Cisco FabricPath and Cisco Nexus compete in the enterprise networking category, with each offering unique strengths in scalability, integration, and network management. Cisco Nexus seems to have an upper hand due to its flexibility and high-performance features.
Features: Cisco FabricPath integrates well with existing infrastructures, emphasizing reliability and scalability, and simplifies multi-layer network management. Cisco Nexus is recognized for its modularity, providing flexibility, high-performance features, and seamless integration with Cisco's other networking solutions.
Room for Improvement: Cisco FabricPath could improve by enhancing documentation, reducing costs, and prioritizing better interoperability with other solutions. Cisco Nexus users desire improvements in documentation, pricing, and the addition of advanced automation features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco FabricPath offers versatile deployment in both on-premises and hybrid cloud scenarios, receiving positive feedback for its technical support. Cisco Nexus primarily supports on-premises deployment and benefits from reliable customer service, despite some regional support inconsistencies.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco FabricPath delivers strong ROI with cost efficiency in operational management, seen as justifying its expense. Cisco Nexus, while costly, provides value through advanced features and performance but has complex licensing structures that could benefit from improved pricing strategies.
Speeding up our response times and reducing errors and incidents with automation and available APIs.
Cisco provides excellent support.
Cisco FabricPath is stable.
Initially, the stability of Cisco Nexus, particularly with the ACI, was problematic due to unstable codes, requiring replacements.
Additionally, parts availability in these regions needs improvement to address hardware failure situations, such as the availability of parts like a power cable.
When I talk about data centers, which are critical infrastructure and centralized application hubs, the Nexus platforms should be highly stable.
While pricing is slightly on the higher side, the overall assessment, which includes cost and technical capabilities, often favors Cisco.
The price of Cisco Nexus is on the higher side due to the premium services Cisco offers.
Cisco is the best choice in terms of cost, quality, and post-procurement services.
The VPC feature of Cisco Nexus is great because it provides an active-active way of forwarding the traffic and avoids blocking any of the links.
We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
