annoying about Cisco Container Platform is that for each cluster you create you have to go through the same web form each time. If you're creating two identical clusters, you still have to go through that web form twice."

"The initial setup can be hard."

"The support costs are too high."

"OpenShift has a pretty steep learning curve. It's not an easy tool to use. It's not only OpenShift but Kubernetes itself. The good thing is that Red Hat provides specific targeted training. There are five or six pieces of training where you can get certifications. The licenses for OpenShift are pretty expensive, so they could be cheaper because the competition isn't sleeping, and Red Hat must take that into account."

"The product could benefit from additional operators and tools integrated with OpenShift."

"It has an option to install OpenShift without connecting it to the Internet. We tried this, but it was very hard. We couldn't manage to use that option. We wanted to use it offline for installations, updates, upgrades, etc., but we didn't find the offline installation and updates easy. This could be better."

"The solution needs to introduce open ID connect integration for role-based access control."

"The setup process is not great and could be better."

"It is difficult to deploy the OpenShift cluster in a bare-metal environment."

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Its price is a bit high because it's a premium product, but as long as the business is ready to pay for that, it's okay."

"The price is slightly on the higher side. It is something that can be worked on because most of the businesses now have margins."

"OpenShift Container Platform is highly-priced."

"The product is expensive."

"We have to pay for the license."

"It largely depends on how much money they earn from the application being deployed; you don't normally deploy an app just for the purpose of having it. You must constantly look into your revenue and how much you spend every container, minute, or hour of how much it is working."

"It depends on who you're talking to. For a large corporation, it is acceptable, other than the significant infrastructure requirements. For a small organization, it is in no way suitable, and we'd go for Amazon's container solution."

"The pricing is a bit more expensive than expected."

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,417 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	41

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which is better - OpenShift Container Platform or VMware Tanzu Mission Control?

Red Hat Openshift is ideal for organizations using microservices and cloud environments. I like that the platform is auto-scalable, which saves overhead time for developers. I think Openshift can b...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenShift Container Platform?

Regarding whether Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is expensive or if the price is reasonable for my customers, to me, the services it provides should incur some costs, but based on market feed...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenShift Container Platform?

See all answers

Comparisons

Kubernetes vs Cisco Container Platform [EOL]

Compared 31% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Cisco Container Platform [EOL]

Compared 29% of the time

More Cisco Container Platform [EOL] Competitors

Amazon EKS vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 56% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Kubernetes vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 5% of the time

HashiCorp Nomad vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Docker vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Container Management

June 2026

Download Cisco Container Platform [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

June 2026

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform report

Download Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform product report

Also Known As

Cisco CCP

No data available

Overview

Cisco Container Platform is a fully curated, lightweight container management platform for production grade environments, powered by Kubernetes, and delivered with Cisco enterprise-class support. It reduces the complexity of configuring, deploying, securing, scaling and managing containers via automation coupled with Cisco’s best practices for security and networking. Cisco Container Platform is built with an open architecture using open source components, so you're not locked in to any single vendor. It works across both on-premises and public cloud environments. And because it’s optimized with Cisco HyperFlex, this preconfigured, integrated solution sets up in minutes.

Cisco

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform enhances productivity with advanced security, scalability, and automation. It supports deployment across environments and is designed for cloud-native applications, making it popular for its role-based access control and efficient networking routes.

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform provides a user-friendly interface and integrated management capabilities that streamline operations. Its auto-scaling features and seamless environment deployment are complemented by robust security through policy-based governance and built-in pipeline management. Users benefit from its flexibility and efficiency when handling enterprise-level tasks. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in costs, documentation, and ease of use, citing a steep learning curve and challenges with installation and updates. Enhanced training and support are in demand, along with pricing considerations and refinement of user interfaces and deployment processes.

What are the key features of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform?

Advanced Security: Leverages policy-based governance for robust protection.
Scalability: Features auto-scaling to manage resources efficiently.
Automation: Integrated management capabilities enhance productivity.
Role-Based Access Control: Provides flexible user permissions for increased security.
Networking Routes: Facilitates efficient routing and communication.

What benefits and ROI should users expect from Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform?

Enhanced Productivity: Streamlines operations through integrated management and automation.
Cost Efficiency: Pay-as-you-go model supports scalable deployments.
Security Compliance: Ensures secure deployments across environments.
Flexibility: Supports transitions from monolithic to cloud-based architectures.

Organizations in banking, telecom, and finance utilize Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform to deploy applications and microservices efficiently. It assists in managing Kubernetes environments, enhancing DevOps workflows, and integrating robust CI/CD pipelines. The platform supports cloud-native transformations and compliance, ensuring security in deployments.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Clemson University

Edenor, BMW, Ford, Argentine Ministry of Health

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Kubernetes and others in Container Management. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,417 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.