Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cisco and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Cisco is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.5, while NETSCOUT is ranked #72. Cisco holds a 0.9% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Read 62 Cisco Secure Network Analytics reviews

10,379 Views
4,359 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Read 13 NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG reviews

2,735 Views
2,598 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Cisco Secure Network Analytics and NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG are competing in network security and monitoring. Cisco has an edge in pricing and support, while NETSCOUT offers more comprehensive features, appealing to those prioritizing advanced capabilities.

Features: Cisco Secure Network Analytics offers comprehensive threat detection, extensive network visibility, and effective anomaly detection. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG provides in-depth traffic analysis, real-time insights, and advanced network performance monitoring.

Room for Improvement: Cisco could enhance its advanced analytics and depth of traffic insights. Users may also suggest improvements in flexibility for diverse infrastructure needs. NETSCOUT may improve its user interface, reduce initial setup complexity, and provide more cost-effective options for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG offers a flexible deployment model and is supported by responsive customer service. Cisco Secure Network Analytics is known for straightforward setup and robust support, although some users find NETSCOUT's flexibility preferable despite its initially complex deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Secure Network Analytics is typically more affordable, offering a favorable ROI with lower setup costs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG, while costlier upfront, provides significant long-term benefits through its advanced capabilities, making it a choice for businesses focused on feature richness.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

31st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (5th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (6th), Cisco Security Portfolio (9th)

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

72nd

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Cisco Secure Network Analytics is 0.9%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Secure Network Analytics	0.9%
NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG	0.6%
Other	98.5%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Harun-Owr-Roshid

CEO at BRIGHT-i SYSTEMS LIMITED

Have streamlined network visibility and troubleshooting while seeing benefits from AI integration

In terms of improvements for Cisco Secure Network Analytics, from the implementation point of view, now that AI is in use, some other features need to be upgraded considering AI solutions. Proper management of the database is also important; it should be centralized for easier data collection from a single database. When precise manual analysis is needed, it's sometimes difficult, so having a centralized database will allow network admins to find actual scenarios more effectively, especially since some information may not be visible on the GUI. Cisco should upgrade their hardware part to run the database, because sometimes it cannot handle the load while all features are running in the network. The database management should indeed be centralized because while AI runs behind the systems, central management is essential. For example, in a network with 100 Cisco switches, a few routers, firewalls, and access points, all data generated should be preserved in a central database. This approach simplifies management and analysis for troubleshooting, as GUI interfaces may not always provide visible information. Centralizing the database will allow for better understanding of which information is preserved for each specific device.

Read full review

Michael Gideon Genita

Associate System Engineer at SMS Global Technologies, Inc.

Easy to set up with good documentation and helpful support

I'm using it for a customer The packet flow switch is the most valuable aspect of the solution. It's an easy product to set up. We can scale the solution if we need to. It's stable. The documentation is well-written and quite useful. It's compatible with other products. Under the pocket flow…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is integration."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the way the net flow is being merged together in a single pane. That's been extremely useful for us, because can see what's going on with traffic in one single place."

"The solution allowed us to not only get gain insight but also start collaborating with other tools."

"AI provides suggested common lines and protection features that help safeguard networks from various threats or unwanted situations."

"The solution has reduced our incident response times by at least 50% and also reduced the amount of time it takes to detect and remediate threats by around 50%."

"The solution reduces the amount of time it takes to detect and remediate threats."

"Most of the engineers I've worked with have been really good. Very knowledgeable and easy to work with."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is data hoarding because it catches threats on a frequent basis that we had no idea of."

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics pros

"From a troubleshooting perspective, it allows us to quickly search all data TAP points in the network and helps our network engineers get to root cause quickly."

"The most valuable feature is utilization."

"The packet flow switch is the most valuable aspect of the solution."

"It helps us to assist our customers to isolate problems. If it is us who is having the problem, then we can use it to streamline the process."

"The real-time troubleshooting and application segregation that you can do within it."

"The solution has helped to increase application and network uptime, reduced our mean time to repair significantly for application and network issues, and cut our overall troubleshooting time from an hour down to five minutes."

"It has cut our group's troubleshooting time down significantly, e.g., depending on the issue, what would normally take maybe a couple of hours will now take minutes."

"The tool has the ability to look back within a month's data. It is very easy to navigate within the tool and troubleshoot the problem, compared to other solutions that we've used in the past."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG pros

Cons

"I'm not really sure it gives us a true picture."

"This is an expensive product. We have quit paying for support because we don't want to have to upgrade it and keep paying for it."

"I would like to see more and cleaner reporting. For example, if I pull up Steven and I want to look and maybe compare him to what you've done in the past week, and compare that to the past six months, the point would be to see what the difference in activity looks like over this time. I don't see that capability in reporting to date. You see that trend but you don't really see a straightforward comparison. That right there is key to what we want to see about the normal activity."

"Stealthwatch needs improvement when it comes to speed."

"The interface is sluggish and not updated."

"The usability of this solution needs to be improved."

"Stealthwatch is still maturing in AI. It uses artificial intelligence for predictions, but AI still needs to mature. It is in a phase where you get 95% correct detection. As its AI engine learns more, it will become more accurate. This is applicable to all the devices that are using AI because they support both supervised and unsupervised machine learning. The accuracy in the case of supervised machine learning is dependent on the data you feed into the box. The accuracy in the case of unsupervised machine learning is dependent on the algorithm. The algorithm matures depending on retrospective learning, and this is how it is able to detect zero-day attacks."

"The initial setup of this solution is complex."

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics cons

"The stability depends on who is using the tool, because you only can get as much out of the tool as you put into it. There are a lot of patches for this particular environment, so you have to keep on them. If you lose track of them, then the product is not useful anymore."

"I would like to see an improved level of stitching between IPs."

"The scalability has some limitations and quirks to it. I would like to be able to upgrade rather than replace the whole thing."

"Being able to manage the packet flow switches in nGeniusONE would be great."

"We don't use the single pane of glass view, even though we own it."

"The NetFlow Collectors could handle more flows per minute."

"I'd like them to make the product more user-friendly."

"There is a timeout feature that we have been asking for awhile."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is done by flows per second, not including outside (in traffic)."

"One of the things which bugs me about Lancope is the licensing. We understand how licensing works. Our problem is when we bought and purchased most of these Lancope devices, we did so with our sister company. Somewhere within the purchase and distribution, licensing got mixed up. That is all on Cisco, and it is their responsibility. They allotted some of our sister company's equipment to us, and some of our equipment to them. To date, they have never been able to fix it."

"We pay for support costs on a yearly basis."

"Our fees are approximately $3,000 USD."

"The yearly licensing cost is about $50,000."

"Licensing is done by flows per second, not including outside>in traffic."

"Pricing is much higher compared to other solutions."

"Licensing is on a yearly basis."

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics pricing and cost advice

"The price is a little high."

"I would like it to be more scalable with less spend."

"To capture more with the solution that we bought, you have to buy another InfiniStreamNG, and there are only four ports in the back."

"It can be scalable. It just costs too much. With a company as big as ours, it gets too expensive to accommodate every single site."

"This product could be cheaper."

"The scalability is good, but it comes at a cost. E.g., if you need 100 InfiniStream because you are sending gigs or terabytes of data to one InfiniStream, then you will have to purchase another InfiniStream, which are not cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	52

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Stealthwatch?

Regarding cost, for the Bangladesh context, Cisco Secure Network Analytics is a little bit high-priced because we are a developing country, making it tough to manage affordable solutions. However, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Stealthwatch?

Several features often look very promising during evaluation or implementation but end up being used only lightly in day-to-day operations. Advanced reporting and scheduled compliance reports look ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Stealthwatch?

My main use case for Cisco Secure Network Analytics has been network visibility and anomaly-based threat detection within the enterprise environment. In security operations and VAPT-related activit...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 7% of the time

Vectra AI vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 4% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 3% of the time

NetWitness Platform vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 3% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 2% of the time

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics Competitors

Riverbed NPM+ vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 9% of the time

NETSCOUT vSTREAM vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 8% of the time

NIKSUN NetVCR vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 6% of the time

Flowmon vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 6% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 5% of the time

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

September 2026

Download Cisco Secure Network Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

September 2026

Download NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG product report

Also Known As

Cisco Stealthwatch, Cisco Stealthwatch Enterprise, Lancope StealthWatch

InfiniStreamNG, NETSCOUT ISNG, Infinistream

Overview

Cisco Secure Network Analytics enhances network security through integrated threat detection and detailed traffic visibility, optimizing performance with AI analytics and strong platform integrations.

Cisco Secure Network Analytics offers deep visibility into network traffic, with tools like network maps and server response times. Its AI-driven analytics help detect threats, focusing on east-west traffic. Integration with platforms such as pxGrid and ISE complements its capabilities. Reporting and telemetry help in identifying bandwidth issues, yet improvements are desired in AI for better data organization. Installation complexity and false positives present challenges, and managing network loads effectively is a recognized need.

What are the key features of Cisco Secure Network Analytics?

Deep Visibility: Provides comprehensive insights into network traffic and server behavior.
Network Maps: Enhances understanding of traffic flow and infrastructure layout.
AI Analytics: Uses AI for superior threat detection and anomaly recognition.
Integration: Compatible with platforms like pxGrid and ISE for enhanced security management.
Telemetry: Delivers detailed bandwidth usage and traffic analysis reports.

How does Cisco Secure Network Analytics provide value?

Enhanced Security: Elevates threat detection and response capabilities.
Traffic Insights: Identifies encrypted and anomalous network behaviors.
Compliance Support: Assists in meeting industry standards for data protection.
Endpoint Protection: Guards network endpoints against potential threats.

Industries such as banking, defense, and police rely on Cisco Secure Network Analytics for securing networks against threats. Its capability to provide insights into encrypted traffic and facilitate device auditing makes it a sought-after choice for those requiring extensive network visibility. Users appreciate its application for threat prevention and response in demanding sectors.

Cisco

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG delivers fast, cost-efficient network visibility with a single pane of glass view, featuring real-time traffic analysis, dependency mapping, and performance metrics for comprehensive management.

InfiniStreamNG stands out for its real-time insights into network activity, providing a unified platform for managing network components. Its deep packet inspection, scalability, and compatibility make it an essential tool for IT professionals looking to optimize network performance and resolve issues quickly. User-friendly interface enhancements are anticipated for improved usability, alongside early product lifecycle notifications due to extensive certification periods.

What are the key features of NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG?

Speed: Enhances real-time traffic analysis and performance monitoring.
Network Visibility: Provides a comprehensive view with single pane device management.
Packet Inspection: Supports deep packet inspections for detailed data analytics.
Stability and Scalability: Ensures reliable performance and adapts to varying network sizes.
Compatibility: Seamlessly integrates with other technologies for smooth operations.

What are the benefits and ROI of using NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG?

Quick Issue Resolution: Identifies and addresses network issues swiftly.
Efficient Utilization: Offers insights for optimizing resource use and network management.
Proactive Monitoring: Facilitates early detection of potential issues to maintain performance.
Application Performance Tracking: Monitors app connectivity and performance effectively.
KPI Evaluation: Provides comprehensive data for informed decision-making.

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG is implemented across industries for packet collection and analysis, serving network monitoring and troubleshooting needs. Companies in telecommunications monitor LTE roaming traffic, while financial institutions rely on it for analyzing banking data. It supports application connectivity checks and proactive remote site monitoring, becoming integral in evaluating KPIs and reporting network issues.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Edge Web Hosting, Telenor Norway, Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana, Webster Financial Corporation, Westinghouse Electric, VMware, TIAA-CREF

U.S. Department of Defense

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

September 2026

Free Report: Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.