EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs PostgreSQL comparison

EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Read 125 PostgreSQL reviews

7,517 Views
6,540 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

PostgreSQL and EDB Postgres Advanced Server are robust solutions in the database category. PostgreSQL seems to have the upper hand in terms of feature set and cost-effectiveness, while EDB Postgres Advanced Server stands out with its Oracle compatibility and enterprise features.

Features: PostgreSQL is known for its scalability, ACID compliance, and support for various programming languages. It supports complex queries and performs exceptionally well in write-intensive tasks. EDB Postgres Advanced Server is praised for its Oracle compatibility, multi-tenancy support, and robust production features.

Room for Improvement: PostgreSQL faces challenges with certain SQL functionalities and large-scale data handling. It could improve support for JSON and replication. EDB Postgres Advanced Server needs enhancements in JSONB querying and indexing, and better performance for large-scale operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PostgreSQL supports diverse deployment environments and benefits from strong community support, though centralized support is limited. EDB Postgres Advanced Server offers similar deployment flexibility with more structured support options for those purchasing service contracts.

Pricing and ROI: PostgreSQL is open-source, leading to low setup and operational costs with high ROI due to community support. EDB Postgres Advanced Server, also open-source, offers paid support that enhances value for enterprises. The cost is reasonable for small to mid-sized businesses but may pose an issue for large enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. PostgreSQL Report (Updated: February 2026).

EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. PostgreSQL

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Ranking in Open Source Databases

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

PostgreSQL

Ranking in Open Source Databases

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

125

Ranking in other categories

Vector Databases (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of EDB Postgres Advanced Server is 2.2%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PostgreSQL is 14.3%, down from 18.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Open Source Databases Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
PostgreSQL	14.3%
EDB Postgres Advanced Server	2.2%
Other	83.5%

Open Source Databases

Featured Reviews

Munirathnakumar Si

Senior Principal Cyber Security Consultant - Cloud and Container at Standard Chartered Bank

Though user-friendly, it fails to offer a mobile application to users

The product currently fails to offer a mobile application. In the future, I want the solution to offer a mobile application, especially since you can access the services via mobile phone with all the service providers like AWS and others. A mobile application provided by the product can help a user to see the status whenever needed.

Read full review

Akhilesh Chipre

Senior Assosiate Consultant at Applied Materials

Real-time data capture optimizes database performance but Views create problems

One of the most valuable features is real-time data capture; it optimizes database performance. I think using real-time data capture reduces job running time and the amount of data sent at once with batch loads. Replicating the same data daily isn't optimal, so real-time reception improves application performance and reduces latency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Postgres is highly compatible with many software and programming languages. Its compatibility is excellent, covering nearly everything related to data engineering or migration."

"I rate EDB Postgres Advanced Server's stability an eight out of ten."

"The feature of vector database management for AI is quite interesting and impactful."

"The product is user-friendly."

"The low cost and functionality allows us to save money on smaller database projects."

"I like that EDB Postgres Advanced Server scales well. A valuable feature of the solution is multi-tenancy support. It also supports JSONB."

"The number of indices available in Postgres is remarkable."

"It gives us a solid, less expensive alternative to deploying with Oracle."

"It's a transactional database, so we use Postgres for most of our reporting. That's where it's helping."

"One of the most valuable features is real-time data capture; it optimizes database performance. I think using real-time data capture reduces job running time and the amount of data sent at once with batch loads."

"PostgreSQL has complete SQL dialects and is useful for writing sophisticated and complex queries. We have experience with Oracle database. My partner is experienced in DDA and he writes sophisticated SQL queries. The solution helps to get the job done in the best possible way. In today’s age, most developers do not have strong SQL knowledge or language command. They find it difficult to write even a SQL statement. These developers write cool queries which perform badly on the database end. As DBAs, we constantly urge the developers not to write bad queries, help them learn more, and write placebo commands."

"The product is easy to use and works fast for relational databases."

"It's quite scalable."

"With the database, you can provide a multi-component at the same service with the same performance, scalability, or all those things."

"The performance is good."

"The initial setup is quick and easy."

Cons

"The system is aging and not keeping up with the performance of new, enhanced database models."

"The security is not very robust and the product would be much more useful with more security options."

"There aren't specific new features we wish to add."

"I would like to see improvements in the performance, especially in large-scale operations, as it currently cannot match Oracle's performance."

"I have faced performance issues in the community edition."

"An area for improvement in EDB Postgres Advanced Server is JSONB querying. It would be nice to have even stronger JSONB support from the solution."

"The product currently fails to offer a mobile application."

"If it was free to use, it would be the perfect solution."

"Sometimes, it becomes slow because of the network. So, there is room for improvement in performance."

"PostgreSQL doesn't have a feature for temporal SQL, which is useful for gathering versions of data. This feature should be included in PostgreSQL. This feature is available in MariaDB, SQL Server, Oracle Database, and DB2."

"PostgreSQL uses high memory compared to its counterparts when a highly demanding load is involved, especially one that makes many concurrent connections to the database."

"I don't think PostgreSQL supports bulk databases, so it needs to have more capabilities in terms of managing the bulk data."

"PostgreSQL could improve by providing a geographical solution for tracking trucks and people in the field. They might already have features similar to this and I have not found them. I haven't done research about this topic."

"There are some products out there that have a slightly different method of implementation for the SQL language. Some of those are slightly better in some areas, and PostgreSQL is slightly better in some areas. I would probably like to match all of those products together. It is just down to the functionality. For example, Oracle has a number of options within SQL that are outside of what you would class as the SQL standard. PostgreSQL misses some of those, but PostgreSQL does other things that are better than what Oracle does. I would like to merge those two products so that there is a certain amount of functionality in a single product."

"I find it difficult to get connectors on the tool. For example, .NET has only one free provider in PostgreSQL. I need to pay the provider if I need something more sophisticated features. Other languages like PHP and Java have good community support. We need community support for .NET."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is either free with community support or very inexpensive with a small yearly fee for paid support."

"It is an open-source product."

"Pricing is significantly lower than competing products."

"I have been working on the community edition."

"EDB Postgres Advanced Server is open source, so I don't pay for licensing."

"We do not pay for licensing."

"It is open-source. If you use it on-premise, it is free. It also has enterprise or commercial versions. If you go for the cloud version, there will be a cost, but it is lower than Oracle or Microsoft."

"Affordable solution."

"The tool is cheaply priced compared to other RDBMS providers in the market."

"This solution can offer a cheaper choice for customers since it is open-source."

"The licensing model is good."

"It is also open-source so it is free."

"It is free. There is no license on it."

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	57
Midsize Enterprise	26
Large Enterprise	46

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for EDB Postgres Advanced Server?

EDB Postgres Advanced Server offers both processor-based and user-based licensing options. The cost is reasonable, particularly for middle and lower-tier customers, but there are hiccups when deali...

What needs improvement with EDB Postgres Advanced Server?

It was challenging to think of improvements for Postgres. We did not choose to extend or add new features to Postgres since it already meets our needs so well. There aren't specific new features we...

What is your primary use case for EDB Postgres Advanced Server?

Our primary use case for EDB Postgres Advanced Server was to study the code base behind it. We aimed to understand how it has been built, how the engine functions, the querying process, and what ki...

How does Firebird SQL compare with PostgreSQL?

PostgreSQL was designed in a way that provides you with not only a high degree of flexibility but also offers you a cheap and easy-to-use solution. It gives you the ability to redesign and audit yo...

What do you like most about PostgreSQL?

It's a transactional database, so we use Postgres for most of our reporting. That's where it's helping.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PostgreSQL?

The tool is free of cost. For now, it's not about making money. But once we perfect it, we can offer it to customers willing to pay for support and other services. Most of my deployments are free.

YugabyteDB vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Comparisons

Compared 14% of the time

Percona Server vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Compared 14% of the time

Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Compared 7% of the time

MariaDB vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Compared 5% of the time

More EDB Postgres Advanced Server Competitors

Firebird SQL vs PostgreSQL

Compared 23% of the time

MySQL vs PostgreSQL

Compared 9% of the time

MariaDB vs PostgreSQL

Compared 7% of the time

Chroma vs PostgreSQL

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs PostgreSQL

Compared 4% of the time

Product Reports

EDB Postgres Advanced Server

January 2026

Download EDB Postgres Advanced Server product report

Download PostgreSQL product report

January 2026

Overview

EDB Postgres Advanced Server is a powerful and reliable database management system designed for production workloads. It offers a range of advanced features, making it an ideal choice for businesses looking to scale their operations. With support for multi-tenancy, JSONB, and production features similar to Oracle, the solution is versatile and can meet the needs of a wide range of organizations.

Overall, EDB Postgres Advanced Server is a robust and flexible database management system that can help businesses achieve their goals and stay competitive in today's fast-paced digital landscape.

EnterpriseDB

PostgreSQL is a versatile and reliable database management system commonly used for web development, data analysis, and building scalable databases.

It offers advanced features like indexing, replication, and transaction management. Users appreciate its flexibility, performance, and ability to handle large amounts of data efficiently. Its robustness, scalability, and support for complex queries make it highly valuable.

Additionally, PostgreSQL's extensibility, flexibility, community support, and frequent updates contribute to its ongoing improvement and stability.

Sample Customers

Ericsson, Clear Capital, PinkRoccade, ABN Amro, WholeWorldBand, Van Genechten, Gallinat-Bank AG, Mariner, coresystems, Aquent, Contegix, AQA, Genscape, InMobi

1. Apple 2. Cisco 3. Fujitsu 4. Instagram 5. Netflix 6. Red Hat 7. Sony 8. Uber 9. Cisco Systems 10. Skype 11. LinkedIn 12. Etsy 13. Yelp 14. Reddit 15. Dropbox 16. Slack 17. Twitch 18. WhatsApp 19. Snapchat 20. Shazam 21. SoundCloud 22. The New York Times 23. Cisco WebEx 24. Atlassian 25. Cisco Meraki 26. Heroku 27. GitLab 28. Zalando 29. OpenTable 30. Trello 31. Square Enix 32. Bloomberg