

ExtremeSwitching and Cisco Nexus are competitors in the network switching market. ExtremeSwitching has an edge in competitive pricing and flexibility, while Cisco Nexus is preferred for its robust features and stability.
Features:ExtremeSwitching offers valuable features such as ExtremeCloud IQ for cloud management, deep packet inspection for enhanced security, and ring topology protocols for improved reliability and performance. Cisco Nexus provides features like VPC support for seamless trunking and aggregation, VRF support for advanced routing and segmentation, and modularity for high flexibility in complex network environments.
Room for Improvement:ExtremeSwitching could improve by providing better training resources and simplifying the transition from other platforms. There are also concerns about hardware stability, pricing, and delivery times. Cisco Nexus could address concerns about its high price point and complex licensing structures, as well as improve system integration and user management tools.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:ExtremeSwitching is known for its ease of deployment across on-premises and hybrid cloud environments, though its training resources are limited. Customer service is generally positive but could benefit from faster response times. Cisco Nexus is appreciated for its comprehensive deployment support and robust technical assistance, which includes smart support for fast issue resolution.
Pricing and ROI:ExtremeSwitching offers competitive pricing, which is more affordable than Cisco, leading to a good return on investment with noticeable cost savings. Cisco Nexus, while more expensive, justifies its cost with extensive functionality and reliability, resulting in a slower return on investment due to higher initial expenses.
Speeding up our response times and reducing errors and incidents with automation and available APIs.
In the future, we can convince the customer to make use of 100G capability to suffice their requirement, but at the moment we are using 40G only.
The return on investment is high.
For us, we have a time advantage because we know the solution, and the technological refresh is easier.
I would rate the support of Cisco an eight out of ten.
Requiring improvement in the technical support provided to customers.
ExtremeSwitching is highly scalable, and I would rate it as nine out of ten.
Initially, the stability of Cisco Nexus, particularly with the ACI, was problematic due to unstable codes, requiring replacements.
The stability for ExtremeSwitching is excellent.
We have standard Equinix data centers with standard installations, but somehow the temperature is always maintained and there is no ducting, yet the ports and the SFPs heat up or become faulty.
It might be pretty expensive for other companies.
The solution is on-premises and stable.
ExtremeSwitching's software stability could be improved, as it sometimes crashes.
Because I am not a networking specialist, I do not know much about the things in detail.
All solutions are very expensive and not an economy solution.
The price of Cisco Nexus is on the higher side due to the premium services Cisco offers.
ExtremeSwitching is priced in the mid-range, not too expensive nor too cheap.
The VPC feature of Cisco Nexus is great because it provides an active-active way of forwarding the traffic and avoids blocking any of the links.
I encountered an issue where different models within the same series, the 95308 DC, do not support VPC between the EX series and FX3 series.
For us, we have a time advantage because we know the solution, and the technological refresh is easier.
The most valuable feature of ExtremeSwitching is the Extreme Fabric, specifically the switching fabric.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco Nexus | 8.7% |
| ExtremeSwitching | 8.3% |
| Other | 83.0% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 17 |
| Large Enterprise | 83 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.