


Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Netgate, Sophos and others in Firewalls.
Clients are now comfortable and not wasting productive hours on IT support.
The automation part is giving us a cost benefit and speed; we can react faster.
It's a very useful tool to mitigate and protect your enterprise.
There is always a return on investment because you find you invest heavily, but your environment is secure and then you are at rest; you do not need to panic.
The biggest return on investment when using Cisco Secure Firewall is that there's no waste in any infrastructure cost and licensing costs for us.
From my point of view, the biggest return on investment when using Cisco Secure Firewall is the single pane of glass, which is a huge plus for us.
Incident troubleshooting time reduced by 35 to 45 percent because Zscaler logs could be directly used instead of correlating multiple cloud and firewall logs.
We did not need additional staff for cloud traffic security, and audit prep became faster, which helped optimize overall cost.
We have definitely seen a return on investment with Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler, saving us money by at least 20 to 25%.
He explained that it required a command line configuration, as it couldn't be done through the graphical user interface.
I would rate their support for FortiGate a nine out of ten.
They offer very accurate solutions.
I have to provide many logs, yet problems remain unresolved, often requiring workarounds rather than solutions.
I have been working with them on firewalls, wireless, switching, and routing, and the support is the best.
They have expertise and provide solutions for the most difficult problems.
In more complex scenarios such as routing or policy tuning, support provided best practices and recommendations, which made the implementation smoother.
They were responsive whenever we had deployment or policy questions, and they helped ensure best practices.
We reached out to customer support three weeks back due to an issue where Zscaler got stuck, and they identified and solved the problem within 45 minutes, which is exceptional.
They scale up really well from smaller models like the FortiGate 40 and 50 to bigger sites with the FortiGate 100 for more throughput - up to enterprise datacenters.
The variation comes in terms of the interfaces and throughputs, but from a security perspective, you get the same benefit, irrespective of whether you have an entry-level unit or an enterprise.
We determine sizing based on multiple factors: number of users, available links, traffic types, server count, services in use, and whether services will be published.
When something happens in the device, the failover happens very quickly without any interruption.
Cisco Secure Cloud now allows us to potentially take the management functions of Cisco Secure Firewall, move it into the cloud, and integrate it with other Cisco security products, managing everything from one single pane.
I rate the scalability as a number 10.
As workloads grow, routing can be updated and traffic can be distributed across multiple connectors without major architecture changes.
The centralized policy scales with it, so we did not hit bottlenecks as we expanded.
Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler's scalability is definitely impressive, as it has handled growth and changes in our organization well.
We're experiencing 99.999% availability consistently.
I would rate the stability of Fortinet FortiGate a ten out of ten.
Currently, we are experiencing a general outage of one of the main internet service providers of the Dominican Republic, and we have not been impacted in our operations because with SD-WAN, we have another internet service provider and we are working with the second WAN connection without any disruption.
We have often encountered split-brain scenarios during failover processes and code upgrades, which have been persistent problems for us.
We work with a cluster with high availability, so if something goes wrong, we have it functioning.
Cisco Secure Firewall offers exceptional performance and stability.
There have not been any major downtime or critical issues.
We have run it in production for years and it is consistently reliable with no major downtime issues.
If I have put 10 GBPS of throughput on a firewall and I enable all of these features available, such as IPS or UTM functionalities, the throughput comes down to 1 GBPS.
By providing an integrated solution, users would have access to all features and functionalities within a single window, eliminating the need to navigate through multiple windows.
Investing in a solution that can accommodate such growth would be more cost-effective than repeatedly purchasing new hardware.
My ongoing complaint for the last six years has been the lack of CLI functionality, which hinders my ability to work on the firewall, alongside concerns regarding deployment time.
The GUI is useless for me and frustrates me to a very high degree, which led me to switch to the CLI for configuration.
Firewall as a Service can scale to a very large extent because it is a cloud-based offering that can scale up to a very large number, which is not a problem.
A key learning from this was that while Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler provides strong security control, proper policy tuning and understanding application behavior is critical for smooth deployment.
If I need to suggest an improvement, it would be to simplify the steep learning curve, as it can be complex for newcomers without prior experience.
Having deeper automation through auto-scaling based on workload changes could further reduce manual setup.
Secure SD-WAN is free of charge.
The most expensive part is the renewal of the license subscription.
Last year, I renewed the support for three years, which can sometimes be expensive but depends on the security benefits and how it helps us.
It's good to have them, however, it costs us a lot.
It's considered a premium, but people pay that price for Cisco.
There are a lot of in-place contracts for us that provide the benefit of discounts.
Overall, while pricing depends on the enterprise agreement, the solution delivers good value considering the visibility, control, and security it provides.
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler is definitely competitive.
Setup costs were mostly tied to initial deployment and policy design, but licensing was predictable based on the number of connectors and throughput.
The firewall, IPS, and VPN functions are the most valuable features.
FortiGate provides solid protection against viruses, malware, and other threats.
Within the same dashboard, you get to see the security profiles, the type of traffic that's passing through, the top applications that are being consumed, etc.
What stands out positively about Cisco is their training and support, which has effectively prepared engineers to work with their products.
This is very important to my organization, as we work extensively with security because we are a bank, so we can keep the data safe.
Cisco Secure Firewall allows me to safeguard Layer 7 or Layer 3 and manage the security rules with the business needs of my organization.
It also provides Layer 4 routed bypass for TCP, UDP, and ICMP traffic, enabling granular traffic control that streamlines our services working with Zscaler.
The most valuable features of Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler include centralized visibility and control.
One of the best features Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler offers is its agentless design for cloud workloads.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco Secure Firewall | 7.5% |
| Fortinet FortiGate | 17.2% |
| OPNsense | 9.6% |
| Other | 65.7% |
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler | 0.7% |
| Cisco Umbrella | 27.9% |
| Zscaler Internet Access | 27.3% |
| Other | 44.1% |



| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 366 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 135 |
| Large Enterprise | 192 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 186 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 129 |
| Large Enterprise | 231 |
Fortinet FortiGate is a versatile network security tool offering features like VPN, firewall, web filtering, intrusion prevention, and scalability. It is known for its performance and integration with other Fortinet products, making it a preferred choice for robust cybersecurity.
Fortinet FortiGate stands out as a comprehensive cybersecurity solution with strong performance and ease of configuration. It delivers unified threat management, integrating features such as dynamic routing, SD-WAN support, and centralized management. Despite its strengths, improvements in the web interface's stability, pricing structures, and reporting capabilities are needed. Users seek better integration with third-party tools and automation advancements to enhance the experience further. These enhancements, alongside improvements in bandwidth management and the reduction of licensing costs, are points of interest for users looking to capitalize on FortiGate's extensive capabilities.
What are Fortinet FortiGate's key features?Fortinet FortiGate is widely implemented across industries as a primary firewall system for securing internet gateways and safeguarding data centers. It supports businesses in achieving SD-WAN integration and enhances cybersecurity by providing essential features like antivirus, web filtering, and application control. Enterprises utilize FortiGate for securing remote connections and ensuring compliance with security standards, making it adaptable for different network sizes and industries.
Cisco Secure Firewall provides comprehensive network security with advanced features such as application visibility, URL filtering, and malware protection. It combines a user-friendly interface with robust VPN capabilities, making it a reliable choice for varying network environments and industry applications.
Cisco Secure Firewall offers exceptional protection with its integration into Cisco's broader ecosystem, ensuring enhanced threat detection and policy unification. Despite its complexity in command-line interfaces and management, Cisco Secure Firewall remains a potent tool for safeguarding data. It is widely adopted for edge security, VPN services, perimeter defense, and traffic segmentation, especially in hybrid settings. Essential sectors like banking and telecom benefit from its stable connectivity and centralized security management. Though there are challenges with costs and support for third-party APIs, the firewall's scalability and high availability provide comprehensive support for protecting network assets.
What are the key features of Cisco Secure Firewall?Cisco Secure Firewall is widely implemented across sectors like banking, education, ISPs, and telecoms. It fortifies data centers and network edge security, delivering strong protection for client access, hybrid environments, and intrusion prevention. In these industries, firewall solutions ensure secure connectivity and manage RTU traffic effectively, leveraging centralized management and integration with Cisco's security tools.
After launching the CSC Mux 4 or 8 from the AWS Marketplace using the CloudFormation template provided, the CSC Mux 4 or 8 will automatically select the best ZEN nodes, do the GRE tunnels and create the Location on your Zscaler console.Simple to install and not further management is required.All Zscaler ZIA functionalities are available, providing complete visibility of all Internet traffic.In addition to this, the CSC provides high availability changing the default route to Zscaler when configured as High Availability pair, and an easy way to manage direct bypasses to trusted sites using your public IP.When deployed as HA Pair, you can duplicate your Web Traffic to 8 or 16 Gbps to Zscaler (ZIA).
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.