Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] vs FatPipe WAN Optimization comparison

Citrix and FatPipe Networks are both solutions in the WAN Optimization category. Additionally, 90% of Citrix users are willing to recommend the solution.
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
Read 22 Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reviews
    90% willing to recommend
    FatPipe WAN Optimization
    • 111 Views
    • 111 Comparison Views
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 12, 2025

    Citrix SD-WAN and FatPipe WAN Optimization compete in the WAN optimization market. Citrix offers better integration capabilities, while FatPipe is preferred for optimization features.

    Features: Citrix SD-WAN includes intelligent path control, application acceleration, and seamless integration with Citrix products, making it suitable for complex environments. FatPipe WAN Optimization prioritizes advanced load balancing, failover technology, and network resilience.

    Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Citrix SD-WAN provides a straightforward deployment process with strong customer support, which assists organizations using other Citrix solutions. FatPipe has a more complex deployment due to its comprehensive features, but it is supported by a responsive service team.

    Pricing and ROI: Citrix SD-WAN involves a moderate setup cost with solid ROI, appealing to Citrix users. FatPipe requires a higher initial investment, offset by enhanced long-term ROI through better network performance and reduced downtimes.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed WAN Optimization Report (Updated: December 2025).
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    December 2025
    Download the complete report
    Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.2
    Reviews Sentiment
    7.4
    Number of Reviews
    22
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
    FatPipe WAN Optimization
    Average Rating
    0.0
    Number of Reviews
    0
    Ranking in other categories
    WAN Optimization (10th)
     

    Featured Reviews

    Rohit Ghorpade - PeerSpot reviewer
    Rohit Ghorpade
    Cloud network engineer at Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd.
    A scalable solution for MCN controller but lacks technical supports, upgrades
    There are a few things that can be improved, are domain-based routing and the slowness of virtual parts, and it may be due to the wrong configuration, which we have been unable to find out. Previously, we faced some issues with the slowness part. Apart from that, feature like end gateway level antivirus. We are currently using a NetFlow proxy to establish a virtual position for the NetFlow. Our current environment has many use cases, but we are not using them on the Citrix SD-WAN. When I navigate the NCL part, it involves configuration. I want to highlight this disadvantage. Sometimes, when we push the configuration, it tries to push it to all branch locations. This process takes a lot of time, nearly 30 minutes, to push a single change from the NCL. Overall, I don't think Citrix meets our use cases what we have. This is based on my feedback after using it for the past year and working on this Citrix SD-WAN. However, from my experience, it is the worst solution I have seen. There's no domain-based routing, which is horrible. That's why we are moving to other products. We have checked our use case requirements with Fortinet, Palo Alto, and they meet them. I will consider the PoC or another OEM. There are many things in the area you need to be prompt, like the automation part. If any link or device goes down, alerting notification, etc. We need to perform and highlight so many things to your management. This should be improved.
    Read full review
    Use FatPipe WAN Optimization?
    Leave a review
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which WAN Optimization solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Computer Software Company
    12%
    Government
    8%
    Educational Organization
    8%
    Manufacturing Company
    8%
    No data available
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business7
    Midsize Enterprise5
    Large Enterprise10
    No data available
     

    Questions from the Community

    What needs improvement with Citrix SD-WAN?
    The solution's licensing model could be improved. Citrix SD-WAN is a good product from a technical point of view. However, when you compare its licensing with the prices of competitors, you will se...
    See all answers
    What advice do you have for others considering Citrix SD-WAN?
    If a customer already has Citrix NetScaler and is not looking to change anything in their existing environment, we proceed with Citrix SD-WAN. However, if a customer is looking for a change because...
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 22% of the time
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 13% of the time
    Prisma SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Prisma SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 12% of the time
    VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 11% of the time
    Talari vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Talari vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 9% of the time
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Competitors
    Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform vs FatPipe WAN Optimization Logo
    Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform vs FatPipe WAN Optimization
    Compared 50% of the time
    Steelhead vs FatPipe WAN Optimization Logo
    Steelhead vs FatPipe WAN Optimization
    Compared 50% of the time
    More FatPipe WAN Optimization Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    January 2026
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reportDownload Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] product report
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    December 2025
    FatPipe WAN Optimization reportDownload FatPipe WAN Optimization product report
     

    Also Known As

    Citrix CloudBridge, WOC, NetScaler SD-WAN
    No data available
     

    Overview

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] enhances connectivity and performance by optimizing bandwidth utilization, ensuring reliable communication across branch offices and headquarter data centers. It offers centralized management, efficient deployment options, and improved network reliability.

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] is designed for businesses seeking enhanced connectivity solutions that boost application performance while reducing costs. With HDX WAN Optimization and reliable Active-Active connectivity, it assures improved bandwidth management. Tailored for both cloud and on-premise deployments, it supports fast communication and seamless integration, making it user-friendly even for those with limited technical expertise. Security features and zero-touch deployments further enhance its appeal. However, users highlight areas needing improvement, such as configuration intuitiveness, pricing alignment for specific markets, and stability. Enhanced reporting, networking features, and technical support are desired. Integration with Windows, security elements like firewalls, and licensing clarity require attention to meet user expectations.

    What are the key features of Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]?
    • HDX WAN Optimization: Enhances application performance and traffic.
    • Load Balancing: Ensures efficient traffic distribution across networks.
    • Reliable Connectivity: Provides seamless failover and reduced costs through MPLS replacement.
    • Cloud Management: Simplifies deployment and management via the cloud.
    • Zero-Touch Deployment: Facilitates easy setup and provisioning.
    • Active-Active Lines: Optimizes bandwidth utilization and performance.
    • Backup Capabilities: Centralizes data management for security.
    What benefits should users look for in Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]?
    • Enhanced Connectivity: Improves stability and reduces downtime.
    • Cost Reduction: Efficiently decreases expenses by replacing MPLS.
    • Network Optimization: Offers better bandwidth for diverse communication types.
    • Secure Interconnectivity: Ensures secure and reliable network connections.
    • Management Flexibility: Supports cloud or on-premise deployment options.

    Industries benefit from Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] by leveraging its features to ensure stable, redundant connectivity between branches and data centers. Organizations experiencing frequent line failures or high reliance on bandwidth-heavy applications find it particularly useful. It caters to sectors needing reliable data management and enhanced networking.

    Citrix

    With FatPipe WAN Optimization, you can measurably increase productivity levels as it reduces response time for interactive applications, helps speed-up large data transfers between your headquarters, branches and data storage and/or disaster recovery sites, thereby increasing speed of data transfer between sites.

    FatPipe Networks
     

    Sample Customers

    AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Cornerstone Home Lending Inc., Dallara, ecVision, Essar, Eurofred, Groupe Promutuel, HMSHost Corporation, Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines Ltd, Royal Caribbean International
    Information Not Available
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    December 2025
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cato Networks, Riverbed, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: December 2025.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.

    We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.