ExtremeSwitching and Cisco Nexus compete in the networking solutions category, catering to businesses of various scales. Cisco Nexus appears to have the upper hand in terms of high-performance capabilities essential for data centers, albeit at a higher cost.
Features: ExtremeSwitching is valued for its ease of use, price-performance value, and scaling capabilities. Its deep packet inspection and unique protocols like ring topology and fabric technology are additional benefits. Conversely, Cisco Nexus is noted for its integration, high bandwidth, and virtual routing. The product is also appreciated for its robust performance and support for advanced technologies like VXLAN and ACI.
Room for Improvement: ExtremeSwitching could improve in training, resources, support availability, pricing, and documentation. Users also face complexity in its interface and desire better support for cellular technologies. Cisco Nexus users suggest easier licensing procedures, enhanced network function virtualization features, and reduced setup complexity. The high expense is another concern, with calls for cost-effective support and licensing models.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtremeSwitching is flexible with deployment options across on-premises, public, and hybrid clouds. While responsive, its customer service has scope for better training and technical support. Cisco Nexus predominantly operates on-premises with private cloud support. Though its technical support is regarded for expertise, users sometimes experience delays in urgent cases due to its complex deployment.
Pricing and ROI: ExtremeSwitching is considered a cost-effective alternative to Cisco with no licensing fees and reasonable hardware support costs, appealing to small and medium markets. Though well-priced, users express concerns over rising costs. Cisco Nexus commands a higher price due to its advanced features and durability. Licensing complexity can increase the overall cost, but it offers solid ROI, especially in large-scale deployments.
Speeding up our response times and reducing errors and incidents with automation and available APIs.
In the future, we can convince the customer to make use of 100G capability to suffice their requirement, but at the moment we are using 40G only.
The return on investment is high.
For us, we have a time advantage because we know the solution, and the technological refresh is easier.
Requiring improvement in the technical support provided to customers.
ExtremeSwitching is highly scalable, and I would rate it as nine out of ten.
Initially, the stability of Cisco Nexus, particularly with the ACI, was problematic due to unstable codes, requiring replacements.
The stability for ExtremeSwitching is excellent.
It might be pretty expensive for other companies.
The solution is on-premises and stable.
When I talk about data centers, which are critical infrastructure and centralized application hubs, the Nexus platforms should be highly stable.
ExtremeSwitching's software stability could be improved, as it sometimes crashes.
Because I am not a networking specialist, I do not know much about the things in detail.
All solutions are very expensive and not an economy solution.
The price of Cisco Nexus is on the higher side due to the premium services Cisco offers.
ExtremeSwitching is priced in the mid-range, not too expensive nor too cheap.
It has helped streamline network-related operations with its automation and API capabilities.
For us, we have a time advantage because we know the solution, and the technological refresh is easier.
I would recommend Cisco Nexus for large enterprises and the government sector, as they can afford it.
The most valuable feature of ExtremeSwitching is the Extreme Fabric, specifically the switching fabric.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco Nexus | 9.0% |
| ExtremeSwitching | 7.7% |
| Other | 83.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 17 |
| Large Enterprise | 82 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
