Citus Data vs MySQL comparison

Citus Data and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Citus Data is ranked #25, while Oracle is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2. Citus Data holds a 2.6% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 6.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Citus Data users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Citus Data

Read 3 Citus Data reviews

1,344 Views
1,250 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MySQL

Read 152 MySQL reviews

8,332 Views
3,833 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Citus Data

MySQL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

MySQL and Citus Data compete in the database category. MySQL has the upper hand with its pricing and support advantages, while Citus Data excels in scalability and distributed features.

Features: MySQL is a robust relational database management system with ACID compliance, various storage engine support, and strong transactional capabilities. Citus Data specializes in sharding for horizontal scalability and real-time analytics. Its distributed architecture allows for efficient handling of large datasets.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MySQL offers straightforward deployment complemented by comprehensive documentation and community support, facilitating integration with various systems. Citus Data, as a PostgreSQL extension, requires additional configuration for its distributed capabilities but provides targeted support for scaling databases across multiple nodes.

Pricing and ROI: MySQL typically has a lower entry cost with community and enterprise editions, offering a favorable ROI for smaller to medium-scale applications. Citus Data may involve higher initial setup costs due to its PostgreSQL integration and additional configuration needs. However, it promises significant ROI for organizations requiring robust distribution and real-time data processing.

To learn more, read our detailed Citus Data vs. MySQL Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Citus Data vs. MySQL

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Citus Data

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MySQL

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

152

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Citus Data is 2.6%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MySQL is 6.1%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MySQL	6.1%
Citus Data	2.6%
Other	91.3%

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Arucy Lionel

Co-Founder at Afriziki

Efficiently handles high-traffic scenarios and compatible with PostgreSQL extensions, offering flexibility in database management

There are many areas of improvement , especially in terms of DDL query routing. Even though it's masterless, DDL queries need to be sent to the coordinator node. Also, setting up a multi-node environment could be more straightforward. Currently, setting up a multi-node environment is challenging. It's a bit tricky. Installation on each PostgreSQL node can lead to communication issues between nodes. An automatic rebalancing feature would be a significant improvement. Currently, I have to manually command the rebalance. It would be more convenient if it was rebalanced automatically. The dashboard and monitoring capabilities are good, but it would be helpful to have an integrated availability dashboard.

Read full review

Prabir Kumar Kundu

SR AVP–Presales Cloud & Platform Management Services at Path Infotech ltd

Offers robust security and availability with impressive replication capabilities

Regarding their documentation and interface, there is room for improvement. Documentation is definitely required when running multiple databases on a cluster system. The load balancer, MySQL LB, which is used to connect to the application, lacks clear documentation. When there are multiple application servers connecting to the MySQL cluster and going through the MySQL load balancer, the documentation is not user-friendly. It's there, but only technical persons with deep knowledge of the MySQL database can implement it. Most of the community users or ISVs who use MySQL don't have many technical persons or DBA experts, so they face some challenges for the high availability of connecting high available databases from high available applications. That documentation should be simplified.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its distributed processing capabilities are a standout feature. It requires minimal changes to get up and running if you already have a system on PostgreSQL. Citus can run in its natural state."

"You can use Citus Data to write complex scripts. I like its version upgrades and disaster recovery as well."

"It's very straightforward to implement the solution. It took us two days to set up everything."

"MySQL has cross-platform support for multiple operating systems. The backups on a Linux machine can be restored on a Windows machine, and vice versa."

"The solution is easy to use."

"The fact that it is free is what appeals to me the most."

"MySQL is a light database. It's not very complex. It's easy to develop, easy to maintain, and easy to back up and restore."

"The solution is a small application and is very easy to deploy."

"The solution is easy to use."

"The tool is open-source and there is no cost involved in its use."

"MySQL gives us a very user-friendly workspace in which to query the database."

More MySQL pros

Cons

"More features in monitoring and the reporting could make it better."

"There are many areas of improvement , especially in terms of DDL query routing. Even though it's masterless, DDL queries need to be sent to the coordinator node. Also, setting up a multi-node environment could be more straightforward."

"Citus Data needs to improve its stability. Do not consider this product if you have the budget. It is still developing and has a lot of issues."

"Since we upgraded from 8.0.12 to 8.0.22, it has had some slowness-related issues. Some of the queries that were fast previously are quite slow now. I did some research, and I found many people complaining about it."

"It should have some code analytical functions. It can also have a monitoring tool."

"Stability needs improvement and the backup needs to be enhanced."

"In terms of what I'd like to see in the next release, one thing that's always missing is dash boarding. There's no real BI tool for MySQL, like there is in Yellowfin and all the different tools that you get. They all have MySQL connectors, but there's no specific BI tool for MySQL. These open source projects have sprung up, but they're more general purpose."

"The tool needs to improve table visualization."

"The full-text search feature must be improved."

"I did the implementation of the solution myself and I used community support. The support from the vendor costs money."

"As an open-source product, there isn't really any technical support available if you get into trouble or have issues."

More MySQL cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Citus Data is an open-source product."

"I don't pay for a license."

"We are using the free community edition of MySQL."

"MySQL is a cheap solution."

"The pricing is not much expensive, it's cheap."

"I rate the solution's pricing as four out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. For our basic needs, it's quite affordable. However, the cost increases when we need to scale up or require high availability. Our developer team of about 600 people uses MySQL without much issue. The pricing becomes more of a concern on the business side, as we have more end users and need constant database availability and scaling. In those cases, the solution gets a bit more expensive, even though it provides good value for the business."

"It has a community version."

"MySQL Enterprise Support is not cheap, though might still be cheaper than Oracle or SQL Server. They may not have local support depending on where you’re based, but there are many smaller agencies out there that will readily provide support. You’ll need to spend some time looking around."

"This is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."

More MySQL pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Consumer Goods Company

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	74
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	62

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?

MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...

See all answers

Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?

I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...

See all answers

What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?

One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...

See all answers

Comparisons

CockroachDB vs Citus Data

Compared 21% of the time

Neon vs Citus Data

Compared 14% of the time

YugabyteDB vs Citus Data

Compared 14% of the time

SQL Server vs Citus Data

Compared 9% of the time

MariaDB vs Citus Data

Compared 3% of the time

More Citus Data Competitors

Firebird SQL vs MySQL

Compared 23% of the time

PostgreSQL vs MySQL

Compared 11% of the time

MariaDB vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

SQL Server vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

SAP HANA vs MySQL

Compared 5% of the time

More MySQL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

January 2026

Download Citus Data product report

Buyer's Guide

MySQL

January 2026

Download MySQL product report

Overview

Citus is a distributed database that extends PostgreSQL, allowing you to continue using all the powerful Postgres features while still scaling.

Whether you're running into a ceiling on a single node, or need more performance for real-time analytical queries Citus can help.

Citus Data

MySQL is an open-source database known for its ease of use and high performance. It offers features like replication and clustering, making it ideal for diverse applications. Its cost-effectiveness and LAMP integration are key advantages for businesses.

MySQL supports a variety of languages and platforms, providing reliable, scalable data management. Its graphical interface and LAMP architecture integration enhance its usability, while community support further strengthens its appeal. Challenges include scalability issues with large databases, lack of advanced clustering, and limited high-availability features. Complex queries may affect performance, and integration can pose difficulties. The outdated interface and insufficient documentation are also concerns, along with replication and backup reliability issues.

What are MySQL's key features?

Open-source nature: Freely available and customizable.
Cross-platform compatibility: Supports multiple operating systems.
Scalability: Capable of handling large volumes of data.
Replication and clustering: Ensure data redundancy and load balancing.
Full-text search: Provides powerful search capabilities.
LAMP integration: Seamlessly integrates with Linux, Apache, and PHP.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost-effectiveness: Reduces expenses due to its open-source nature.
High performance: Efficiently processes large volumes of data.
Active community support: Access to a wide range of resources and expertise.
Versatile use cases: Suitable for varied applications including web development and IoT.

MySQL is widely implemented in industries such as web development, e-commerce, and finance. It's used for managing dynamic websites, powering e-commerce platforms, and supporting financial applications. Its compatibility with PHP and cost-effectiveness make it suitable for CMS platforms like WordPress. With cloud services integration, MySQL is a backend choice for scalable applications in various sectors.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Cloud Flare, Agari, Mix Rank, Heap

Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.

Buyer's Guide

Citus Data vs. MySQL

December 2025

Free Report: Citus Data vs. MySQL

Find out what your peers are saying about Citus Data vs. MySQL and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Citus Data vs. MySQL report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.