No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs PostgreSQL comparison

EnterpriseDB and PostgreSQL are both solutions in the Open Source Databases category. EnterpriseDB is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0, while PostgreSQL is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.8. EnterpriseDB holds a 2.2% mindshare in OSD, compared to PostgreSQL’s 12.6% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of EnterpriseDB users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of PostgreSQL users who would recommend it.
EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Read 11 EDB Postgres Advanced Server reviews
  • 1,965 Views
  • 1,965 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
PostgreSQL
Read 128 PostgreSQL reviews
  • 13,460 Views
  • 10,768 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

PostgreSQL and EDB Postgres Advanced Server are leading competitors in the database management system space. EDB Postgres Advanced Server seems to have an edge for users prioritizing Oracle compatibility and advanced support offerings.

Features: PostgreSQL features robust support for spatial data and full-text search. It offers a wide range of extensions like PostGIS. EDB Postgres Advanced Server includes Oracle compatibility, offering scalability and performance enhancements.

Room for Improvement: PostgreSQL could improve database migration simplicity and pgAdmin's interface. Enhancing query profiling and monitoring solutions is also suggested. EDB Postgres Advanced Server may benefit from better JSONB query support and performance optimization for large-scale operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PostgreSQL supports varied environments, including on-premises and cloud, with strong community backing. EDB Postgres Advanced Server offers enhanced support management options and better customer service via support contracts.

Pricing and ROI: PostgreSQL is cost-effective due to its open-source nature, appealing to cost-conscious startups and enterprises. EDB Postgres Advanced Server also offers favorable pricing for Oracle compatibility needs, although there are costs associated with extensive support or large data handling, yet both provide strong ROI potential.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. PostgreSQL Report (Updated: August 2026).
Buyer's Guide
EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. PostgreSQL
August 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Ranking in Open Source Databases
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PostgreSQL
Ranking in Open Source Databases
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
128
Ranking in other categories
Vector Databases (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of EDB Postgres Advanced Server is 2.2%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PostgreSQL is 12.6%, down from 17.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Open Source Databases Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
PostgreSQL12.6%
EDB Postgres Advanced Server2.2%
Other85.2%
Open Source Databases
 

Featured Reviews

SB
Shardul Borhade
Database Engineer at a tech vendor with 1-10 employees
Centralized management has reduced database overhead but pricing and documentation have needed work
What I appreciate about EDB Postgres Advanced Server is that it offers management tools such as PEM and CNPG under one umbrella, providing enterprise features that eliminate the need for multiple engineers to maintain PostgreSQL databases, although it is somewhat expensive. I evaluate the technical support and customer service of EDB Postgres Advanced Server as really good, as I have sought their help three to four times regarding issues with PEM configuration, and they respond quickly and solve issues promptly. I would rate the technical support of EDB Postgres Advanced Server an 8 out of 10. EDB Postgres Advanced Server's high availability and disaster recovery features, specifically the introduction of CNPG based on Kubernetes, are good, but they require significant infrastructure overhead, which I believe necessitates a lightweight integration model for better performance. I rate the efficiency improvements from EDB Postgres Advanced Server a 10 out of 10 when it comes to Oracle compatibility. Its native support for Oracle's PL/SQL syntax makes evaluating and migrating legacy workloads incredibly smooth, bypassing the typical headaches of manual code rewrites.
Read full review
Shobhit Goel - PeerSpot reviewer
Shobhit Goel
Data Science Architect at publicis Sapient
High-volume transactions have reduced failures and improve customer service efficiency
The best feature is performance, because of which I decided on PostgreSQL. I have also enabled the PG vector plugin on top of PostgreSQL. I have the opportunity to use two different features and two different flavors in a single product, which is the best thing about PostgreSQL. Initially, we had some hiccups around the performance part, but later we did indexing in PostgreSQL and now it is working very well. Even when we are doing 100,000 transactions in a day, PostgreSQL is working excellently. The interface is another best feature. If I need to do any query, I simply install the plugin on my local, which is pgAdmin. Through pgAdmin, I am able to communicate with PostgreSQL and execute all my SQL queries. I am getting a better UI with PostgreSQL as the backend, which is also one of the best options. PG vector is also very strong from PostgreSQL where I have implemented RAG and on a daily basis, I inject thousands of pages of PDF. More than 100 PDFs are coming into my system and one PDF is around 1,000 pages. We are injecting them into PostgreSQL and converting them into dimensions and inserting them into PG vector. The level of transactions we are doing on a daily basis is substantial, and we are getting very good throughput and low latency from PostgreSQL. When we were doing more than 50,000 transactions in a minute with the previous database, we were getting a lot of latency issues with threads getting blocked and abruptly closed unwantedly. After doing extensive research, we decided to move to PostgreSQL. Now, we are doing around 100,000 transactions in PostgreSQL and we are getting good throughput with no latency.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Cost/benefit wise Postgres is a great solution."
"What I appreciate about EDB Postgres Advanced Server is that it offers management tools such as PEM and CNPG under one umbrella, providing enterprise features that eliminate the need for multiple engineers to maintain PostgreSQL databases, although it is somewhat expensive."
"The number of indices available in Postgres is remarkable."
"Major reduction in run cost, and a quantum leap in the flexibility of deployment models Elimination of replication of transaction from reporting systems Able to do rolling upgrades with zero production downtime."
"It gives us a solid, less expensive alternative to deploying with Oracle."
"I like that EDB Postgres Advanced Server scales well. A valuable feature of the solution is multi-tenancy support. It also supports JSONB."
"I rate EDB Postgres Advanced Server's stability an eight out of ten."
"The feature of vector database management for AI is quite interesting and impactful."
More EDB Postgres Advanced Server pros
"The solution provides complete support in terms of the SQL dialect and behaves nicely when it comes to transactions."
"PostgreSQL really works well."
"The community support and the open-source community for it are good."
"Overall, the solution is very good. The solution is free to use. It is easy to use and quite stable."
"From our use of it, its stability and performance are the best features."
"As PostgreSQL is free, this enables us to develop applications without having to think about budgets, and give us greater flexibility."
"PostgreSQL is for personal use, e.g. I've been using it for my applications."
"Updatable views (also over multiple tables), array and JSON fields, and point-in-time backup and recovery (WAL files archiving) are very useful features."
More PostgreSQL pros
 

Cons

"Setting up MySQL is slightly more straightforward than Postgres."
"There aren't specific new features we wish to add."
"Postgres performance is suffering and the product model is not doing enough to keep current."
"The system is aging and not keeping up with the performance of new, enhanced database models."
"The product currently fails to offer a mobile application."
"I would like to see improvements in the performance, especially in large-scale operations, as it currently cannot match Oracle's performance."
"An area for improvement in EDB Postgres Advanced Server is JSONB querying. It would be nice to have even stronger JSONB support from the solution."
"I have faced performance issues in the community edition."
More EDB Postgres Advanced Server cons
"I find it difficult to get connectors on the tool. For example, .NET has only one free provider in PostgreSQL. I need to pay the provider if I need something more sophisticated features. Other languages like PHP and Java have good community support. We need community support for .NET."
"PostgreSQL could improve by being more user-friendly. In SQL Server they have a studio where you can easily do management but not in this solution."
"The solution could improve the integration."
"It tends to be slower when processing a large number of records."
"There are some products out there that have a slightly different method of implementation for the SQL language. Some of those are slightly better in some areas, and PostgreSQL is slightly better in some areas. I would probably like to match all of those products together. It is just down to the functionality. For example, Oracle has a number of options within SQL that are outside of what you would class as the SQL standard. PostgreSQL misses some of those, but PostgreSQL does other things that are better than what Oracle does. I would like to merge those two products so that there is a certain amount of functionality in a single product."
"Performance and scalability are areas where PostgreSQL can be improved."
"The pricing could be better."
"I'd like to see the following improvements: Streaming replication (or similar) disconnected from the version, so we can use it for upgrades (i.e., a 9.3 version master and a 9.5 slave)."
More PostgreSQL cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I have been working on the community edition."
"Pricing is significantly lower than competing products."
"It is an open-source product."
"The product is either free with community support or very inexpensive with a small yearly fee for paid support."
"EDB Postgres Advanced Server is open source, so I don't pay for licensing."
"We do not pay for licensing."
"The licensing model is good."
"The community version of Postgre is basically free."
"Our company pays for it. There are free versions available, but for advanced features, you obviously have to pay."
"The solution requires a license."
"We use the open-source version of PostgreSQL and not the enterprise edition."
"We are using the free version of PostgreSQL."
"It is open source. There is no licensing."
More PostgreSQL pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Open Source Databases solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Construction Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Construction Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business58
Midsize Enterprise26
Large Enterprise49
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for EDB Postgres Advanced Server?
We obtained EPAS through our partnership with EDB using an enterprise deployment model on-premises. From a pure testing perspective for a startup like DBtune, the licensing can feel quite expensive...
See all answers
What needs improvement with EDB Postgres Advanced Server?
Beyond the aspects that I mentioned about the enterprise manager PEM and UI complexities, I would like to see improvements in the pricing structure to accommodate startups and clearer centralized d...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for EDB Postgres Advanced Server?
The main use case for EDB Postgres Advanced Server (EPAS) is within my work at DBtune, an AI-driven SaaS product for database optimization. I am responsible for developing and testing our platform'...
See all answers
How does Firebird SQL compare with PostgreSQL?
PostgreSQL was designed in a way that provides you with not only a high degree of flexibility but also offers you a cheap and easy-to-use solution. It gives you the ability to redesign and audit yo...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PostgreSQL?
I am not directly involved in the licensing or procurement decisions, so I cannot comment in detail on the price. From an engineering perspective, PostgreSQL is cost-efficient because it is open so...
See all answers
What needs improvement with PostgreSQL?
While improving reliability, I have noticed that the limitations in PostgreSQL can be complex. For large-scale deployments, configuration, performance tuning, and related tasks can be complex and i...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

YugabyteDB vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server Logo
YugabyteDB vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Compared 14% of the time
Percona Server vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server Logo
Percona Server vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Compared 14% of the time
Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server Logo
Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Compared 8% of the time
Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server Logo
Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Compared 6% of the time
MySQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server Logo
MySQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Compared 6% of the time
More EDB Postgres Advanced Server Competitors
Firebird SQL vs PostgreSQL Logo
Firebird SQL vs PostgreSQL
Compared 12% of the time
MySQL vs PostgreSQL Logo
MySQL vs PostgreSQL
Compared 7% of the time
MariaDB vs PostgreSQL Logo
MariaDB vs PostgreSQL
Compared 6% of the time
LanceDB vs PostgreSQL Logo
LanceDB vs PostgreSQL
Compared 5% of the time
Chroma vs PostgreSQL Logo
Chroma vs PostgreSQL
Compared 5% of the time
More PostgreSQL Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
EDB Postgres Advanced Server
August 2026
EDB Postgres Advanced Server reportDownload EDB Postgres Advanced Server product report
Buyer's Guide
PostgreSQL
July 2026
PostgreSQL reportDownload PostgreSQL product report
 

Overview

EDB Postgres Advanced Server offers robust database solutions with standout configurations and flexible support, ideal for demanding environments.

EDB Postgres Advanced Server addresses diverse database needs with advanced tools and configurations. Efficiently managing distributed databases and supporting high availability with Patroni cluster deployment, it provides superior backup solutions and cost-efficient licensing compared to Oracle. Its compatibility with Oracle and vector database management for AI make it suitable for middle and lower-tier clients. However, areas like performance enhancement for large-scale operations, containerized deployments, and better monitoring require attention.

What are the key features of EDB Postgres Advanced Server?
  • Standout Configurations: Offers flexibility and a wide range of indices for varied needs.
  • Patroni Cluster Deployment: Ensures high availability for critical applications.
  • JSONB Support: Provides enhanced management of JSON data.
  • Cost-Efficient Licensing: More affordable than Oracle for budget-conscious organizations.
  • Built-In Scripting: Simplifies automation tasks with ease.
  • PgAdmin Metrics Insights: Delivers valuable database performance metrics.
Why should users consider EDB Postgres Advanced Server?
  • Oracle Compatibility: Smooth transition for users familiar with Oracle systems.
  • AI Database Management: Accommodates vector databases crucial for AI workloads.
  • Multitenancy: Supports multiple users, enhancing flexibility and efficiency.
  • Impressive Speed: Facilitates quick data processing for demanding tasks.
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduces overall database expenditure.

Organizations deploy EDB Postgres Advanced Server to replace Oracle RAC and manage tasks requiring multiple servers and distributed data access. Educational institutions utilize it for examining architecture and development, with global data centers harnessing its capabilities for engineering endeavors. Academic purposes include teaching database fundamentals and aiding Oracle migrations, while aligning with on-premises deployments due to specific restrictions.

EnterpriseDB

PostgreSQL is a versatile and reliable database management system commonly used for web development, data analysis, and building scalable databases. 

It offers advanced features like indexing, replication, and transaction management. Users appreciate its flexibility, performance, and ability to handle large amounts of data efficiently. Its robustness, scalability, and support for complex queries make it highly valuable. 

Additionally, PostgreSQL's extensibility, flexibility, community support, and frequent updates contribute to its ongoing improvement and stability.

PostgreSQL
 

Sample Customers

Ericsson, Clear Capital, PinkRoccade, ABN Amro, WholeWorldBand, Van Genechten, Gallinat-Bank AG, Mariner, coresystems, Aquent, Contegix, AQA, Genscape, InMobi
1. Apple 2. Cisco 3. Fujitsu 4. Instagram 5. Netflix 6. Red Hat 7. Sony 8. Uber 9. Cisco Systems 10. Skype 11. LinkedIn 12. Etsy 13. Yelp 14. Reddit 15. Dropbox 16. Slack 17. Twitch 18. WhatsApp 19. Snapchat 20. Shazam 21. SoundCloud 22. The New York Times 23. Cisco WebEx 24. Atlassian 25. Cisco Meraki 26. Heroku 27. GitLab 28. Zalando 29. OpenTable 30. Trello 31. Square Enix 32. Bloomberg
Buyer's Guide
EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. PostgreSQL
August 2026
Free Report: EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. PostgreSQL
Find out what your peers are saying about EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. PostgreSQL and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. PostgreSQL report.
See our list of best Open Source Databases vendors.

We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.