No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Micro Focus Network Management Center [EOL] comparison

Cisco and OpenText are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Additionally, 88% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
Cisco Secure Network Analytics
Read 63 Cisco Secure Network Analytics reviews
  • 8,771 Views
  • 3,596 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Cisco Secure Network Analytics and Micro Focus Network Management Center [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, SolarWinds, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Network Monitoring Software Report (Updated: May 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Network Monitoring Software
May 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Secure Network Analytics
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
63
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (33rd), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (3rd), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (5th), Cisco Security Portfolio (7th)
Micro Focus Network Managem...
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Akash Das Barman - PeerSpot reviewer
Akash Das Barman
Cyber Security Trainee at DataSpace Academy
Network analytics has reduced investigation time and provides deeper visibility into lateral movement
Several features often look very promising during evaluation or implementation but end up being used only lightly in day-to-day operations. Advanced reporting and scheduled compliance reports look very attractive for audit and compliance teams at implementation time and can generate structured reports for visibility, risk posture, and traffic summaries. In practice, many teams do not rely on it heavily because SIEM tools or GRC platforms already handle reporting better. Built-in threat intelligence feeds represent another area where expectations do not always match usage. The platform includes threat intelligence-based detection and classifications. Initially, teams expect to depend on this heavily, but later SOC teams often prefer their own threat intelligence feeds or correlate intelligence inside SIEM instead. The built-in feeds are used but not as a primary detection source. Automated incident summaries and guided investigation views are designed to simplify triage by automatically grouping related activity into incidents. However, teams often move away from them due to various factors affecting adoption.
Read full review
it_user1040238 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user1040238
Project Manager at Fingerprint Consultancy
Monitors network devices, switches, and servers but the current dashboards need improvement
The only thing I can say needs improvement is in how they present the data to the end-users. End-users are looking for a dashboard with an attractive view. The current dashboards we have are sufficient for our needs, but not attractive for the business users at the upper management levels.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Stealthwatch doubled our threat detection rate, while halving our incident response time and the time it takes us to detect and remediate threats."
"I value the feature which enables me to detect devices talking to suspect IPs."
"It does change the way we troubleshoot and it is relatively easy to use once you learn it. I would recommend it to someone considering it."
"The analytics and threat detection capabilities of Cisco Stealthwatch are pretty good, it gives us good visibility of the information, and it is easy to use and to the point."
"The most valuable feature is its alerts and dashboard."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the way the net flow is being merged together in a single pane. That's been extremely useful for us, because can see what's going on with traffic in one single place."
"The amount of information that this product gives us for detecting threats is very valuable, and we don't have another product like this in our environment."
"This solution has improved my organization because when I have users who are having issues with patching slowness it gives me the ability to be able to proactively troubleshoot and determine what the issue is."
More Cisco Secure Network Analytics pros
"We manage about one thousand network devices in our data center, and now we have visibility on all these network devices through this tool, which gives me immediate alerts or notifications when some devices fail and helps us to identify the root cause and fix it as fast as possible to keep the operation running smoothly."
 

Cons

"Cisco Stealthwatch can improve by having bundled packages for popular add-ons. It would be a lot easier for people implementing it, have let's say a better way to use the product."
"The visualization could be improved, the GUI is not the best."
"I would like to see it better organized when I'm looking at it, so I would prefer it to be more clean and structured, making it easier to use."
"I think the interface is a little lacking. The interface seems like it just needs to be modernized. It's been the same interface now, ever since I've seen it probably four years ago."
"We've had problems with element licensing costs so scalability is a concern."
"I would like to see a hybrid solution that can work without being connected directly to the internet for those destinations."
"It's not great as a standalone solution."
"One thing I would like to see improved is if it could automatically be tied through ISE, instead of you having to manually get notifications and disable it yourself."
More Cisco Secure Network Analytics cons
"The only thing I can say needs improvement is in how they present the data to the end users. End users are looking for a dashboard with an attractive view. The current dashboards we have are sufficient for our needs, but not attractive for the business users at the upper management levels."
"The only thing I can say needs improvement is in how they present the data to the end-users."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Today, we are part of the big Cisco ELA, and it is a la carte. We can get orders for whatever we want. At the end of the day, we have to pay for it in one big expense, but that is fine. We are okay with that."
"We pay for support costs on a yearly basis."
"Licensing is done by flows per second, not including outside>in traffic."
"The solution is expensive. It costs several hundred thousand dollars per year (depending on how many flows you are collecting)."
"The licensing costs are outrageous."
"The yearly licensing cost is about $50,000."
"This is an expensive product. We have quit paying for support because we don't want to have to upgrade it and keep paying for it."
"Our fees are approximately $3,000 USD."
More Cisco Secure Network Analytics pricing and cost advice
"The price is reasonable for the services and different products we have.Compared to others, it's reasonable."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
Construction Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise52
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Stealthwatch?
Regarding cost, for the Bangladesh context, Cisco Secure Network Analytics is a little bit high-priced because we are a developing country, making it tough to manage affordable solutions. However, ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cisco Stealthwatch?
Several features often look very promising during evaluation or implementation but end up being used only lightly in day-to-day operations. Advanced reporting and scheduled compliance reports look ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Cisco Stealthwatch?
My main use case for Cisco Secure Network Analytics has been network visibility and anomaly-based threat detection within the enterprise environment. In security operations and VAPT-related activit...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics Logo
Darktrace vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics
Compared 7% of the time
Vectra AI vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics Logo
Vectra AI vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics
Compared 4% of the time
ThousandEyes vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics Logo
ThousandEyes vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics
Compared 3% of the time
Nmap vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics Logo
Nmap vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics
Compared 3% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics
Compared 3% of the time
More Cisco Secure Network Analytics Competitors
Alluvio AppResponse vs Micro Focus Network Management Center [EOL] Logo
Alluvio AppResponse vs Micro Focus Network Management Center [EOL]
Compared 42% of the time
More Micro Focus Network Management Center [EOL] Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cisco Secure Network Analytics
June 2026
Cisco Secure Network Analytics reportDownload Cisco Secure Network Analytics product report
Buyer's Guide
Network Monitoring Software
May 2026
Micro Focus Network Management Center [EOL] reportDownload Micro Focus Network Management Center [EOL] product report
 

Also Known As

Cisco Stealthwatch, Cisco Stealthwatch Enterprise, Lancope StealthWatch
Network Management Center, HPE Network Management Center
 

Overview

Cisco Secure Network Analytics enhances network security through integrated threat detection and detailed traffic visibility, optimizing performance with AI analytics and strong platform integrations.

Cisco Secure Network Analytics offers deep visibility into network traffic, with tools like network maps and server response times. Its AI-driven analytics help detect threats, focusing on east-west traffic. Integration with platforms such as pxGrid and ISE complements its capabilities. Reporting and telemetry help in identifying bandwidth issues, yet improvements are desired in AI for better data organization. Installation complexity and false positives present challenges, and managing network loads effectively is a recognized need.

What are the key features of Cisco Secure Network Analytics?
  • Deep Visibility: Provides comprehensive insights into network traffic and server behavior.
  • Network Maps: Enhances understanding of traffic flow and infrastructure layout.
  • AI Analytics: Uses AI for superior threat detection and anomaly recognition.
  • Integration: Compatible with platforms like pxGrid and ISE for enhanced security management.
  • Telemetry: Delivers detailed bandwidth usage and traffic analysis reports.
How does Cisco Secure Network Analytics provide value?
  • Enhanced Security: Elevates threat detection and response capabilities.
  • Traffic Insights: Identifies encrypted and anomalous network behaviors.
  • Compliance Support: Assists in meeting industry standards for data protection.
  • Endpoint Protection: Guards network endpoints against potential threats.

Industries such as banking, defense, and police rely on Cisco Secure Network Analytics for securing networks against threats. Its capability to provide insights into encrypted traffic and facilitate device auditing makes it a sought-after choice for those requiring extensive network visibility. Users appreciate its application for threat prevention and response in demanding sectors.

Cisco
Network Management Center is represented by automated network management solutions to reduce cost and overhead, and avoid unplanned network interruptions to deliver the availability and performance that your business demands.
OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Edge Web Hosting, Telenor Norway, Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana, Webster Financial Corporation, Westinghouse Electric, VMware, TIAA-CREF
Retegal, KMC Technologies, NEC Australia
Buyer's Guide
Network Monitoring Software
May 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, SolarWinds, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software. Updated: May 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.