MySQL vs PostgreSQL comparison

Read 125 PostgreSQL reviews

7,165 Views
6,305 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

MySQL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

PostgreSQL and MySQL compete in the open-source database management system category. PostgreSQL appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced feature set and strong performance under high workloads.

Features: PostgreSQL offers comprehensive SQL compliance, advanced data types like JSONB, and support for complex queries and operations. It is recognized for superior scalability and extensibility. On the other hand, MySQL focuses on speed and compatibility, making it well-suited for small to medium-sized applications. It supports multi-threaded architecture, LAMP/WAMP integration, and provides excellent performance and stability in various environments.

Room for Improvement: PostgreSQL could benefit from improved documentation and support, as well as enhancements in multi-master replication and partitioning features. MySQL, while easy to use, faces challenges with scalability and lacks advanced analytical capabilities compared to enterprise solutions. It also needs to enhance support for complex data operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both PostgreSQL and MySQL are widely deployed across on-premises and cloud environments. PostgreSQL boasts a strong open-source community that offers extensive support, whereas MySQL, also backed by community forums, is noted for its ease of deployment. However, both lack centralized official support and primarily rely on community or third-party assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Both PostgreSQL and MySQL are open-source, minimizing software costs. PostgreSQL's rich features offer significant ROI for enterprises requiring advanced database functionalities, despite potentially higher personnel costs. MySQL, distributed under GPL, provides rapid ROI with lower overhead, appealing particularly to budget-constrained projects needing simple database solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed MySQL vs. PostgreSQL Report (Updated: December 2025).

Download the complete report

MySQL vs. PostgreSQL

December 2025

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MySQL

Ranking in Open Source Databases

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

152

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (4th)

PostgreSQL

Ranking in Open Source Databases

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

125

Ranking in other categories

Vector Databases (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of MySQL is 9.0%, down from 12.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PostgreSQL is 14.7%, down from 18.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Open Source Databases Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MySQL	9.0%
PostgreSQL	14.7%
Other	76.3%

Open Source Databases

Featured Reviews

Prabir Kumar Kundu

SR AVP–Presales Cloud & Platform Management Services at Path Infotech ltd

Offers robust security and availability with impressive replication capabilities

Regarding their documentation and interface, there is room for improvement. Documentation is definitely required when running multiple databases on a cluster system. The load balancer, MySQL LB, which is used to connect to the application, lacks clear documentation. When there are multiple application servers connecting to the MySQL cluster and going through the MySQL load balancer, the documentation is not user-friendly. It's there, but only technical persons with deep knowledge of the MySQL database can implement it. Most of the community users or ISVs who use MySQL don't have many technical persons or DBA experts, so they face some challenges for the high availability of connecting high available databases from high available applications. That documentation should be simplified.

Read full review

Akhilesh Chipre

Senior Assosiate Consultant at Applied Materials

Real-time data capture optimizes database performance but Views create problems

One of the most valuable features is real-time data capture; it optimizes database performance. I think using real-time data capture reduces job running time and the amount of data sent at once with batch loads. Replicating the same data daily isn't optimal, so real-time reception improves application performance and reduces latency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ML modules in MySQL are advantageous since they make data handling easy and quick at MNQM."

"The initial setup was easy. I work in an agile way, which means coding and deploying quickly."

"This product is a good teaching tool for students who want to learn about networked databases."

"The solution is free to use, which is its most valuable aspect."

"The initial setup was pretty straightforward. I would have worked with our IT team in terms of the initial setup."

"However, it is easy to scale MySQL using the functions provided with the product."

"The solution is easy to use."

"We use MySQL for enterprise data storage as well as part of the back-end of websites and web applications."

More MySQL pros

"The solution provides complete support in terms of the SQL dialect and behaves nicely when it comes to transactions."

"PostgreSQL is stable. It's available, stable, and reliable."

"The performance is good."

"It has completely met our needs. It works, and it is robust. We haven't had any problems with what PostgreSQL does for us and the way it does it. That's why we've been using it for so long. We understand it, and it does the job."

"PostgreSQL is very powerful, easy to manage, and has many features."

"It is very simple to manage."

"The built-in code procedural language is the most valuable. It has a built-in layer for code procedures. Its installation is very easy and quick, and it is free. It is also stable, and its performance is also good."

"What I like is that it's quite powerful in terms of performance."

Cons

"In MySQL, we need to define every table beforehand."

"It is not as powerful as SQL Server. It can be more powerful. It is not scalable and has certain limitations, which is not the case with SQL Server."

"It does not stand out regarding scalability. When the company size increases, the user base having actual experience with (very) large MySQL solutions is reduced."

"The GUI could improve in MySQL."

"This solution needs to be improved when it comes to working with desktop applications on the developer side."

"I would like to see some improvements in the solution’s integration aspects."

"I find the Microsoft solution a bit better. But mostly in terms of the UI layout, I would say. I just find it a little bit more efficient."

"I am looking for the Temporal SQL feature, which basically means that there is complete history for each table. This feature is currently available in MariaDB. PostgreSQL has something called a foreign-data wrapper, which is another way to access external data from inside. MySQL could have a similar feature."

More MySQL cons

"The performance of PostgreSQL could improve."

"Integration with other platforms could be improved."

"Instead of the installation agent downloading all the packages for the install, it should allow the user to download the packages separately on their own to do the install."

"They need to improve the user experience of the management."

"They need to have a better graphical interface. There is a tool called pgAdmin 4 that they use, which is free. It is written in Java, and it is slow. They need to have a better product that is similar to Toad for Oracle, but, of course, it is hard to get something that's really great and free. Other than that, it is great."

"The solution could improve the integration."

"PostgreSQL doesn't have a feature for temporal SQL, which is useful for gathering versions of data. This feature should be included in PostgreSQL. This feature is available in MariaDB, SQL Server, Oracle Database, and DB2."

"I'm not really able to customize it."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing falls within the moderate range."

"It is an open source platform."

"When you know the setup will continue to grow, make sure you have the paid support."

"It's cheaper than other solutions."

"There is no licensing fee."

"I am not paying, but I am not sure about the exact licensing requirements."

"We are using the free community version of the solution."

"The solution is open source so is free."

More MySQL pricing and cost advice

"We use the open-source version of PostgreSQL and not the enterprise edition."

"It is an open-source platform."

"Our company pays for it. There are free versions available, but for advanced features, you obviously have to pay."

"PostgreSQL is open-source, so if capable admins are available then the setup cost can be $0."

"It is also open-source so it is free."

"This solution can offer a cheaper choice for customers since it is open-source."

"The solution requires a license."

"It is open source. There is no licensing."

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	74
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	62

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	57
Midsize Enterprise	26
Large Enterprise	46

Questions from the Community

Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?

MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...

Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?

I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...

What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?

One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...

How does Firebird SQL compare with PostgreSQL?

PostgreSQL was designed in a way that provides you with not only a high degree of flexibility but also offers you a cheap and easy-to-use solution. It gives you the ability to redesign and audit yo...

What do you like most about PostgreSQL?

It's a transactional database, so we use Postgres for most of our reporting. That's where it's helping.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PostgreSQL?

The tool is free of cost. For now, it's not about making money. But once we perfect it, we can offer it to customers willing to pay for support and other services. Most of my deployments are free.

Firebird SQL vs PostgreSQL

Comparisons

Firebird SQL vs MySQL

Compared 23% of the time

MariaDB vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

SQL Server vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

SAP HANA vs MySQL

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Database vs MySQL

Compared 4% of the time

More MySQL Competitors

Compared 25% of the time

MariaDB vs PostgreSQL

Compared 7% of the time

Chroma vs PostgreSQL

Compared 5% of the time

LanceDB vs PostgreSQL

Compared 5% of the time

EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs PostgreSQL

Compared 4% of the time

Product Reports

Download MySQL product report

MySQL

January 2026

Download PostgreSQL product report

January 2026

Overview

MySQL is an open-source database known for its ease of use and high performance. It offers features like replication and clustering, making it ideal for diverse applications. Its cost-effectiveness and LAMP integration are key advantages for businesses.

MySQL supports a variety of languages and platforms, providing reliable, scalable data management. Its graphical interface and LAMP architecture integration enhance its usability, while community support further strengthens its appeal. Challenges include scalability issues with large databases, lack of advanced clustering, and limited high-availability features. Complex queries may affect performance, and integration can pose difficulties. The outdated interface and insufficient documentation are also concerns, along with replication and backup reliability issues.

What are MySQL's key features?

Open-source nature: Freely available and customizable.
Cross-platform compatibility: Supports multiple operating systems.
Scalability: Capable of handling large volumes of data.
Replication and clustering: Ensure data redundancy and load balancing.
Full-text search: Provides powerful search capabilities.
LAMP integration: Seamlessly integrates with Linux, Apache, and PHP.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost-effectiveness: Reduces expenses due to its open-source nature.
High performance: Efficiently processes large volumes of data.
Active community support: Access to a wide range of resources and expertise.
Versatile use cases: Suitable for varied applications including web development and IoT.

MySQL is widely implemented in industries such as web development, e-commerce, and finance. It's used for managing dynamic websites, powering e-commerce platforms, and supporting financial applications. Its compatibility with PHP and cost-effectiveness make it suitable for CMS platforms like WordPress. With cloud services integration, MySQL is a backend choice for scalable applications in various sectors.

Oracle

PostgreSQL is a versatile and reliable database management system commonly used for web development, data analysis, and building scalable databases.

It offers advanced features like indexing, replication, and transaction management. Users appreciate its flexibility, performance, and ability to handle large amounts of data efficiently. Its robustness, scalability, and support for complex queries make it highly valuable.

Additionally, PostgreSQL's extensibility, flexibility, community support, and frequent updates contribute to its ongoing improvement and stability.

Sample Customers

Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.

1. Apple 2. Cisco 3. Fujitsu 4. Instagram 5. Netflix 6. Red Hat 7. Sony 8. Uber 9. Cisco Systems 10. Skype 11. LinkedIn 12. Etsy 13. Yelp 14. Reddit 15. Dropbox 16. Slack 17. Twitch 18. WhatsApp 19. Snapchat 20. Shazam 21. SoundCloud 22. The New York Times 23. Cisco WebEx 24. Atlassian 25. Cisco Meraki 26. Heroku 27. GitLab 28. Zalando 29. OpenTable 30. Trello 31. Square Enix 32. Bloomberg