EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs MySQL comparison

EnterpriseDB and Oracle are both solutions in the Open Source Databases category. EnterpriseDB is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0, while Oracle is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. EnterpriseDB holds a 2.2% mindshare in OSD, compared to Oracle’s 12.3% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of EnterpriseDB users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Read 11 EDB Postgres Advanced Server reviews

1,965 Views
1,965 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

MySQL

Read 152 MySQL reviews

16,824 Views
9,421 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

EDB Postgres Advanced Server

MySQL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

MySQL and EDB Postgres Advanced Server compete in the enterprise database market. EDB Postgres Advanced Server seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced enterprise features and scalability options.

Features: MySQL is known for its open-source nature, ease of use, and strong community support. It runs on multiple platforms and delivers solid performance for web applications. EDB Postgres Advanced Server provides enhanced compatibility with Oracle and includes robust transactional capabilities with features like JSONB support and multi-tenancy.

Room for Improvement: MySQL requires better usability improvements, particularly in replication, clustering, and high availability. Users often consider MariaDB for its cluster support. EDB Postgres Advanced Server needs enhancements in JSONB querying and mobile accessibility, alongside performance improvements for large-scale operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MySQL benefits from a broad range of online resources and community forums, but dedicated customer service is mainly available for paid versions. EDB Postgres Advanced Server offers various deployment options, including on-premises, hybrid, and cloud solutions, with specialized support available, providing more reliability for enterprise clients.

Pricing and ROI: MySQL is free as an open-source solution, making it appealing for cost-conscious businesses, though enterprise versions incur costs. EDB Postgres Advanced Server offers processor-based and user-based licensing at reasonable prices, yet large enterprises may face cost challenges with significant data volumes.

To learn more, read our detailed EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. MySQL Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. MySQL

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Ranking in Open Source Databases

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MySQL

Ranking in Open Source Databases

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

152

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of EDB Postgres Advanced Server is 2.2%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MySQL is 12.3%, up from 9.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Open Source Databases Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
MySQL	12.3%
EDB Postgres Advanced Server	2.2%
Other	85.5%

Open Source Databases

Featured Reviews

Shardul Borhade

Database Engineer at a tech vendor with 1-10 employees

Centralized management has reduced database overhead but pricing and documentation have needed work

What I appreciate about EDB Postgres Advanced Server is that it offers management tools such as PEM and CNPG under one umbrella, providing enterprise features that eliminate the need for multiple engineers to maintain PostgreSQL databases, although it is somewhat expensive. I evaluate the technical support and customer service of EDB Postgres Advanced Server as really good, as I have sought their help three to four times regarding issues with PEM configuration, and they respond quickly and solve issues promptly. I would rate the technical support of EDB Postgres Advanced Server an 8 out of 10. EDB Postgres Advanced Server's high availability and disaster recovery features, specifically the introduction of CNPG based on Kubernetes, are good, but they require significant infrastructure overhead, which I believe necessitates a lightweight integration model for better performance. I rate the efficiency improvements from EDB Postgres Advanced Server a 10 out of 10 when it comes to Oracle compatibility. Its native support for Oracle's PL/SQL syntax makes evaluating and migrating legacy workloads incredibly smooth, bypassing the typical headaches of manual code rewrites.

Read full review

Prabir Kumar Kundu

SR AVP–Presales Cloud & Platform Management Services at Path Infotech ltd

Offers robust security and availability with impressive replication capabilities

Regarding their documentation and interface, there is room for improvement. Documentation is definitely required when running multiple databases on a cluster system. The load balancer, MySQL LB, which is used to connect to the application, lacks clear documentation. When there are multiple application servers connecting to the MySQL cluster and going through the MySQL load balancer, the documentation is not user-friendly. It's there, but only technical persons with deep knowledge of the MySQL database can implement it. Most of the community users or ISVs who use MySQL don't have many technical persons or DBA experts, so they face some challenges for the high availability of connecting high available databases from high available applications. That documentation should be simplified.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I rate EDB Postgres Advanced Server's stability an eight out of ten."

"The number of indices available in Postgres is remarkable."

"Cost/benefit wise Postgres is a great solution."

"I like that EDB Postgres Advanced Server scales well. A valuable feature of the solution is multi-tenancy support. It also supports JSONB."

"The low cost and functionality allows us to save money on smaller database projects."

"I would highly recommend EDB Postgres Advanced Server to others."

"This product has allowed us to reduce costs in some parts of our infrastructure without losing functionality."

"Major reduction in run cost, and a quantum leap in the flexibility of deployment models Elimination of replication of transaction from reporting systems Able to do rolling upgrades with zero production downtime."

Cons

"I would like to see improvements in the performance, especially in large-scale operations, as it currently cannot match Oracle's performance."

"Setting up MySQL is slightly more straightforward than Postgres."

"An area for improvement in EDB Postgres Advanced Server is JSONB querying. It would be nice to have even stronger JSONB support from the solution."

"Postgres performance is suffering and the product model is not doing enough to keep current."

"From a pricing perspective, I do not find it cost-effective from DBtune's SaaS perspective as we are just testing it, but for enterprises, it is worth it as you do not require many engineers for management and receive good support."

"The system is aging and not keeping up with the performance of new, enhanced database models."

"The security is not very robust and the product would be much more useful with more security options."

"Lighter integration model for containerized deployment. Effectively, there still remain some issues with a containerized deployment, so we have opted for a non-containerized deployment."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is significantly lower than competing products."

"EDB Postgres Advanced Server is open source, so I don't pay for licensing."

"It is an open-source product."

"I have been working on the community edition."

"The product is either free with community support or very inexpensive with a small yearly fee for paid support."

"MySQL Enterprise Support is not cheap, though might still be cheaper than Oracle or SQL Server. They may not have local support depending on where you’re based, but there are many smaller agencies out there that will readily provide support. You’ll need to spend some time looking around."

"There is no licensing fee."

"It is an open source platform."

"I would rate the solution’s pricing a six out of ten. The solution is not cheap but it’s a fair value. The pricing depends on the use cases of our customers. Some of our customers use the community edition which is license free and a good fit for their use cases. However, we encourage our bigger customers to sign up because of the scalability issues. The paid versions get direct technical support from Oracle."

"There is a licensing cost because we are going for a proprietary product. There are some other versions for which there is no licensing cost."

"It's free."

"I rate the solution's pricing as four out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. For our basic needs, it's quite affordable. However, the cost increases when we need to scale up or require high availability. Our developer team of about 600 people uses MySQL without much issue. The pricing becomes more of a concern on the business side, as we have more end users and need constant database availability and scaling. In those cases, the solution gets a bit more expensive, even though it provides good value for the business."

"I use the open-source free community version."

More MySQL pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Open Source Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	74
Midsize Enterprise	34
Large Enterprise	64

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for EDB Postgres Advanced Server?

We obtained EPAS through our partnership with EDB using an enterprise deployment model on-premises. From a pure testing perspective for a startup like DBtune, the licensing can feel quite expensive...

See all answers

What needs improvement with EDB Postgres Advanced Server?

Beyond the aspects that I mentioned about the enterprise manager PEM and UI complexities, I would like to see improvements in the pricing structure to accommodate startups and clearer centralized d...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for EDB Postgres Advanced Server?

The main use case for EDB Postgres Advanced Server (EPAS) is within my work at DBtune, an AI-driven SaaS product for database optimization. I am responsible for developing and testing our platform'...

See all answers

Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?

MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...

See all answers

Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?

I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...

See all answers

What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?

One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...

See all answers

Comparisons

PostgreSQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Compared 19% of the time

YugabyteDB vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Compared 14% of the time

Percona Server vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Compared 14% of the time

Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Compared 8% of the time

Firebird SQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Compared 6% of the time

More EDB Postgres Advanced Server Competitors

Firebird SQL vs MySQL

Compared 20% of the time

MariaDB vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

PostgreSQL vs MySQL

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Database vs MySQL

Compared 5% of the time

SQL Server vs MySQL

Compared 5% of the time

More MySQL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

EDB Postgres Advanced Server

August 2026

Download EDB Postgres Advanced Server product report

Buyer's Guide

MySQL

July 2026

Download MySQL product report

Overview

EDB Postgres Advanced Server offers robust database solutions with standout configurations and flexible support, ideal for demanding environments.

EDB Postgres Advanced Server addresses diverse database needs with advanced tools and configurations. Efficiently managing distributed databases and supporting high availability with Patroni cluster deployment, it provides superior backup solutions and cost-efficient licensing compared to Oracle. Its compatibility with Oracle and vector database management for AI make it suitable for middle and lower-tier clients. However, areas like performance enhancement for large-scale operations, containerized deployments, and better monitoring require attention.

What are the key features of EDB Postgres Advanced Server?

Standout Configurations: Offers flexibility and a wide range of indices for varied needs.
Patroni Cluster Deployment: Ensures high availability for critical applications.
JSONB Support: Provides enhanced management of JSON data.
Cost-Efficient Licensing: More affordable than Oracle for budget-conscious organizations.
Built-In Scripting: Simplifies automation tasks with ease.
PgAdmin Metrics Insights: Delivers valuable database performance metrics.

Why should users consider EDB Postgres Advanced Server?

Oracle Compatibility: Smooth transition for users familiar with Oracle systems.
AI Database Management: Accommodates vector databases crucial for AI workloads.
Multitenancy: Supports multiple users, enhancing flexibility and efficiency.
Impressive Speed: Facilitates quick data processing for demanding tasks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces overall database expenditure.

Organizations deploy EDB Postgres Advanced Server to replace Oracle RAC and manage tasks requiring multiple servers and distributed data access. Educational institutions utilize it for examining architecture and development, with global data centers harnessing its capabilities for engineering endeavors. Academic purposes include teaching database fundamentals and aiding Oracle migrations, while aligning with on-premises deployments due to specific restrictions.

EnterpriseDB

MySQL is an open-source database known for its ease of use and high performance. It offers features like replication and clustering, making it ideal for diverse applications. Its cost-effectiveness and LAMP integration are key advantages for businesses.

MySQL supports a variety of languages and platforms, providing reliable, scalable data management. Its graphical interface and LAMP architecture integration enhance its usability, while community support further strengthens its appeal. Challenges include scalability issues with large databases, lack of advanced clustering, and limited high-availability features. Complex queries may affect performance, and integration can pose difficulties. The outdated interface and insufficient documentation are also concerns, along with replication and backup reliability issues.

What are MySQL's key features?

Open-source nature: Freely available and customizable.
Cross-platform compatibility: Supports multiple operating systems.
Scalability: Capable of handling large volumes of data.
Replication and clustering: Ensure data redundancy and load balancing.
Full-text search: Provides powerful search capabilities.
LAMP integration: Seamlessly integrates with Linux, Apache, and PHP.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost-effectiveness: Reduces expenses due to its open-source nature.
High performance: Efficiently processes large volumes of data.
Active community support: Access to a wide range of resources and expertise.
Versatile use cases: Suitable for varied applications including web development and IoT.

MySQL is widely implemented in industries such as web development, e-commerce, and finance. It's used for managing dynamic websites, powering e-commerce platforms, and supporting financial applications. Its compatibility with PHP and cost-effectiveness make it suitable for CMS platforms like WordPress. With cloud services integration, MySQL is a backend choice for scalable applications in various sectors.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Ericsson, Clear Capital, PinkRoccade, ABN Amro, WholeWorldBand, Van Genechten, Gallinat-Bank AG, Mariner, coresystems, Aquent, Contegix, AQA, Genscape, InMobi

Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.

Buyer's Guide

EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. MySQL

August 2026

Free Report: EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. MySQL

Find out what your peers are saying about EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. MySQL and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. MySQL report.

See our list of best Open Source Databases vendors.

We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.